Landscape Ecology

, 22:103 | Cite as

Historical landscape ecology of an urbanized California valley: wetlands and woodlands in the Santa Clara Valley

  • Robin M. Grossinger
  • Charles J. Striplen
  • Ruth A. Askevold
  • Elise Brewster
  • Erin E. Beller
Research Article

Abstract

Historical records provide information to land managers and landscape ecologists attempting to understand current trajectories in altered landscapes. In this study, we synthesized a heterogeneous array of historical sources to reconstruct historical land cover in California’s Santa Clara Valley (a.k.a. “Silicon Valley”). To increase and assess accuracy, we used the triangulation of overlapping, independent data sources and the application of certainty level standards. The region has been subject to extensive urbanization, so we also evaluated the applicability of historical landscape reconstructions to the altered landscape. We found evidence for five major land cover types prior to significant Euro–American modification. Valley freshwater marsh, wet meadow, alkali meadow, willow grove, and valley oak savanna have all experienced extreme decline (85–100%) since Euro–American settlement. However, comparison of historical land cover patterns to contemporary land use suggested several new strategies for environmental recovery, despite the limitations of surrounding urbanization. We also observed a temporal shift in riparian habitat along the mainstem of Coyote Creek, from a relatively open mixture of riparian scrub, sycamore woodland, and unvegetated gravel bars to dense riparian forest, likely resulting from stream flow regulation. By identifying former land cover patterns we provide a basis for evaluating local landscape change and setting restoration targets, including the identification of residual features and under-recognized land cover types. These findings suggest that reliable historical landscape reconstructions can be developed in the absence of standardized historical data sources and can be of value even in highly modified regions.

Keywords

Landscape history Urban ecology Landscape heterogeneity Platanus racemosa Populus fremontii Quercus lobata 

References

  1. AirPhotoUSA, LLC (2002) [Natural color aerial photos of the Santa Clara Valley]. Ground resolution: 2’. PhoenixGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen RH (1932) The influence of Spanish and Mexican land grants on California agriculture. J Farm Econ 14:679–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen-Diaz B, Bartolome JW, McClaran MP (1999) California oak savanna. In: Anderson RC, Fralish JS, Baskin JM (eds) Savannas, barrens, and rock outcrop plant communities of North America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 322–339Google Scholar
  4. Andersen MD, Baker WL (2006) Reconstructing landscape-scale tree invasion using survey notes in the Medicine Bow Mountains, Wyoming, USA. Landscape Ecol 21:243–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersen OB, Crow TR, Lietz SM et al (1996) Transformation of a landscape in the upper mid-west, USA: the history of the lower St. Croix river valley, 1830 to present. Landscape Urban Plan 35:247–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson MK (1997) From tillage to table: the indigenous cultivation of geophytes for food in California. J Ethnobiol 17:149–169Google Scholar
  7. Arbuckle C (1986) Clyde Arbuckle’s history of San Jose: chronicling San Jose’s founding as California’s earliest pueblo... Memorabilia of San Jose, San JoseGoogle Scholar
  8. Askevold RA (2005) Interpreting historical maps to reconstruct past landscapes in the Santa Clara Valley. Master’s Thesis, San Francisco State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  9. Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) (2000) [Map of] regional existing land use. Digital format, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  10. Axelsson A-L, Östlund L, Hellberg E (2002) Changes in mixed deciduous forests of boreal Sweden 1866–1999 based on interpretation of historical records. Landscape Ecol 17:403–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baye PR, Faber PM, Grewell B (1999) Tidal marsh plants of the San Francisco Estuary. In: Baylands ecosystem species and community profiles. Prepared by the San Francisco Bay Area wetlands ecosystem goals project. USEPA, San Francisco & SF Bay RWQCB, Oakland, pp 9–32Google Scholar
  12. Blackburn TC, Anderson K (1993) Before the wilderness: environmental management by native Californians. Ballena Press, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
  13. Bolliger J, Schulte LA, Burrows SN et al (2004) Assessing ecological restoration potentials of Wisconsin (USA) using historical landscape reconstructions. Restoration Ecol 12:124–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bolton HE, Diaz J, Garces FTH et al (1930) Anza’s California expeditions. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  15. Borde AB, Thom RM, Rumrill S et al (2003) Geospatial habitat change analysis in Pacific Northwest coastal estuaries. Estuaries 26:1104–1116Google Scholar
  16. Bowman JN (1943) Indices to California land cases. California private land grant cases. The Bancroft Library, UC BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  17. Brewster E (2006) Land grant research and the pictorial collection. In: Faulhaber CB, Vincent S (eds) Exploring the bancroft library. Salt Lake City, Signature Books; Berkeley, Bancroft Library, pp 84–85Google Scholar
  18. Broek JOM (1932) The Santa Clara valley, California; a study in landscape changes. N. V. A. Oosthoek’s Uitgevers-Mu., UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  19. Brown AK (2002) Historical oak woodland detected through Armillaria mellea damage in fruit orchards. USDA Forest Service Gen Tech Rep PSW-GTR-184:651–661Google Scholar
  20. Brown AK (2005) Reconstructing early historical landscapes in the northern Santa Clara Valley. Santa Clara University, Santa ClaraGoogle Scholar
  21. Buchan LAJ, Randall PJ (2003) Assessment of stream ecosystem functions for the Coyote Creek watershed: Coyote Creek watershed integrated pilot assessment final report. SCVURPPP, San JoseGoogle Scholar
  22. California DFG, Stermer D (2003) Atlas of the biodiversity of California. California DFG, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  23. Campbell D, Fiske D (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 56:81–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Carroll MB (1903) Ten years in paradise. Leaves from a society reporter’s note-book. Press of Popp & Hogan, San JoseGoogle Scholar
  25. Clarke WC (1952) The vegetation cover of the San Francisco Bay region in the early Spanish period. Thesis, University of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  26. Clay KB (1999) Property rights and institutions: Congress and the California Land Act of 1851. J Econ Hist 59:122–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Clements FE (1920) Plant indicators. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. Cloak D, Buchan LAJ, SCVURPPP (2001) Stormwater environmental indicators demonstration project, Project 96-IRM-3. US EPAGoogle Scholar
  29. Collins BD, Montgomery DR, Sheikh AJ (2003) Reconstructing the historical riverine landscape of the Puget lowland. In: Montgomery DR (ed) Restoration of Puget Sound rivers. Center for Water and Watershed Studies in association with University of Washington Press, Seattle, pp 79–128Google Scholar
  30. Cooper WS (1926) Vegetational development upon alluvial fans in the vicinity of Palo Alto, California. Ecology 7:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Cousins SAO (2001) Analysis of land-cover transitions based on 17th and 18th century cadastral maps and aerial photographs. Landscape Ecol 16:41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Cowardin LM (1979) Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program, US Dept. of the Interior, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  33. Crespi J, Brown AK (2001) A description of distant roads: original journals of the first expedition into California, 1769–1770. San Diego State University Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  34. Crowell M, Leatherman SP, Buckley MK (1991) Historical shoreline change: error analysis and mapping accuracy. J Coastal Res 7:839–852Google Scholar
  35. Day S (1854) Field notes of the survey of the exterior boundaries of townships, the interior sections and other lines, and the standard parallel, described in the following notes, on the east side of the Mount Diablo meridian…, vol. R231. GLO, US Department of the Interior, BLM Rectangular Survey, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  36. Dedrick K (1985) Modern and historic mapping of tidal marshlands of San Francisco Bay, California. In: Fourth symposium on coastal zone management. BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  37. Delcourt HR, Delcourt PA (1996) Presettlement landscape heterogeneity: evaluating grain of resolution using General Land Office survey data. Landscape Ecol 11:363–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Denzin N (1978) The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Dettinger MD, Cayan DR, Diaz HF et al (1998) North-south precipitation patterns in western North America on interannual-to-decadal timescales. J Climate 11:3095–3111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Foote HS (1888) Pen pictures from the garden of the world... Lewis Pub. Co., ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  41. Foster DR, Motzkin G (1998) Ecology and conservation in the cultural landscape of New England: lessons from nature’s history. Northeastern Nat 5:111–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Friedly M (2000) This brief Eden: a history of landscape change in California’s Santa Clara Valley. Thesis (Ph.D.), Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  43. Gardner RA (1958) Soil survey, Santa Clara area, California. US Soil Conservation Service, California Agricultural Experiment Station, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  44. Goals Project (1999) Baylands ecosystem habitat goals. A report of habitat recommendations prepared by the San Francisco Bay Area Wetlands Ecosystem Goals Project. USEPA, San Francisco/SF Bay RWQCB, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  45. Gray WV, Gifford CB (1869) Bird’s-eye view of city of San Jose, Ca. George H. Hare, San JoseGoogle Scholar
  46. Green E (2006) Planting the future, one tree at a time. Los Angeles Times, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  47. Grossinger RM (2005) Documenting local landscape change: the San Francisco Bay Area historical ecology project. In: Egan D, Howell EA (eds) The historical ecology handbook: a restorationist’s guide to reference ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 425–442Google Scholar
  48. Grossinger RM, Askevold RA (2005) Historical analysis of California coastal landscapes: methods for the reliable acquisition, interpretation, and synthesis of archival data. Report to the USFWS SF Bay program, the Santa Clara University Environmental Studies Institute, and the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. SFEI Contribution 396. San Francisco Estuary Institute, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  49. Grossinger RM, Askevold RA, Striplen CJ, Brewster E, Pearce S, Larned KN, McKee LJ et al (2006) Coyote Creek watershed historical ecology study: historical condition, landscape change, and restoration potential in the eastern Santa Clara Valley, California. SFEI Publication 426. San Francisco Estuary Institute, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  50. Hamilton JG (1997) Changing perceptions of pre-European grasslands in California. Madroño 44:311–333Google Scholar
  51. Harley JB (1989) Historical geography and cartographic illusion. J Hist Cartogr 15:80–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Harley JB (1990) Text and contexts in the interpretation of early maps. In: Buisseret D (ed) From sea charts to satellite images: interpreting North American history through maps. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 3–15Google Scholar
  53. Healy CT (1857) County surveyor’s report. County of Santa Clara Surveyor’s Office, San Jose, Dec. 22d, 1857Google Scholar
  54. Healy CT (1859) A topographical map of the Rancho de Santa Teresa. Land case map E-408, US District Court, Northern DistrictGoogle Scholar
  55. Herrmann AT (1874) Map of Dan Rota’s segregation, the so called Stark Farm, a part of the Rancho Laguna Seca surveyed. SCCSO Herrmann map no. 229a. San JoseGoogle Scholar
  56. Herrmann AT (1905) Map of the pumping tests made during 1905 in the artesian belt of the Coyote River. Santa Clara County, California, San JoseGoogle Scholar
  57. Holstein G (1999) Plant communities ecotonal to the baylands. In: Baylands ecosystem species and community profiles. Prepared by the San Francisco Bay Area wetlands ecosystem goals project. USEPA, San Francisco, Calif./SF Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland, pp 49–68Google Scholar
  58. Holstein G (2001) Pre-agricultural grassland in Central California. Madroño 48:253–264Google Scholar
  59. Hornbeck D (1979) The patenting of California’s private land claims, 1851–1885. Geogr Rev 69:7–27Google Scholar
  60. Howe R (1851) Field notes on a meridian line south of Mount Diablo in the state of California, vol. R231. GLO, US Department of the Interior, BLM Rectangular Survey, California, Township 7 South, Range 1 EastGoogle Scholar
  61. Jones, Stokes (2006) Santa Clara Valley habitat conservation plan and natural community conservation plan, preliminary draft chapters and land cover mappingGoogle Scholar
  62. Kearney MS, Grace RE, Stevenson JC (1988) Marsh loss in Nanticoke Estuary, Chesapeake Bay. Geogr Rev 78:205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Keeler-Wolf T, Lewis K, Roye C (1996) The definition and location of sycamore alluvial woodland in California. State of California, The Resources Agency, DFG, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  64. Keeley JE (2005) Fire history of the San Francisco East Bay region and implications for landscape patterns. Intl J Wildland Fire 14:285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Leidy RA (2007) Ecology, assemblage structure, distribution, and status of fishes in streams tributary to the San Francisco Estuary, California. SFEI Contribution 530. San Francisco Estuary Institute, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  66. Ligon FK, Dietrich WE, Trush WJ (1995) Downstream ecological effects of dams: a geomorphic perspective. Bioscience 45:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lindsey WC (1974) Soil survey of eastern Santa Clara area, California. US Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  68. LoCoco V (n.d.[1777–1842]) [translated mission records: Mission Santa Clara report]. Archives of Santa Clara UniversityGoogle Scholar
  69. Lyman CS (1847) Mapa del Rancho de la Laguna Seca: de la propriedad [sic] de Dn. Guillermo Fisher. Land case map E-463, US District Court, Northern DistrictGoogle Scholar
  70. MacDougall AS, Beckwith BR, Maslovat CY (2004) Defining conservation strategies with historical perspectives: a case study from a degraded oak grassland ecosystem. Conserv Biol 18:455–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Manies KL, Mladenoff DJ (2000) Testing methods to produce landscape-scale presettlement vegetation maps from the US Public Land Survey records. Landscape Ecol 15:741–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Manly WL (1894) Death Valley in ‘49. Important chapter of California pioneer history. The autobiography of a pioneer... Pacific Tree and Vine Co., San JoseGoogle Scholar
  73. Mayfield DW (1978) Ecology of the pre-Spanish San Francisco Bay Area. Thesis, San Francisco State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  74. McKee L, Leatherbarrow J, Pearce S, Davis J (2003) A review of urban runoff processes in the Bay Area: existing knowledge, conceptual models, and monitoring recommendations. SFEI Contribution 66. San Francisco Estuary Institute, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  75. Mladenoff DJ, Dahir SE, Nordheim EV et al (2002) Narowing historical uncertainty: probabilistic classification of ambiguously identified tree species in historical forest survey data. Ecosystems 5:539–553Google Scholar
  76. NRC (1992) Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: science, technology, and public policy. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  77. NRC (2002) Riparian areas: functions and strategies for management. Committee on Riparian zone functioning and strategies for management, water science and technology board, board on environmental studies and technology, division on earth and life studies. National Research Council, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  78. Oetter DR, Ashkenas LR, Gregory SV et al (2004) GIS methodology for characterizing historical conditions of the Willamette River flood plain, Oregon. Transactions in GIS 8:367–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pearce SA, Grossinger RM (2004) Relative effects of fluvial processes and historical land use on channel morphology in three sub-basins, Napa River basin, California, USA. In: Golosov V, Belyaev V, Walling DE (eds) Sediment transfer through the fluvial system, Publication 288. International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
  80. Pickwell G, Smith E (1938) The Texas nighthawk in its summer home. Condor 40:193–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Pico A (1860) US v. Francisco Berryessa, et al., heirs of Guadalupe Berryessa. Land case no. 239, US District Court, Northern DistrictGoogle Scholar
  82. Reed W (2005) Natural resources conservation service, personal communication with RM GrossingerGoogle Scholar
  83. RHJV (Riparian Habitat Joint Venture) (2004) The riparian bird conservation plan: a strategy for reversing the decline of riparian associated birds in California. California Partners in FlightGoogle Scholar
  84. Robinson WW (1979) Land in California: the story of mission lands, ranchos, squatters, mining claims, railroad grants, land scrip, homesteads. University of California Press, California Indian Library Collections, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  85. Roe E (1998) Taking complexity seriously: policy analysis, triangulation and sustainable development. Kluwer Academic, BostonGoogle Scholar
  86. Rottenborn SC (1997) The impacts of urbanization on riparian bird communities in central California, Dissertation, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  87. Schick GW (1994) The Ohlone and the oak woodlands: cultural adaptation in the Santa Clara Valley. Santa Clara University, Santa ClaraGoogle Scholar
  88. Schulte LA, Mladenoff DJ (2001) The original US Public Land Survey records: their use and limitations in reconstructing presettlement vegetation. J Forestry October 2001:5–10Google Scholar
  89. SCVWD (2005) Urban water management plan: public review draft September 22, 2005. SCVWD, San JoseGoogle Scholar
  90. SCVWD (2006a) Neighborhood work: Coyote parkway freshwater wetland project. Fact Sheet prepared by the SCVWDGoogle Scholar
  91. SCVWD (2006b) Santa Clara Valley Water District’s clean, safe creeks & natural flood protection program: independent oversight report, fiscal year 2004–2005Google Scholar
  92. SCVWD Vault (1916) Photographs of Rancho Laguna Seca. SCVWD, San JoseGoogle Scholar
  93. SCVWMI (2003) Watershed characteristics report, watershed management plan. Santa Clara Basin Watershed Management Initiative, San JoseGoogle Scholar
  94. SER (Society for Ecological Restoration International), Science & Policy Working Group (2004) The SER international primer on ecological restoration. SER, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  95. SFEI (2005) US Coast Survey maps of SF Bay. Available from http://maps.sfei.org/tSheets/viewer.htm (accessed 01/31/2007)Google Scholar
  96. Shalowitz AL (1962) Shore and sea boundaries, with special reference to the interpretation and use of coast and geodetic survey data. US Dept. of Commerce, Coast and Geodetic Survey; US Govt. Print. Off., WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  97. Shortridge CM (1986) Santa Clara County and its resources: historical, descriptive, statistical, a souvenir of the San Jose Mercury, 1896. San Jose Historical Museum Association, San JoseGoogle Scholar
  98. Smith R (1905) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), record for Astragalus tener var. tener in Santa Clara County (accessed August 2006)Google Scholar
  99. Sork VL, Davis FW, Smouse PE et al (2002) Pollen movement in declining populations of California valley oak, Quercus lobata: where have all the fathers gone? Mol Ecol 11:1657–1668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Steiner FR (2000) The living landscape: an ecological approach to landscape planning. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  101. Stephens SL, Ruth LW (2005) Federal forest-fire policy in the United States. Ecol Appl 15:532–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Stephenson NL (1999) Reference conditions for giant sequoia forest restoration: structure, process, and precision. Ecol Appl 9:1253–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Stewart OC, Lewis HT, Anderson K (2002) Forgotten fires: Native Americans and the transient wilderness. University of Oklahoma Press, NormanGoogle Scholar
  104. Striplen C, DeWeerdt S (2002) Old science, new science: incorporating traditional ecological knowledge into contemporary management. Conserv Practice 3:20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Striplen CJ (2005) A proposal to the Ford Foundation: the ecological role of pre-colonial peoples in Central Coastal California: observations on ecosystem management. University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  106. Swetnam TW, Allen CD, Betancourt JL (1999) Applied historical ecology: using the past to manage for the future. Ecol Appl 9:1189–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Thompson AW (1857a) The rejected survey of the rancho Milpitas heirs of Jose Maria Alviso confirmee. GLO, US Department of the Interior, BLM Rectangular SurveyGoogle Scholar
  108. Thompson AW, General Land Office (1857b) [Field notes of the Laguna Seca Grant], vol R507. GLO, Department of the Interior, BLM Rectangular Survey, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  109. US Census Bureau (2000) Census 2000 urban and rural classification. Available from http://www.census.gov/geo/www/ua/ua_2k.html (accessed 01/02/2007)Google Scholar
  110. USDA (1939) [Aerial photos of the Santa Clara Valley]. Agricultural adjustment administration, US department of agriculture. Western Division LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  111. Van Dyke E, Wasson K (2005) Historical ecology of a central California estuary: 150 years of habitat change. Estuaries 28:173–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Vancouver G (1984) A voyage of discovery to the North Pacific Ocean and round the world 1791–1795. In: Lamb WK (ed) Hakluyt Society, LondonGoogle Scholar
  113. Wallace J (1858) Field notes of the final survey of the Rancho Yerba Buena. Antonio Chabolla, confirmeeGoogle Scholar
  114. White MA, Mladenoff DJ (1994) Old growth forest landscape transitions from pre-European settlement to present. Landscape Ecol 9:191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. White MD, Greer KA (2006) The effects of watershed urbanization on the stream hydrology and riparian vegetation of Los Penasquitos Creek, California. Landscape Urban Plan 74:125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. White PS, Walker JL (1997) Approximating nature’s variation: selecting and using reference information in restoration ecology. Restoration Ecol 5:338–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. White TW (1850) Map of James Enright’s farm. Land case map E-326, The Bancroft Library, UC BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  118. Whitney GG, DeCant J (2005) Government land office survey and other early land surveys. In: Egan D, Howell EA (eds) The historical ecology handbook: a restorationist’s guide to reference ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 147–176Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin M. Grossinger
    • 1
  • Charles J. Striplen
    • 1
  • Ruth A. Askevold
    • 1
  • Elise Brewster
    • 2
  • Erin E. Beller
    • 1
  1. 1.San Francisco Estuary InstituteOaklandUSA
  2. 2.Brewster Design ArtsBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations