Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing landscape health by scaling with remote sensing: when is it not enough?

  • Perspective
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessment of the health of landscapes, by monitoring their condition over space and time, is needed to better understand the processes for sustaining or, in many cases, repairing them. Remote sensing is a tool that can efficiently identify and assess areas of landscape damage at different scales and help land managers solve specific problems. Remote sensing may appear to be a panacea for all monitoring situations but sometimes the information it provides is not enough by itself. In this paper we give examples of both scenarios—when remote sensing alone is adequate and when it is not. When remotely sensed data alone is not sufficient, monitoring problems can be solved by incorporating additional finer scale data. We use a five-step procedure based on scaling to help land managers answer the question: when is remote sensing data alone not sufficient to underpin the information needs required to achieve a specific management goal?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ash A (2004) Dynamics of the grass layer. In: McCullough M, Musso B (eds) Healthy rangelands: principles for sustainable systems—focus on Australia’s Burdekin rangelands. Tropical Savannas Cooperative Research Centre. Charles Darwin University Darwin, Australia, pp 69–95

  • Bartley R, Roth CH, Ludwig JA, McJannet D, Liedloff A, Corfield J, Hawdon A, Abbott B (2006) Runoff and erosion from Australia’s tropical semi-arid rangelands: influence of ground cover for differing space and time scales. Hydrol Processes (in press)

  • Bastin GN, ACRIS Management Committee members (2005) Australian Collaborative Rangeland Information System, Reporting Change in the Rangelands: National Synthesis of Reports from Pilot Regions. Report to the Australian Collaborative Rangeland Information System (ACRIS) Management Committee, prepared by CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Alice Springs, Australia

  • Bastin GN, Ludwig JA (2006) Problems and prospects for mapping vegetation condition in Australia’s arid rangelands. Ecol Manage Restor 7:S71–S74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooker LC (2002) The application of focal species knowledge to landscape design in agricultural lands using the ecological neighbourhood as a template. Landsc Urban Plan 60:185–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caccetta PA, Allen A, Watson I (2000) The Land Monitor Project. In: Proceedings of 10th Australasian Remote Sensing & Photogrammetry Conference, August 2000, Adelaide, Australia, pp 97–107

  • Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Hopkins AJM (1990) From frontier to fragments: European impact on Australia’s vegetation. In: Saunders DA, Hopkins AJM, How RA (eds) Australian ecosystems: 200 years of utilization, degradation and reconstruction. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Sydney, Australia, pp 93–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambeck RJ (1999) Landscape planning for biodiversity conservation in agricultural regions: a case study from the wheatbelt of Western Australia. Biodiversity Technical Paper No. 2, Department of the Environment and Hertiage, Canberra, Australia. URL: http://www.deh.gov.au/biodiversity/publications/technical/landscape/exec-summary.html

  • Lambeck RJ, Wallace JF (1993) Assessment of the conservation value of remnant native vegetation in the central wheatbelt of Western Australia using Landsat TM imagery. Report to the Australian National Parks and Wildlife Service, prepared by CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Perth, Australia

  • Ludwig JA, Bastin GN, Chewings VH, Eager RW, Liedloff AC (2006) Leakiness: a new index for monitoring the health of arid and semiarid landscapes using remotely sensed vegetation cover and elevation data. Ecol Indic (in press)

  • Ludwig JA, Stafford Smith MD (2005) Interpreting and correcting cross-scale mismatches in resilience analysis: a procedure and examples from Australia’s rangelands. Ecol Soc 10(2):20. URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art20

    Google Scholar 

  • McVicar TR, Briggs PR, King EA, Raupach MR (2003) A review of predictive modelling from a natural resource management perspective: the role of remote sensing of the terrestrial environment. A report to the Bureau of Rural Sciences, published by CSIRO Land and Water and the CSIRO Earth Observation Centre, Canberra, Australia. URL: http://www.clw.csiro.au/publications/consultancy/2003/Review_Of_Remote_Sensing.pdf

  • McVicar TR, Davies PJ, Qinke Y, Zhang G (2002) An introduction to temporal-geographic information systems (TGIS) for assessing, monitoring and modelling regional water and soil processes. In: McVicar TR, Rui L, Walker J, Fitzpatrick RW, Changming L (eds) Regional water and soil assessment for managing sustainable agriculture in China and Australia. ACIAR Monograph 84, Australian Center for International Agricultural Research, Canberra, Australia, pp 205–223. URL: http://www.eoc.csiro.au/aciar/book/PDF/Monograph_84_Chapter_16.pdf

  • McVicar TR, Jupp DLB (1998) The current and potential operational uses of remote sensing to aid decisions on drought exceptional circumstances in Australia: a review. Agric Syst 57:399–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment report of the conceptual framework working group of the millennium ecosystems assessment. Island Press, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil GP (2002) Overview: landscape health assessment. In: Rapport DJ, Lasley WL, Rolston DE, Nielsen NO, Qualset CO, Damania AB (eds) Managing for healthy ecosystems. Lewis Publishers, CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, pp 559–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince SD (2002) Spatial and temporal scales for detection of desertification. In: Reynolds JF, Stafford Smith DM (eds) Global desertification: do humans cause deserts? Dahlem University Press, Berlin, Germany, pp 23–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle HJR, Watson IW, Tinley KL (2006) Landscape improvement, or ongoing degradation—reconciling apparent contradiction from the arid rangelands of Western Australia. Landsc Ecol 21 (in press)

  • Ryan P (2004) Balancing the scales. Ecol Manage Restor 5:85–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DA, Arnold GW, Burbidge AA, Hopkins AJM (1987) Nature conservation: the role of remnants of native vegetation. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol 5:18–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford Smith DM, Morton SR, Ash AJ (2000) Towards sustainable pastoralism in Australia’s rangelands. Aust J Environ Manage 7:190–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Tongway DJ, Hindley NL (2004) Landscape function analysis manual: procedures for monitoring and assessing landscapes with special reference to minesites and rangelands. Version 3.1 on CD Produced by CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Canberra, Australia

  • Wallace JF, Behn G, Furby S (2006) Vegetation condition assessment and monitoring from sequences of satellite imagery. Ecol Manage Restor 7:S31–S36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace JF, Caccetta PA, Kiiveri HT (2004) Recent developments in analysis of spatial and temporal data for landscape qualities and monitoring. Aust Ecol 29:100–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace JF, Campbell N (1998) Evaluation of the feasibility of remote sensing for monitoring national state of the environment indicators. State of the Environment Technical Paper Series (Environmental Indicators), Department of the Environment, Canberra, Australia. URL: http://www.deh.gov.au/soe/techpapers/series1/remote.html

  • Wessman CA, Bateson CA (2006) Building up with a top–down approach: the role of remote sensing in deciphering functional and structural diversity. In: Wu J, Jones KB, Li H, Loucks OL (eds) Scaling and uncertainty analysis in ecology: methods and applications. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 147–163

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • White DH (2000) Implementing drought policy in Australia. Agric Sci 13:27–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woinarski JCZ, Fisher A (2003) Conservation and the maintenaince of biodiversity in the rangelands. Rangeland J 25:157–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock CE, Strahler AH (1987) The factor of scale in remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ 21:311–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J (1999) Hierarchy and scaling: extrapolating information along a scaling ladder. Can J Remote Sens 25:367–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Li H (2006) Concepts of scale and scaling. In: Wu J, Jones KB, Li H, Loucks OL (eds) Scaling and uncertainty analysis in ecology: methods and applications. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 3–15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge support from CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystem’s Scaling our Science initiative and CSIRO’s Water for Healthy Country Flagship Program. We also appreciate the suggestions of reviewers which improved the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John A. Ludwig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ludwig, J.A., Bastin, G.N., Wallace, J.F. et al. Assessing landscape health by scaling with remote sensing: when is it not enough?. Landscape Ecol 22, 163–169 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9038-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9038-6

Keywords

Navigation