Landscape Ecology

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 595–607 | Cite as

Conserving natural heterogeneity is crucial for designing effective ecological networks

  • James S. PrykeEmail author
  • Michael J. Samways
Research Article


Large-scale ecological networks (ENs) are an important mitigation measure in agriculturally transformed landscapes. However, understanding the multitude of pressures influencing the presence/absence of species, and subsequent degree of species spatial heterogeneity, is important when planning effective ENs. We aim here to measure these pressures and determine species heterogeneity in ENs against natural reference sites. We use arthropods, as they are effective bioindicators for measuring these pressures and heterogeneity, as many are habitat sensitive. Here we use many arthropod taxa to determine how a suite of variables influences the spatially sensitive grassland interior species of both EN corridors and protected areas (PAs). At each of 48 selected sites, nine stations were sampled for arthropods, with six stations in plantation block (i.e. transformed grassland) or natural indigenous forest, as well as associated edge zone and three stations in EN corridor or PA interior. Eleven variables were measured and classed into environmental, design, and current and historical management variables. Data were split into: overall data, recording all species found in interior zones, and datasets containing only species that had >50 or >75 % of their abundance sampled in the interior zone. These datasets were split into total species and singleton-removed datasets. Overall, the richness of non-singleton species, i.e. those frequently sampled in grassland interiors, were most responsive to natural background environmental variables, while design and management variables were most important for datasets with singletons retained. This means that when planning ENs, we first need to conserve the natural range of environmental heterogeneity to conserve a range of interior specialists. This natural spatial heterogeneity then needs to be incorporated into design and management planning to conserve the full range of biodiversity in ENs, as if in PAs.


Agriculture Arthropod conservation Biodiversity Design Forestry Insect conservation Landscape ecology Management Rarity Singletons 



We thank Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife and Mondi South Africa for permitting sampling on their holdings. Funding was from the Mondi Ecological Network Programme (MENP) and co-funding from the National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF).

Supplementary material

10980_2014_96_MOESM1_ESM.docx (19 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18 kb)


