Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 27, Issue 8, pp 1167–1181 | Cite as

Linking habitat suitability and road mortalities across geographic ranges

  • Erin Roger
  • Gilad Bino
  • Daniel Ramp
Research Article

Abstract

Protected areas are established to conserve biodiversity and facilitate resilience to threatening processes. Yet protected areas are not isolated environmental compounds. Many threats breach their borders, including transportation infrastructure. Despite an abundance of roads in many protected areas, the impact of roads on biota within these protected areas is usually unaccounted for in threat mitigation efforts. As landscapes become further developed and the importance of protected areas increases, knowledge of how roads impact on the persistence of species at large scales and whether protected areas provide relief from this process is vital. We took a two-staged approach to analysing landscape-scale habitat use and road-kill impacts of the common wombat (Vombatus ursinus), a large, widely distributed herbivore, within New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Firstly, we modelled their state-wide distribution from atlas records and evaluated the relationship between habitat suitability and wombat road fatalities at that scale. Secondly, we used local-scale fatality data to derive an annual estimate of wombats killed within an optimal habitat area. We then combined these two approaches to derive a measure of total wombats killed on roads within the protected area network. Our results showed that common wombats have a broad distribution (290,981 km2), one quarter (24.9 %) of their distribution lies within protected areas, and the percentage of optimal habitat contained within protected areas is 35.6 %, far greater than the COP10 guidelines of 17 %. Problematically, optimal habitat within protected areas was not a barrier to the effects of road-kill, as we estimated that the total annual count of wombat road-kill in optimal habitat within protected areas could be as high as 13.6 % of the total NSW population. These findings suggest that although protected areas are important spatial refuges for biodiversity, greater effort should be made to evaluate how reserves confer resilience from the impacts of roads across geographic ranges.

Keywords

GAMs Habitat suitability modelling, protected areas Road-kill Spatial analysis Threatening processes Common wombat 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to New South Wales Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water for the provision of Atlas data and the New South Wales Roads and Traffic Authority for provision of TADS. We thank David Warton, Shiquan Ren and David Eldridge for statistical advice and Evan Webster and Shawn Laffan for technical support.

Supplementary material

10980_2012_9769_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

References

  1. Allmaras RR, Burwell RE, Larson WE, Holt RF (1966) Total porosity and random roughness of the interrow zone as influenced by tillage. Conservation research report, USDA, pp 1–14Google Scholar
  2. Ament R, Clevenger AP, Yu O, Hardy A (2008) An assessment of road impacts on wildlife populations in US National Parks. Environ Manag 42:480–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beyer HL (2004) Hawth's Analysis Tools for ArcGIS. Available from http://www.spatialecology.com/htools
  4. Bissonette JA, Adair W (2008) Restoring habitat permeability to roaded landscapes with isometrically-scaled wildlife crossings. Biol Conserv 141:482–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borchard P, McIlroy J, McArthur C (2008) Links between riparian characteristics and the abundance of common wombat (Vombatus ursinus) burrows in an agricultural landscape. Wildl Res 35:760–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brewer CA, Pickle L (2002) Evaluation of methods for classifying epidemiological data on choropleth maps in series. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 92:662–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchan A, Goldney DC (1998) The common wombat Vombatus ursinus in a fragmented landscape. In: Wells RT, Pridmore PA (eds) Wombats. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, New South Wales, pp 251–261Google Scholar
  8. Carr LW, Fahrig L (2001) Effect of road traffic on two amphibian species of differing vagility. Conserv Biol 15:1071–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Catling PC, Burt RJ, Forrester RI (2000) Models of the distribution and abundance of ground-dwelling mammals in the eucalypt forests of north-eastern New South Wales in relation to habitat variables. Wildl Res 27:639–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Catling PC, Burt RJ, Forrester RI (2002) Models of the distribution and abundance of ground-dwelling mammals in the eucalypt forests of north-eastern New South Wales in relation to environmental variables. Wildl Res 29:313–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clevenger AP, Waltho N (2000) Factors influencing the effectiveness of wildlife underpasses in Banff National Park, Alberta, Canada. Conserv Biol 14:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clevenger AP, Waltho N (2005) Performance indices to identify attributes of highway crossing structures facilitating movement of large mammals. Biol Conserv 121:453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clevenger AP, Chruszcz B, Gunson KE (2003) Spatial patterns and factors influencing small vertebrate fauna road-kill aggregations. Biol Conserv 109:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crofts R (2004) Linking protected areas to the wider world: a review of approaches. J Environ Pol Plann 6:143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DECCW (2009) The atlas of NSW wildlife. The NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  16. Deguise IE, Kerr JT (2006) Protected areas and prospects for endangered species conservation in Canada. Conserv Biol 20(1):48–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Devictor V, Godet L, Julliard R, Couvet D, Jiguet F (2007) Can common species benefit from protected areas? Biol Conserv 139:29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Efron B (1983) Estimating the error rate of the prediction rule: improvement on cross-validation. J Am Statistical Association 78:316–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Efron B, Tibshirani R (1997) Improvements on cross-validation: the.632+ bootstrap method. J Am Statistical Association 92:548–560Google Scholar
  20. Eigenbrod F, Hecnar SJ, Fahrig L (2009) Quantifying the road-effect zone: threshold effects of a motorway on anuran populations in Ontario. Canada. Ecol Soc 14:24Google Scholar
  21. Epps CW, Palsboll PJ, Wehausen JD, Roderick GK, Ramey II RR, McCullough DR (2005) Highways block gene flow and cause a rapid decline in genetic diversity of desert bighorn sheep. Ecol Lett 8:1029–1038Google Scholar
  22. ESRI (2007) ArcGIS version 9.2. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  23. Evans MC (2008) Home range, burrow-use and activity patterns in common wombats (Vombatus ursinus). Wildl Res 35:455–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fahrig L, Rytwinski T (2009) Effects of roads on animal abundance: an empirical review and synthesis. Ecol Soc 14:21Google Scholar
  25. Farr TG, Rosen PA, Caro E, Crippen R, Duren R, Hensley S, Kobrick M, Paller M, Rodriguez E, Roth L, Seal D, Shaffer S, Shimada J, Umland J, Werner M, Oskin M, Burbank D, Alsdorf D (2007) The shuttle radar topography mission. Rev Geophys 45:33Google Scholar
  26. Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods of the assessment f prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24:38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Forman RTT, Alexander LE (1998) Roads and their major ecological effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:207–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Forman RTT, Sperling D, Bissonette JA et al (2003) Road ecology: science and solutions. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  29. Gaston KJ (2008) Bliodiversity and extinction: the importance of being common. Prog Phys Geog 32:73–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gaston KJ, Fuller RA (2007) Biodiversity and extinction: losing the common and the widespread. Prog Phys Geog 31:213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gaston KJ, Fuller RA (2008) Commonness, population depletion and conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 23:14–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gerlach G, Musolf K (2000) Fragmentation of landscape as a cause for genetic subdivision in bank voles. Conserv Biol 14:1066–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grilo C, Ascensao F, Bissonette JA, Santos-Reis M (2011) Do well-connected landscapes promote road-related mortality? Eur J Wildl Res 57:707–716Google Scholar
  34. Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8:993–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH (2001) The elements of statistical learning: data mining inference and prediction. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Hirzel AH, Le Lay G, Helfer V, Randin C, Guisan A (2006) Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences. Ecol Model 199:142–152Google Scholar
  37. Hobday AJ, Minstrell ML (2008) Distribution and abundance of roadkill on Tasmanian highways: human management options. Wildl Res 35:712–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Houlder DJ, Hutchinson MF, Nix HA, McMahon JP (2000) ANUCLIM User Guide, Version 5.1. Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  39. Jaarsma CF, Willems GPA (2002) Reducing habitat fragmentation by minor rural roads through traffic calming. Landsc Urban Plan 58:125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jaeger JAG, Bowman J, Brennan J, Fahrig L, Bert D, Bouchard J, Charbonneau N, Frank K, Gruber B, von Toschanowitz KT (2005) Predicting when animal populations are at risk from roads: an interactive model of road avoidance behavior. Ecol Model 185:329–348Google Scholar
  41. Jones ME (2000) Road upgrade, road mortality and remedial measures: impacts on a population of eastern quolls and Tasmanian devils. Wildl Res 27:289–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Justice CO, Vermote E, Townshend JRG, Defries R, Roy DP, Hall DK, Salomonson VV, Privette JL, Riggs G, Strahler A, Lucht W, Myneni RB, Knyazikhin Y, Running SW, Nemani RR, Wan ZM, Huete AR, Van Leeuwen W, Wolfe RE, Giglio L, Muller JP, Lewis P, Barnsley MJ (1998) The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS): land remote sensing for global change research. Ieee T Geosci Remote 36:1228–1249Google Scholar
  43. Kingsford RT, Brandis K, Thomas RF, Crighton P, Knowles E, Gale E (2004) Classifying landform at broad spatial scales: the distribution and conservation of wetlands in New South Wales, Australia. Mar Freshw Res 55:17–31Google Scholar
  44. Klöcker U, Croft DB, Ramp D (2006) Frequency and causes of kangaroo-vehicle collisions on an Australian outback highway. Wildl Res 33:5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kramer-Schadt S, Revilla E, Wiegand T, Breitenmoser U (2004) Fragmented landscapes, road mortality and patch connectivity: modelling influences on the dispersal of Eurasian lynx. J Appl Ecol 41:711–723Google Scholar
  46. Lennon JJ, Koleff P, Greenwood JJD, Gaston KJ (2004) Contribution of rarity and commonness to patterns of species richness. Ecol Lett 7:81–87Google Scholar
  47. Lyons KG, Brigham CA, Traut BH et al (2005) Rare species and ecosystem functioning. Conserv Biol 19:1019–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mac Nally R (2000) Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: the distinction between and reconciliation of ‘predictive’ and ‘explanatory’ models. Biodiversity Conserv 9:655–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Matthews A, Spooner PG, Lunney D, Green K, Klomp NI (2010) The influence of snow cover, vegetation and topography on the upper range limit of common wombats (Vombatus ursinus) in the subalpine zone, Australia. Divers Distrib 16:277–287Google Scholar
  50. McDonnell MD, Possingham HP, Ball IR, Cousins EA (2002) Mathematical methods for spatially cohesive reserve design. Environ Model Assess 7:107–114Google Scholar
  51. McIlroy JC (1973) Aspects of the ecology of the Common wombat Vombatus ursinus (Shaw, 1800). Dissertation, Australian National UniversityGoogle Scholar
  52. McIlroy JC (1995) Common Wombat. In: Strahan R (ed) The mammals of Australia. Reed Books, Chatswood, New South Wales, pp 204–205Google Scholar
  53. McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 14:450–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR (1991) Digital terrain modeling—a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrol Process 5:3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nix H (1986) A biogeographic analysis of Australian Elapid snakes. In: Longmore R (ed) Snakes: Atlas of elapid snakes of Australia. Bureau of Flora and Fauna, Canberra, pp 4–10Google Scholar
  56. Pearman PB, Weber D (2007) Common species determine richness patterns in biodiversity indicator taxa. Biol Conserv 138:109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pressey RL, Hager TC, Ryan KM, Schwarz J, Wall S, Ferrier S, Creaser PM (2000) Using abiotic data for conservation assessments over extensive regions: quantitative methods applied across New South Wales, Australia. Biol Conserv 96:55–82Google Scholar
  59. R Development Core Team (2005) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  60. Ramp D, Ben-Ami D (2006) The effect of road-based fatalities on the viability of a peri-urban swamp wallaby population. J Wildl Manag 70:1615–1624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ramp D, Roger E (2008) Frequency of animal-vehicle collisions in NSW. In: Lunney D, Munn A, Meikle W (eds) Too close for comfort. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, Australia, pp 118–126Google Scholar
  62. Ramp D, Caldwell J, Edwards KA, Warton D, Croft DB (2005) Modelling of wildlife fatality hotspots along the snowy mountain highway in New South Wales, Australia. Biol Conserv 126:474–490Google Scholar
  63. Regan HM, Hierl LA, Franklin J, Deutschman DH, Schmalbach HL, Winchell CS, Johnson BS (2008) Species prioritization for monitoring and management in regional multiple species conservation plans. Divers Distrib 14:462–471Google Scholar
  64. Robertson MP, Cumming GS, Erasmus BFN (2010) Getting the most out of atlas data. Divers Distrib 16:363–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Roger E, Ramp D (2009) Incorporating habitat use in models of fauna fatalities on roads. Divers Distrib 15:222–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Roger E, Laffan SW, Ramp D (2007) Habitat selection by the common wombat (Vombatus ursinus) in disturbed environments: implications for the conservation of a ‘common’ species. Biol Conserv 137:437–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Roger E, Laffan SW, Ramp D (2011) Road impacts a tipping point for wildlife populations in threatened landscapes. Popul Ecol 53:215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Seiler A (2004) Trends and spatial patterns in ungulate-vehicle collision in Sweden. Wildlife Biol 10:301–313Google Scholar
  69. Skerratt LF, Skerratt JHL, Banks S, Martin R, Handasyde K (2004) Aspects of the ecology of common wombats (Vombatus ursinus) at high density on pastoral land in Victoria. Aust J Zool 52:303–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Soutullo A, Castro MD, Urios V (2008) Linking political and scientifically derived targets for global biodiversity conservation: implications for the expansion of the global network of protected areas. Divers Distrib 14:604–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Thomson FJ, Moles AT, Auld TD, Ramp D, Ren S, Kingsford RT (2010) Chasing the unknown: predicting seed dispersal mechanisms from plant traits. J Ecol 98:1310–1318Google Scholar
  72. Triggs B (1988) The wombat: common wombats in Australia. Revised edition. New South Wales University Press, Kensington, New South WalesGoogle Scholar
  73. Trombulak SC, Frissell CA (2000) Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conserv Biol 14:18–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. van der Ree R, Jaeger JAG, van der Grift EA, Clevenger AP (2011) Effects of roads and traffic on wildlife populations and landscape funtion: road ecology is moving toward larger scales. Ecol Soc 16:48Google Scholar
  75. Warren MS, Hill JK, Thomas JA, Asher J, Fox R, Huntley B, Roy DB, Telfer MG, Jeffcoate S, Harding P, Jeffcoate G, Willis SG, Greatorex-Davies JN, Moss D, Thomas CD (2001) Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature 414:65–69Google Scholar
  76. Wilkie D, Shaw E, Rotberg F, Morelli G, Auzel P (2000) Roads, development, and conservation in the Congo basin. Conserv Biol 14:1614–1622Google Scholar
  77. Wilson KA, Underwood EC, Shaw MR, Possingham HP (2007) Conserving biodiversity efficiently: what to do, where, and when. PLoS Biol 5:223Google Scholar
  78. Wintle BA, Elith J, Potts JM (2005) Fauna habitat modelling and mapping: a review and case study in the Lower Hunter Central Coast region of NSW. Austral Ecol 30:729–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zarnetske PL, Edwards TC, Moisen GG (2007) Habitat classification modeling with incomplete data: pushing the habitat envelope. Ecol Appl 17:1714–1726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian Wetlands and Rivers CentreUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of the EnvironmentUniversity of Technology SydneyBroadwayAustralia

Personalised recommendations