Landscape Ecology

, Volume 22, Issue 8, pp 1169–1186 | Cite as

A riverscape perspective on habitat associations among riverine bird assemblages in the Lake Champlain Basin, USA

  • S. Mažeika P. Sullivan
  • Mary C. Watzin
  • William S. Keeton
Research Article

Abstract

The riverscape perspective recognizes the heterogeneous habitat types within the stream corridor as a single, integrated ecological unit operating across spatial scales. Although there is ample evidence that the riverscape notion is appropriate in understanding the physical phenomena of stream corridors, significantly less attention has focused on its ecological ramifications. To this end, we surveyed riverscape habitat variables and bird community characteristics in the Champlain Valley of Vermont, USA. From the data collected, we used information theoretic methodology (AICc) to model relationships between bird community attributes and key habitat variables across the riverscape. Our models with the greatest support suggest that riverine bird communities respond to a suite of characteristics; representing a variety of riverscape habitats at the in-stream, floodplain, and riparian levels. Channel slope, drainage area, percent conifers, and in-stream habitat condition were among the most influential variables. We found that piscivores are potentially important indicators of riverscape condition, responding to a host of variables across the riverscape. Our results endorse a holistic approach to assessing and managing the mosaic of patches in the riverscape and suggest that a riverscape approach has significant conservation potential.

Keywords

Bird communities Conservation Floodplain Information theoretic method In-stream Riparian Riverscape 

References

  1. Ammon E (2000) Sustaining western riparian bird habitats: Are we? Rivers 7:258–261Google Scholar
  2. Amoros C, Bornette G (2002) Connectivity and biocomplexity in waterbodies of riverine floodplains. Freshwater Biol 47:761–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amoros C, Roux A (1988) Interaction between water bodies within the floodplains of large rivers: function and development of connectivity. Münstersche Geographische Arbeiten 29:125–130Google Scholar
  4. Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Thompson WL (2000) Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alternative. J Wildlife Manage 64:912–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Angermeier PL, Schlosser IJ (1991) Species–area relationships in stream fishes. Ecology 70:1450–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment, part 1: model development. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34:73–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baxter CV, Fausch KD, Saunders WC (2005) Tangled webs: reciprocal flows of invertebrate prey link streams and riparian zones. Freshwater Biol 50:201–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ben-David M, Hanley TA, Schell DM (1998) Fertilization of terrestrial vegetation by spawning Pacific salmon: the role of flooding and predator activity. Oikos 83:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bollinger EK, Gavin TA, McIntyre DC (1988) Comparison of transects and circular plots for estimating Bobolink densities. J Wildlife Manage 53:777–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boothroyd IKG, Quinn JM, Langer ER, Costley KJ, Steward G (2004) Riparian buffers mitigate the effects of pine plantation logging on New Zealand streams 1. Riparian vegetation structure, stream geomorphology, and periphyton. Forest Ecol and Management 194:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brotons L, Herrando S, Martin J-L (2004) Bird assemblages in forest fragments within Mediterranean mosaics created by wild fires. Landsc Ecol 19:663–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bryce SA, Hughes RM, Kaufmann PR (2002) Development of a bird integrity index: using bird assemblages as indicators of riparian condition. Environ Manage 30:294–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buckton ST, Ormerod SJ (2002) Global patterns of diversity among the specialist birds of riverine landscapes. Freshwater Biol 47:695–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burnham KP (1981) Summarizing remarks: environmental influences. Stud Avian Biol 6:324–325Google Scholar
  15. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  16. Canterbury GE, Martin TE, Petit DR, Petit LJ, Bradford DF (2000) Bird communities and habitat as ecological indicators of forest condition in regional monitoring. Conserv Biol 14:544–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clear DFR, Genner MJ, Boyle TJB, Setyawati T, Angraeti CD, Menken SBJ (2005) Associations of bird species richness and community composition with local- and landscape-scale environmental factors in Borneo. Landsc Ecol 20:989–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Collier KJ, Wakelin MD (1996) Instream habitat use by blue duck (Hymenolaimus malacorhynchos) in a New Zealand river. Freshwater Biol 37:277–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Copp G (1989) The habitat diversity and fish reproduction of floodplain ecosystems. Environ Biol Fish 26:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Covich AP, Austen MC, Barlocher F, Chauvet E, Cardinale BJ, Biles CL, Inchausti P, Danles O, Solan M, Gessner MO, Statzner B, Moss B (2004) The role of biodiversity in the functioning of freshwater and marine benthic ecosystems. BioScience 54:767–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Croonquist MJ, Brooks RP (1993) Effects of habitat disturbance on bird communities in riparian corridors. J Soil Water Conserv 48:65–70Google Scholar
  22. Deacon JR, Mize SV (1997) Effects of water quality and habitat on composition of fish communities in the Upper Colorado Basin. In U.S. Geological Fact Sheet, pp 122–197Google Scholar
  23. DeShon JE (1995) Development and application of the Invertebrate Community Index (ICI). In: Davis WS, Simon TP (eds) Biological assessment and criteria. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 217–243Google Scholar
  24. Diefenbach DR, Brauning DW, Mattice JA (2003) Variability in grassland bird counts related to observer differences and species detection rates. The Auk 120:1168–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elias JE (1997) Avian species richness and abundance levels in different habitats along the Band River Corridor, northern Wisconsin. Passenger Pigeon 59:21–44Google Scholar
  26. Feck J, Hall ROJ (2004) Response of American dippers (Cinclus mexicanus) to variation in stream water quality. Freshwater Biol 49:1123–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscape and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  28. Giller PS (1996) Floods and droughts: the effects of variations in water flow on streams and rivers. In: Giller PS, Myers AA (eds) Disturbance and recovery of ecological systems. Royal Irish Academy, Dublin, Eire, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  29. Gorman OT, Karr JR (1978) Habitat structure and stream fish communities. Ecology 59:507–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gregory SV, Swanson FJ, McKee WA, Cummins KW (1991) An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. BioScience 41:540–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hansen AJ, di Castri F (eds) (1992) Landscape boundaries: consequences for biotic diversity and ecological flows. Springer-Verlag, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  32. Hodges MF, Krementz DG (1996) Neotropical migratory breeding bird communities in riparian forests of different widths along the Altamaha River, Georgia. Wilson Bull 108:496–506Google Scholar
  33. Inman RL, Prince HH, Hayes DB (2002) Avian communities in forested riparian wetlands of southern Michigan, USA. Wetlands 22:647–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Inoue M, Nunokawa M (2002) Effects of longitudinal variations in stream habitat structure on fish abundance: an analysis based on subunit-scale habitat classification. Freshwater Biol 47:1594–1607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Iwata T, Nakano S, Murakami M (2003) Stream meanders increase insectivorous bird abundance in riparian deciduous forests. Ecography 26:325–337Google Scholar
  36. Jackson JK, Fisher SG (1986) Secondary production, emergence, and export of aquatic insects of a Sonoran Desert stream. Ecology 67:629–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. James FC, Wamer NO (1982) Relationships between temperate forest bird communities and vegetation structure. Ecology 63:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jelinski DE, Wu J (1996) The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 11:129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Johnson SL, Swanson FJ, Grant GE, Wondzell SM (2000) Riparian forest disturbances by a mountain flood—the influence of floated wood. Hydrol Process 14:3031–3050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jones EBDI, Helfman GG, Harper JO, Bolstad PV (1999) Effects of riparian forest removal on fish assemblages in Southern Appalachian streams. Conserv Biol 13:1454–1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Junk WJ, Bailey PB, Sparks RE (1989) The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. In: Dodge DP (eds) International river symposium. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Ottawa, Canada, pp 110–127Google Scholar
  42. Karr J (1981) Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Keeton WS, Kraft CE, Warren DR, Millward AA (2005) Effects of old-growth riparian forests on Adirondack stream systems. In: 6th Eastern Old-Growth Conference. University of New Hampshire Cooperative Extension Natural Resource Network Report, Moultonborough, NH, pp 39–43Google Scholar
  44. Kerans BL, Karr JR (1994) A benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for rivers of the Tennessee Valley. Ecol Appl 4:768–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Knopf FL, Johnson R, Rich T, Samson FB, Szaro RC (1988) Conservation of riparian ecosystems in the United States. Wilson Bull 100:272-284Google Scholar
  46. Kondolf GM, Micheli ER (1995) Evaluating stream restoration projects. Environ Manage 19:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Leopold L, Maddock T (1953) The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 252:57Google Scholar
  48. Loegering JP, Anthony RG (1999) Distribution, abundance, and habitat associations of riparian-obligate and -associated birds in the Oregon Coast Range. Northwest Nat 73:168–185Google Scholar
  49. MacFaden SW, Capen DE (2002) Avian habitat relationships at multiple scales in a New England forest. For Sci 48:243–253Google Scholar
  50. Malard F, Tockner K, Ward JV (2000) Physicochemical heterogeneity in a glacial riverscape. Landsc Ecol 15:679–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maloney RF, Keedwell RJ, Wells NJ, Rebergen AL, Nillson RJ (1999) Effect of willow removal on habitat use by five birds of braided rivers, Mackenzie Basin, New Zealand. New Zeal J Ecol 23:53–60Google Scholar
  52. McDade MH, Swanson FJ, McKee WA, Franklin JF, Van Sickle J (1990) Source distances for coarse woody debris entering small streams in western Oregon and Washington. Can J For Res 20:326–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Miller JR, Dixon MD, Turner MG (2004) Response of avian communities in large-river floodplains to environmental variation at multiple scales. Ecol Appl 14:1394–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Montgomery DR, Buffington JM (1997) Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins. Geol Soc Am Bull 109:596–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Moore FR (eds) (2000) Stopover ecology of Nearctic-neotropical landbird migrants: Habitat relations and conservation implications. Studies in Avian Biology No. 20. Allen Press, Lawrence, KS, USAGoogle Scholar
  56. Murakami M, Nakano S (2002) Indirect effect of aquatic insect emergence on a terrestrial insect population through bird predation. Ecol Lett 5:333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Naiman RJ, Décamps H (1997) The ecology of interfaces—riparian zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:621–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nakano S, Miyasaka H, Kuhura N (1999) Terrestrial-aquatic linkages: riparian arthropod inputs alter trophic cascades in a stream food web. Ecology 80:2435–2441Google Scholar
  59. Nakano S, Murakami M (2001) Reciprocal subsidies: dynamic interdependence between terrestrial and aquatic food webs. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:166–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Newall PR, Magnuson JJ (1999) The importance of ecoregion versus drainage area on fish distributions in the St. Croix River and its Wisconsin tributaries. Environ Biol Fish 55:245–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nichols JD, Hines JE, Sauer JR, Fallon FW, Fallon JE, Heglund PJ (2000) A double-observer approach for estimating detection probability and abundance from point counts. The Auk 117:393–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. O’Connell TJ, Jackson LE, Brooks RP (2000) Bird guilds as indicators of ecological condition in the Central Appalachians. Ecol Appl 10:1706–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ohmart RD (1994) The effects of human-induced changes on the avifauna of western riparian habitats. Stud Avian Biol 15:273–285Google Scholar
  64. Parsons M, Thoms M, Norris R (2002) Australian river assessment system: review of physical river assessment methods—a biological perspective. Monitoring River Health Initiative Technical Report Number 21. Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, Environment AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  65. Perkins MW, Johnson R, Blakenship EE (2003) Response of riparian avifauna to percentage and pattern of woody cover in an agricultural landscape. Wildlife Soc Bull 31:642–660Google Scholar
  66. Petersson RP, Ball JP, Renhorn K, Esseen P, Sjoberg K (1995) Invertebrate communities in boreal forest canopies as influenced by forestry and lichens with implications for passerine birds. Biol Conserv 74:57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Poff NL (1992) Why disturbances can be predictable: a perspective on the definition of disturbance in streams. J North Am Benthol Soc 11:86–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC (1997) The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience 47:1805–1818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Popotnik GJ, Giuliano WM (2000) Grazing and riparian birds. J Wildlife Manage 64:972–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ralph CJ, Guepel GR, Pyle P, Martin TE, DeSante DF (1993) Handbook of field methods for monitoring landbirds. NC-187, Pacific Southwest Research Station, United States Forest Service, Albany, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
  71. Resh VH, Brown AV, Covich AP, Gurtz ME, Li HW, Minshall GW, Reice SR, Sheldon AL, Wallace BJ, Wissmar RC (1988) The role of disturbance in stream ecology. J North Am Benthol Soc 7:433–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rodenhouse NL, Holmes RT (1992) Food limitation for breeding Black-throated Blue Warblers: results of experimental and natural food reductions. Ecology 73:357–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rosenstock SS, Anderson DR, Giesen KM, Leukering T, Carter MF (2002) Landbird counting techniques: current practices and an alternative. The Auk 119:46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rosgen DL (1996) Applied river morphology. Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO, USAGoogle Scholar
  75. Saab V (1999) Importance of spatial scale to habitat use by breeding birds in riparian forests: A hierarchical analysis. Ecol Appl 9:135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Simpson BT, Kollasch RP, Twery MJ, Schuler TM (1996) NED/SIPS User’s manual—Northeast Decision Model Stand Inventory Processor and Simulator—Version 1.11. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Radnor, PA, USAGoogle Scholar
  77. Skagen SK, Melcher CP, Howe WH, Knopf FL (1998) Comparative use of riparian corridors and oases by migrating birds in southeast Arizona. Conserv Biol 12:896–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IO, USAGoogle Scholar
  79. Spackman S (1992) Streamside buffers, where to draw the lines: investigating the relationship between stream corridor width and species richness in Vermont. University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USAGoogle Scholar
  80. Steinmetz J, Kohler SL, Soluk DA (2003) Birds are overlooked top predators in aquatic food webs. Ecology 84:1324–1328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sullivan SMP, Watzin MC, Hession WC (2006) Differences in the reproductive ecology of belted kingfishers (Ceryle alcyon) across streams with varying geomorphology and habitat quality. Waterbirds 29:258–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Thompson WL (2002) Towards reliable bird surveys: accounting for individuals present but not detected. The Auk 119:18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tockner K, Pennetzdorfer D, Reiner N, Schiemer F, Ward JV (1999) Hydrological connectivity, and the exchange of organic matter and nutrients in a dynamic river-floodplain system (Danube, Austria). Freshw Biol 41:521–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tucker JW Jr, Hill GE, Holler NR (2003) Longleaf pine restoration: implications for landscape-level effects on bird communities in the Lower Gulf Coastal Plain. South J Appl Forest 27:107–122Google Scholar
  85. Turner MG, Gardner RH (1991) Quantitative methods in landscape ecology: an introduction. In: Turner MG, Gardner RH (eds) Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA, pp 3–14Google Scholar
  86. USEPA (2006) National stream report: wadeable streams assessment: a collaborative survey of the Nation’s streams. EPA 841-B-06–002. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  87. USFWS (1990) Instructions for breeding bird survey routes’ participants. Patuxent Research Laboratory, Patuxent, MD, USAGoogle Scholar
  88. Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE (1980) The river continuum concept. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37:130–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. VTDEC (2001) Fluvial geomorphology: a foundation for watershed protection, management, and restoration. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, Water Quality Division, River Corridor Management Section, Waterbury, VT, USAGoogle Scholar
  90. VTDEC (2003) Stream geomorphic assessment handbook: rapid stream assessment—phase 2 field protocols. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality Division, Waterbury, VT, USAGoogle Scholar
  91. VTDEC (2006) Vermont regional hydraulic geometry curves. Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation, River Management Program, Waterbury, VT, USAGoogle Scholar
  92. Ward JV (1989) The four-dimensional nature of lotic ecosystems. J North Am Benthol Soc 8:2–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Ward JV, Tockner K, Arscott DB, Claret C (2002) Riverine landscape diversity. Freshw Biol 47:517–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Ward JV, Tockner K, Schiemer F (1999) Biodiversity of floodplain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity. Regul River: Res Manage 15:125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Ward JV, Wiens JA (2001) Ecotones of riverine systems: role and typology, spatio-temporal dynamics, and river regulation. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 1:25–36Google Scholar
  96. Warkentin IG, Fisher AL, Flemming SP, Roberts SE (2003) Response to clear-cut logging by Northern Waterthrushes. Can J For Res 33:755–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. White DS (1993) Perspective on defining and delineating hyporheic zones. J North Am Benthol Soc 12:79–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wiens JA (1995) Landscape mosaics and ecological theory. In: Hansson L, Fahrig L, Merriam G (eds) Mosaic landscapes and ecological processes. Chapman & Hall, London, England, pp 1–26Google Scholar
  99. Wiens JA (2002) Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water. Freshw Biol 47:777–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Willson MF, Comet TA (1996) Bird communities of northern forests: patterns of diversity and abundance. The Condor 98:337–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wipfli MS (1997) Terrestrial invertebrates as salmonid prey and nitrogen sources in streams: contrasting old-growth and young-growth riparian forests in southeastern Alaska, U.S.A. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:1259–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Yong W, Finch DM (2002) Stopover ecology of landbirds migrating along the middle Rio Grande in spring and fall. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT, USAGoogle Scholar
  103. Zaimes GN, Schultz RC, Isenhart TM (2004) Stream bank erosion adjacent to riparian forest buffers, row-crop fields, and continuously-grazed pastures along Bear Creek in central Iowa. J Soil Water Conserv 59:19–27Google Scholar
  104. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Mažeika P. Sullivan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mary C. Watzin
    • 1
  • William S. Keeton
    • 3
  1. 1.Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, Rubenstein Ecosystem Science LaboratoryUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, College of Natural ResourcesUniversity of IdahoMoscowUSA
  3. 3.Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural ResourcesUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations