Landscape Ecology

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 135–145 | Cite as

Summer spatial patterning of chukars in relation to free water in western Utah

  • Randy T. Larsen
  • John A. Bissonette
  • Jerran T. Flinders
  • Mevin B. Hooten
  • Tammy L. Wilson
Research Article

Abstract

Free water is considered important to wildlife in arid regions. In the western United States, thousands of water developments have been built to benefit wildlife in arid landscapes. Agencies and researchers have yet to clearly demonstrate their effectiveness. We combined a spatial analysis of summer chukar (Alectoris chukar) covey locations with dietary composition analysis in western Utah. Our specific objectives were to determine if chukars showed a spatial pattern that suggested association with free water in four study areas and to document summer dietary moisture content in relation to average distance from water. The observed data for the Cedar Mountains study area fell within the middle of the random mean distance to water distribution suggesting no association with free water. The observed mean distance to water for the other three areas was much closer than expected compared to a random spatial process, suggesting the importance of free water to these populations. Dietary moisture content of chukar food items from the Cedar Mountains (59%) was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than that of birds from Box Elder (44%) and Keg-Dugway (44%). Water developments on the Cedar Mountains are likely ineffective for chukars. Spatial patterns on the other areas, however, suggest association with free water and our results demonstrate the need for site-specific considerations. Researchers should be aware of the potential to satisfy water demand with pre-formed and metabolic water for a variety of species in studies that address the effects of wildlife water developments. We encourage incorporation of spatial structure in model error components in future ecological research.

Keywords

Guzzler Monte Carlo Spatial pattern Spatial structure Water development 

References

  1. Akaike H (1973) Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F (eds) Second international symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 267–281Google Scholar
  2. Alcorn JR, Richardson F (1951) The chukar partridge in Nevada. J Wildl Manage 15:265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alkon PU, Pinshow B, Degen AA (1982) Seasonal water turnover rates and body water volumes in desert chukars. Condor 84:332–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alkon PU, Degen AA, Pinshow B, Shaw PJ (1985) Phenology, diet, and water turnover rates of Negev Desert Chukars. J Arid Environ 9:51–61Google Scholar
  5. Bailey TC, Gatrell AC (1995) Interactive spatial data analysis. Prentice Hall, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  6. Benolkin PJ (1990). Strategic placement of artificial watering devices for use by chukar partridge. In: Tsukamoto GK, Stiver SJ (eds) Proceedings of wildlife water development symposium, 30 November–1 December, Las Vegas, Nevada. Nevada Chapter of the Wildlife Society, US Bureau of Land Management, and Nevada Department of Wildlife, Reno, NevadaGoogle Scholar
  7. Benolkin PJ, Benolkin AC (1994) Determination of a cost-benefit relationship between chukar populations, hunter utilization and the cost of artificial watering devices. Nevada Department of Wildlife, RenoGoogle Scholar
  8. Borralho R, Rito A, Rego F, Simoes H, Pinto PV (1998) Summer distribution of red-legged partridges Alectoris rufa in relation to water availability on Mediterranean farmland. Ibis 140:620–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown DE, Hagelin JC, Taylor M, Galloway J (1998) Gambel’s quail (Callipepla gambelii). In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The birds of North America, no. 321. The birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  10. Broyles B (1995) Desert wildlife water developments: questioning use in the southwest. Wildl Soc Bull 23:663–675Google Scholar
  11. Broyles B (1997) Reckoning real costs and secondary benefits of artificial game waters in southwestern Arizona. In: Proceedings of symposium on environmental, economic, and legal issues related to rangeland water development. College of Law, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA, pp 236–253Google Scholar
  12. Broyles B, Cutler TL (1999) Effect of surface water on desert bighorn sheep in the Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge, southwestern Arizona. Wildl Soc Bull 27:1082–1088Google Scholar
  13. Cain III JW, Krausman PR, Morgart JR, Jansen BD, Pepper MP (2008) Responses of desert bighorn sheep to removal of water sources. Wildlife Monographs 171Google Scholar
  14. Chambers JM, Cleveland WS, Kleiner B, Tukey PA (1983) Graphical methods for data analysis. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole, MontereyGoogle Scholar
  15. Christensen GC (1952) An ecological study of the chukar partridge in western Nevada. Thesis, University of Nevada, RenoGoogle Scholar
  16. Christensen GC (1954) The chukar partridge in Nevada. Nevada Fish and Game Commission Biological Bulletin No. 1, NevadaGoogle Scholar
  17. Christensen GC (1970) The chukar partridge: its introduction, life history, and management. Nevada Department of Fish and Game, Biological Bulletin no 4, NevadaGoogle Scholar
  18. Christensen GC (1996) Chukar (Alectoris chukar). In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The birds of North America, no 258. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia and The American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  19. Churchwell R, Ratti JT (2004) Comparison of fall and winter food habits for sympatric chukar and gray partridge in Hells Canyon of Idaho and Oregon. Northwest Sci 78:42–47Google Scholar
  20. Cressie NAC (1985) Fitting variogram models by weighted least squares. Math Geol 17:563–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dayani A (1986) Fall food items utilized by chukars in central Alborz protected region, Iran. Linz Biol Beitr 18:95–99Google Scholar
  22. Degen AA, Pinshow B, Alkon PU (1983) Summer water turnover rates in free-living chukars and sand partridges in the Negev Desert. Condor 83:333–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Degen AA, Pinshow B, Shaw PJ (1984) Must desert chukars (Alectoris chukar sinaica) drink water? Water influx and body mass changes in response to dietary water content. Auk 101:47–52Google Scholar
  24. Dice LR (1943) The biotic provinces of North America. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  25. Fenneman NM (1931) Physiography of the western United States. McGraw-Hill Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Fischer RA, Reese KP, Connelly JW (1996) Influence of vegetal moisture content and nest fate on timing of female sage grouse migration. Condor 98:868–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fortin M-J, Dale M (2005) Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Glading B (1947) Game watering devices for the arid southwest. Trans North American Wildlife Conference 12:286–292Google Scholar
  29. Harper HT, Harry BH, Bailey WD (1958) The chukar partridge in California. Calif Fish Game 44:5–50Google Scholar
  30. Jackson RB, Carpenter SR, Dahm CN, McKnight DE, Naiman RJ, Postel SL, Running SW (2001) Water in a changing world. Ecol Appl 11:1027–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Knight RL, Every DA, Erickson AW (1979) Seasonal food habits of four game bird species in Okanogan County, Washington. The Murrelet 60:58–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krausman PR, Rosenstock SS, Cain JW III (2006) Developed waters for wildlife: science, perception, values, and controversy. Wildl Soc Bull 34:563–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Larsen RT, Flinders JT, Mitchell DL, Perkins ER, Whiting DG (2007) Chukar watering patterns and water site selection. Range Ecol Manage 60:559–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leopold A (1933) Game management. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Lindbloom AJ (1998) Habitat use, reproduction, movements, and survival of chukar partridge in west-central Idaho. M.S., University of Idaho, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  36. Long JL (1981) Introduced birds of the world; the worldwide history, distribution, and influence of birds introduced to new environments. Universe Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Lowry JHJ, Ramsey RD, Boykin K, Bradford D, Comer P, Falzarano S, Kepner W, Kirby J, Langs L, Prior-Magee J, Manis G, O’Brien L, Sajwaj T, Thomas KA, Rieth W, Schrader S, Schrupp D, Schulz K, Thompson B, Velasquez C, Wallace C, Waller E, Wolk B (2005) Southwest regional gap analysis project: final report on land cover mapping methods. RS/GIS Laboratory, Utah State University, LoganGoogle Scholar
  38. Messerli JR (1970) Water in relation to the establishment of chukar partridge in Utah deserts. M.S., Utah State University, LoganGoogle Scholar
  39. Naifa L (1995) Ecological investigations of chukar partridge in northwest China. Ann Rev World Pheas Assoc 4:4–48Google Scholar
  40. Nicolls KE (1961) Influences of “gallinaceous guzzlers” on selected chukar partridge population characteristics in western Colorado. M.S., Colorado State University, Fort CollinsGoogle Scholar
  41. Nygren LR (1963) Summer habits and habitat of chukar partridge in northern Utah. M.S., Utah State University, UtahGoogle Scholar
  42. Pearce F (2006) When the rivers run dry: water the defining crisis of the twenty-first century. Beacon Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  43. Rosenstock SS, Ballard WB, Devos JC Jr (1999) Viewpoint: benefits and impacts of wildlife water developments. J Range Manage 52:302–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Serventy DL (1971) Biology of desert birds. In: Farner DS, King JR, Parkes KC (eds) Avian biology. Academic Press, New York, pp 287–339Google Scholar
  45. Shaw WW (1971) The effects of available water upon populations of chukar partridge on desert mountains of Utah. M.S., Utah State University, LoganGoogle Scholar
  46. Stiver SJ (1993) Chukar population and utilization relationships to artificial watering devices. Nevada Department of Wildlife. Report Project W-48-R-24, Study R-XVIII, Job 1, Reno, NevadaGoogle Scholar
  47. R Development Core Team (2007) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 24 June 2008
  48. Thornthwaite CW (1931) The climates of North America according to a new classification. Geogr Rev 21:633–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Walter H (2000) Ecology of the chukar in eastern Oregon. M.S., University of Idaho, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  50. Walter H (2002) Natural history and ecology of the chukar (Alectoris chukar) in the northern Great Basin. Great Basin Birds 5:28–37Google Scholar
  51. Walter H, Reese KP (2003) Fall diet of chukars (Alectoris chukar) in eastern Oregon and discovery of ingested lead pellets. West N Am Nat 63:402–405Google Scholar
  52. Weaver HR, Haskell WL (1967) Some fall foods of Nevada chukar partridge. J Wildl Manage 31:582–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zembal RL (1977) The feeding habits of the chukar partridge (Alectoris chukar) in the Argus and Coso mountains of California. M.S., California State University, Long BeachGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Randy T. Larsen
    • 1
  • John A. Bissonette
    • 2
  • Jerran T. Flinders
    • 3
  • Mevin B. Hooten
    • 4
  • Tammy L. Wilson
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, 407 WIDBBrigham Young UniversityProvoUSA
  2. 2.United States Geological Survey, Utah Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research UnitUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  3. 3.Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, 275 WIDBBrigham Young UniversityProvoUSA
  4. 4.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  5. 5.Department of Wildland ResourcesUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations