Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent & structure of the resource in five major cities

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Private domestic gardens are known to constitute a considerable proportion of “green space” in urban areas and are therefore of potential significance for maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem service provision in such areas. However, little is known about the actual size and nature of this resource. This study provides the first detailed audit and comparison of the size and structure of the domestic garden resource across different cities in the U.K. (Edinburgh, Belfast, Leicester, Oxford and Cardiff). The urban area of each city covered by domestic gardens ranged from 21.8% to 26.8% and was positively correlated with variation in human population density and housing density. In a random sample of at least 500 houses in each city, 99% had associated gardens, the mean areas of which ranged from 155.4 m2 to 253.0 m2 and were closely associated with housing type (terraced, semi-detached or detached houses). Relatively small gardens (< 400 m2) contributed disproportionately to the total garden area of each city, being more numerous than larger gardens. There was no clear relationship between garden area and distance to the edge of any of the cities. These and other results are discussed in terms of the potential role of urban gardens as wildlife habitats and the implications for housing policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anon (2003) The times atlas of the world. Times Books, London

  • Birmingham and The Black Country Biodiversity Action Plan Steering Group (2000) Biodiversity action plan for birmingham and the black country. Birmingham and The Black Country Biodiversity Action Plan Steering Group, Birmingham

  • Bonan GB (2000) The microclimates of a suburban Colorado (USA) landscape and implications for planning and design. Landsc Urban Plan 49:97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CABE Space (2001) Green space strategies: making the most of your parks and green spaces. Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment, Department of Culture, Media and Sport, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

  • Chocholoušková Z, Pyšek P (2003) Changes in composition and structure of urban flora over 120 years: a case study of the city of Plzeň. Flora 198:366–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis BNK (1978) Urbanisation and the diversity of insects. I. In: Mound LA, Waloff LA (eds) Diversity of insects faunas, Symposia of the Royal Entomological Society of London, vol. 9. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 126–138

  • DETR (1999) Planning policy guidance 3: housing. Department of Transport Local Government and the Regions, London

    Google Scholar 

  • DETR (2000) Our towns and cities: the future-full report. Department of Transport and the Regions, London

    Google Scholar 

  • DETR (2002) Green spaces, better places. The final report of the Urban Greenspaces Taskforce. Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Devon Biodiversity Partnership (1998) The Nature of Devons. A biodiversity action plan. Devon County Council, Exeter

    Google Scholar 

  • Edinburgh Biodiversity Partnership (2004) The Edinburgh biodiversity action plan 2004–2009. Edinburgh City Council

  • English Nature (2004) Get green fingers on-line with a virtual garden tour. In http://www.english-nature.org.uk/news/story.asp?ID=578

  • Essex Biodiversity Partnership (1999) Essex biodiversity action plan: A wild future for Essex. Essex, Wildlife Trust

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E (2000) Avifaunal use of wooded streets in an urban landscape. Conserv Biol 14:513–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Smith RM, Thompson K, Warren PH (2004) Gardens and wildlife—the BUGS project. British Wildlife 16:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Smith R M, Thompson K, Warren PH (2005a) Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity. Biodiv Conserv 14:395–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Warren PH, Thompson K, Smith RM (2005b) Urban domestic gardens (IV): the extent of the resource and its associated features. Biodiv Conserv 14:3327–3349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy PB, Dennis RLH (1999) The impact of urban development on butterflies within a city region. Biodiv Conserv 8:1261–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry JA, Dicks SE (1987) Association of urban temperatures with land use and surface materials. Landsc Urban Plan 14:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hessayon DG, Hessayon JP (1973) The garden books of Europe. Elm Tree Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzig AP, Grove JM (2001) Urban-suburban ecology. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopaedia of biodiversity, vol. 5, Academic Press, pp 733–745

  • Kühn I, Brandl R, Klotz S (2004) The flora of German cities is naturally species rich. Evol Ecol Res 6:749–764

    Google Scholar 

  • London Biodiversity Partnership (2005) Habitat action plan; Private gardens. London Biodiversity Partnership

  • Marzluff J M, Ewing K (2001) Restoration of fragmented landscapes for the conservation of birds: a general framework and specific recommendations for urbanizing landscapes. Restorat Ecol 9:280–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall A, Doar N (1997) The State of Scottish Greenspace. Scottish Natural Heritage Review No. 88

  • McIntyre NE, Rango J, Fagan WF, Faeth SH (2001) Ground arthropod community structure in a heterogeneous urban environment. Landsc Urban Plan 52:257–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52:883–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J (1999a) Ecology and urban planning. Biodiv Conserv 8:119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J (1999b) Is there a need for a theory of urban ecology? Urban Ecosyst 3:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen J (1991) The Ecology of a Garden: the first fifteen years. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Pyšek P, Chocholoušková Z, Pyšek A, Jarošík V, Chytrý M, Tichý L (2004) Trends in species diversity and composition of urban vegetation over three decades. J Vegetat Sci 15:781–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebele F (1994) Urban ecology and special features of urban ecosystems. Global Ecol Biogeogr Letts (1998) 4:173–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy DB, Hill MO, Rothery P (1999) Effects of urban land cover on the local species pool in Britain. Ecography 22:507–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruszczyk A, de Araujo AM (1992) Gradients in butterfly species diversity in an urban area in Brazil. J Lepidopterist’s Soc 46:255–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RM, Gaston KJ, Warren PH, Thompson K (2005a) Urban domestic gardens (V): relationships between landcover composition, housing and landscape. Landsc Ecol 20:235–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RM, Warren PH, Thompson K, Gaston KJ (2005b) Urban domestic gardens (VI): environmental correlates of invertebrate species richness. Biodiv Conserv 15:2415–2438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The GeoInformation Group (2001) Cities revealed. The GeoInformation Group, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K, Austin KC, Smith RM, Warren PH, Angold PG, Gaston KJ (2003) Urban domestic gardens (I): Putting small-scale plant diversity in context. J Vegetat Sci 14:71–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K, Colsell S, Carpenter J, Smith RM, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2005) Urban domestic gardens (VII): a preliminary survey of soil seed banks. Seed Sci Res 15:133–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K, Hodgson JG, Smith RM, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2004) Urban domestic gardens (III): composition and diversity of lawn floras. J Vegetat Sci 15:373–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildlife Trusts (2000) The Wildlife Trust’s guide to wildlife gardening. The Wildlife Trusts, Newark

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood BC, Pullin AS (2002) Persistence of species in a fragmented urban landscape: the importance of dispersal ability and habitat availability for grassland butterflies. Biodiv Conserv 11:1451–1468

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funding from the Countryside Council for Wales, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, English Nature, Environment and Heritage Service and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council through the Cityform Consortium. Data were kindly supplied by Ordnance Survey and Ordnance Survey Northern Ireland. We are grateful to Peter Cush, Scott Ferguson, Peter Frost, David Knight and Phil Lewis, two anonymous reviewers and the coordinating editor for helpful comments and discussion, and to Richard Fuller and Sarah Jackson for assistance with GIS. K.J.G. holds a Royal Society–Wolfson Research Merit Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison Loram.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loram, A., Tratalos, J., Warren, P.H. et al. Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent & structure of the resource in five major cities. Landscape Ecol 22, 601–615 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9051-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9051-9

Keywords

Navigation