Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Farmland bird responses to intersecting replanted areas

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite increasing revegetation of cleared landscapes around the world, there is limited research on the implications of different types of plantings for birdlife. We examined the “intersection effect”, whereby species richness is higher at the intersection of “corridors” or vegetation strips for birds inhabiting replanted areas. We also examined individual species responses. Replicated sites at the intersections of plantings were compared with “internal controls” (located in the same plantings ∼100 m from intersections), “external controls”(sites in isolated linear plantings), and block plantings. We surveyed the 39 sites in our experimental design repeatedly – on different days by different observers and in different seasons. We found no significant difference in species richness between intersections and block plantings, but intersections had higher species richness than isolated linear strips and the internal controls. Similar results were found for bird assemblage scores derived by correspondence analysis. We found evidence of extra-variation at the farm-level for species richness and derived assemblage scores, suggesting a farm-scale response. This suggests the importance of other (often unmeasured) factors at the farm level (e.g. baiting for feral animals). Our results suggest that replanting programs aimed at maximizing bird species richness may benefit from consideration of planting geometry. In particular, linking strip plantings to create intersections and/or establishing block plantings appear to be superior to isolated strips for aggregate species richness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett G (2000) Birds on farms: ecological management for agricultural sustainability. Supplement to Wingspan: Volume 10 (4). Birds Australia, Victoria, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudry J (1984) Effects of landscape structure on biological communities: the case of hedgerow network landscapes. In: Brandt J, Agger P (eds) Proceedings of the first international seminar on methodology in landscape ecological research and planning. Roskilde Universitetsforlag GeoRuc, Roskilde, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett AF (1998) Linkages in the landscape: the role of corridors and connectivity in wildlife conservation. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett AF, Kimber S, Ryan P (2000) Revegetation and wildlife. A guide to enhancing revegetated habitats for wildlife conservation in rural environments. Bushcare Research Report 2/00. Bushcare National Research and Development Program Research Report, Canberra, Australia

  • Benson J (1999) Setting the scene—the native vegetation of New South Wales. Native Vegetation Advisory Council. Royal Botanic Gardens, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond SJ (2004) Do woodland birds breed in revegetated sites? Honours Thesis. The Australian National University, Canberra

  • Brooker L (2002) The application of focal species knowledge to landscape design in agricultural lands. Landsc Urban Plan 60:185–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper CB, Walters JR, Ford H (2002) Effects of remnant size and connectivity on the response of Brown Treecreepers to habitat fragmentation. Emu 102:249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham RB, Lindenmayer DB, Nix HA, Lindenmayer BD (1999) Quantifying observer heterogeneity in bird counts. Aust J Ecol 24:270–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham RB, Lindenmayer DB, Crane M, Michael D, MacGregor C (2007) Large scale revegetation and mammal and reptile response: novel multi-scale and interactive effects. Ecol Appl 17:609–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Er K, Tidemann CR (1996) Importance of Yellow Box-Blakely’s Red Gum woodland remnants in maintaining bird species diversity: inferences from seasonal data. Corella 20:117–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Field SA, Tyre AJ, Possingham HP (2002) Estimating bird species richness: how should repeat surveys be organized in time? Austral Ecol 27:624–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J Lindenmayer DB (2002) The conservation value of paddock trees for birds in a variegated landscape in southern New South Wales. I. Species composition and site occupancy patterns. Biodivers Conserv 11:807–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RF (1995) Landscape mosaics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenberger D (2001) Bush for the birds: biodiversity enhancement guidelines for the Saltshaker Project, Boorowa, NSW. CSIRO and Greening Australia, ACT and SE NSW Inc

  • Freudenberger D, Harvey J (2004) Predicting biodiversity benefits of the Saltshaker Project, Boorowa, NSW. Ecol Manage Restor 5:5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry GL (1989) Conservation in agricultural ecosystems. In: Spellerberg IF, Goldsmith FB, Morris MG (eds) The scientific management of temperate communities for conservation. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Galwey NW (2006) Introduction to mixed modelling: beyond regression and analysis of variance. John Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons P, Boak M (2002) The value of paddock trees for regional conservation in an agricultural landscape. Ecol Manage Restor 3:205–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenacre MJ (1984) Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Greening Australia (2001) Bringing birds back: a glovebox guide for bird identification and habitat restoration in ACT and SE NSW. Greening Australia ACT and SE NSW, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Yates CJ (2000) Temperate eucalypt woodlands in Australia. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh R, Law B, Lemckert F, Stanton M, Chidle M, Brassil T, Towerton A, Herring M (2005) Biodiversity in eucalypt plantings established to reduce salinity. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Report 05/165. November 2005, Canberra, Australia

  • Keast A (1968) Seasonal movements in the Australian honeyeaters (Meliphagidae) and their ecological significance. Emu 67:159–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinross C (2004) Avian use of farm habitats, including windbreaks, on the New South Wales tablelands. Pac Conserv Biol 10:180–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig WD (1998) Spatial autocorrelation in California land birds. Conserv Biol 12:612–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lack PC (1988) Hedge intersections and breeding bird distribution in farmland. Bird Study 35:133–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambeck RJ (1999) Landscape planning for biodiversity conservation in agricultural regions. A case study from the wheatbelt of Western Australia. Biodiversity Technical Paper No. 2. pp 1–96. Environment Australia, Canberra, Australia

  • Levey DJ, Bolker BM, Tewksbury JJ, Sargent S, Haddad NM (2005) Effects of landscape corridors on seed dispersal by birds. Science 309:146–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Beaton E, Crane M, Michael D, MacGregor C, Cunningham R (2005) Woodlands: a disappearing landscape. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J (2006) Habitat fragmentation and landscape change: an ecological and conservation synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J (2007) Tackling the habitat fragmentation panchreston. Trends Ecol Evol 22:127–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin WK, Eyears-Chaddock M, Wilson BR, Lemon J (2004) The value of habitat reconstruction to birds at Gunnedah, New South Wales. Emu 104:177–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Némethová D, Tirinda A (2005) The influence of intersections and dead-ends of line-corridors networks on the breeding bird distribution. Folia Zool 54:123–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF (1987) Corridors in real landscapes: a reply to Simberloff and Cox. Conserv Biol 1:159–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF, Beier P (2000) Arguing over little things: response to Haddad et al. Conserv Biol 15:1546–1548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH, Recher HF (1983) Censusing Australian birds: a summary of procedures and a scheme for the standardization of data presentation and storage. In: Davies SJ (ed) Methods of censusing birds in Australia. Proceedings of a symposium organised by the Zoology section of the ANZAAS and the Western Australian Group of the Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union. Department of Conservation and Environment, Perth, Australia, pp 55–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Riffell SK, Gutziller KJ (1996) Plant-species richness in corridor intersections: is intersection shape influential? Landsc Ecol 11:157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D (1992) Habitat use and foraging behaviour of the Scarlet Robin and the Flame Robin at a site of breeding season sympatry. Wildlife Res 19:377–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg DK, Noon BR, Meslow EC (1997) Biological corridors: form, function and efficacy. BioScience 47:677–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan PA (2000) The use of revegetated areas by vertebrate fauna in Australia: a review. In: Hobbs RJ, Yates C (eds) Temperate eucalypt woodlands in Australia: biology, conservation, management and restoration. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, Australia, pp 318–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt D, Lindenmayer DB, Hobbs RJ (2004) Trees and biodiversity. a guide for Australian farm forestry. Joint Venture Agroforestry Program. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Schall R (1991) Estimation in generalized linear models with random effects. Biometrika 78:719–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, J, Briggs S, Doyle S (2001) Birds in woodland of the central wheat/sheep belt of New South Wales. NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, Canberra. February 2001

  • Simberloff D, Farr JA, Cox J, Mehlman DW (1992) Movement corridors: conservation bargains or poor investments? Conserv Biol 6:493–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith PA (1994) Autocorrelation in logistic regression modeling of species’ distribution. Global Ecol Biogeogr 4:47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirzaker R, Vertessy R, Sarre A (eds) (2002) Trees, water and salt: an Australian guide to using trees for healthy catchment and productive farms. Joint Venture Agroforestry Program, Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Natural Heritage Trust, Land and Water Australia and Australian Research Council grants to The Australian National University. Dr. J. Fischer and Dr. A. Manning kindly assisted with several aspects of the study and made useful critical comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. We most gratefully acknowledge the private landholders who allowed access to their properties.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David B. Lindenmayer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindenmayer, D.B., Cunningham, R., Crane, M. et al. Farmland bird responses to intersecting replanted areas. Landscape Ecol 22, 1555–1562 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9156-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9156-9

Keywords

Navigation