Skip to main content

Spatial heterogeneity in statistical power to detect changes in lake area in Alaskan National Wildlife Refuges

Abstract

Over the past 50 years, the number and size of high-latitude lakes have decreased throughout many regions; however, individual lake trends have been variable in direction and magnitude. This spatial heterogeneity in lake change makes statistical detection of temporal trends challenging, particularly in small analysis areas where weak trends are difficult to separate from inter- and intra-annual variability. Factors affecting trend detection include inherent variability, trend magnitude, and sample size. In this paper, we investigated how the statistical power to detect average linear trends in lake size of 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 %/year was affected by the size of the analysis area and the number of years of monitoring in National Wildlife Refuges in Alaska. We estimated power for large (930–4,560 sq km) study areas within refuges and for 2.6, 12.9, and 25.9 sq km cells nested within study areas over temporal extents of 4–50 years. We found that: (1) trends in study areas could be detected within 5–15 years, (2) trends smaller than 2.0 %/year would take >50 years to detect in cells within study areas, and (3) there was substantial spatial variation in the time required to detect change among cells. Power was particularly low in the smallest cells which typically had the fewest lakes. Because small but ecologically meaningful trends may take decades to detect, early establishment of long-term monitoring will enhance power to detect change. Our results have broad applicability and our method is useful for any study involving change detection among variable spatial and temporal extents.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Carroll ML, Townshend JRG, DiMiceli CM, Loboda T, Sohlberg RA (2011) Shrinking lakes of the Arctic: Spatial relationships and trajectory of change. Geophys Res Let 38:L20406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmberg J, Nummi P, Pöysä H, Sjöberg K (1994) Relationships between species number, lake size and resource diversity in assemblages of breeding waterfowl. J Biogeogr 21:75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather P (1991) Statistical power and design requirements for environmental monitoring. Mar Freshwater Res 42(5):555–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinzman L, Bettez N, Bolton W, Chapin F, Dyurgerov M, Fastie C, Griffith B, Hollister R, Hope A, Huntington H, Jensen A, Jia G, Jorgenson T, Kane D, Klein D, Kofinas G, Lynch A, Lloyd A, McGuire A, Nelson F, Oechel W, Osterkamp T, Racine C, Romanovsky V, Stone R, Stow D, Sturm M, Tweedie C, Vourlitis G, Walker M, Walker D, Webber P, Welker J, Winker K, Yoshikawa K (2005) Evidence and implications of recent climate change in northern Alaska and other arctic regions. Clim Chang 72(3):251–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges JI, King JG, Conant B, Hanson HA (1996) Aerial surveys of waterbirds in Alaska 1957–94: population trends and observer variability. National Biological Service Information and Technology, Report 4

  • Jassby AD (1998) Interannual variability at three inland water sites: implications for sentinel ecosystems. Ecol Appl 8(2):277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DH, Grier JW (1988) Determinants of breeding distributions of ducks. Wildlife Monogr 100:3–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl TR, Derr VE, Easterling DR, Folland CK, Hofmann DJ, Levitus S, Nicholls N, Parker DE, Withee GW (1995) Critical issues for long-term climate monitoring. Clim Chang 31(2):185–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman DS, Schneider DP, McKay NP, Ammann CM, Bradley RS, Briffa KR, Miller GH, Otto-Bliesner BL, Overpeck JT, Vinther BM, Members ALkP (2009) Recent warming reverses long-term arctic cooling. Science 325(5945):1236–1239

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klein E, Berg E, Dial R (2005) Wetland drying and succession changes across the Kenai Peninsula Lowlands, south-central Alaska. Can J For Res 35:1931–1941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemuth ND, Wangler B, Reynolds RE (2010) Spatial and temporal variation in wet area of wetlands in the Prairie Pothole Region of North Dakota and South Dakota. Wetlands 30:1053–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterkamp TE (2005) The recent warming of permafrost in Alaska. Glob Planet Chang 49(3–4):187–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overpeck J, Hughen K, Hardy D, Bradley R, Case R, Douglas M, Finney B, Gajewski K, Jacoby G, Jennings A, Lamoureux S, Lasca A, MacDonald G, Moore J, Retelle M, Smith S, Wolfe A, Zielinski G (1997) Arctic environmental change of the last four centuries. Science 278(5341):1251–1256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterman RM (1990) Statistical power analysis can improve fisheries research and management. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47(1):2–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pospahala R, Anderson D, Henny C (1974) Population ecology of the mallard: breeding habitat conditions, size of the breeding populations, and production indices. US Fish and Wildlife Service Resources 115

  • R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Riordan B, Verbyla D, McGuire AD (2006) Shrinking ponds in subarctic Alaska based on 1950–2002 remotely sensed images. J Geophys Res 111:G04002. doi:10.1029/2005JG000150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roach J (2011) Lake area change in Alaskan National Wildlife Refuges: magnitude, mechanisms and heterogeneity. University of Alaska Fairbanks, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach J, Griffith B, Verbyla D, Jones J (2011) Mechanisms influencing changes in lake area in Alaskan boreal forest. Glob Chang Biol 17(8):2567–2583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roach J, Griffith B, Verbyla D (2012) Comparison of three methods for long-term monitoring of boreal lake area using Landsat TM and ETM + imagery. Can J Remote Sens 38(4):427–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Rover J, Ji L, Wylie BK, Tieszen LL (2011) Establishing water body areal extent trends in interior Alaska from multi-temporal Landsat data. Remote Sens Lett 3(7):595–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serreze MC, Walsh JE, Chapin FS, Osterkamp T, Dyurgerov M, Romanovsky V, Oechel WC, Morison J, Zhang T, Barry RG (2000) Observational evidence of recent change in the northern high-latitude environment. Clim Chang 46(1):159–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith L, Sheng Y, MacDonald GH, Hinzman LD (2005) Disappearing Arctic Lakes. Science 308(5727):1429

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steidl RJ, Hayes JP, Schauber E (1997) Statistical power analysis in wildlife research. J Wildl Manage 61(2):270–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoddard JL, Driscoll CT, Kahl JS, Kellogg JH (1998) Can site-specific trends be extrapolated to a region? An acidification example for the Northeast. Ecol Appl 8(2):288–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suter W (1994) Overwintering waterfowl on Swiss lakes: how are abundance and species richness influenced by trophic status and lake morphology? Hydrobiologia 279(280):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart NS, Paulsen SG, Larsen DP (1998) Monitoring for policy-relevant regional trends over time. Ecol Appl 8(2):246–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner T, Bence J, Bremigan M, Hayes D, Wilberg M (2007) Regional trends in fish mean length at age: components of variance and the statistical power to detect trends. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64:968–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner T, Vandergoot C, Tyson J (2009) Evaluating the power to detect temporal trends in fishery-independent surveys: a case study based on gill nets set in the Ohio waters of Lake Erie for walleyes. N Am J Fish Manag 29:805–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherhead EC, Reinsel GC, Meng XL, Tiao GC, Choi D, Cheang WK, Keller T, DeLuisi J, Wuebbles DJ, Kerr JB, Miller AJ, Oltmans SJ, Frederick JE (1998) Factors affecting the detection of trends: statistical considerations and applications to environmental data. J Geophys Res 103(D14):17149–17161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens J (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3(4):385–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa K, Hinzman LD (2003) Shrinking thermokarst ponds and groundwater dynamics in discontinuous permafrost near Council, Alaska. Permafrost Periglac 14(2):151–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou L, Tucker CJ, Kaufmann RK, Slayback D, Myneni RB, Tucker CJ (2001) Variations in northern vegetation activity inferred from satellite data of vegetation index during 1981 to 1999. J Geophys Res 106(D17):20069–20083

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding was provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. Geological Survey. Special thanks to Jay Ver Hoef for his comments on an early draft of this manuscript. Use of trade names does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Nicol.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1999 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nicol, S., Roach, J.K. & Griffith, B. Spatial heterogeneity in statistical power to detect changes in lake area in Alaskan National Wildlife Refuges. Landscape Ecol 28, 507–517 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9853-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9853-5

Keywords

  • Statistical power
  • Mixed model
  • Lake drying
  • Alaska
  • Temporal sampling
  • Regional trend
  • Trend detection
  • Climate change