Landscape Ecology

, Volume 25, Issue 9, pp 1333–1348 | Cite as

Biodiversity is associated with indicators of soil ecosystem functions over a landscape gradient of agricultural intensification

  • Steven W. Culman
  • Anna Young-Mathews
  • Allan D. Hollander
  • Howard Ferris
  • Sara Sánchez-Moreno
  • Anthony T. O’Geen
  • Louise E. Jackson
Research article


Agricultural intensification has led to dramatic losses in biodiversity over the past several decades. Many studies have shown the effects of intensification on vegetation or soil communities at field or local scales. However, the functional significance of biodiversity may only appear at larger spatial and temporal scales, due to exchanges among local ecosystems throughout a landscape. To examine how patterns of biodiversity loss are reflected at larger spatial scales, plant and soil biodiversity and associated indicators of ecosystem functions were assessed in riparian areas over a 150 km2 agricultural landscape in the Sacramento Valley of California. Publicly-available GIS data were first used to classify and select sites over the range of soils, topography and plant community types. Representative sites from the landscape were sampled for soil physiochemical properties, as well as microbial, nematode, and plant communities. Higher agricultural intensification, based on field and landscape indices, was negatively correlated with richness and diversity of plant and soil taxa, and was related to indicators of ecosystem functions, such as increased soil nitrate and phosphorus loading, decreased riparian health ratings, and lower soil carbon, soil microbial biomass and soil food web structure. Both field- and landscape-scale factors played important roles in the measured losses. The study area was composed of a wide array of soils, vegetation, and land management, indicating that the observed trends transcended site-specific conditions.


Agricultural intensification Biodiversity loss Riparian Landscape classification PLFA Nematode Soil biota GIS Aboveground–belowground diversity 


  1. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MJ (2006) Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions. Biometrics 62:245–253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arshad MA, Martin S (2002) Identifying critical limits for soil quality indicators in agro-ecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 88:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atauri JA, de Lucio JV (2001) The role of landscape structure in species richness distribution of birds, amphibians, reptiles and lepidopterans in Mediterranean landscapes. Landscape Ecol 16:147–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Attwood SJ, Maron M, House APN, Zammit C (2008) Do arthropod assemblages display globally consistent responses to intensified agricultural land use and management? Global Ecol Biogeogr 17:585–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbour M, Pavlik B, Drysdale F, Lindstron S (1993) California’s changing landscapes: diversity and conservation of California vegetation. California Native Plant Society, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  7. Bardgett RD, Lovell RD, Hobbs PJ, Jarvis SC (1999) Seasonal changes in soil microbial communities along a fertility gradient of temperate grasslands. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1021–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barker KR (1985) Nematode extraction and bioassays. In: Barker KR, Carter CC, Sasser JN (eds) An advanced treatise on meloidogyne. North Carolina State University Graphics, Raleigh, pp 19–35Google Scholar
  9. Billeter R, Liira J, Bailey D, Bugter R, Arens P, Augenstein I, Aviron S, Baudry J et al (2008) Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan-European study. J Appl Ecol 45:141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bongers T, Bongers M (1998) Functional diversity of nematodes. Appl Soil Ecol 10:239–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bossio DA, Scow KM, Gunapala N, Graham KJ (1998) Determinants of soil microbial communities: effects of agricultural management, season, and soil type on phospholipid fatty acid profiles. Microb Ecol 36:1–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark CM, Tilman D (2008) Loss of plant species after chronic low-level nitrogen deposition to prairie grasslands. Nature 451:712–715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. CNPS Vegetation Committee (2000) CNPS Relevé Protocol. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CAGoogle Scholar
  14. Daily GC (ed) (1997) Nature’s services. Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Danz NP, Regal RR, Niemi GJ, Brady VJ, Hollenhorst T, Johnson LB, Host GE, Hanowski JM et al (2005) Environmentally stratified sampling design for the development of great lakes environmental indicators. Environ Monit Assess 102:41–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. De Deyn GB, Van der Putten WH (2005) Linking aboveground and belowground diversity. Trends Ecol Evol 20:625–633CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Di HJ, Cameron KC (2002) Nitrate leaching in temperate agroecosystems: sources, factors and mitigating strategies. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 46:237–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eggleton P, Vanbergen AJ, Jones DT, Lambert MC, Rockett C, Hammond PM, Beccaloni J, Marriott D, Ross E, Giusti A (2005) Assemblages of soil macrofauna across a Scottish land-use intensification gradient: influences of habitat quality, heterogeneity and area. J Appl Ecol 42:1153–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eshel G, Levy GJ, Mingelgrin U, Singer MJ (2004) Critical evaluation of the use of laser diffraction for particle-size distribution analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:736–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferris H, Bongers T, de Goede RGM (2001) A framework for soil food web diagnostics: extension of the nematode faunal analysis concept. Appl Soil Ecol 18:13–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flynn DFB, Gogol-Prokurat M, Nogeire T, Molinari N, Richers BT, Lin BB, Simpson N, Mayfield MM, DeClerck F (2009) Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. Ecol Lett 12:22–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gough L, Osenberg CW, Gross KL, Collins SL (2000) Fertilization effects on species density and primary productivity in herbaceous plant communities. Oikos 89:428–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gower JC (1971) General coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27:623–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guil N, Hortal J, Sanchez-Moreno S, Machordom A (2009) Effects of macro and micro-environmental factors on the species richness of terrestrial tardigrade assemblages in an Iberian mountain environment. Landscape Ecol 24:375–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hector A, Bagchi R (2007) Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature 448:188–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hedlund K, Regina IS, Van der Putten WH, Leps J, Diaz T, Korthals GW, Lavorel S, Brown VK, Gormsen D, Mortimer SR, Barrueco CR, Roy J, Smilauer P, Smilauerova M, Van Dijk C (2003) Plant species diversity, plant biomass and responses of the soil community on abandoned land across Europe: idiosyncracy or above-belowground time lags. Oikos 103:45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jackson LE, Pascual U, Hodgkin T (2007a) Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 121:196–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jackson LE, Potthoff M, Steenwerth KL, O’Geen AT, Stromberg MR, Scow KM (2007b) Soil biology and carbon sequestration. In: Corbin J, D’Antonio C, Stromberg MR (eds) Ecology and management of California grasslands. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp 107–118Google Scholar
  29. Jackson LE, Rosenstock T, Thomas M, Wright J, Symstad A (2009) Managed ecosystems: biodiversity and ecosystem functions in landscapes modified by human use. In: Naeem S, Bunker D, Hector A, Loreau M, Perrings C (eds) Biodiversity and human impacts. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 178–194Google Scholar
  30. Jangid K, Williams MA, Franzluebbers AJ, Sanderlin JS, Reeves JH, Jenkins MB, Endale DM, Coleman DC, Whitman WB (2008) Relative impacts of land-use, management intensity and fertilization upon soil microbial community structure in agricultural systems. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2843–2853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ (1990) Finding groups in data. An introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Kleijn D, Kohler F, Baldi A, Batary P, Concepcion ED, Clough Y, Diaz M, Gabriel D et al (2009) On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land-use intensity in Europe. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:903–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krishnaswamy J, Bawa KS, Ganeshaiah KN, Kiran MC (2009) Quantifying and mapping biodiversity and ecosystem services: utility of a multi-season NDVI based Mahalanobis distance surrogate. Remote Sens Environ 113:857–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lovell ST, Sullivan WC (2006) Environmental benefits of conservation buffers in the United States: evidence, promise, and open questions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 112:249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mantel N (1967) Detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Matson PA, Parton WJ, Power AG, Swift MJ (1997) Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277:504–509CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Minoshima H, Jackson LE, Cavagnaro TR, Sánchez-Moreno S, Ferris H, Temple SR, Mitchell JP (2007) Soil food webs and carbon dynamics in response to conservation tillage in legume rotations in California. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:952–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Miranda KM, Espey MG, Wink DA (2001) A rapid, simple spectrophotometric method for simultaneous detection of nitrate and nitrite. Nitric Oxide 5:62–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Neher DA, Wu J, Barbercheck ME, Anas O (2005) Ecosystem type affects interpretation of soil nematode community measures. Appl Soil Ecol 30:47–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Neldner VJ, Crossley DC, Cofinas M (1995) Using geographic information systems (GIS) to determine the adquacy of sampling in vegetation surveys. Biol Conserv 73:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. OECD (2003) Agriculture and biodiversity: developing indicators for policy analysis (summary and recommendations). OECD Publishing, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  42. Potthoff M, Steenwerth KL, Jackson LE, Drenovsky RE, Scow KM, Joergensen RG (2006) Soil microbial community composition as affected by restoration practices in California grassland. Soil Biol Biochem 38:1851–1860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  44. Richardson DM, Holmes PM, Esler KJ, Galatowitsch SM, Stromberg JC, Kirkman SP, Pysek P, Hobbs RJ (2007) Riparian vegetation: degradation, alien plant invasions, and restoration prospects. Divers Distrib 13:126–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ruiz J, Domon G (2009) Analysis of landscape pattern change trajectories within areas of intensive agricultural use: case study in a watershed of southern Quebec, Canada. Landscape Ecol 24:419–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sánchez-Moreno S, Ferris H (2007) Suppressive service of the soil food web: effects of environmental management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 119:75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sánchez-Moreno S, Minoshima H, Ferris H, Jackson LE (2006) Linking soil properties and nematode community composition: effects of soil management on soil food webs. Nematology 8:703–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sawyer JO, Keeler-Wolf T (1995) Manual of California vegetation. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CAGoogle Scholar
  49. Smukler SM, Jackson LE, Sánchez-Moreno S, Fonte SJ, Ferris H, Klonsky K, O’Geen AT, Scow KM, Steenwerth KL (2010) Biodiversity and multiple ecosystem functions in an organic farmscape. Agric Ecosyst Environ (in press)Google Scholar
  50. Soil Survey Staff (2006) Keys to soil taxonomy, 10th edn. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  51. Steenwerth KL, Jackson LE, Carlisle EA, Scow KM (2006) Microbial communities of a native perennial bunchgrass do not respond consistently across a gradient of land-use intensification. Soil Biol Biochem 38:1797–1811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Steffan-Dewenter I, Munzenberg U, Burger C, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2002) Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83:1421–1432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stephan A et al (2000) Plant diversity affects culturable soil bacteria in experimental grassland communities. J Ecol 88:988–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stromberg MR, Griffin JR (1996) Long-term patterns in coastal California grasslands in relation to cultivation, gophers, and grazing. Ecol Appl 6:1189–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Suding KN, Collins SL, Gough L, Clark C, Cleland EE, Gross KL, Milchunas DG, Pennings S (2005) Functional- and abundance-based mechanisms explain diversity loss due to N fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:4387–4392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Swift MJ, Izac A-MN, van Noordwijk M (2004) Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes-are we asking the right questions? Agric Ecosyst Environ 104:113–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Treseder KK (2008) Nitrogen additions and microbial biomass: a meta-analysis of ecosystem studies. Ecol Lett 11:1111–1120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity—ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Waldrop MP, Zak DR, Blackwood CB, Curtis CD, Tilman D (2006) Resource availability controls fungal diversity across a plant diversity gradient. Ecol Lett 9:1127–1135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Wallenstein MD, Myrold DD, Firestone M, Voytek M (2006) Environmental controls on denitrifying communities and denitrification rates: insights from molecular methods. Ecol Appl 16:2143–2152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Ward TA, Tate KW, Atwill ER, Lile DF, Lancaster DL, McDougald N, Barry S, Ingram RS et al (2003) A comparison of three visual assessments for riparian and stream health. J Soil Water Conserv 58:83–88Google Scholar
  62. Wardle DA (2006) The influence of biotic interactions on soil biodiversity. Ecol Lett 9:870–886CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Wardle DA, Yeates GW, Nicholson KS, Bonner KI, Watson RN (1999) Response of soil microbial biomass dynamics, activity and plant litter decomposition to agricultural intensification over a seven-year period. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1707–1720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wassen MJ, Venterink HO, Lapshina ED, Tanneberger F (2005) Endangered plants persist under phosphorus limitation. Nature 437:547–550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Wedin DA, Tilman D (1996) Influence of nitrogen loading and species composition on the carbon balance of grasslands. Science 274:1720–1723CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Winward AH (2000) Monitoring the vegetation resources in riparian areas. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRSGTR-47. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, p 49Google Scholar
  67. Yeates GW, Bongers T (1999) Nematode diversity in agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:113–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yeates GW, Stirling GR (2008) Regional patterns among soil nematode assemblages in Australasian pastures and effects of management practices. Austral Plant Pathol 37:298–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yeates GW, Bongers T, Degoede RGM, Freckman DW, Georgieva SS (1993) Feeding habits in soil nematode families and genera—an outline for soil ecologists. J Nematol 25:315–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Young-Mathews A, Culman SW, Sánchez-Moreno S, O’Geen TA, Ferris H, Hollander AD, Jackson LE (2010) Plant-soil biodiversity relationships and nutrient retention in agricultural riparian zones of the Sacramento Valley, California. Agrofor Syst. doi:10.1007/s10457-010-9332-9
  71. Zak DR, Holmes WE, White DC, Peacock AD, Tilman D (2003) Plant diversity, soil microbial communities, and ecosystem function: are there any links? Ecology 84:2042–2050CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven W. Culman
    • 1
  • Anna Young-Mathews
    • 1
  • Allan D. Hollander
    • 2
  • Howard Ferris
    • 3
  • Sara Sánchez-Moreno
    • 4
  • Anthony T. O’Geen
    • 1
  • Louise E. Jackson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Land, Air and Water ResourcesUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.Information Center for the EnvironmentUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  3. 3.Department of NematologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  4. 4.Unidad de Productos FitosanitariosInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y AlimentariaMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations