Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Spatial planning of a climate adaptation zone for wetland ecosystems

  • Landscape Ecology in Practice
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Here we present a spatial planning approach for the implementation of adaptation measures to climate change in conservation planning for ecological networks. We analyse the wetland ecosystems of the Dutch National Ecological Network for locations where the effectiveness of the network might be weakened because of climate change. We first identify potential dispersal bottlenecks where connectivity might be insufficient to facilitate range expansions. We then identify habitat patches that might have a too low carrying capacity for populations to cope with additional population fluctuations caused by weather extremes. Finally, we describe the spatial planning steps that were followed to determine the best locations for adaptation measures. An essential part of our adaptation strategy is to concentrate adaptation measures in a ‘climate adaptation zone’. Concentrating adaptation measures is a cost-effective planning strategy, rendering the largest benefit per area unit. Measures are taken where abiotic conditions are optimal and measures to enhance the spatial cohesion of the network are taken close to existing areas, thus creating the highest possible connectivity with the lowest area demands. Another benefit of a climate adaptation zone is that it provides a spatial protection zone where activities that will have a negative impact on ecosystem functioning might be avoided or mitigated. The following adaptation measures are proposed within the climate adaptation zone: (1) link habitat networks to enable species to disperse from present to future suitable climate zones, (2) enlarge the carrying capacity by either enlarging the size of natural areas or by improving habitat quality to shorten population recovery after disturbances, (3) increase the heterogeneity of natural areas, preferably by stimulating natural landscape-forming processes, to avoid large synchronised extinctions after extreme weather events. The presented approach can be generalised to develop climate adaptation zones for other ecosystem types inside or outside Europe, where habitat fragmentation is a limiting factor in biodiversity responses to climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Acreman M, Fisher J, Stratford C, Mould D, Mountford J (2007) Hydrological science and wetland restoration: some case studies from Europe. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 1:158–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Akcakaya HR, Baur B (1996) Effects of population subdivision and catastrophes on the persistence of a land snail metapopulation. Oecologia 105:475–483

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo MB, New M (2007) Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:42–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson J, Angelstam P, Elmqvist T, Emanuelsson U, Folke C, Ihse M, Moberg F, Nyström M (2003) Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes. Ambio 32:389–396

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brook BW, Sodhi NS, Bradshaw CJA (2008) Synergies among extinction drivers under global change. Trends Ecol Evol 23:453–460

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooke C (2008) Conservation and adaptation to climate change. Conserv Biol 22:1471–1476

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooker R, Young JC, Watt AD (2007) Climate change and biodiversity: impacts and policy development challenges—a European case study. Int J Biodivers Sci Manage 3:12–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (2009) Adapting to climate change: towards a European framework for action. White Paper April 1 2009, Brussels

  • Da Fonseca GAB, Sechrest W, Oglethorpe J (2005) Managing the matrix. In: Lovejoy TE, Hannah L (eds) Climate change and biodiversity. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 346–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Boer PJ (1986) Environmental heterogeneity and the survival of natural populations. In: Velthuis HHW (ed) Proceedings of the 3rd European congress of entomology. KNAW, Amsterdam, pp 345–356

  • Devictor V, Julliard R, Couvet D, Jiquet F (2008) Birds are tracking climate warming, but not fast enough. Proc R Soc B 275:2743–2748. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0878

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Easterling DR, Evans JL, Groisman PY, Karl TR, Kunkel KE, Ambenje P (2000a) Observed variability and trends in extreme climate events: a brief review. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 81:417–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterling DR, Meehl GA, Parmesan C, Changnon SA, Karl TR, Mearns LO (2000b) Climate extremes: observations, modeling and impacts. Science 289:2068–2074

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foppen R, Ter Braak CJF, Verboom J, Reijnen R (1999) Dutch Sedge warblers Acrocephalus schoenobaenus and West African rainfall: empirical data and simulation modeling show low population resilience in fragmented marshlands. Ardea 87:113–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Green K, Pickering CM (2002) A potential scenario for mammal and bird diversity in the Snowy Mountains of Australia in relation to climate change. In: Körner C, Spehn EM (eds) Mountain biodiversity: a global assessment. Parthenon Publishing, London, pp 241–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah L, Hansen L (2005) Designing landscapes and seascapes for change. In: Lovejoy TE, Hannah L (eds) Climate change and biodiversity. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Moilanen A, Gyllenberg M (1996) Minimum viable metapopulation size. Am Nat 147:527–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison PA, Berry PM, Butt N, New M (2006) Modeling climate change impacts on species distributions at the European scale: implications for conservation policy. Environ Sci Policy 9:116–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller NE, Zavaleta ES (2009) Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: a review of 22 years of recommendations. Biol Conserv 142:14–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Hey D, Philippi N (1995) Flood reduction through wetland restoration: the Upper Mississippi River Basin as a case history. Restor Ecol 3:4–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickling R, Roy DB, Hill JK, Fox R, Thomas CD (2006) The distributions of a wide range of taxonomic groups are expanding polewards. Global Change Biol 12:450–455. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01116.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson JA, Thomas CD, Wintle BA, Moilanen A (2009) Climate change, connectivity and conservation decision making: back to basics. J Appl Ecol 46:964–969

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75:3–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntley B, Green RE, Collingham YC, Willis SG (2007) A climatic atlas of European breeding birds, the RSPB and Lynx edns. Durham University, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine Action Plan on Floods (2005) Action targets, implementation and results, 1995–2005. International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine, Koblenz, www.iksr.org

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, Van Der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment. Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Jentsch A, Beierkuhnlein B (2008) Research frontiers in climate change: effects of extreme meteorological events on ecosystems. CR Geosci 340:621–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson KH, Vogt KA, Clark HJ, Schmitz OJ, Vogt DJ (1996) Biodiversity and the productivity and stability of ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 11:372–377

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johst K, Brandl R, Eber S (2002) Metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapes: the role of dispersal distance. Oikos 98:263–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongman RH, Pungetti G (2004) Ecological networks and greenways: concept, design, implementation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Julliard R, Jiguet F, Couvet D (2004) Common birds facing global changes: what makes a species at risk? Global Change Biol 10:148–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungwirth M, Muhar S, Schmutzr S (2002) Re-establishing and assessing ecological integrity in riverine landscapes. Freshw Biol 47:867–887

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Turner BL, Hisieh W, Schiller A (2005) Vulnerability to global environmental change. In: Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE (eds) The social contours of risk: volume II risk analysis, corporations and the globalization of risk. Earth scan, London, pp 245–285

    Google Scholar 

  • KNMI (2006) Climate in the 21st century; four scenarios for the Netherlands. KNMI, De Bilt (in Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

  • KNMI (2008) The state of the climate in the Netherlands. KNMI, De Bilt (in Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy TE, Hannah L (eds) (2005) Climate change and biodiversity. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut

    Google Scholar 

  • Menéndez R, González Megías A, Hill JK, Braschler B, Willis SG, Collingham Y, Fox R, Roy DB, Thomas CD (2006) Species richness changes lag behind climate change. Proc R Soc B 273:1465–1470

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Opdam P, Washer D (2004) Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale level in research and conservation. Biol Conserv 117:285–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Opdam P, Verboom J, Pouwels R (2003) Landscape cohesion, an index for the conservation potential of landscapes for biodiversity. Landscape Ecol 18:113–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Opdam P, Steingröver E, Van Rooij S (2006) Ecological networks: a spatial planning concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 75:322–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Opdam P, Pouwels R, van Rooij S, Steingröver E, Vos CC (2008) Setting biodiversity targets in participatory regional planning: introducing ecoprofiles. Ecol Soc 13(1): 20. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art20/

  • Pallemearts M, Parker CN, Shukla PR, Van Schaik LG (2005) The Greenland dialogue on climate change: a policy discussion paper

  • Piessens K, Adriaens D, Jacquemyn H, Honnay O (2008) Synergistic effects of an extreme weather event and habitat fragmentation on a specialized insect herbivore. Oecologia 159:117–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piha H, Luoto M, Piha M, Merilä J (2007) Anuran abundance and persistence in agricultural landscapes during a climatic extreme. Global Change Biol 13:300–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Reijnen MJSM, Kuipers H, Pouwels R (2007) Optimisation of the spatial cohesion of the Dutch National Ecological Network; spatial conditions for sustainable protection of fauna species. Alterra-report no 1296, WUR, Wageningen (in Dutch)

  • Ricketts TH (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 158:87–99

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Runhaar J, Clement J, Jansen PC, Hennekens SM, Weeda EJ, Wamelink W, Schouwenberg EPAG (2005) Hotspots of floristic biodiversity. WOT report 9. Statutory Research Tasks Unit for Nature and the Environment, Wageningen (in Dutch)

  • Schippers P, Verboom J, Vos CC, Jochem R (submitted) Metapopulation shift and survival of woodland birds under climate change: will species be able to track?

  • Scott D, Lemieux C (2007) Climate change and protected area policy, planning and management in Canada’s boreal forest. For Chron 83:347–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2009) Connecting biodiversity and climate change mitigation and adaptation: report of the second Ad Hoc technical expert group on biodiversity and climate change. Technical Series, Montreal, p 41

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer CL (1999) National park and reserve planning to protect biological diversity: some basic elements. Landsc Urban Plan 44:123–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé M (ed) (1987) Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M, Beaumont LJ, Collingham YC, Erasmus BFN, Ferreira M, De Siqueira A, Garinger L, Hannah L, Hughes B, Huntley B, van Jaarsveld AS, Midgley GF, Miles L, Ortega-Huerta MA, Peterson AT, Phillips OL, Williams SE (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Travis JMJ (2003) Climate change and habitat destruction: a deadly anthropogenic cocktail. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 270:467–473

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Grift EA (2005) Defragmentation in the Netherlands: a success story? GAIA 14:144–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Verboom J, Pouwels R (2004) Ecological functioning of ecological networks: a species perspective. In: Jongman RHG, Pungetti G (eds) Ecological networks and greenways: concept, design, implementation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Verboom J, Foppen R, Chardon P, Opdam P, Luttikhuizen P (2001) Standards for persistent habitat networks for vertebrate populations: the key patch approach. An example for marshland bird populations. Biol Conserv 100:89–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Verboom J, Schippers P, Cormont A, Sterk M, Vos CC, Opdam P (2010) Population dynamics under increasing environmental fluctuations; implications of climate change for ecological network design criteria. Landscape Ecol 25:1289–1298

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos CC, Verboom J, Opdam PFM, Ter Braak CJF (2001) Towards ecologically scaled landscape indices. Am Nat 157:24–51

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vos CC, Berry P, Opdam P, Baveco H, Nijhof B, O’Hanley J, Bell C, Kuipers H (2008) Adapting landscapes to climate change: examples of climate-proof ecosystem networks and priority adaptation zones. J Appl Ecol 45:1722–1731

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren MS, Hill JK, Thomas JA, Asher J, Fox R, Huntley B, Roy DB, Telfer MG, Jeffcoate S, Harding P, Jeffcoate G, Willis SG, Greatorex-Davies JN, Moss D, Thomas CD (2001) Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature 414:65–69

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson E, Piper J (2008) Spatial planning for biodiversity in Europe’s changing climate. Eur Environ 18:135–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RJ, Davies ZG, Thomas CD (2009) Modelling the effect of habitat fragmentation on range expansion in a butterfly. Proc R Soc B 276:1421–1427

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Alterra Wageningen University and Research Centre, PO Box 47, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Claire C. Vos

  2. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, PO Box 303, 3720 AH, Bilthoven, The Netherlands

    Dirk C. J. van der Hoek & Marijke Vonk

Authors
  1. Claire C. Vos
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dirk C. J. van der Hoek
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marijke Vonk
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire C. Vos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vos, C.C., van der Hoek, D.C.J. & Vonk, M. Spatial planning of a climate adaptation zone for wetland ecosystems. Landscape Ecol 25, 1465–1477 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9535-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9535-5

Keywords