Landscape Ecology

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 999–1023 | Cite as

Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes

  • Jianguo WuEmail author
Research Article


The future of humanity depends on whether or not we have a vision to guide our transition toward sustainability, on scales ranging from local landscapes to the planet as a whole. Sustainability science is at the core of this vision, and landscapes and regions represent a pivotal scale domain. The main objectives of this paper are: (1) to elucidate key definitions and concepts of sustainability, including the Brundtland definition, the triple bottom line, weak and strong sustainability, resilience, human well-being, and ecosystem services; (2) to examine key definitions and concepts of landscape sustainability, including those derived from general concepts and those developed for specific landscapes; and (3) to propose a framework for developing a science of landscape sustainability. Landscape sustainability is defined as the capacity of a landscape to consistently provide long-term, landscape-specific ecosystem services essential for maintaining and improving human well-being. Fundamentally, well-being is a journey, not a destination. Landscape sustainability science is a place-based, use-inspired science of understanding and improving the dynamic relationship between ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes under uncertainties arising from internal feedbacks and external disturbances. While landscape sustainability science emphasizes place-based research on landscape and regional scales, significant between landscape interactions and hierarchical linkages to both finer and broader scales (or externalities) must not be ignored. To advance landscape sustainability science, spatially explicit methods are essential, especially experimental approaches that take advantage of designed landscapes and multi-scaled simulation models that couple the dynamics of landscape services (ecosystem services provided by multiple landscape elements in combination as emergent properties) and human well-being.


Sustainability Landscape sustainability science Landscape sustainability spectrum Ecosystem services Human well-being Key research questions and approaches 



I would like to thank Richard Forman, Robert Kates, Simon Levin, Billie Turner II, Peter Verburg, Tong Wu, and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on an earlier version of the paper. My research in landscape ecology and sustainability science has been supported in part by National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. DEB 9714833, DEB-0423704, and BCS-1026865 (Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research, CAP-LTER) and BCS-0508002 (Biocomplexity/CNH).


  1. Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Global Environ Change Hum Policy Dimens 16(3):268–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahern J (2013) Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: the promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z Google Scholar
  3. Antrop M (2006) Sustainable landscapes: contradiction, fiction or utopia? Landsc Urban Plan 75:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrow K, Dasgupta P, Goulder L, Daily G, Ehrlich P, Heal G, Levin S, Mäler K-G, Schneider S, Starrett D, Walker B (2004) Are we consuming too much? J Econ Perspect 18:147–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagstad KJ, Johnson GW, Voigt B, Villa F (2012) Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: a comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services. Ecosyst Serv. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012 Google Scholar
  6. Baker JP, Hulse DW, Gregory SV, White D, Van Sickle J, Berger PA, Dole D, Schumaker NH (2004) Alternative futures for the Willamette River Basin, Oregon. Ecol Appl 14:313–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrett TL, Farina A, Barrett GW (2009a) Aesthetic landscapes: an emergent component in sustaining societies. Landscape Ecol 24(8):1029–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barrett TL, Farina A, Barrett GW (2009b) Positioning aesthetic landscape as economy. Landscape Ecol 24(3):299–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benson SG, Dundis SP (2003) Understanding and motivating health care employees: integrating Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, training and technology. J Nurs Manag 11:315–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bettencourt LMA, Kaur J (2011) Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:19540–19545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bohnet I, Roebeling P, Williams K, Holzworth D, van Grieken M, Pert P, Kroon F, Westcott D, Brodie J (2011) Landscapes Toolkit: an integrated modelling framework to assist stakeholders in exploring options for sustainable landscape development. Landscape Ecol 26(8):1179–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bolte JP, Hulse DW, Gregory SV, Smith C (2006) Modeling biocomplexity—actors, landscapes and alternative futures. Environ Model Softw 22:570–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Braat LC, de Groot R (2012) The ecosystem services agenda: bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosyst Serv 1(1):4–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bryan BA, Crossman ND, King D, Meyer WS (2011) Landscape futures analysis: assessing the impacts of environmental targets under alternative spatial policy options and future scenarios. Environ Model Softw 26:83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Charles CW (ed) (2009) Thresholds of climate change in ecosystems, synthesis and assessment product 4.2. The U.S. Climate Change Science Program, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8059–8061PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coelho P, Mascarenhas A, Vaz P, Dores A, Ramos TB (2010) A framework for regional sustainability assessment: developing indicators for a Portuguese region. Sustain Dev 18:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Costanza R, Daly HE (1992) Natural capital and sustainable development. Conserv Biol 6(1):37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Costanza R, Patten BC (1995) Defining and predicting sustainability. Ecol Econ 15(3):193–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crow MM (2010) Sustainability as a founding principle of the United States. In: Moore KD, Nelson MP (eds) Moral ground: ethical action for a planet in peril. Trinity University Press, San Antonio, pp 301–305Google Scholar
  22. Cumming GS (2011) Spatial resilience: integrating landscape ecology, resilience, and sustainability. Landscape Ecol 26(7):899–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cumming GS, Olsson P, Chapin FS III, Holling CS (2013) Resilience, experimentation, and scale mismatches in social–ecological landscapes. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-012-9725-4 Google Scholar
  24. Daily GC (ed) (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  25. Daly HE (1973) Toward a steady-state economy. W. H. Freeman and Company, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  26. Daly HE (1995) On Wilfred Beckerman’s critique of sustainable development. Environ Values 4:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Daly HE (1997) Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow/Stiglitz. Ecol Econ 22(3):261–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dasgupta P (2009) The welfare economic theory of green national accounts. Environ Resour Econ 42(1):3–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. De Groot R (2006) Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 75:175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. De Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41(3):393–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. de Groot R, Brander L, van der Ploeg S, Costanza R, Bernard F, Braat L, Christie M, Crossman N, Ghermandi A, Hein L (2012) Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosyst Serv 1(1):50–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dominati E, Patterson M, Mackay A (2010) A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils. Ecol Econ 69(9):1858–1868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Du Pisani JA (2006) Sustainable development—historical roots of the concept. Environ Sci 3:83–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dunnett N, Clayden A (2007) Resources: the raw materials of landscape. In: Benson JF, Roe M (eds) Landscape and sustainability. Routledge, New York, pp 196–221Google Scholar
  35. Duraiappah AK (2011) Ecosystem services and human well-being: do global findings make any sense? Bioscience 61:7–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Elkington J (2004) Enter the triple bottom line. In: Henriques A, Richardson J (eds) The triple bottom line: does it all add up?. Earthscan, London, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  37. Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS (2004) Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:557–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Forman RTT (1990) Ecologically sustainable landscapes: the role of spatial configuration. In: Zonneveld IS, Forman RTT (eds) Changing landscapes: an ecological perspective. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 261–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Forman RTT (2008) The urban region: natural systems in our place, our nourishment, our home range, our future. Landscape Ecol 23(3):251–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fu BJ, Wang S, Su CH, Forsius M (2013) Linking ecosystem processes and ecosystem services. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.12.002 Google Scholar
  42. Gallopin GC (2006) Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environ Change Hum Policy Dimens 16:293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gobster PH, Nassauer JI, Daniel TC, Fry G (2007) The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape Ecol 22(7):959–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Golley FB, Bellot J (1991) Interactions of landscape ecology, planning and design. Landsc Urban Plan 21(1–2):3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gorman D (2010) Maslow’s hierarchy and social and emotional wellbeing. Aborig Isl Health Work J 33:27–29Google Scholar
  46. Hagerty MR (1999) Testing Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: national quality-of-life across time. Soc Indic Res 46:249–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Haggbloom SJ, Warnick R, Warnick JE, Jones VK, Yarbrough GL, Russell TM, Borecky CM, McGahhey R, Powell JL, Beavers J, Monte E (2002) The 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20th century. Rev Gen Psychol 6(2):139–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Haines-Young R (2000) Sustainable development and sustainable landscapes: defining a new paradigm for landscape ecology. Fennia 178:7–14Google Scholar
  49. Holland A (1997) Substitutability: or, why strong sustainability is weak and absurdly strong sustainability is not absurd. In: Foster J (ed) Valuing nature?. Ethics, Economics and the Environment, Routledge, pp 119–134Google Scholar
  50. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 4:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Holling CS (1996) Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In: Schulze P (ed) Engineering within ecological constraints. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 31–44Google Scholar
  52. Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4:390–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Holling CS (2004) From complex regions to complex worlds. Ecol Soc 9(1):11. Google Scholar
  54. Hulse D, Branscomb A, Enright C, Bolte J (2009) Anticipating floodplain trajectories: a comparison of two alternative futures approaches. Landscape Ecol 24(8):1067–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jenerette G, Shen W (2012) Experimental landscape ecology. Landscape Ecol 27(9):1237–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Johnson GW, Bagstad KJ, Snapp RR, Villa F (2012) Service patch attribution networks (SPANs): a network flow approach to ecosystem service assessment. Int J Agric Environ Inf Syst 3:54–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Polasky S (eds) (2011) Natural capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  58. Kates RW (2003) Overarching themes of the conference: sustainability science. Transition to sustainability in the 21st century: the contribution of science and technology. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, pp 140–145Google Scholar
  59. Kates RW (2011) What kind of a science is sustainability science? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:19449–19450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Grubler A, Huntley B, Jager J, Jodha NS, Kasperson RE, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H, Moore B III, O’Riordan T, Svedin U (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292:641–642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kates RW, Parris TM, Leiserowitz A (2005) What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environ Sci Policy Sustain Dev 47(3):8–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kidd CV (1992) The evolution of sustainability. J Agric Environ Ethics 5:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kinzig AP, Pacala SW, Tilman D (eds) (2002) The functional consequences of biodiversity. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  64. Kofinas GP, Chapin FS (2009) Sustaining livelihoods and human well-being during social–ecological change. In: Chapin FS, Kofinas GP, Folke C (eds) Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. Springer, New York, pp 55–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Koltko-Rivera ME (2006) Rediscovering the later version of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: self-transcendence and opportunities for theory, research, and unification. Rev Gen Psychol 10:302–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Koniak G, Noy-Meir I, Perevolotsky A (2011) Modelling dynamics of ecosystem services basket in Mediterranean landscapes: a tool for rational management. Landscape Ecol 26(1):109–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lenzholzer S, Duchhart I, Koh J (2013) ‘Research through designing’ in landscape architecture. Landsc Urban Plan 113:120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Levin SA (1998) Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems 1:431–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Levin SA (1999) Fragile dominion: complexity and the commons. Perseus Books, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  70. Levin SA (2012) The challenge of sustainability: lessons from an evolutionary perspective. In: Weinstein MP, Turner RE (eds) Sustainability science: the emerging paradigm and the urban environment. Springer, New York, pp 431–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Levin SA, Clark WC (eds) (2010) Toward a science of sustainability: report from toward a science of sustainability conference. Princeton Environmental Institute, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  72. Levin SA, Lubchenco J (2008) Resilience, robustness, and marine ecosystem-based management. Bioscience 58(1):27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Levin SA, Paine RT (1974) Disturbance, patch formation and community structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71(7):2744–2747PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Loucks OL (1994) Sustainability in urban ecosystems: beyond an object of study. In: Platt RH, Rowntree RA, Muick PC (eds) The ecological city. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, pp 49–65Google Scholar
  75. Lovell ST, Johnston DM (2009) Creating multifunctional landscapes: how can the field of ecology inform the design of the landscape? Front Ecol Environ 7(4):212–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Macintyre S, Maciver S, Sooman A (1993) Area, class and health; should we be focusing on places or people? J Soc Policy 22:213–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Macintyre S, Ellaway A, Cummins S (2002) Place effects on health: how can we conceptualise, operationalise and measure them? Soc Sci Med 55(1):125–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Mander U, Muller F, Wrbka T (2005) Functional and structural landscape indicators: upscaling and downscaling problems. Ecol Ind 5:267–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Marshall JD, Toffel MW (2005) Framing the elusive concept of sustainability: a sustainability hierarchy. Environ Sci Technol 39:673–682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Maslow A (1954) Motivation and personality. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  81. MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  82. Meadows DH (ed) (1998) Indicators and information systems for sustainable development. Sustainability Institute, Hartland Four CornersGoogle Scholar
  83. Meadows DH (2001) Dancing with systems. Whole earth (Winter edition).
  84. Morse S, Vogiatzakis I, Griffiths G (2011) Space and sustainability: potential for landscape as a spatial unit for assessing sustainability. Sustain Dev 19:30–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Musacchio LR (2009) The scientific basis for the design of landscape sustainability: a conceptual framework for translational landscape research and practice of designed landscapes and the six Es of landscape sustainability. Landscape Ecol 24(8):993–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Musacchio LR (2011) The grand challenge to operationalize landscape sustainability and the design-in-science paradigm. Landscape Ecol 26(1):1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Naeem S, Bunker DE, Hector A, Loreau M, Perrings C (eds) (2009) Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and human wellbeing: an ecological and economic perspective. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  88. Nassauer JI, Opdam P (2008) Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecol 23(6):633–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Naveh Z (2007) Landscape ecology and sustainability. Landscape Ecol 22(10):1437–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Neale AC, Jones KB, Nash MS, Van Remortel KD, Wickham JD, Riitters KH, O’Neill RV (2003) Application of landscape models to alternative futures analyses. In: Rapport DJ, Lasley WL, Rolston DE, Nielsen NO, Qualset CO, Damania AB (eds) Managing for healthy ecosystems. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 577–587Google Scholar
  91. Newman P, Beatley T, Boyer H (2009) Resilient cities: responding to peak oil and climate change. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  92. NRC (1999) Our common journey: a transition toward sustainability. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  93. O’farrell PJ, Anderson PML (2010) Sustainable multifunctional landscapes: a review to implementation. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2(1–2):59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Odum EP, Barrett GW (2005) Fundamentals of ecology. Brooks/Cole, SouthbankGoogle Scholar
  95. Palmer MA, Febria CM (2012) The heartbeat of ecosystems. Science 336:1393–1394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Perrings C (2005) Economics and the value of biodiversity and ecosystem services. In: De Luc J-P (ed) Proceedings of the international conference on biodiversity science and governance. Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, pp 109–118Google Scholar
  97. Perrings C (2007) Future challenges. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:15179–15180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Potschin M, Haines-Young R (2006) “Rio + 10”, sustainability science and Landscape Ecology. Landsc Urban Plan 75:162–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Potschin M, Haines-Young R (2013) Landscape, sustainability and the place-based analysis of ecosystem services. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-012-9756-x Google Scholar
  100. Power N, Sekar K (2011) Benchmarking sustainable landscapes—green mark for parks. CityGreen 3:82–87Google Scholar
  101. Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Tengo M, Bennett EM, Holland T, Benessaiah K, MacDonald GK, Pfeifer L (2010) Untangling the environmentalist’s paradox: why is human well-being increasing as ecosystem services degrade? Bioscience 60:576–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Rees WE (2002) Globalization and sustainability: conflict or convergence? Bull Sci Technol Soc 22(4):249–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Reitan PH (2005) Sustainability science—and what’s needed beyond science. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 1:77–80Google Scholar
  104. Selman P (2007) Landscape and sustainability at the national and regional scales. In: Benson JF, Roe M (eds) Landscape and sustainability. Routledge, New York, pp 104–117Google Scholar
  105. Selman P (2008) What do we mean by sustainable landscape? Sustain Sci Pract Policy 4(2):23–28Google Scholar
  106. Selman P (2009) Planning for landscape multifunctionality. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 5(2):45–52Google Scholar
  107. Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc Am Philos Soc 106(6):467–482Google Scholar
  108. Steffen W, Persson Å, Deutsch L, Zalasiewicz J, Williams M, Richardson K, Crumley C, Crutzen P, Folke C, Gordon L, Molina M, Ramanathan V, RockstrÖm J, Scheffer M, Schellnhuber HJ, Svedin U (2011) The Anthropocene: from global change to planetary stewardship. Ambio 40:739–761PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Steinitz C, Binford M, Cote P, Edwards T Jr, Ervin S, Forman RTT, Johnson C, Kiester R, Mouat D, Olson D, Shearer A, Toth R, Wills R (1996) Biodiversity and landscape planning: alternative future for the region of Camp Pendleton, California. Harvard University Graduate School of Design, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  110. Stiglitz J, Sen A, Fitoussi J-P (2009) Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, ParisGoogle Scholar
