Abstract
Private domestic gardens are known to constitute a considerable proportion of “green space” in urban areas and are therefore of potential significance for maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem service provision in such areas. However, little is known about the actual size and nature of this resource. This study provides the first detailed audit and comparison of the size and structure of the domestic garden resource across different cities in the U.K. (Edinburgh, Belfast, Leicester, Oxford and Cardiff). The urban area of each city covered by domestic gardens ranged from 21.8% to 26.8% and was positively correlated with variation in human population density and housing density. In a random sample of at least 500 houses in each city, 99% had associated gardens, the mean areas of which ranged from 155.4 m2 to 253.0 m2 and were closely associated with housing type (terraced, semi-detached or detached houses). Relatively small gardens (< 400 m2) contributed disproportionately to the total garden area of each city, being more numerous than larger gardens. There was no clear relationship between garden area and distance to the edge of any of the cities. These and other results are discussed in terms of the potential role of urban gardens as wildlife habitats and the implications for housing policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anon (2003) The times atlas of the world. Times Books, London
Birmingham and The Black Country Biodiversity Action Plan Steering Group (2000) Biodiversity action plan for birmingham and the black country. Birmingham and The Black Country Biodiversity Action Plan Steering Group, Birmingham
Bonan GB (2000) The microclimates of a suburban Colorado (USA) landscape and implications for planning and design. Landsc Urban Plan 49:97–114
CABE Space (2001) Green space strategies: making the most of your parks and green spaces. Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment, Department of Culture, Media and Sport, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
Chocholoušková Z, Pyšek P (2003) Changes in composition and structure of urban flora over 120 years: a case study of the city of Plzeň. Flora 198:366–376
Davis BNK (1978) Urbanisation and the diversity of insects. I. In: Mound LA, Waloff LA (eds) Diversity of insects faunas, Symposia of the Royal Entomological Society of London, vol. 9. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 126–138
DETR (1999) Planning policy guidance 3: housing. Department of Transport Local Government and the Regions, London
DETR (2000) Our towns and cities: the future-full report. Department of Transport and the Regions, London
DETR (2002) Green spaces, better places. The final report of the Urban Greenspaces Taskforce. Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions, London
Devon Biodiversity Partnership (1998) The Nature of Devons. A biodiversity action plan. Devon County Council, Exeter
Edinburgh Biodiversity Partnership (2004) The Edinburgh biodiversity action plan 2004–2009. Edinburgh City Council
English Nature (2004) Get green fingers on-line with a virtual garden tour. In http://www.english-nature.org.uk/news/story.asp?ID=578
Essex Biodiversity Partnership (1999) Essex biodiversity action plan: A wild future for Essex. Essex, Wildlife Trust
Fernández-Juricic E (2000) Avifaunal use of wooded streets in an urban landscape. Conserv Biol 14:513–531
Gaston KJ, Smith RM, Thompson K, Warren PH (2004) Gardens and wildlife—the BUGS project. British Wildlife 16:1–9
Gaston KJ, Smith R M, Thompson K, Warren PH (2005a) Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity. Biodiv Conserv 14:395–413
Gaston KJ, Warren PH, Thompson K, Smith RM (2005b) Urban domestic gardens (IV): the extent of the resource and its associated features. Biodiv Conserv 14:3327–3349
Hardy PB, Dennis RLH (1999) The impact of urban development on butterflies within a city region. Biodiv Conserv 8:1261–1279
Henry JA, Dicks SE (1987) Association of urban temperatures with land use and surface materials. Landsc Urban Plan 14:21–29
Hessayon DG, Hessayon JP (1973) The garden books of Europe. Elm Tree Books, London
Kinzig AP, Grove JM (2001) Urban-suburban ecology. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopaedia of biodiversity, vol. 5, Academic Press, pp 733–745
Kühn I, Brandl R, Klotz S (2004) The flora of German cities is naturally species rich. Evol Ecol Res 6:749–764
London Biodiversity Partnership (2005) Habitat action plan; Private gardens. London Biodiversity Partnership
Marzluff J M, Ewing K (2001) Restoration of fragmented landscapes for the conservation of birds: a general framework and specific recommendations for urbanizing landscapes. Restorat Ecol 9:280–292
McCall A, Doar N (1997) The State of Scottish Greenspace. Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 88
McIntyre NE, Rango J, Fagan WF, Faeth SH (2001) Ground arthropod community structure in a heterogeneous urban environment. Landsc Urban Plan 52:257–274
McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52:883–890
Niemelä J (1999a) Ecology and urban planning. Biodiv Conserv 8:119–131
Niemelä J (1999b) Is there a need for a theory of urban ecology? Urban Ecosyst 3:57–65
Owen J (1991) The Ecology of a Garden: the first fifteen years. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Pyšek P, Chocholoušková Z, Pyšek A, Jarošík V, Chytrý M, Tichý L (2004) Trends in species diversity and composition of urban vegetation over three decades. J Vegetat Sci 15:781–788
Rebele F (1994) Urban ecology and special features of urban ecosystems. Global Ecol Biogeogr Letts (1998) 4:173–187
Roy DB, Hill MO, Rothery P (1999) Effects of urban land cover on the local species pool in Britain. Ecography 22:507–515
Ruszczyk A, de Araujo AM (1992) Gradients in butterfly species diversity in an urban area in Brazil. J Lepidopterist’s Soc 46:255–264
Smith RM, Gaston KJ, Warren PH, Thompson K (2005a) Urban domestic gardens (V): relationships between landcover composition, housing and landscape. Landsc Ecol 20:235–253
Smith RM, Warren PH, Thompson K, Gaston KJ (2005b) Urban domestic gardens (VI): environmental correlates of invertebrate species richness. Biodiv Conserv 15:2415–2438
The GeoInformation Group (2001) Cities revealed. The GeoInformation Group, Cambridge
Thompson K, Austin KC, Smith RM, Warren PH, Angold PG, Gaston KJ (2003) Urban domestic gardens (I): Putting small-scale plant diversity in context. J Vegetat Sci 14:71–78
Thompson K, Colsell S, Carpenter J, Smith RM, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2005) Urban domestic gardens (VII): a preliminary survey of soil seed banks. Seed Sci Res 15:133–141
Thompson K, Hodgson JG, Smith RM, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2004) Urban domestic gardens (III): composition and diversity of lawn floras. J Vegetat Sci 15:373–378
Wildlife Trusts (2000) The Wildlife Trust’s guide to wildlife gardening. The Wildlife Trusts, Newark
Wood BC, Pullin AS (2002) Persistence of species in a fragmented urban landscape: the importance of dispersal ability and habitat availability for grassland butterflies. Biodiv Conserv 11:1451–1468
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by funding from the Countryside Council for Wales, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, English Nature, Environment and Heritage Service and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council through the Cityform Consortium. Data were kindly supplied by Ordnance Survey and Ordnance Survey Northern Ireland. We are grateful to Peter Cush, Scott Ferguson, Peter Frost, David Knight and Phil Lewis, two anonymous reviewers and the coordinating editor for helpful comments and discussion, and to Richard Fuller and Sarah Jackson for assistance with GIS. K.J.G. holds a Royal Society–Wolfson Research Merit Award.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loram, A., Tratalos, J., Warren, P.H. et al. Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent & structure of the resource in five major cities. Landscape Ecol 22, 601–615 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9051-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9051-9