Skip to main content

Are hedgerows the route to increased farmland small mammal density? Use of hedgerows in British pastoral habitats

Landscape Ecology volume 22, pages 1019–1032 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Linear habitats are becoming increasingly common as a consequence of habitat fragmentation, and may provide the sole habitat for some species. Hedgerows are linear features that can vary substantially in structure and quality. Having surveyed 180 hedgerows, in four locations, and sampled their small mammal communities we examined the effect of physical hedgerow attributes on the abundance of small mammal species. Using three elements of landscape structure, we explored whether variation was best explained by the Random Sample Hypothesis (that small islands represent a random sample of those species populating larger areas), or by the Fragmentation Hypothesis (that species abundance will decrease with a loss of habitat area). We tested the relationship between the relative abundance of small mammals and 1. hedgerow connectivity; 2. total habitat availability and 3. local habitat complexity. We then explored the predictive power of combinations of these habitat variables. Connectivity was a positive predictor of wood mice Apodemus sylvaticus, and hedgerow gappiness was a negative predictor of bank voles Clethrionomys glareolus. The total amount of habitat available (hedgerow width, height and length) was a positive indicator of total small mammal biomass. These results support the Fragmentation Hypothesis that species abundance and distribution decrease with a loss of habitat area. The preservation of linear and associated habitats may therefore be important in maintaining metapopulations of the species we studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  • Alibhai SK, Gipps JHW (1985) The population dynamics of bank voles. Symp Zool Soc Lond 55:277–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Alibhai SK, Gipps JHW (1991a) Bank vole. In: Harris S (ed) The handbook of British mammals. Blackwell Scientific Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Alibhai SK, Gipps JHW (1991b) Field vole. In: Harris S (ed) The handbook of British mammals. Blackwell Scientific Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrén H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr CJ, Gillespie MK (2000) Estimating hedgerow length and pattern characteristics in Great Britain using countryside survey data. J Environ Manage 60:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett AF (1987) Conservation of mammals within a fragmented forest environment: the contributions of insular biogeography and autecology. In: Saunders DA, Arnold GW, Burbidge AA, Hopkins AJM (eds) Nature conservation: the role of remnants of native vegetation. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, Australia, pp 41–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone GC, Tinklin R (1988) Importance of hedgerow structure in determining the occurrence and density of small mammals. Asp Appl Biol 16:73–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra R, Craine ITM (1996) Natal nest location and small mammals tracking with a spool and line technique. Can J Zool 64:1034–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bright PW (1993) Habitat fragmentation – problems and predictions for British mammals. Mammal Rev 23:101–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements DK, Tofts RJ (1992) Hedgerow evaluation and grading system (HEGS). A methodology for the ecological survey, evaluation and grading of hedgerows. Countryside Planning and Management, UK

  • Connor EF, McCoy ED (1979) The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship. Am Nat 113:791–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CPRE (1999) Hedging your bets: is hedgerow legislation gambling with our heritage? Council for the protection of rural England, UK

  • DEFRA (2005a) Entry level stewardship handbook. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London

  • DEFRA (2005b) The countryside stewardship scheme: traditional farming in the modern environment. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London

  • Edwards K, Leighton D, Llewellyn P (2006) Hedgerows and the historic landscape: a case study from south Gower. Br Wildl 17(4):260–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgibbon CD (1997) Small mammals in farm woodlands: the effects of habitat, isolation and surrounding land-use patterns. J Appl Ecol 34:530–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew JR (1985) The population dynamics of wood mice and yellow-necked mice. Symp Zool Soc Lond 55:315–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew JR (1991) Wood mouse. In: Harris S (ed) The handbook of British mammals. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew JR (1993) Mice and voles. Whittet Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Green RE, Osborne PE, Sears EJ (1994) The distribution of passerine birds in hedgerows during the breeding-season in relation to characteristics of the hedgerow and adjacent farmland. J Appl Ecol 31:677–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurnell J (1985) Woodland rodent communities. Symp Zool Soc Lond 55:377–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurnell J, Flowerdew JR (1990) Live trapping small mammals: a practical guide. Mammal Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad NM, Bowne DR, Cunningham A, Danielson BJ, Levey DJ, Sargent S, Spira T (2003) Corridor use by diverse taxa. Ecology 84:609–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haila Y (1983) Land birds on northern islands: a sampling metaphor for insular colonization. Oikos 41:334–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haila Y (1990) Towards an ecological definition of an island: a north-west European perspective. J Biogeogr 17:561–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinsley SA, Bellamy PE (2000) The influence of hedge structure, management and landscape context on the value of hedgerows to birds: a review. J Environ Manage 60:33–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce B, Williams G, Woods A (1988) Hedgerows: still a cause for concern. RSPB Conserv Rev 2:34–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotzageorgis GC, Mason CF (1996) Range use, determined by telemetry, of yellow-necked mice (Apodemus flavicollis) in hedgerows. J Zool 240:773–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotzageorgis GC, Mason CF (1997) Small mammal populations in relation to hedgerow structure in an arable landscape. J Zool 242:425–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald DW, Baker S (2005) The state of Britain’s mammals 2005. Mammals Trust, UK, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald DW, Johnson PJ (1995) The relationship between bird distribution and the botanical and structural characteristics of hedges. J Appl Ecol 32:492–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald DW, Johnson PJ (2000) Farmers and the custody of the countryside: trends in loss and conservation of non-productive habitats 1981–1998. Biol Conserv 94:221–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald DW, Tattersall FH, Service KM, Firbank LG, Feber RE (2006) Mammals, agri-environment schemes and set-aside – what are the putative benefits? Mammal Rev (in press)

  • Mallorie HC, Flowerdew JR (1994) Woodland small mammal population ecology in Britain – a preliminary review of the mammal-society survey of wood mice Apodemus-sylvaticus and bank voles Clethrionomys-glareolus, 1982–87. Mammal Rev 24:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews F, Macdonald DW, Taylor GM, Gelling M, Norman RA, Honess PE, Foster R, Gower CM, Varley S, Harris A, Palmer S, Hewinson G, Webster JP (2006) Bovine Tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) in British farmland wildlife: the importance to agriculture. Proc R Soc B 273:357–365

  • Montgomery WI (1978) Studies on the distributions of Apodemus sylvaticus (L.) and A. Flavicollis (Melchior) in Britain. Mammal Rev 8:177–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery WI (1991) Yellow-necked mouse. In: Harris S (ed) The handbook of British mammals. Blackwell Scientific Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery WI, Dowie M (1993) The distribution and population regulation of the wood mouse Apodemus-sylvaticus on field boundaries of pastoral farmland. J Appl Ecol 30:783–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris P (ed) (1982) The country life book of natural history of the British Isles. Hamlyn Publishing Group Ltd., London, 6–7

  • Orrock JL, Danielson BJ, Brinkerhoff RJ (2004) Rodent foraging is affected by indirect, but not by direct, cues of predation risk. Behav Ecol 15(3):433–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard E, Relton J (1970) A study of small mammals in hedges and cultivated fields. J Appl Ecol 7:549–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard E, Hooper MD, Moore NW (1974) Hedges. Collins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rackham O (1997) History of the countryside. Phoenix Giant, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ JM, Montgomery WI (2002) Habitat associations of bats in Northern Ireland: implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 108:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol 5:18–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger W, Diffendorfer J, Holt RD, Pierotti R (2000) The interaction of habitat fragmentation, plant, and small mammal succession in an old field. Ecol Monogr 70:383–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soule ME, Terbough J (1999) Continental conservation: scientific foundations of regional reserve networks. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall FH, Macdonald DW, Hart BJ, Johnson P, Manley W, Feber R (2002) Is habitat linearity important for small mammal communities on farmland? J Appl Ecol 39:643–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall FH, Macdonald DW, Hart BJ, Manley WJ, Feber RE (2001) Habitat use by wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) in a changeable arable landscape. J Zool 255:487–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall FH, Macdonald DW, Hart BJ, Manley WJ (2004) Balanced dispersal or source-sink – do both models describe wood mice in farmed landscapes? Oikos 106:536–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tew TE, Todd IA, Macdonald DW (1994) Field margins and small mammals. BCPC Monograph 58 field margins-integrating agriculture and conservation, 85–94

  • Tew TE, Todd IA, Macdonald DW (2000) Arable habitat use by wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus). 2. Microhabitat. J Zool 250:305–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd IA, Tew TE, Macdonald DW (2000) Arable habitat use by wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus). 1. Macrohabitat. J Zool 250:299–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tofts RJ, Clements DK (1994) The development and testing of HEGS, a methodology for the evaluation and grading of hedgerows. BCPC Monogr 58:277–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox BA (1980) Insular ecology and conservation. In: Wilcox BA (ed) Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp 95–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox BA, Murphy DD (1985) Conservation strategy: the effects of fragmentation on extinction. Am Nat 125:879–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to landowners, fieldworkers and volunteers too numerous to mention for their help with data collection. We would like to thank Paul Johnson for statistical advice, Amanda Lloyd for help with GIS, and Fran Tattersall for comments on earlier drafts. This work was funded as part of a larger project by DEFRA (SE3009) and by grants to David Macdonald from the Peoples Trust for Endangered Species. Fiona Mathews was supported by a Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Tubney House, Tubney, Oxon, OX13 5QL, UK

    Merryl Gelling, David W. Macdonald & Fiona Mathews

Authors
  1. Merryl Gelling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David W. Macdonald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fiona Mathews
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Merryl Gelling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gelling, M., Macdonald, D.W. & Mathews, F. Are hedgerows the route to increased farmland small mammal density? Use of hedgerows in British pastoral habitats. Landscape Ecol 22, 1019–1032 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9088-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9088-4

Keywords

  • Apodemus flavicollis
  • Apodemus sylvaticus
  • Clethrionomys glareolus
  • Fragmentation
  • Habitat corridors
  • Linear habitat
  • Population density
  • Microtus agrestis