Landscape Ecology

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 579–592 | Cite as

Mapping sources, sinks, and connectivity using a simulation model of northern spotted owls

  • Nathan H. Schumaker
  • Allen Brookes
  • Jeffrey R. Dunk
  • Brian Woodbridge
  • Julie A. Heinrichs
  • Joshua J. Lawler
  • Carlos Carroll
  • David LaPlante
Research Article

Abstract

Source-sink dynamics are an emergent property of complex species–landscape interactions. A better understanding of how human activities affect source-sink dynamics has the potential to inform and improve the management of species of conservation concern. Here we use a study of the northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) to introduce new methods for quantifying source-sink dynamics that simultaneously describe the population-wide consequences of changes to landscape connectivity. Our spotted owl model is mechanistic, spatially-explicit, individual-based, and incorporates competition with barred owls (Strix varia). Our observations of spotted owl source-sink dynamics could not have been inferred solely from habitat quality, and were sensitive to landscape connectivity and the spatial sampling schemes employed by the model. We conclude that a clear understanding of source-sink dynamics can best be obtained from sampling simultaneously at multiple spatial scales. Our methodology is general, can be readily adapted to other systems, and will work with population models ranging from simple and low-parameter to complex and data-intensive.

Keywords

HexSim Habitat connectivity Net flux Population viability analysis 

References

  1. Baguette M, Van Dyck H (2007) Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal. Landscape Ecol 22:1117–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bunn AG, Urban DL, Keitt TH (2000) Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory. J Environ Manage 59:265–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carroll C, McRae B, Brookes A (2012) Use of linkage mapping and centrality analysis across habitat gradients to conserve connectivity of gray wolf populations in western north America. Conserv Biol 26:78–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Courtney SP, Blakesley JA, Bigley RE, Cody ML, Dumacher JP, Fleischer RC, Franklin AB, Franklin JF, Gutiérrez RJ, Marzluff JM, Sztukowski L (2004) Scientific evaluation of the status of the northern spotted owl. Sustainable Ecosystems Institute, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  5. Dias P (1996) Sources and sinks in population biology. Tree 11:326–330PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dugger KM, Anthony RG, Andrews LS (2011) Transient dynamics of invasive competition: barred owls, spotted owls, habitat, and the demons of competition present. Ecol Appl 21:2459–2468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferraz G, Nichols JD, Hines JE, Stouffer PC, Bierregaard RO, Lovejoy TE (2007) A large-scale deforestation experiment: effects of patch area and isolation on Amazon birds. Science 315:238–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forsman ED, Anthony RG, Reid JA, Loschl PJ, Sovern SG, Taylor M, Biswell BL, Ellingson A, Meslow EC, Miller GS, Swindle KA, Thrailkill JA, Wagner FF, Seaman DE (2002) Natal and breeding dispersal of northern spotted owls. Wildl Monogr 149:1–35Google Scholar
  9. Forsman ED, Anthony RG, Dugger KM, Glenn EM, Franklin AB, White GC, Schwarz CJ, Burnham KP, Anderson DR, Nichols JD, Hines JE, Lint JB, Davis RJ, Ackers SH, Andrews LS, Biswell BL, Carlson PC, Diller LV, Gremel SA, Herter DR, Higley JM, Horn RB, Reid JA, Rockweit J, Schaberl J, Snetsinger TJ, Sovern SG (2011) Population demography of northern spotted owls. Studies in Avian Biology. Cooper Ornithological Society. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  10. Franklin AB, Burnham KP, White GC, Anthony RG, Forsman ED, Schwarz CJ, Nichols JD, Hines JE (1999) Range-wide status and trends in Northern Spotted Owl populations. U.S Fish and Wildlife Service, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodwin B (2003) Is landscape connectivity a dependent or independent variable? Landscape Ecol 18:687–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gutiérrez RJ, Franklin AB, LaHaye WS (1995) Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis). In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The birds of north America No 179: life histories for the 21st century. The Philadelphia Academy of Sciences and The American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, pp 247–257Google Scholar
  13. Hansen A (2011) Contribution of source-sink theory to protected area science. In: Liu J, Hull V, Morzillo AT, Wiens JA (eds) Sources, Sinks and Sustainability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 339–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heinrichs JA, Bender DJ, Gummer DL, Schumaker NH (2010) Assessing critical habitat: evaluating the relative contribution of habitats to population persistence. Biol Conserv 143:2229–2237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hudgens BR, Morris WF, Haddad NM, Fields WR, Wilson JW, Kuefler D, Jobe T (2012) How complex do models need to be to predict dispersal of threatened species through matrix habitats? Ecol Appl 22:1701–1710PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacobi MN, Jonsson PR (2011) Optimal networks of nature reserves can be found through eigenvalue perturbation theory of the connectivity matrix. Ecol Appl 21:1861–1870PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koh I, Rowe HI, Holland JD (2013) Graph and circuit theory connectivity models of conservation biological control agents. Ecol Appl 23:1554–1573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kool J, Moilanen A, Treml EA (2013) Population connectivity: recent advances and new perspectives. Landscape Ecol 28:165–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu J, Hull V, Morzillo AT, Wiens JA (eds) (2011) Sources, Sinks and Sustainability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Marcot BG, Raphael MG, Schumaker NH, Galleher B (2013) How big and how close? Habitat patch size and spacing to conserve a threatened species. Nat Resour Model 26:194–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McKelvey K, Noon BR, Lamberson RH (1993) Conservation planning for species occupying fragmented landscapes: The case of the northern spotted owl. In: Karevia PM, Kingsolver JG, Huey RB (eds) Biotic interactions and global change. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 424–450Google Scholar
  22. McRae BH, Dickson BG, Keitt TH, Shah VB (2008) Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology 89:2712–2724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Minor ES, Urban DL (2007) Graph theory as a proxy for spatially explicit population models in conservation planning. Ecol Appl 17:1771–1782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Minor ES, McDonald RI, Treml EA, Urban DL (2008) Uncertainty in spatially explicit population models. Biol Conserv 141:956–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moilanen A (2011) On the limitations of graph-theoretic connectivity in spatial ecology and conservation. J Appl Ecol 48:1543–1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Murphy DD, Noon BR (1992) Integrating scientific methods with habitat conservation planning: reserve design for northern spotted owls. Ecol Appl 2:3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Noon BR, McKelvey K (1996) Management of the spotted owl: a case history in conservation biology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:135–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nuñez TA, Lawler JJ, McRae BH, Pierce DJ, Krosby MB, Kavanagh DM, Singleton PH, Tewksbury JJ (2013) Connectivity planning to address climate change. Conserv Biol 27:407–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Phillips SJ, Dudik M (2008) Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31:161–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Phillips SJ, Williams P, Midgley G, Archer A (2008) Optimizing dispersal corridors for the Cape Proteaceae using network flow. Ecol Appl 18:1200–1211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pulliam RH (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am Nat 132:652–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rayfield B, Fortin MJ, Fall A (2011) Connectivity for conservation: a framework to classify network measures. Ecology 92:847–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schilling JW (2009) Demography, home range, and habitat selection of northern spotted owls in the Ashland Watershed. MS Thesis, Oregon State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  34. Schumaker NH (2013) HexSim Version 2.5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon, USA. http://www.epa.gov/hexsim
  35. Stronen AV, Schumaker NH, Forbes GJ, Paquet PC, Brook RK (2012) Landscape resistance to dispersal: simulating long-term effects of human disturbance on a small and isolated wolf population in southwestern Manitoba, Canada. Environ Model Assess 184:6923–6934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas JW, Forsman ED, Lint JB, Meslow EC, Noon BR, Verner JA (1990) A conservation strategy for the northern spotted owl: report to the interagency scientific committee to address the conservation of the northern spotted owl. United States Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  37. USDA Forest Service and USDI Bureau of Land Management (1994) Record of decision for amendments to the forest service and bureau of land management planning documents within the range of the northern spotted owl: standards and guidelines for management of habitat for late-successional and old-growth forest related species within the range of the northern spotted owl. USDA Forest Service and USDI Bureau of Land Management, Portland, Oregon.Google Scholar
  38. USFWS (1990) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: determination of threatened status for the northern spotted owl. Fed Reg 55:26114–26194Google Scholar
  39. USFWS (2011) Revised recovery plan for the northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  40. Watkinson AR, Sutherland WJ (1995) Sources, sinks and pseudo-sinks. J Anim Ecol 64:126–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wiens JD (2012) Competitive interactions and resource partitioning between northern spotted owls and barred owls in western Oregon. Dissertation, Oregon State University, CorvallisGoogle Scholar
  42. Yackulic CB, Reid JR, Davis R, Hines JE, Nichols JD, Forsman E (2012) Neighborhood and habitat effects on vital rates: expansion of the barred owl in the Oregon coast ranges. Ecology 93:1953–1966PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nathan H. Schumaker
    • 1
  • Allen Brookes
    • 1
  • Jeffrey R. Dunk
    • 2
  • Brian Woodbridge
    • 3
  • Julie A. Heinrichs
    • 4
  • Joshua J. Lawler
    • 4
  • Carlos Carroll
    • 5
  • David LaPlante
    • 6
  1. 1.U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Science and ManagementHumboldt State UniversityArcataUSA
  3. 3.US Fish and Wildlife Service, Yreka Fish and Wildlife OfficeYrekaUSA
  4. 4.School of Environmental and Forest SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  5. 5.Klamath Center for Conservation ResearchOrleansUSA
  6. 6.Natural Resources GeospatialMontagueUSA

Personalised recommendations