  111. Swaffield S (2013) Empowering landscape ecology—connecting science to governance through design values. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-012-9765-9 Google Scholar
  112. Termorshuizen JW, Opdam P (2009) Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecol 24(8):1037–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Turner MG (2005) Landscape ecology: what is the state of the science? Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:319–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Turner BL II (2010) Vulnerability and resilience: coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science? Global Environ Change Hum Policy Dimens 20(4):570–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Turner MG, Gardner RH (1991) Quantitative methods in landscape ecology: the analysis and interpretation of landscape heterogeneity. Springer-Verlag, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (2001) Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and process. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  117. Turner BL II, Kasperson RE, Matson P, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martello ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(14):8074–8079PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Turner BL II, Janetos AC, Verburg PH, Murray AT (2013a) Land system architecture: using land systems to adapt and mitigate global environmental change. Global Environ Change 23:395–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Turner MG, Donato DC, Romme WH (2013b) Consequences of spatial heterogeneity for ecosystem services in changing forest landscapes: priorities for future research. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-012-9741-4 Google Scholar
  120. UNU-IHDP, UNEP (2012) Inclusive wealth report 2012—measuring progress toward sustainability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  121. Verburg PH, Koomen E, Hilferink M, Perez-Soba M, Lesschen JP (2012) An assessment of the impact of climate adaptation measures to reduce flood risk on ecosystem services. Landscape Ecol 27(4):473–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Vince G (2011) An epoch debate. Science 333(6052):32–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Walker B, Salt D (2006) Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  124. Wallace KJ (2007) Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biol Conserv 139(3–4):235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. WCED (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  126. Weisz H, Steinberger JK (2010) Reducing energy and material flows in cities. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Wiens JA (2013) Is landscape sustainability a useful concept in a changing world? Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-012-9801-9 Google Scholar
  128. Wu J (1999) Hierarchy and scaling: extrapolating information along a scaling ladder. Can J Remote Sens 25(4):367–380Google Scholar
  129. Wu J (2006) Landscape ecology, cross-disciplinarity, and sustainability science. Landscape Ecol 21(1):1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Wu J (2008) Changing perspectives on biodiversity conservation: from species protection to regional sustainability. Biodivers Sci 16:205–213Google Scholar
  131. Wu J (2010) Urban sustainability: an inevitable goal of landscape research. Landscape Ecol 25(1):1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Wu J (2012) A landscape approach for sustainability science. In: Weinstein MP, Turner RE (eds) Sustainability science: the emerging paradigm and the urban environment. Springer, New York, pp 59–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Wu J (2013) Key concepts and research topics in landscape ecology revisited: 30 years after the Allerton Park workshop. Landscape Ecol 20:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Wu J, Hobbs R (2002) Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: an idiosyncratic synthesis. Landscape Ecol 17(4):355–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Wu J, Loucks OL (1995) From balance-of-nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. Q Rev Biol 70:439–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Wu J, Wu T (2012) Sustainability indicators and indices: an overview. In: Madu CN, Kuei C (eds) Handbook of sustainable management. Imperial College Press, London, pp 65–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Wu J, Wu T (2013) Ecological resilience as a foundation for urban design and sustainability. In: Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, McGrath BP (eds) Resilience in urban ecology and design: linking theory and practice for sustainable cities. Springer, New York, pp 211–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Wu T, Kim Y-S (2013) Pricing ecosystem resilience in frequent-fire ponderosa pine forests. For Policy Econ 27:8–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Life Sciences & Global Institute of SustainabilityArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Center for Human-Environment System Sustainability (CHESS), State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology (ESPRE)Beijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.Sino-US Center for Conservation, Energy, and Sustainability Science (SUCCESS)Inner Mongolia UniversityHohhotChina

Personalised recommendations