Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dwindling resources and fragmentation of landscapes around parks: wetlands and forest patches around Kibale National Park, Uganda

Landscape Ecology volume 24, pages 643–656 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Landscapes surrounding parks in most of the developing world, while still containing considerable biodiversity, also have rapidly growing human populations and associated agricultural development. Since the establishment of Kibale National Park first as a Crown Forest Reserve in 1932 and later as a park in 1993 in western Uganda, most access and resource extraction has been prohibited. The park has become nearly a complete island of forested land cover surrounded by intensive small-scale agriculture and some large-scale tea plantations, along with a network of wetland and forest patches. As the population grows outside the park and land becomes more scarce, remaining forests and wetlands are being used more intensively for material resources (e.g., fuelwood, building poles) and converted to other land uses (e.g., pasture, agriculture). This study uses both discrete and continuous data analyses of satellite imagery to examine these diminishing resource bases at the landscape level placing the results within the social context of conservation and parks. Findings reveal that the park boundaries have remained fairly intact whereas, the landscape surrounding the park has become increasingly fragmented. From a landscape perspective, while the park has indeed maintained its forest cover, it has become increasingly islandized with wetland and forest patches in the surrounding landscape becoming smaller in number and size. Those that have survived are now more isolated and even lower productivity than in 1984, which may be a precursor to their eventual loss in this landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Bakema RJ, Iyango L (2000) Engaging local users in the management of wetland resources: the case of the National Wetlands Programme, Uganda. IUCN Eastern Africa Regional Office, Nairobi, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  • Banana AY, Gombya-Ssembajjwe W (1998) Successful forest management: the importance of security of tenure and rule enforcement in Ugandan forests. In: Gibson C, McKean M, Ostrom E (eds) Forest resources and institutions. Working paper 3. Food and agricultural organization of the united nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/ac694e/AC694E00.HTM

  • Basset TJ, Koli Bi Z (2000) Environmental discourses and the Ivorian savanna. Ann Assoc Geogr 90(1):67–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DG, Duh J-D, Drzyzga SA (2000) Estimating error in an analysis of forest fragmentation change using North American landscape characterization (NALC) data. Remote Sens Environ 71:106–117. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00070-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman C, Lambert J (2000) Habitat alteration and the conservation of African primates: a case study of Kibale National Park, Uganda. Am J Primatol 50:169–186. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(200003)50:3<169::AID-AJP1>3.0.CO;2-P

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman LJ, Balirwa J, Bugenyi FWB, Chapman C, Crisman TL (2001) Wetlands of East Africa: biodiversity, exploitation, and policy perspectives. In: Gopal B, Junk WJ, Davis JA (eds) Biodiversity in wetlands: assessment, function and conservation, vol 2. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 101–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CA, Wasserman MD, Gillespie TR, Speirs ML, Lawes MJ, Saj TL, Zieglers TE (2006) Do food availability, parasitism, and stress have synergistic effects on red colobus populations living in forest fragments? Am J Phys Anthropol 131:525–534. doi:10.1002/ajpa.20477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chatelain C, Gautier L, Spichiger R (1996) A recent history of forest fragmentation in southwestern Ivory Coast. Biodiv Cons 5:37–53. doi:10.1007/BF00056291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavez PS Jr (1996) Image-based atmospheric corrections—revisited and improved. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 62(9):1025–1036

    Google Scholar 

  • Cihlar J (2000) Land cover mapping of large areas from satellites: status and research priorities. Int J Remote Sens 21(6 & 7):1093–1114. doi:10.1080/014311600210092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisman TL, Chapman LJ, Chapman CA, Kaufman LS (2003) Conservation, ecology and management of African fresh waters. University Press of Florida, Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan BW, Boyle S, Breininger DR, Schmalzer PA (1999) Coupling past management practice and historic landscape change on John F. Kennedy Space Center, Florida. Land Ecol 14:291–309. doi:10.1023/A:1008029831187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foody GM (2002) Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sens Environ 80:185–201. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00295-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics. The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox J, Rindfuss RR, Walsh SJ, Mishra V (2003) People and the environment. Approaches for linking household and community surveys to remote sensing and GIS. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RM, Groom GB, Mugisha S, Ipulet P, Pomeroy D, Katende A, Bailey R, Ogutu-Ohwayo R (1998) The integration of field survey and remote sensing for biodiversity assessment: a case study in the tropical forests and wetlands of Sango Bay, Uganda. Biol Conserv 86:379–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gascon C, Williamson GB, da Fonseca GAB (2000) Receding forest edges and vanishing reserves. Science 288:1356–1358. doi:10.1126/science.288.5470.1356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geist HJ, Lambin E (2001) What drives tropical deforestation? A meta-analysis of proximate causes of deforestation based on subnational case study evidence. LUCC Report Series No. 4. http://www.geo.ucl.ac.be/LUCC/lucc.html. Accessed 11 Jan 2005

  • Geist HJ, Lambin EF (2002) Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience 52:143–150. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:PCAUDF]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie TR, Chapman CA (2006) Prediction of parasite infection dynamics in primate metapopulations based on attributes of forest fragmentation. Cons Bio 20(2):441–448. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00290.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman A, Hartter J, Southworth J, Binford M (2008) Studying the human landscape around Kibale National Park. In: Wrangham R, Ross E (eds) Science and conservation in a Ugandan forest: how long-term research can help habitat management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 129–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Haack B (1996) Monitoring wetland changes with remote sensing: an East African example. Environ Manag 20:411–419. doi:10.1007/BF01203848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartter J (2007) Landscape change around Kibale National Park, Uganda: impacts on land cover, land use, and livelihoods. PhD Dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville

  • Hayes TM (2006) Parks, people, and forest protection: an intuitional assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas. World Dev 34(12):2064–2075. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill J, Curran P (2003) Area, shape and isolation of tropical forest fragments: effects on tree species diversity and implications for conservation. J Biogeogr 30(9):1391–1403. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00930.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard P, Davenport T, Kigenyi F, Viskanic P, Baltzer M, Dickinson C, Lwanga J, Matthews R, Mupada E (2000) Protected area planning in the tropics: Uganda’s national system of forest nature reserves. Cons Bio 14(3):858–875. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99180.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme D, Murphree M (eds) (2001) African wildlife and livelihoods: the promise and performance of community conservation. James Curry, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JR (1996) Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin EF (1997) Modelling and monitoring land cover change processes in tropical regions. Prog Phys Geogr 21(3):375–393. doi:10.1177/030913339702100303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Bierregaard RO Jr (eds) (1997) Tropical forest remnants—ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Lovejoy TE, Vasconcelos HL, Bruna E, Didham R, Stouffer P, Gascon C, Bierregaard R, Laurance S, Sampiao E (2002) Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: a 22-year investigation. Cons Bio 16:605–618. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01025.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepp A, Holland S (2006) A comparison of attitudes toward state-led conservation and community-based conservation in the village of Bigodi, Uganda. Soc Nat Resour 19:609–623. doi:10.1080/08941920600742377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLean I, Tinch R, Hassal M, Boar R (2003) Social and economic use of wetland resources: a case study from Lake Bunyonyi, Uganda. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, Norwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh LK, Chapman CA, Norconk M, Wallis J, Umapathy G, Bicca-Marques JC, Gilbert K, Ferarri S, Scott S (2003) Fragmentation: specter of the future of the spirit of conservation? In: Marsh LK (ed) Primates in fragments: ecology and conservation. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp 381–398

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-351. U.S. Department of agriculture, forest service. Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra HJ, Southworth J, Tucker C (2003) Accessibility as a determinant of landscape transformation in western Honduras: linking pattern and process. Landscape Ecol 18(2):141–158. doi:10.1023/A:1024430026953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra H, Pareeth S, Ghate R (2006) People within parks–forest villages, land-cover change and landscape fragmentation in the Tadoba Andhari Tiger Reserve, India. Appl Geogr 26:96–112. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton-Treves L (1998) Predicting patterns of crop damage by wildlife around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Cons Bio 12(1):156–168. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96346.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NEMA National Environment Management Authority (2001) State of environment report for Uganda 2000/2001. Kampala

  • NRC National Research Council, Board on Sustainable Development, Policy Division, Committee on Global Change Research (1999) Global environmental change: research pathways for the next decade. National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Onderdonk DA, Chapman CA (2000) Coping with forest fragmentation: the primates of Kibale National Park, Uganda. Int J Primatol 21(4):587–611. doi:10.1023/A:1005509119693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey-Benayas JM, Pope KO (1995) Landscape ecology and diversity patterns in the seasonal tropics from Landsat TM imagery. Ecol Appl 5(2):386–394. doi:10.2307/1942029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson BJ (1993) Environmental management in Uganda: the importance of property law and local government in wetlands conservation. J Afr Law 37(2):109–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riitters K, Wickham J, O’Neill R, Jones B, Smith E (2000) Global-scale patterns of forest fragmentation. Cons Ecol 4(2):3. http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss2/art3/

    Google Scholar 

  • Runte A (1997) National Parks. The American experience, 3rd edn. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweik CM, Thomas C (2002) Using remote sensing for evaluating environmental institutions: a habitat conservation planning example. Soc Sci Quart 83:244–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serneels S, Said MY, Lambin EF (2001) Land cover changes around a major East African wildlife reserve: the Mara ecosystem (Kenya). Int J Remote Sens 22(17):3397–3420. doi:10.1080/01431160152609236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiva S, Bandyopadhyay J (1983) Eucalyptus—a disastrous tree for India. Ecologist 13(5):184–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Southworth J, Munroe D, Nagendra H (2004) Land cover change and landscape fragmentation—comparing the utility of continuous and discrete analyses for a western Honduras Region. Agric Ecosyst Environ 101:185–205. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2003.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southworth J, Nagendra H, Munroe DK (2006) Introduction to the special issue: are parks working? Exploring human-environment tradeoffs in protected area conservation. Appl Geogr 26:87–95. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer P, Bierregaard R (1995) Use of Amazonian forest fragments by understory insectivorous birds. Ecology 76:2429–2445. doi:10.2307/2265818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struhsaker T (1997) Ecology of an African rain forest: logging in Kibale and the conflict between conservation and exploitation. University Press of Florida, Gainesville

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner I, Corlett R (1996) The conservation value of small, isolated fragments of lowland tropical rain forest. Trends Ecol Evol 11(8):330–333. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(96)10046-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock CE, Gopal S (2000) Fuzzy set theory and thematic maps: accuracy assessment and area estimation. Int J GIS 14(2):153–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods CH, Skole D (1998) Linking satellite, census, and survey data to study deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. In: Liverman D, Moran EF, Rindfuss RR, Stern PC (eds) People and pixels: linking remote sensing and social science. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 70–93

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation grant (#0352008), a Working Forests in the Tropics Field Research Grant, and the Center for African Studies David L. Niddrie Memorial Scholarship. Permission to conduct this research was granted by the University of Florida Institutional Review Board, Uganda National Council for Science and Technology, and the Uganda Wildlife Authority. We appreciate the continued cooperation with Makerere University Biological Field Station and colleagues Abe Goldman, Mike Binford, Colin and Lauren Chapman, Patrick Omeja, Dennis Twinomugisha, and Aventino Kasangaki. We are especially grateful to our field assistants Agaba Erimosi and Mwesigwe Peace for their hard work and diligence in data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, University of New Hampshire, 102 Huddleston Hall, 73 Main Street, Durham, NH, 03824, USA

    Joel Hartter

  2. Department of Geography and Land Use and Environmental Change Institute (LUECI), University of Florida, 3141 Turlington Hall, P.O. Box 117315, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

    Jane Southworth

Authors
  1. Joel Hartter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jane Southworth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel Hartter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hartter, J., Southworth, J. Dwindling resources and fragmentation of landscapes around parks: wetlands and forest patches around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Landscape Ecol 24, 643–656 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9339-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9339-7

Keywords

search

Navigation