Landscape Ecology

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 267–280 | Cite as

Making molehills out of mountains: landscape genetics of the Mojave desert tortoise

  • Bridgette E. Hagerty
  • Kenneth E. Nussear
  • Todd C. Esque
  • C. Richard Tracy
Research Article

Abstract

Heterogeneity in habitat often influences how organisms traverse the landscape matrix that connects populations. Understanding landscape connectivity is important to determine the ecological processes that influence those movements, which lead to evolutionary change due to gene flow. Here, we used landscape genetics and statistical models to evaluate hypotheses that could explain isolation among locations of the threatened Mojave desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii). Within a causal modeling framework, we investigated three factors that can influence landscape connectivity: geographic distance, barriers to dispersal, and landscape friction. A statistical model of habitat suitability for the Mojave desert tortoise, based on topography, vegetation, and climate variables, was used as a proxy for landscape friction and barriers to dispersal. We quantified landscape friction with least-cost distances and with resistance distances among sampling locations. A set of diagnostic partial Mantel tests statistically separated the hypotheses of potential causes of genetic isolation. The best-supported model varied depending upon how landscape friction was quantified. Patterns of genetic structure were related to a combination of geographic distance and barriers as defined by least-cost distances, suggesting that mountain ranges and extremely low-elevation valleys influence connectivity at the regional scale beyond the tortoises’ ability to disperse. However, geographic distance was the only influence detected using resistance distances, which we attributed to fundamental differences between the two ways of quantifying friction. Landscape friction, as we measured it, did not influence the observed patterns of genetic distances using either quantification. Barriers and distance may be more valuable predictors of observed population structure for species like the desert tortoise, which has high dispersal capability and a long generation time.

Keywords

Landscape genetics Desert tortoise Gopherus agassizii Mojave desert Least-cost-path Isolation-by-resistance Habitat suitability model 

Supplementary material

10980_2010_9550_MOESM1_ESM.doc (108 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 108 kb)

References

  1. Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, De Blust G, Swinnen E, Villalba S, Gulinck H, Matthysen E (2003) The application of ‘least-cost’ modeling as a functional landscape model. Landsc Urban Plan 64:233–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen MC, Watts JM, Freilich JE, Yool SR, Wakefield GI, McCauley JF, Fahnestock PB (2000) Regression-tree modeling of desert tortoise habitat in the central Mojave Desert. Ecol Appl 10:890–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Austin MP (2002) Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modeling. Ecol Model 157:101–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balkenhol N, Gugerli F, Cushman SA, Waits LP, Coulon A, Arntzen JW, Holderegger R, Wagner HH (2009) Identifying future research needs in landscape genetics: where to from here? Landscape Ecol 24:455–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blainey JB, Webb RH, Magirl CS (2007) Modeling the spatial and temporal variation of monthly and seasonal precipitation on the Nevada Test Site, 1960-2006. U.S. Geological Survey open-file report 2007-1269. Available from http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2007/1269/
  6. Bliss N (1998) Soils1 and Soils2. Digital data distributed on CD-ROM by the Mojave Desert Ecosystem ProgramGoogle Scholar
  7. Bohonak AJ (1999) Dispersal, gene flow, and population structure. Q Rev Biol 74:21–45CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Britten HB, Riddle BR, Brussard PF, Marlow R, Lee TE (1997) Genetic delineation of management units for the desert tortoise, Gopherus agassizii, in Northeastern Mojave Desert. Copeia 3:523–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooks CP (2003) A scalar analysis of landscape connectivity. Oikos 102:433–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Broquet T, Ray N, Petit E, Fryxell JM, Burel F (2006) Genetic isolation by distance and landscape connectivity in the American marten (Martes americana). Landscape Ecol 21:877–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Bury RB, Esque TC, DeFalco LC, Medica PA (1994) Distribution, habitat use, and protection of the desert tortoise in the Eastern Mojave Desert. In: Bury RB, Germano DJ (eds) Biology of the North American tortoises. National Biological Survey, Fish and Wildlife Research 13, Washington, DC, pp 57–72Google Scholar
  13. Castellano S, Balletto E (2002) Is the partial Mantel test inadequate? Evolution 56:1871–1873PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Coulon A, Cosson JF, Angibault JM, Cargnelutti B, Galan M, Morellet N, Petit E, Aulagnier S, Hewison AJM (2004) Landscape connectivity influences gene flow in a roe deer population inhabiting a fragmented landscape: an individual-based approach. Mol Ecol 13:2841–2850CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Crooks KR, Sanjayan M (eds) (2006) Connectivity conservation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Cushman SA, McKelvey KS, Hayden J, Schwartz MK (2006) Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling. Am Nat 168:486–499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Edwards T, Goldberg CS, Kaplan ME, Schwalbe CR, Swann DE (2003) PCR primers for microsatellite loci in the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii, Testudinae). Mol Ecol Notes 3:589–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Edwards T, Schwalbe CR, Swann DE, Goldberg CS (2004) Implications of anthropogenic landscape change on inter-population movements of the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii). Conserv Genet 5:485–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Epperson BK (2003) Geographical genetics. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  20. Epps CW, Palsboll PJ, Wehausen JD, Roderick GK, Ramey RR, McCullough DR (2005) Highways block gene flow and cause a rapid decline in genetic diversity of desert bighorn sheep. Ecol Lett 8:1029–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Epps CW, Wehausen JD, Bleich VC, Torres SG, Brashares JS (2007) Optimizing dispersal and corridor models using landscape genetics. J Appl Ecol 44:714–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 34:487–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Global Ecol Biogeogr 16:265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Germano DJ, Bury RB, Esque TC, Fritts TH, Medica PA (1994) Range and habitats of the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii). In: Bury RB, Germano DJ (eds) Biology of North American tortoises. U.S.D.I. National Biological Survey, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  25. Goudet J (1996) FSTAT (Version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86:485–486Google Scholar
  26. GRASS Development Team (2008) Geographic Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS) Software, Version 6.3.0. http://grass.osgeo.org
  27. Hagerty BE, Tracy CR (2010) Defining population boundaries for the Mojave desert tortoise. Conserv Genet 11:1795–1807. doi:10.1007/s10592-010-0073-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hagerty BE, Peacock M, Kirchoff VS, Tracy CR (2008) Polymorphic microsatellite markers for the Mojave desert tortoise, Gopherus agassizii. Mol Ecol Res 8:1149–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Henle K, Davies KF, Kleyer M, Margules C, Settele J (2004) Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation. Biodivers Conserv 13:207–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Holderegger R, Wagner HH (2008) Landscape genetics. Bioscience 58:199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Howeth JG, McGaugh SE, Hendrickson DA (2008) Contrasting demographic and genetic estimates of dispersal in the endangered Coahuilan box turtle: a contemporary approach to conservation. Mol Ecol 17:4209–4221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Keyghobadi N (2007) The genetic implications of habitat fragmentation for animals. Can J Zool 85:1049–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koenig WD, Van Vuren D, Hooge PN (1996) Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates. Trends Ecol Evol 11:514–517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lande R (1988) Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241:1455–1460CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee-Yaw JA, Davidson A, McRae BH, Green DM (2009) Do landscape processes predict phylogeographic patterns in the wood frog? Mol Ecol 18:1863–1874CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Legendre P (1993) Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74:1659–1673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lehmann A, Overton JMcC, Leathwick JR (2002) GRASP: generalized regression analysis and spatial prediction. Ecol Modell 157:189–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Luckenbach RA (1982) Ecology and management of the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) in California. In: Bury RB (ed) North American tortoises: conservation and ecology. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wildlife Research Report 12, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  39. Manel S, Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2003) Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends Ecol Evol 18:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mantel N (1967) Detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. McRae BH (2006) Isolation by resistance. Evolution 60:1551–1561PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. McRae BH, Beier P (2007) Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:19885–19890CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. McRae BH, Shah VB (2009) Circuitscape user guide. The University of California, Santa Barbara. Online. Available at: http://www.circuitscape.org
  44. McRae BH, Dickson BG, Keitt T, Shah VB (2008) Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology 89:2712–2724CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller MP (1997) Tools for population genetic analysis (TFPGA, 1.3): a Windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular population genetic data. Computer software distributed by author from http://www.marksgeneticsoftware.net/
  46. Morafka D (1994) Neonates: missing links in the life histories of North American tortoises. In: Bury RB, Germano DJ (eds) Biology of North American tortoises. National Biological Survey, Fish and Wildlife Research, Washington, DC, pp 161–173Google Scholar
  47. Murphy RW, Berry KH, Edwards T, McLuckie AM (2007) A genetic assessment of the recovery units for the Mojave population of the desert tortoise, Gopherus agassizii. Chelonian Conserv Biol 6:229–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Murphy M, Evans J, Cushman S, Storfer A (2008) Evaluation of a novel approach for representing “populations” as continuous surfaces in landscape genetics. Ecography 31:685–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nagy KA, Medica PA (1986) Physiological ecology of desert tortoises. Herpetologica 42:73–92Google Scholar
  50. Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat 106:283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nussear KE (2004) Mechanistic investigation of the distributional limits of the desert tortoise, Gopherus agassizii. Dissertation, University of Nevada, RenoGoogle Scholar
  52. Nussear KE, Esque TC, Inman RD, Gass L, Thomas KA, Wallace CSA, Blainey JB, Miller DM, Webb RH (2009) Modeling habitat of the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) in the Mojave and parts of the Sonoran Deserts of California, Nevada, Utah, and Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey open-file report 2009-1102, 18 ppGoogle Scholar
  53. Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara B, Stevens MHH (2007) Vegan: community ecology package. R Package Version 1.8.8. Available from http://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/vegan. Accessed May 2008
  54. Paetkau D, Waits LP, Clarkson PL, Craighead L, Strobeck C (1997) An empirical evaluation of genetic distance statistics using microsatellite data from bear (Ursidae) populations. Genetics 147:1943–1957PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. URL http://www.R-project.org
  56. Raufaste N, Rousset F (2001) Are partial Mantel tests adequate? Evolution 55:1703–1705PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Reed DH (2004) Extinction risk in fragmented habitats. Anim Conserv 7:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rousset F (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145:1219–1228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Rousset F (2002) Partial Mantel tests: reply to Castellano and Balletto. Evolution 56:1874–1875Google Scholar
  60. Rowlands PG, Johnson H, Ritter E, Endo A (1982) The Mojave Desert. In: Bender GL (ed) Reference handbook on the deserts of North America. Greenwood Press, Westport, pp 103–162Google Scholar
  61. Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (2001) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol 5:18–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schwartz TS, Osentoski M, Lamb T, Karl SA (2003) Microsatellite loci for the North American tortoises (genus Gopherus) and their applicability to other turtle species. Mol Ecol Notes 3:283–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sing T, Sander O, Beerenwinkel N, Lengauer T (2005) ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R. Bioinformatics 21:3940–3941CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Slatkin M (1993) Isolation by distance in equilibrium and nonequilibrium populations. Evolution 47:264–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smouse PE, Long JC, Sokal RR (1986) Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Syst Zool 35:627–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stevens VM, Verkenne C, Vandewoestijne S, Wesselingh RA, Baguette M (2006) Gene flow and functional connectivity in the natterjack toad. Mol Ecol 15:2333–2344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Storfer A, Murphy MA, Evans JS, Goldberg CS, Robinson S, Spear SF, Dezzani R, Delmelle E, Vierling L, Waits LP (2007) Putting the ‘landscape’ in landscape genetics. Heredity 98:128–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Taylor PD, Fahrig L, Henein K, Merriam G (1993) Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68:571–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Taylor PD, Fahrig L, With KA (2006) Landscape connectivity: a return to the basics. In: Crooks KR, Sanjayan MA (eds) Connectivity conservation: maintaining connections for nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 29–43Google Scholar
  70. Theobald DM (2006) Exploring the functional connectivity of landscapes using landscape networks. In: Crooks KR, Sanjayan MA (eds) Connectivity conservation: maintaining connections for nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 416–443Google Scholar
  71. Tracy CR, Averill-Murray RC, Boarman WI, Delehanty DJ, Heaton JS, McCoy ED, Morafka DJ, Nussear KE, Hagerty BE, Medica PA (2004) Desert tortoise recovery plan assessment. Technical report to US Fish and Wildlife Service, Reno, 254 ppGoogle Scholar
  72. Uezu A, Metzger JP, Vielliard JME (2005) Effects of structural and functional connectivity and patch size on the abundance of seven Atlantic Forest bird species. Biol Conserv 123:507–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (1994) Desert tortoise (Mojave population) Recovery Plan. USFWS, Portland, 73 pp, plus AppendicesGoogle Scholar
  74. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2006) Review draft monitoring report. USFWS, Portland. http://www.fws.gov/nevada/desert_tortoise/dt_reports.html. Accessed March 2006
  75. Verbeylen G, De Bruyn L, Adriaensen F, Matthysen E (2003) Does matrix resistance influence Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris L. 1758) distribution in an urban landscape? Landscape Ecol 18:791–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vos CC, Antonisse-De Jong AG, Goedhart PW, Smulders MJM (2001) Genetic similarity as a measure for connectivity between fragmented populations of the moor frog (Rana arvalis). Heredity 86:598–608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Wallace CSA, Gass L (2008) Elevation derivatives for Mojave desert tortoise habitat models. Geological Survey open-file report 2008-1283. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1283/. Accessed March 26, 2009
  78. Wallace CSA, Thomas KA (2008) An annual plant growth proxy in the Mojave desert using MODIS-EVI data. Sensors 6:7792–7808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wallace CSA, Webb RH, Thomas KA (2008) Estimation of perennial vegetation cover distribution in the Mojave Desert using MODIS-EVI data. GISci Remote Sens 45:167–187. doi:10.2747/1548-1603.45.2.167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wang YH, Yang KC, Bridgman CL, Lin LK (2008) Habitat suitability modeling to correlate gene flow with landscape connectivity. Landscape Ecol 23:989–1000. doi:10.1007/s10980-008-9262-3 Google Scholar
  81. Waples RS (1998) Separating the wheat from the chaff: patterns of genetic differentiation in high gene flow species. J Hered 89:438–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wiens J (2001) The landscape concept of dispersal. In: Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA, Nichols JD (eds) Dispersal. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 96–109Google Scholar
  83. Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Zimmerman LC, O’Connor MC, Bulova SJ, Spotila JR, Kemp SJ, Salice CJ (1994) Thermal ecology of desert tortoises in the eastern Mojave Desert: seasonal patterns of operative and body temperatures, and microhabitat utilization. Herpetol Monogr 8:45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bridgette E. Hagerty
    • 1
  • Kenneth E. Nussear
    • 2
  • Todd C. Esque
    • 2
  • C. Richard Tracy
    • 1
  1. 1.Program in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology, Department of BiologyUniversity of NevadaRenoUSA
  2. 2.Western Ecological Research CenterU. S. Geological SurveyHendersonUSA

Personalised recommendations