Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

The influence of species traits and q-metrics on scale-specific β-diversity components of arthropod communities of temperate forests

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protection of biodiversity and ecosystem functions requires a better understanding of spatial diversity. Here we studied diversity patterns of true bugs and saproxylic beetles, sampled in 28 forest stands of southern Germany, using a hierarchical nested design of five increasingly broader spatial levels: trap location, stratum, forest stand, forest site, and ecoregion. We predicted that: (1) for large body-sized species (as a surrogate for highly mobile species) and host generalist species (low host specificity), the proportion of β-diversity decreases from small to large spatial scales; and (2) the differences between trait-based functional guilds in the proportion of β-diversity increase with increasing weighting of more-abundant species. Our results indicated that the ecoregion level is the most important diversity scale for both taxa and among functional guilds sampled, followed by the forest stand level. Specialized species were more strongly affected on the ecoregion level than generalist species. Differences in the proportion of β-diversity between functional guilds increased with increasing weighting of abundant species. The β-diversity patterns based on body size and host specificity were similar for true bugs, but partly contrasting for saproxylic beetles. Our results suggest that (1) future conservation schemes should focus on establishing new conservation sites in new ecoregions, rather than on enlarging existing protected areas; (2) host specificity might be a more meaningful trait than body size to be considered in biodiversity studies; and (3) common conservation approaches restricted to only large, conspicuous, but rare species might result in a mismatch of important biodiversity scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Balmford A, Bennun L, ten Brink B, Cooper D, Cote IM, Crane P, Dobson A (2005a) The convention on biological diversity’s 2010 target. Science 307:212–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A, Crane P, Dobson A, Green RE, Mace GM (2005b) The 2010 challenge: data availability, information needs and extraterrestrial insights. Philos Trans R Soc B 360:221–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balvanera P, Pfisterer AB, Buchmann N, He JS, Nakashizuka T, Raffaelli D, Schmid B (2006) Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol Lett 9:1146–1156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baselga A, Jimenez-Valverde A (2007) Environmental and geographical determinants of beta diversity of leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in the Iberian Peninsula. Ecol Entomol 32:312–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basset Y, Novotny V, Miller SE, Kitching RL (2003) Conclusion: arthropods, canopies and interpretable patterns. In: Basset Y, Novotny V, Miller SE, Kitching RL (eds) Arthropods of tropical forests: spatio temporal dynamics and resource use in the canopy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 394–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Basset Y, Missa O, Alonso A, Miller SE, Curletti G, De Meyer M, Eardley C, Lewis OT, Mansell MW, Novotny V, Wagner T (2008) Changes in arthropod assemblages along a wide gradient of disturbance in Gabon. Conserv Biol 22:1552–1563

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck J, Khen CV (2007) Beta-diversity of geometrid moths from northern Borneo: effects of habitat, time and space. J Anim Ecol 76:230–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bertheau C, Brockerhoff EG, Roux-Morabito G, Lieutier F, Jactel H (2010) Novel insect-tree associations resulting from accidental and intentional biological ‘invasions’: a meta-analysis of effects on insect fitness. Ecol Lett 13:506–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ (2003) Macroecology: concepts and consequences. Blackwell Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhme J (2005) Die Käfer Mitteleuropas, Bd. K: Katalog (Faunistische Übersicht). Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg

  • Brandl R, Kristin A, Leisler B (1994) Dietary host plant breadth in a local community of passerine birds: an analysis using phylogenetic contrast. Oecologia 98:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brändle M, Stadler J, Brandl R (2000) Body size and host range in European Heteroptera. Ecography 23:139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brändle M, Ohlschlager S, Brandl R (2002) Range sizes in butterflies: correlation across scales. Evol Ecol Res 4:993–1004

    Google Scholar 

  • Braz E, Joly P (1994) Micro-habitat use, resource partitioning and ecological succession in a size structured guild of newt larvae (Triturus, Caudata, Amphibia). Arch Hydrobiol 131:129–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Gillooly JF, Allen AP, Savage VM, West GB (2004) Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85:1771–1789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunker DE, DeClerck F, Bradford JC, Colwell RK, Perfecto I, Phillips OL, Sankaran M, Naeem S (2005) Species loss and aboveground carbon storage in a tropical forest. Science 310:1029–1031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale BJ, Srivastava DS, Duffy JE, Wright JP, Downing AL, Sankaran M, Jouseau C (2006) Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature 443:989–992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chown SL, Gaston KJ (2010) Body size variation in insects: a macroecological perspective. Biol Rev 85:139–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Didham RK, Fagan LL (2004) Forest canopies. In: Burley J, Evans J, Youngquist J (eds) Encyclopaedia of forest sciences. Academic Press, London, pp 68–80

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dover J, Settele J (2009) The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review. J Insect Conserv 13:3–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst R, Rödel M-R (2005) Anthropogenically induced changes of predictability in tropical anuran assemblages. Ecology 86:3111–3118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freude H, Harde K, Lohse GA (1964–1983) Die Käfer Mitteleuropas. Goecke and Evers, Krefeld

  • Gaston KJ (2010) Valuing common species. Science 327:154–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gering JC, Crist TO (2002) The alpha-beta-regional relationship: providing new insights into local-regional patterns of species richness and scale dependence of diversity components. Ecol Lett 5:433–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gering JC, Crist TO, Veech JA (2003) Additive partitioning of species diversity across multiple spatial scales: implications for regional conservation of biodiversity. Conserv Biol 17:488–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert F (1990) Size, phylogeny and life history in the evolution of feeding specialization in insect predators. In: Gilbert F (ed) Life cycles: genetics, evolution and co-ordination. Springer, London, pp 101–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Gossner M (2008) Heteroptera (Insecta: Hemiptera) communities in tree crowns of beech, oak and spruce in managed forests: diversity, seasonality, guild structure, and tree specificity. In: Floren A, Schmidl J (eds) Canopy Arthropod Research in Central Europe—basic and applied studies from the high frontier. Bioform Entomology, Nürnberg, pp 119–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Gossner MM (2009) Light intensity affects spatial distribution of Heteroptera in deciduous forests. Eur J Entomol 106:241–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruppe A, Gossner M, Engel K, Simon U (2008) Vertical and horizontal distribution of arthropods in temperate forests. In: Floren A, Schmidl J (eds) Canopy Arthropod Research in Central Europe—basic and applied studies from the high frontier. Bioform Entomology, Nürnberg, pp 383–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S, Ross SJ, Lawton JH (1992) Beta diversity on geographic gradients in Britain. J Anim Ecol 61:151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirao T, Murakami M, Kashizaki A (2007) Additive apportioning of lepidoptera and coleopteran species diversity across spatial and temporal scales in a cool-temperate deciduous forest in Japan. Ecol Entomol 32:627–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setälä H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75:3–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Horchler PJ, Morawetz W (2008) Canopy structure and its effect on canopy organisms: a general introduction and some first findings of the Leipzig Canopy Crane Project with special reference to vertical stratification. In: Floren A, Schmidl J (eds) Canopy Arthropod Research in Central Europe. Bioform Entomology, Nürnberg, pp 31–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarman PJ (1974) The social organisation of antelopes in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48:215–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joly P, Giacoma C (1992) Limitation of similarity and feeding habits in three synanthropic species of newts (Triturus, Amphibia). Ecography 15:401–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson BG (2000) Availability of coarse woody debris in a boreal old-growth Picea abies forest. J Veg Sci 11:51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113:363–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost L (2007) Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology 88:2427–2439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jost L, DeVries P, Walla T, Greeney H, Chao A, Ricotta C (2010) Partitioning diversity for conservation analyses. Divers Distrib 16:65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keylock C (2005) Simpson diversity and the Shannon–Wiener index as special cases of a generalized entropy. Oikos 109:203–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein AM, Cunningham SA, Bos M, Steffan-Dewenter I (2008) Advances in pollination ecology from tropical plantation crops. Ecology 89:935–943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Komonen A, Grapputo A, Kaitala V, Kotiaho JS, Paivinen J (2004) The role of niche breadth, resource availability and range position on the life history of butterflies. Oikos 105:41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubota U, Loyola RD, Almeida AM, Carvalho DA, Lewinsohn TM (2007) Body size and host range co-determine the altitudinal distribution of neotropical tephritid flies. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:632–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1996) Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos 76:5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrom J, Kaila L, Niemela P (1994) Polyphagy and adult body-size in geometrid moths. Oecologia 98:130–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loder N, Gaston KJ, Warren PH, Arnold HR (1998) Body size and feeding specificity: macrolepidoptera in Britain. Biol J Linn Soc 63:121–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marti CD (1993) Community trophic structure: the roles of diet, body size, and activity time in vertebrate predators. Oikos 67:6–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre PB, Jones LE, Flecker AS, Vanni MJ (2007) Fish extinctions alter nutrient recycling in tropical freshwaters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:4461–4466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Müller J, Brandl R (2009) Assessing biodiversity by remote sensing in mountainous terrain: the potential of LiDAR to predict forest beetle assemblages. J Appl Ecol 46:897–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller J, Gossner M (2007) Single host trees in a closed forest canopy matrix: a highly fragmented landscape. J Appl Entomol 131:613–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller J, Gossner MM (2010) Three-dimensional partitioning of diversity reveals baseline information for state-wide strategies for the conservation of saproxylic beetles. Biol Conserv 143:625–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller J, Bußler H, Bense U, Brustel H, Flechtner G, Fowles A, Kahlen M, Möller G, Mühle H, Schmidl J, Zabransky P (2005) Urwald relict species—saproxylic beetles indicating structural qualities and habitat tradition. Waldoekologie Online 2:106–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller J, Bußler H, Gossner M, Rettelbach T, Duelli P (2008) The European spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (L.) in a national park—from pest to keystone species. Biodivers Conserv 17:2979–3001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nekola JC, White PS (1999) The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J Biogeogr 26:867–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novotny V, Basset Y (1999) Body size and host plant specialization: a relationship from a community of herbivorous insects on Ficus from Papua New Guinea. J Trop Ecol 15:315–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GG (1997) Canopy structure and light environment of an old-growth Douglas-fir/Western hemlock forest. Northwest Sci 71:261–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen B, Ellwanger G, Biewald G et al (2003) Das europäische Schutzgebietssystem Natura 2000. Ökologie und Verbreitung von Arten der FFH-Richtlinie in Deutschland. Bd.1 Pflanzen und Wirbellose. Schriftenreihe für Landschaftspflege und Naturschutz 69:1–743

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian H, Ricklefs RE (2007) A latitudinal gradient in large-scale beta diversity for vascular plants in North America. Ecol Lett 10:737–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qian H, Ricklefs RE (2008) Global concordance in diversity patterns of vascular plants and terrestrial vertebrates. Ecol Lett 11:547–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qian H, Ricklefs RE, White PS (2005) Beta diversity of angiosperms in temperate floras of eastern Asia and eastern North America. Ecol Lett 8:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranius T (2006) Measuring the dispersal of saproxylic insects: a key characteristic for their conservation. Popul Ecol 48:177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranius T, Heding J (2001) The dispersal rate of a beetle, Osmoderma eremita, living in tree hollows. Oecologia 126:363–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro KT, Codeco CT, Fernandes GW (2003) Local and regional spatial distribution of an eruptive and a latent herbivore insect species. Austral Ecol 28:99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JG, Redford KH (1986) Body size, diet, and population density of neotropical forest mammals. Am Nat 128:665–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Röder J, Bässler C, Brandl R, Dvořak L, Floren A, Gruppe A, Goßner M, Jarzabek-Müller A, Vojtech O, Wagner C, Müller J (2010) Arthropod species richness in the Norway Spruce canopy along an elevation gradient. For Ecol Manag 259:1513–1521

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberger AL (1992) Evolution of feeding niches in new-world monkeys. Am J Phys Anthropol 88:525–562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sobek S, Gossner MM, Scherber C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2009) Tree diversity drives abundance and spatiotemporal β-diversity of true bugs (Heteroptera). Ecol Entomol 34:772–782

    Google Scholar 

  • Soininen J, McDonald R, Hillebrand H (2007) The distance decay of similarity in ecological communities. Ecography 30:3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Spehn EM, Hector A, Joshi J, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schmid B, Bazeley-White E, Beierkuhnlein C, Caldeira MC, Diemer M, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Finn JA, Freitas H, Giller PS, Good J, Harris R, Hogberg P, Huss-Danell K, Jumpponen A, Koricheva J, Leadley PW, Loreau M, Minns A, Mulder CPH, O'Donovan G, Otway SJ, Palmborg C, Pereira JS, Pfisterer AB, Prinz A, Read DJ, Schulze E-D, Siamantziouras ASD, Terry AC, Troumbis AY, Woodward FI, Yachi S, Lawton JH (2005) Ecosystem effects of biodiversity manipulations in European grasslands. Ecol Monogr 75:37–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Speight MCD (1989) Saproxylic invertebrates and their conservation. Council of Europe. Nat Environ Ser 42:1–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerville KS, Crist TO (2002) Effects of timber harvest on forest Lepidoptera: community, guild, and species responses. Ecol Appl 12:820–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summerville KS, Crist TO (2003) Determinants of lepidopteran community composition and species diversity in eastern deciduous forests: roles of season, eco-region and patch size. Oikos 100:134–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summerville KS, Boulware MJ, Veech JA, Crist TO (2003) Spatial variation in species diversity and composition of forest Lepidoptera in eastern deciduous forests of North America. Conserv Biol 17:1045–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summerville KS, Wilson TD, Veech JA, Crist TO (2006) Do body size and diet breadth affect partitioning of species diversity? A test with forest Lepidoptera. Divers Distrib 12:91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tal O, Freiberg M, Morawetz W (2008) Micro-climatic variability in the canopy of a temperate forest. In: Floren A, Schmidl J (eds) Canopy Arthropod Research in Central Europe. Bioform Entomology, Nürnberg, pp 49–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor BW, Flecker AS, Hall RO (2006) Loss of a harvested fish species disrupts carbon flow in a diverse tropical river. Science 313:833–836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomisto H (2010) A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 1. Defining beta diversity as a function of alpha and gamma diversity. Ecography 33:2–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen K (2006) Analyzing or explaining beta diversity? Understanding the targets of different methods of analysis. Ecology 87:2697–2708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tylianakis JM, Klein AM, Lozada T, Tscharntke T (2006) Spatial scale of observation affects alpha, beta and gamma diversity of cavity-nesting bees and wasps across a tropical land-use gradient. J Biogeogr 33:1295–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veech JA (2005) Analyzing patterns of species diversity as departures from random expectations. Oikos 108:149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veech JA, Crist TO (2009) PARTITION: software for hierarchical partitioning of species diversity, version 3.0. http://www.users.muohio.edu/cristto/partition.htm

  • Veech JA, Crist TO (2010) Diversity partitioning without statistical independence of alpha and beta. Ecology 91:1964–1969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veech JA, Summerville KS, Crist TO, Gering JC (2002) The additive partitioning of species diversity: recent revival of an old idea. Oikos 99:3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wachmann E, Melber A, Deckert J (2004–2008) Wanzen Band 1–4. Goecke and Evers, Keltern

  • Walentowski H, Ewald J, Fischer A, Kölling C, Türk W (2006) Handbuch der natürlichen Waldgesellschaften Bayerns. Geobotanica, Freising

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol Monogr 30:279–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ylisirnio AL, Berglund H, Aakala T, Kuuluvainen T, Kuparinen AM, Norokorpi Y, Hallikainen V, Mikkola K, Huhta E (2009) Spatial distribution of dead wood and the occurrence of five saproxylic fungi in old-growth timberline spruce forests in northern Finland. Scand J For Res 24:527–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavaleta ES, Hulvey KB (2004) Realistic species losses disproportionately reduce grassland resistance to biological invaders. Science 306:1175–1177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all the researchers who contributed to the projects from which data was compiled for the present study. We thank the Bavarian State Institute of Forestry for providing data, Karen A. Brune for linguistic revision of the manuscript, and two anonymous referees for their critical comments and helpful suggestions on a previous draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Ecology, Friedrich Schiller University, Dornburger Str. 159, 07743, Jena, Germany

    Martin M. Gossner

  2. Bavarian Forest National Park, Freyunger Str. 2, 94481, Grafenau, Germany

    Jörg Müller

Authors
  1. Martin M. Gossner
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jörg Müller
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin M. Gossner.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 1476 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gossner, M.M., Müller, J. The influence of species traits and q-metrics on scale-specific β-diversity components of arthropod communities of temperate forests. Landscape Ecol 26, 411–424 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9568-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9568-9

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Martin M. Gossner View author profile