  1. Abensperg-Traun M, Steven D (1995) The effects of pitfall trap diameter on ant species richness (Hymenoptera: formicidae) and species composition of the catch in a semi-arid eucalypt woodland. Aust J Ecol 20:282–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barlow J, Gardner TA, Louzada J, Peres CA (2010) Measuring the conservation value of tropical primary forests: the effect of occasional species on estimates of biodiversity uniqueness. PLoS ONE 5:e9609CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates DM, Sarkar D (2007) Lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.99875-6Google Scholar
  4. Bazelet CS, Samways MJ (2011) Relative importance of management vs. Design for implementation of large-scale ecological networks. Landscape Ecol 26:341–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beier P, Noss RF (1998) Do habitat corridors provide connectivity? Conserv Biol 12:1241–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18:182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boitani L, Falcucci A, Maiorano L, Rondinini C (2007) Ecological networks as conceptual frameworks or operational tools in conservation. Conserv Biol 21:1414–1422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White JSS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bremer LL, Farley KA (2010) Does plantation forestry restore biodiversity or create green deserts? A synthesis of the effects of land-use transitions on plant species richness. Biodivers Conserv 19:3893–3915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brennan KEC, Majer JD, Moir ML (2005) Refining sampling protocols for inventorying invertebrate biodiversity: influence of drift-fence length and pitfall trap diameter on spiders. J Arachnol 33:681–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crous CJ, Samways MJ, Pryke JS (2013) Exploring the mesofilter as a novel operational scale in conservation planning. J Appl Ecol 50:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crous CJ, Samways MJ, Pryke JS (2014) Rockiness determines meso-scale conservation of butterflies in Afro-montane grassland. J Insect Conserv 18:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cubbage F, Koesbandana S, Mac Donagh P, Rubilar R, Balmell G, Olmos VM, De La Torre R, Murara M, Hoeflich VA, Kotze H, Gonzalez R, Carrero O, Frey G, Adams T, Turner J, Lord R, Huang J, MacIntyre C, McGinley K, Abt R, Phillips R (2010) Global timber investments, wood costs, regulation, and risk. Biomass Bioenerg 34:1667–1678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dennis RHL (2010) A resource-based habitat view for conservation. Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Driscoll DA, Banks SC, Barton PS, Lindenmeyer DB, Smith AL (2013) Conceptual domain of the matrix in fragmented landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol 28:605–623CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ewers RM, Didham RK (2006) Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol Rev 81:117–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Filgueiras BKC, Iannuzzi L, Leal IR (2011) Habitat fragmentation alters the structure of dung beetle communities in the Atlantic forest. Biol Conserv 144:362–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fitzgerald P, Carlson S (2006) Examining the latitudinal diversity gradient in Paleozoic terebratulide brachiopods: should singleton data be removed? Palebiology 32:367–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Gerlach J, Samways MJ, Pryke JS (2013) Terrestrial invertebrates as bioindicators: an overview of available taxonomic groups. J Insect Conserv 17:831–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grant PBC, Samways MJ (2011) Micro-hotspot determination and buffer zone value for Odonata in a globally significant reserve. Biol Conserv 144:772–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gurrutxaga M, Lozano PJ, Del Barrio G (2010) GIS-based approach for incorporating the connectivity of ecological networks into regional planning. J Nature Conserv 18:318–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haddad NM (1999) Corridor and distance effects on interpatch movements: a landscape experiment with butterflies. Ecol Appl 9:612–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haddad NM, Baum KA (1999) An experimental test of corridor effects on butterfly densities. Ecol Appl 9:623–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hepcan S, Hepcan CC, Bouwma IM, Jongman RHG, Ozkan MB (2009) Ecological networks as a new approach for nature conservation in Turkey: a case study of Izmir Province. Landsc Urban Plann 90:143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50:346–363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hunter ML (2005) A mesofilter conservation strategy to complement fine and coarse filters. Conserv Biol 19:1025–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Janse van Rensburg FP, Bosch OJH (1990) Influence of habitat differences on the ecological grouping of grass species on a grazing gradient. J Grassl Soc Southern Afr 7:11–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jongman RHG (1995) Nature conservation planning in Europe: developing ecological networks. Landsc Urban Plann 32:169–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jongman RHG (2004) European ecological networks and greenways. Landsc Urban Plann 68:305–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kirkman KE, Pott RM (2002) Biodiversity conservation in plantation forestry. In: Pierce SM, Cowling RM, Sandwith T, MacKinnon K (eds) Mainstreaming biodiversity in development—case studies from South Africa. The World Bank Environmental Department, Washington DC, pp 33–42Google Scholar
  33. Kotze DJ, Samways MJ (1999) Support for the multi-taxa approach in biodiversity assessment, as shown by epigaeic invertebrates in an Afromontane forest archipelago. J Insect Conserv 3:125–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  35. Lentini PE, Martin TG, Gibbons P, Fischer J, Cunningham SA (2012) Supporting wild pollinators in a temperate agricultural landscape: maintaining mosaics of natural features and production. Biol Conserv 149:84–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Levey DJ, Bolker BM, Tewksbury JJ, Sargent S, Haddad NM (2005) Effects of landscape corridors on seed dispersal by birds. Science 309:146–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lomolino MV (2001) Elevation gradients of species-density: historical and prospective views. Global Ecol Biogeog 10:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCulloch CE, Searle SR, Neuhaus JM (2008) Generalized. Linear, and Mixed Models, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  39. McGeoch MA, Sithole H, Samways MJ, Simaika JP, Pryke JS, Picker M, Uys C, Armstrong AJ, Dippenaar-Schoeman AS, Engelbrecht IA, Braschler B, Hamer M (2011) Conservation and monitoring of invertebrates in terrestrial protected areas. Koedoe 53:137–149Google Scholar
  40. McGeogh MA (1998) The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators. Biol Rev 73:181–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mucina L, Rutherford MC (2006) The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. South African National Biodiversity Institute, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Connor TG, Kuyler P, Kirkman KP, Corcoran B (2010) Which grazing management practices are most appropriate for maintaining biodiversity in South African grassland? Afri J Range Forage Sci 27:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2009) Recovery of invertebrate diversity in a rehabilitated city landscape mosaic in the heart of a biodiversity hotspot. Landsc Urban Plann 93:54–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2010) Significant variables for the conservation of mountain invertebrates. J Insect Conserv 14:247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2012a) Conservation management of complex natural forest and plantation edge effects. Landscape Ecology 27:73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2012b) Ecological networks act as extensions of protected areas for arthropod biodiversity conservation. J Appl Ecol 49:591–600Google Scholar
  47. Pryke JS, Roets F, Samways MJ (2013) Importance of habitat heterogeneity in remnant patches for conserving dung beetles. Biodivers Conserv 22:2857–2873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Romero-Alcaraz E, Avila J (2000) Landscape heterogeneity in relation to variations in epigaeic beetle diversity of a Mediterranean ecosystem implications for conservation. Biodivers Conserv 9:985–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Samways MJ, Moore SD (1991) Influence of exotic conifer patches on grasshopper (Orthoptera) assemblages in a grassland matrix at a recreational resort, Natal, South-Africa. Biol Conserv 57:117–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Samways MJ, Bazelet CS, Pryke JS (2010) Provision of ecosystem services by large scale corridors and ecological networks. Biodivers Conserv 19:2949–2962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Slancarova J, Benes J, Kristynek M, Kepka P, Konvicka M (2014) Does the surrounding landscape heterogeneity affect the butterflies of insular grassland reserves? A contrast between composition and configuration. J Insect Conserv 18:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sobek S, Steffan-Dewenter I, Scherber C, Tscharntke T (2009) Spatiotemporal changes of beetle communities across a tree diversity gradient. Divers Distrib 15:660–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stevens GC (1992) The elevational gradient in altitudinal range - an extension of Rapoport latitudinal rule to altitude. Am Nat 140:893–911CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Stork NE, Eggleton P (1992) Invertebrates as determinants and indicators of soil quality. Am J Altern Agri 7:38–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Straatsma G, Egli S (2012) Rarity in large data sets: singletons, modal values and the location of the species abundance distribution. Basic Appl Ecol 13:380–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Swengel AB (1998) Effects of management on butterfly abundance in tallgrass prairie and pine barrens. Biol Conserv 83:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tropek R, Spitzer L, Konvicka M (2008) Two groups of epigeic arthropods differ in colonising of piedmont quarries: the necessity of multi-taxa and life-history traits approaches in the monitoring studies. Commun Ecol 9:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wan H, Chizinski CJ, Dolph CL, Vondracek B, Wilson BN (2010) The impact of rare taxa on a fish index of biotic integrity. Ecol Indicator 10:781–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weaver JC (1995) Indicator species and scale of observation. Conserv Biol 9:939–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Woodcock BA (2005) Pitfall trapping in ecological studies. In: Leather S (ed) Insect Sampling in Forest Ecosystems. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 37–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yu K, Li D, Li N (2006) The evolution of greenways in China. Landsc Urban Plann 76:223–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zulka KP, Abensperg-Traun M, Milasowszky N, Bieringer G, Gereben-Krenn B-A, Holzinger W, Hölzler G, Rabitsch W, Reischütz A, Querner P, Sauberer N, Schmitzberger I, Willner W, Thomas Wrbka T, Zechmeister H (2014) Species richness in dry grassland patches of eastern Austria: a multi-taxon study on the role of local, landscape and habitat quality variables. Agri Ecosys Environ 182:25–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Faculty of AgriSciencesStellenbosch UniversityMatielandSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations