Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The importance of functional connectivity in the conservation of a ground-dwelling mammal in an urban Australian landscape

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The distribution of the northern brown bandicoot (Isoodon macrourus), a medium-sized ground-dwelling marsupial, was examined in habitat fragments within the urban landscape of the city of Brisbane, Australia. From surveys conducted in 68 fragments, bandicoots were found to be present in 33 (49%) despite widespread habitat loss and fragmentation. Logistic regression analysis revealed that of 13 measured independent variables, functional connectivity was the only factor that significantly predicted the presence of bandicoots within fragments, with connectivity positively correlated with the likelihood of occupation. Functional connectivity was equated to the likelihood of bandicoot immigration into the focal fragment from the nearest occupied fragment, based on the estimated resistance to movement offered by the intervening matrix. Within Brisbane, riparian habitat fragments typically have a relatively high level of functional connectivity, as thin strips of vegetation fringing waterways serve as corridors between larger riparian areas and facilitate the movement of bandicoots between patches. Analyses based on the Akaike Information Criterion revealed that the optimal model based on landscape context variables was convincingly better supported by the data than the optimal model produced from fragment characteristics. However, it is important to examine both internal attributes of habitat fragments and external features of the surrounding landscape when modelling the distribution of ground-dwelling fauna in urban environments, or other landscapes with a highly variable matrix. As urban centres throughout the world expand, it is crucial that the ecology of local wildlife be considered to ensure functional connection is maintained between habitat patches, especially for the conservation of species that are highly susceptible to fragmentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abensperg-Traun M, Smith GT (1999) How small is too small for small animals? Four terrestrial arthropod species in different-sized remnant woodlands in agricultural Western Australia. Biodiv Conserv 8:709–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams LA (1994) Urban wildlife habitats: a landscape perspective. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Akaike H (1973) Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F (eds) Second international symposium on information theory. Akedemiai Kiado, pp 267–281

  • Andrén H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews A (1990) Fragmentation of habitat by roads and utility corridors: a review. Aust Zool 26:130–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Meterology (2004) Climate averages for Australian sites: Archerfield airport, Brisbane (Station 040211). Australian Government, Canberra, ACT

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender DJ, Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2003) Using patch isolation metrics to predict animal movement in binary landscapes. Landsc Ecol 18:17–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett AF (1987) Conservation of mammals within a fragmented forest environment: the contributions of insular biogeography and autecology. In: Saunders DA, Arnold GW, Burbidge AA, Hopkins AJM (eds) Nature conservation: the role of remnants of native vegetation. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Sydney, pp 41–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett AF (1991) Roads, roadsides and wildlife conservation: a review. In: Saunders A, Hobbs R (eds) Nature conservation 2: the role of corridors. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Sydney, pp 99–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett AF, Kimber SL, Ryan PA (2000) Revegetation and wildlife: a guide to enhancing revegetated habitats for wildlife conservation in rural environments. Environment Australia, Canberra, p 33

    Google Scholar 

  • Brisbane City Council (2001) State of the Environment Report. Brisbane City Council, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Brotons L, Monkkonen M, Martin JL (2003) Are fragments islands? Landscape context and density-area relationships in boreal forest birds. Am Nat 162:343–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Kodric-Brown A (1977) Turnover rates in insular biogeography – effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58:445–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Catterall CP, Kingston M (1993) Remnant Bushland of South East Queensland in the 1990’s: Its Distribution, Loss, Ecological Consequences, and Future Prospects. Griffith University, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins JP, Kinzig A, Grimm NB, Fagan WF, Hope D, Wu J, Borer ET (2000) A New Urban Ecology. Am Sci 88:416–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conover WJ, Iman RL (1981) Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Am Stat 35:124–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox MP, Dickman CR, Hunter J (2004) Effects of rainforest fragmentation on non-flying mammals of the Eastern Dorrigo Plateau, Australia. Biol Conserv 115:175–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drinnan IN (2005) The search for fragmentation thresholds in a Southern Sydney Suburb. Biol Conserv 124:339–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RT, Alexander LE (1998) Roads and their major ecological effects. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 29:207–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon G (1974) Movements and activity of the short-nosed bandicoot Isoodon macrourus Gould (Marsupialia). Mammalia 38:405–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon G (1995) The northern brown bandicoot Isoodon macrourus (Gould 1842). In: Strahan R (ed) The mammals of Australia. Reed Books Australia, Sydney, pp 174–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn R, Mangel M (1997) The ecological detective: confronting models with data. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JB, Omland KS (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Evol Ecol 19:101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low T (1993) The fauna of Brisbane: unpublished report to Brisbane City Council, Brisbane

  • Newell GR (1999) Responses of Lumholtz’s tree-kangaroo (Dendrolagus lumholtzi) to loss of habitat within a tropical rainforest fragment. Biol Conserv 91:181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nupp TE, Swihart RK (2000) Landscape-level correlates of small-mammal assemblages in forest fragments of farmland. J Mammal 81:512–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patten D (1975) A diversity index for quantifying habitat “edge”. Wildlife Soc Bull 3:171–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Department of Local Government, Planning (2003) Population and housing fact sheet: Brisbane City. Queensland Government, Brisbane, p 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DA, Ingram JA (1987) Factors affecting survival of breeding populations of Carnaby’s cockatoo Calyptorhynchus funereus latirostris in remnants of native vegetation. In: Saunders DA, Arnold GW, Burbidge AA, Hopkins AJM (eds) Nature conservation: the role of remnants of native vegetation. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Sydney, pp 249–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. W. H. Freeman & Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Statsoft Inc. (2003) STATISTICA: Data analysis software program

  • Swihart RK, Atwood TC, Goheen JR, Scheiman DM, Munroe KE, Gehring TM (2003) Patch occupancy of North American mammals: is patchiness in the eye of the beholder? J Biogeogr 30:1259–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor BD, Goldingay RL (2003) Cutting the carnage: wildlife usage of road culverts in north-eastern New South Wales. Wildlife Res 30:529–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor BD, Goldingay RL (2004) Wildlife road-kills on three major roads in north-eastern New South Wales. Wildlife Res 31:83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PD, Fahrig L, Henein K, Merriam G (1993) Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68:571–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2000) On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos 90:7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tischendorf L, Bender DJ, Fahrig L (2003) Evaluation of patch isolation metrics in mosaic landscapes for specialist vs. generalist dispersers. Landsc Ecol 18:41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trombulak SC, Frissell CA (2000) Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conserv Biol 14:18–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umapathy G, Kumar A (2000) The occurrence of arboreal mammals in the rain forest fragments in the Anamalai Hills, south India. Biol Conserv 92:311–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeylen G, De Bruyn L, Adriaensen F, Matthysen E (2003) Does matrix resistance influence Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris L. 1758) distribution in an urban landscape? Landsc Ecol 18:791–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos CC, Antonisse-de Jong AG, Goedhart PW, Smulders MJM (2001) Genetic similarity as a measure for connectivity between fragmented populations of the moor frog (Rana arvalis). Heredity 86:598–608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA, Milne BT (1989) Scaling of ‘landscapes’ in landscape ecology, or, landscape ecology from a beetle’s perspective. Landsc Ecol 3:87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank The University of Queensland and the Brisbane City Council for extensive financial and in-kind support of the project, as well as the Australian Geographic Society and Royal Zoological Society of NSW for additional funding. The advice and assistance of Darryl Jones, Steve Van Dyke, Greg Gordon, David Paull, Lisa Pope, Stacey McLean, Mel Venz, Luke Hogan and Gwendolyn David was also greatly appreciated. We also thank the reviewers of this manuscript for their constructive criticisms and suggested changes, especially Dean Anderson. This research was conducted under clearance from The University of Queensland Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee and a Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service Scientific Purposes Permit.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean I. FitzGibbon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

FitzGibbon, S.I., Putland, D.A. & Goldizen, A.W. The importance of functional connectivity in the conservation of a ground-dwelling mammal in an urban Australian landscape. Landscape Ecol 22, 1513–1525 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9139-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9139-x

Keywords

Navigation