Landscape Ecology

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 829–841 | Cite as

Spatial dynamics of the knob-tailed gecko Nephrurus stellatus in a fragmented agricultural landscape

  • Don A. Driscoll
  • Catherine A. Whitehead
  • Juliana Lazzari
Research Article

Abstract

In fragmented landscapes, a species’ dispersal ability and response to habitat condition are key determinants of persistence. To understand the relative importance of dispersal and condition for survival of Nephrurus stellatus (Gekkonidae) in southern Australia, we surveyed 92 woodland remnants three times. This gecko favours early post-fire succession conditions so may be at risk of extinction in the long-unburnt agricultural landscape. Using N-mixture models, we compared the influence of four measures of isolation, patch area and two habitat variables on the abundance and occurrence of N. stellatus, while taking into account detection probability. Patch occupancy was high, despite the long-term absence of fire from most remnants. Distance to the nearest occupied site was the most informative measure of patch isolation, exhibiting a negative relationship with occupancy. Distance to a nearby conservation park had little influence, suggesting that mainland–island metapopulation dynamics are not important. Abundance and occurrence were positively related to  %-cover of spinifex (Triodia), indicating that niche-related factors may also contribute to spatial dynamics. Patterns of patch occupancy imply that N. stellatus has a sequence of spatial dynamics across an isolation gradient, with patchy populations and source-sink dynamics when patches are within 300 m, metapopulations at intermediate isolation, and declining populations when patches are separated by >1–2 km. Considering the conservation needs of the community, habitat condition and connectivity may need to be improved before fire can be reintroduced to the landscape. We speculate that fire may interact with habitat degradation and isolation, increasing the risk of local extinctions.

Keywords

Metacommunity Reptile Patch-matrix model Invasive weeds Land clearing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Annabel Smith, Jake Overton and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on earlier drafts. We are grateful for accommodation provided by David McKenna and Frank and Judy Schaefer and we thank all of the landholders who permitted access to their properties. Thanks to Hong Kuch, Mailyn Thomas, Angus Kennedy, Anni Walsh and Ollanta Lipcer for their assistance in the field. The project was funded by the Australian Research Council, Native Vegetation Council of South Australia, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, South Australia, and the New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage. DD was supported by the Australian Government’s National Environmental Research Program. This research was completed under the ANU Animal Experimentation Ethics project number S.RE.09.09, the South Australian Government, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Scientific Research Permit K25737-3, and the South Australian Government, Wildlife Ethics 26/2009-M1.

Supplementary material

10980_2012_9734_MOESM1_ESM.doc (130 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 131 kb)

References

  1. Akima H, Gebhardt A, Petzoldt T, Maechler M (2009) akima: Interpolation of irregularly spaced data. R package version 0.5-4. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=akima. Accessed June 2011
  2. Audsley BW, Bock CE, Jones ZF, Bock JH, Smith HM (2006) Lizard abundance in an exurban southwestern Savanna, and the possible importance of roadrunner predation. Am Midl Nat 155:395–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banks SC, Lindenmayer DB, Ward SJ, Taylor AC (2005) The effects of habitat fragmentation via forestry plantation establishment on spatial genotypic structure in the small marsupial carnivore, Antechinus agilis. Mol Ecol 14:1667–1680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blevins E, With KA (2011) Landscape context matters: local habitat and landscape effects on the abundance and patch occupancy of collared lizards in managed grasslands. Landscape Ecol 26:837–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown GW (2001) The influence of habitat disturbance on reptiles in Box-Ironbark eucalypt forest of south-eastern Australia. Biodivers Conserv 10:161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown S, Clarke M, Clarke R (2009) Fire is a key element in the landscape-scale habitat requirements and global population status of a threatened bird: the Mallee Emu-wren (Stipiturus mallee). Biol Conserv 142:432–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnham KP, Anderson D (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Calcagno V, de Mazancourt C (2010) Glmulti: an R Package for easy automated model selection with (generalized) linear models. J Stat Softw 34:1–29Google Scholar
  9. Castellano MJ, Valone TJ (2006) Effects of livestock removal and perennial grass recovery on the lizards of a desertified arid grassland. J Arid Environ 66:87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caughley J (1985) Effect of fire on the reptile fauna of mallee. In: Grigg G, Shine R, Ehmann H (eds) Biology of Australasian frogs and reptiles. Royal Zoological Society of NSW and Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, pp 31–34Google Scholar
  11. Clarke MF, Avitabile SC, Brown L, Callister KE, Haslem A, Holland GJ, Kelly LT, Kenny SA, Nimmo DG, Spence-Bailey LM, Taylor RS, Watson SJ, Bennett AF (2010) Ageing mallee eucalypt vegetation after fire: insights for successional trajectories in semi-arid mallee ecosystems. Aust J Bot 58:363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cottenie K (2005) Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. Ecol Lett 8:1175–1182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daly BG, Dickman CR, Crowther MS (2008) Causes of habitat divergence in two species of agamid lizards in arid central Australia. Ecology 89:65–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davies KF, Margules CR, Lawrence JF (2000) Which traits of species predict population declines in experimental forest fragments? Ecology 81:1450–1461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Debinski DM, Holt RD (2000) A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv Biol 14:342–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Driscoll DA (2004) Extinction and outbreaks accompany fragmentation of a reptile community. Ecol Appl 14:220–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Driscoll DA (2007) How to find a metapopulation. Can J Zool/Rev Can Zool 85:1031–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Driscoll DA (2008) The frequency of metapopulations, metacommunities and nestedness in a fragmented landscape. Oikos 117:297–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Driscoll DA, Henderson MK (2008) How many common reptile species are fire specialists? A replicated natural experiment highlights the predictive weakness of a fire succession model. Biol Conserv 141:460–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Driscoll DA, Weir T (2005) Beetle responses to habitat fragmentation depend on ecological traits, remnant condition and shape. Conserv Biol 19:182–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Driscoll DA, Kirkpatrick JB, McQuillan PB, Bonham K (2010) Classic metapopulations are rare among beetle species from a naturally fragmented landscape. J Anim Ecol 79:294–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Driscoll DA, Felton A, Gibbons P, Felton AM, Munro NT, Lindenmayer DB (2012) Priorities in policy and management when existing biodiversity stressors interact with climate-change. Clim Change 111:533–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Driscoll DA, Smith AL, Blight S, Maindonald J (in press) Reptile responses to fire and the risk of post-disturbance sampling bias. Biodivers Conserv. doi: 10.1007/s10531-012-0267-5
  24. Dunstan CE, Fox BJ (1996) The effects of fragmentation and disturbance of rainforest on ground-dwelling small mammals on the Robertson Plateau, New South Wales. Aust J Biogeogr 23:187–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Etienne RS, Ter Braak CJF, Vos CC (2004) Application of stochastic patch occupancy models to real metapopulations. In: Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (eds) Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier, Burlington, pp 105–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fiske I, Chandler R, Royle A (2011) unmarked: Models for Data from Unmarked Animals. R package version 0.9-0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=unmarked. Accessed June 2011
  27. Giraudoux P (2011) pgirmess: Data analysis in ecology. R package version 1.5.1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pgirmess. Accessed June 2011
  28. Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396:41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hanski I (2010) The theories of island biogeography and metapopulation dynamics. In: Losos JB, Ricklefs RE (eds) The theory of island biogeography revisited. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 186–213Google Scholar
  30. Hanski I, Moilanen A, Pakkala T, Kuussaari M (1996) The quantitative incidence function model and persistence of an endangered butterfly metapopulation. Conserv Biol 10:578–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harrison S (1991) Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation. Biol J Linn Soc 42:73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harrison S, Taylor AD (1997) Empirical evidence for metapopulation dynamics. In: Hanski IA, Gilpin ME (eds), Metapopulation biology. Ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 27–42Google Scholar
  33. Haslem A, Kelly LT, Nimmo DG, Watson SJ, Kenny SA, Taylor RS, Avitabile SC, Callister KE, Spence-Bailey LM, Clarke MF, Bennett AF (2011) Habitat or fuel? Implications of long-term, post-fire dynamics for the development of key resources for fauna and fire. J Appl Ecol 48:247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hill JK, Thomas CD, Lewis OT (1996) Effects of habitat patch size and isolation on dispersal by Hesperia comma butterflies: implications for metapopulation structure. J Anim Ecol 65:725–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoare JM, Adams LK, Bull LS, Towns DR (2007a) Attempting to manage complex predator–prey interactions fails to avert imminent extinction of a threatened New Zealand skink population. J Wildl Manag 71:1576–1584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hoare JM, Shirley P, Nelson NJ, Daugherty CH (2007b) Avoiding aliens: behavioural plasticity in habitat use enables large, nocturnal geckos to survive Pacific rat invasions. Biol Conserv 136:510–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hobbs RJ, Harris JA (2001) Restoration ecology: repairing the Earth’s ecosystems in the new millennium. Restor Ecol 9:239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hodgson JA, Thomas CD, Wintle BA, Moilanen A (2009) Climate change, connectivity and conservation decision making: back to basics. J Appl Ecol 46:964–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoehn M, Sarre SD, Henle K (2007) The tales of two geckos: does dispersal prevent extinction in recently fragmented populations? Mol Ecol 16:3299–3312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hokit DG, Stith BM, Branch LC (1999) Effects of landscape structure in Florida scrub: a population perspective. Ecol Appl 9:124–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hokit DG, Ascunce M, Ernst J, Branch LC, Clark AM (2010) Ecological metrics predict connectivity better than geographic distance. Conserv Genet 11:149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hubbell SP, Lake JK (2003) The neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography, and beyond. In: Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ (eds) Macroecology: concepts and consequences. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 45–63Google Scholar
  43. Huxel GR, Hastings A (1999) Habitat loss, fragmentation, and restoration. Restor Ecol 7:309–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Keeley JE (2006) Fire management impacts on invasive plants in the western United States. Conserv Biol 20:375–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kelly LT, Nimmo DG, Spence-Bailey LM, Clarke MF, Bennett AF (2010) The short-term responses of small mammals to wildfire in semiarid mallee shrubland. Aust Wildl Res 37:293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kery M, Royle JA, Schmid H (2005) Modeling avian abundance from replicated counts using binomial mixture models. Ecol Appl 15:1450–1461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, Amarasekare P, Chase JM, Hoopes MF, Holt RD, Shurin JB, Law R, Tilman D, Loreau M, Gonzalez A (2004) The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett 7:601–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Letnic M (2004) Cattle grazing in a hummock grassland regenerating after fire: the short-term effects of cattle exclusion on vegetation in south-western Queensland. Rangel J 26:34–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Levins R (1969) Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull Entomol Soc Am 15:237–240Google Scholar
  50. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  51. MacKenzie D, Nichols J, Royle J, Pollock K, Bailey L, Hines J (2006) Occupancy estimation and modeling: inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence. Elsevier Academic Press, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  52. McDonald T, Williams J (2009) A perspective on the evolving science and practice of ecological restoration in Australia. Ecol Manag Restor 10:113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McGarigal K, Cushman SA (2002) Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecol Appl 12:335–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Menkhorst PW, Bennett AF (1990) Vertebrate fauna of mallee vegetation in southern Victoria. In: Noble JC, Joss PJ, Jones GK (eds) The mallee lands: a conservation perspective. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 39–53Google Scholar
  55. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  56. Moilanen A (2002) Implications of empirical data quality to metapopulation model parameter estimation and application. Oikos 96:516–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nano CEM, Clarke PJ (2010) Woody-grass ratios in a grassy arid system are limited by multi-causal interactions of abiotic constraint, competition and fire. Oecologia 162:719–732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Noss RF, Beier P, Covington WW, Grumbine RE, Lindenmayer DB, Prather JW, Schmiegelow F, Sisk TD, Vosick DJ (2006) Recommendations for integrating restoration ecology and conservation biology in ponderosa pine forests of the southwestern United States. Restor Ecol 14:4–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ovaskainen O, Hanski I (2004) From individual behavior to metapopulation dynamics: Unifying the patchy population and classic metapopulation models. Am Nat 164:364–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Perry RW, Rudolph DC, Thill RE (2009) Reptile and amphibian responses to restoration of fire-maintained pine woodlands. Restor Ecol 17:917–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pianka ER (1969) Habitat specificity, speciation, and species density in Australian desert lizards. Ecology 50:498–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Prugh LR (2009) An evaluation of patch connectivity measures. Ecol Appl 19:1300–1310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Prugh LR, Hodges KE, Sinclair ARE, Brashares JS (2008) Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:20770–20775PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pulliam HR (1988) Sources, sinks and population regulation. Am Nat 132:652–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Risk BB, de Valpine P, Beissinger SR (2011) A robust-design formulation of the incidence function model of metapopulation dynamics applied to two species of rails. Ecology 92:462–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. R Development Core Team (2010) R: A language and environment for statistical computing, version 2.12.0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed Nov 2010
  67. Royle JA (2004) N-mixture models for estimating population size from spatially replicated counts. Biometrics 60:108–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Ehrlich PR (1993) Reconstruction of fragmented ecosystems: problems and possibilities. In: Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Ehrlich PR (eds) Nature conservation 3: reconstruction of fragmented ecosystems. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, pp 305–313Google Scholar
  69. Schutz AJ, Driscoll DA (2008) Common reptiles unaffected by connectivity or condition in a fragmented farming landscape. Aust Ecol 33:641–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Smith A, Bull CM, Driscoll DA (2012) Post-fire succession affects abundance and survival but not detectability in a knob-tailed gecko. Biol Conserv 145:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sturges HA (1926) The choice of a class interval. J Am Stat Assoc 21:65–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sutcliffe OL, Thomas CD, Peggie D (1997) Area-dependent migration by ringlet butterflies generates a mixture of patchy population and metapopulation attributes. Oecologia 109:229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Templeton AR, Brazeal H, Neuwald JL (2011) The transition from isolated patches to a metapopulation in the eastern collared lizard in response to prescribed fires. Ecology 92:1736–1747PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Thomas CD (1994) Extinction, colonization and metapopulations: environmental tracking by rare species. Conserv Biol 8:373–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Thomas JA, Bourn NAD, Clarke RT, Stewart KE, Simcox DJ, Pearman GS, Curtis R, Goodger B (2001) The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:1791–1796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Towns DR, Parrish GR, Tyrrell CL, Ussher GT, Cree A, Newman DG, Whitaker AH, Westbrooke I (2007) Responses of tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus) to removal of introduced Pacific rats from islands. Conserv Biol 21:1021–1031PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Werner EE, Relyea RA, Yurewicz KL, Skelly DK, Davis CJ (2009) Comparative landscape dynamics of two anuran species: climate-driven interaction of local and regional processes. Ecol Monogr 79:503–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Williams JR, Driscoll DA, Bull CM (in press) Dispersal and isolation affect structure of vertebrate communities in a fragmented landscape. Aust Ecol. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02292.x
  79. Zoellick BW, Ulmschneider HM, Cade BS, Stanley AW (2004) Isolation of snake river islands and mammalian predation of waterfowl nests. J Wildl Manag 68:650–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Don A. Driscoll
    • 1
  • Catherine A. Whitehead
    • 2
  • Juliana Lazzari
    • 1
  1. 1.Fenner School of Environment and SocietyAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesFlinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations