Landscape Ecology

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 607–619 | Cite as

Effects of weather, fuel and terrain on fire severity in topographically diverse landscapes of south-eastern Australia

  • R. A. BradstockEmail author
  • K. A. Hammill
  • L. Collins
  • O. Price
Research Article


The effects of weather, terrain, fuels on fire severity were compared using remote sensing of the severity of two large fires in south-eastern Australian forests. The probability of contrasting levels of fire severity (fire confined to the understorey vs. tree canopies consumed) was analysed using logistic regression. These severities equate to extremes of fire intensity (<1,500 vs. >10,000 kW m−1), consequent suppression potential (high vs. nil) and potential adverse ecological impacts on vertebrate fauna and soils (low vs. high). Weather was the major influence on fire severity. Crown fire was absent under non-extreme weather and but more likely under extreme weather, particularly on ridges in vegetation unburnt for >10 years. Crown fire probability was very low in recently burnt vegetation (1–5 years) and increased at higher fuel ages. In all cases, fire severity was lower in valleys, probably due to effects of wind protection and higher fuel moisture in moderating fire behaviour. Under non-extreme weather, fires are likely to be suppressible and burn heterogeneously, due to the influence of topographic position, slope and fuel load. Under extreme weather, fires are influenced only by fuel and topographic position, and probability of suppression on accessible ridges will be low except in recently burnt (i.e. 1–5 year old) fuels. Topographically imposed variation may mitigate adverse ecological effects on arboreal fauna and soil erosion potential.


Fire intensity Fire suppression Fire regimes Prescribed burning Ecological effects 



This project was supported by a research grant (2004/RD/0104) from the Environmental Trust NSW. Substantial in kind support was provided by the Department of Environment and Climate Change (NSW) and the Sydney Catchment Authority (provision of remote sensing data). Stefan Maier provided advice on use of remote sensing for detection of fire boundaries and hotspots. Michael Bedward and Geoff Gordon provided advice on analyses. Two reviewers provided constructive comments on the manuscript.


  1. Agresti A (2007) An introduction to categorical data analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker WL, Veblen TT, Sherriff RR (2007) Fire, fuels and restoration of ponderosa-pine-Douglas fir forests in the Rocky Mountains, USA. J Biogeogr 34:251–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boer MM, Sadler RJ, Bradstock RA, Gill AM, Grierson PF (2008) Spatial scale invariance of forest fires mirrors the scaling behaviour of weather events. Landscape Ecol 23:899–913Google Scholar
  4. Bradstock RA (2008) Effects of large fires on biodiversity in south-eastern Australia: disaster or template for diversity? Int J Wildl Fire 17:809–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Chafer CJ, Noonan M, Macnaught E (2004) The post-fire measurement of fire severity and intensity in the Christmas 2001 Sydney wildfires. Int J Wildl Fire 13:227–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheney N (1981) Fire behaviour. In: Gill AM, Groves RH, Noble IR (eds) Fire and the Australian biota. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, pp 151–175Google Scholar
  8. Collins BM, Kelly M, van Wagtendonk JW, Stephens SL (2007) Spatial patterns of large natural fires in Sierra Nevada wilderness areas. Landscape Ecol 22:545–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doerr SH, Shakesby RA, Blake WH, Chafer CJ, Humphreys GS, Wallbrink PJ (2006) Effects of differing wildfire severities on soil wettability and implications for hydrological responses. J Hydrol 319:295–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellis S, Kanowski P, Whelan R (2004) National inquiry on bushfire mitigation and management. Commonwealth of Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernandes PM, Botelho HS (2003) A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction. Int J Wildl Fire 12:117–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gill AM (1997) Eucalypts and fire: interdependent or independent? In: Williams JE, Woinarski JCZ (eds) Eucalypt ecology: individuals to ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, pp 151–167Google Scholar
  13. Gill AM, Christian KR, Moore PHR, Forrester RI (1987) Bushfire incidence, fire hazard and fuel reduction burning. Aust J Ecol 12:299–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gould JS, Knight I, Sullivan AL (1997) Physical modelling of leaf scorch height from prescribed fire sin young Eucalyptus sieberi regrowth forests in south-eastern Australia. Int J Wildl Fire 7:7–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hammill KA, Bradstock RA (2006) Remote sensing of fire severity in the Blue Mountains: influence of vegetation type and inferring fire intensity. Int J Wildl Fire 15:213–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keeley JE (2009) Fire intensity, fire severity and burn severity: a brief review and suggested usage. Int J Wildl Fire 18:116–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lindenmayer DB, MacGregor C, Welsh A, Donnelly C, Crane M, Michael D, Montague-Drake R, Cunningham RB, Brown D, Fortescue M, Dexter N, Hudson M, Gill AM (2008) Contrasting mammal responses to vegetation type and fire. Wildl Res 35:395–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lunney D, Gresser S, O’Neill LE, Mathews A, Rhodes J (2007) The impact of fire and dogs on Koalas at Port Stephens, New South Wales, using population viability analysis. Pac Conserv Biol 13:189–201Google Scholar
  19. Mackey B, Lindenmayer D, Gill AM, McCarthy M, Lindesay J (2002) Wildlife, fire and future climate. A forest ecosystem analysis. CSIRO Publishing, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  20. McCaw WL, Gould JS, Cheney NP (2008) Existing fire behaviour models under-predict the rate of spread of summer fires in open jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) forest. Aust For 71:16–26Google Scholar
  21. Moritz MA, Keeley JE, Johnson EA, Schaffner AA (2004) Testing a basic assumption of shrubland fire management: does the hazard of burning increase with the age of fuels? Front Ecol Environ 2:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morrison DA, Buckney RT, Bewick BJ, Cary CJ (1996) Conservation conflicts over burning bush in south-eastern Australia. Biol Control 76:167–175Google Scholar
  23. Noble IR, Bary GAV, Gill AM (1980) McArthur’s fire-danger meters expressed as equations. Aust J Ecol 5:201–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Odion DC, Hanson CT (2006) Fire severity in conifer forests of the Sierra Nevada, California. Ecosystems 9:1177–1189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Odion DC, Hanson CT (2008) Fire severity in the Sierra Nevada revisited: conclusions robust to further analysis. Ecosystems 11:12–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Quin DG, Smith AP, Green SW, Hines HB (1992) Estimating the home ranges of sugar gliders (Petaurus breviceps) (Marsupialia:Petauridae) from grid-trapping and radiotelemetry. Wildl Res 19:471–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. R Core Development Team (2007) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  28. Raison RJ, Woods PV, Khanna PK (1983) Dynamics of fine fuels in recurrently burnt eucalypt forests. Aust For 46:294–302Google Scholar
  29. Safford HD, Miller J, Schmidt D, Roath B, Parsons A (2008) BAER soil burn severity maps do not measure fire effects to vegetation. A comment on Odion DC, Hanson CT (2006). Ecosystems 11:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schoennagel T, Veblen TT, Romme WH (2004) The interaction of fire, fuels and climate across Rocky Mountains forests. Bioscience 54:661–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shakesby RA, Wallbrink PJ, Doerr SH, English PM, Chafer CJ, Humphreys GS, Blake WH, Tomkins KM (2007) Distinctiveness of wildfire effects on soil erosion in south-east Australian eucalypt forests assessed in a global context. For Ecol Manag 238:347–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith HG, Dragovich D (2008) Post-fire hillslope erosion response in a sub-alpine environment, south-eastern Australia. Catena 73:274–285. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2007.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith GC, Mathieson M, Hogan L (2007) Home range and habitat use of a low-density population of greater gliders, Petauroides volans (Pseudocheiridae:Marsupialia) in a hollow-limiting environment. Wildl Res 34:472–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thompson JR, Spies TA, Ganio LM (2007) Reburn severity in managed and unmanaged vegetation in a large wildfire. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 104:10743–10748CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tomkins KM, Humphreys GS, Gero AF, Shakesby RA, Doerr SH, Wallbrink PJ, Blake WH (2008) Postwildfire hydrological response in an El Nino-southern oscillation-dominated environment. J Geophys Res 113:F02023. doi: 10.1029/2007JF000853 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Loon AP (1977) Bushland fuel quantities in the Blue Mountains: litter and understorey. Research note no. 33. Forestry Commission of NSW, SydneyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. A. Bradstock
    • 1
    Email author
  • K. A. Hammill
    • 2
  • L. Collins
    • 1
  • O. Price
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Environmental Risk Management of BushfiresUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Environment and Climate Change (NSW)HurstvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations