Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improving land change detection based on uncertain survey maps using fuzzy sets

  • RESEARCH ARTICLE
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we present a method for correcting inherent classification bias in historical survey maps with which subsequent land cover change analysis can be improved. We linked generalized linear modelling techniques for spatial uncertainty prediction to fuzzy set based operations. The predicted uncertainty information was used to compute fuzzy memberships of forest and non-forest classes at each location. These memberships were used to reclassify the original map based on decision rules, which take into consideration the differences in identification likelihood during the historical mapping. Since the forest area was underestimated in the original mapping, the process allows to correct this bias by favouring forest, especially where uncertainty was high. The analyses were performed in a cross-wise manner between two study areas in order to examine whether the bias correction algorithm would still hold in an independent test area. Our approach resulted in a significant improvement of the original map as indicated by an increase of the Normalized Mutual Information from 0.26 and 0.36 to 0.38 and 0.45 for the cross-wise test against reference maps in Pontresina and St. Moritz, respectively. Consequently subsequent land cover change assessments could be considerably improved by reducing the deviations from a reference change by almost 50 percent. We concluded that the use of logistic regression techniques for uncertainty modelling based on topographic gradients and fuzzy set operations are useful tools for predictively reducing uncertainty in maps and land cover change models. The procedure allows to get more reliable area estimates of crisp classes and it improves the computation of the fuzzy areas of classes. The approach has limitations when the original map shows high initial accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlqvist O, Keukelaar J, Oukbir K (2003) Rough and fuzzy geographical data integration. Int J Geograph Inform Sci 17(3):223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andréfouët S, Roux L, Chancerelle Y, Bonneville A (2000) A fuzzy-possibilistic scheme of study for objects with indeterminate boundaries: Application to French Polynesian reefscapes. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing 38(1):257–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker WL (1989) A review of models in landscape change. Landscape Ecol 2(2):111–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek JC (1981) Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Binaghi E, Brivio PA, Ghezzi P, Rampini A (1999) A fuzzy set-based accuracy assessment of soft classification. Pattern Recognition Lett 20:935–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolliger J, Mladenoff DJ (2005) Quantifying spatial classification uncertainties of the historical Wisconsin landscape (USA). Ecography 28:141–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DG (1998) Classification and boundary vagueness in mapping pre-settlement forest types. Int J Geograph Inform Sci 12(2):105–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrough PA (1989) Fuzzy mathematical methods for soil survey and land evaluation. J Soil Sci 40:477–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrough P, McDonnell R (1998) Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford University Press

  • Cheng T, Molenaar M, Lin H (2001) Formalizing fuzzy objects from uncertain classification results. Int J Geograph Inform Sci 15(1):27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Edu Psychol Measurement 20:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coppin P, Jonckheere I, Nackaerts K, Muys B (2004) Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review. Int J Remote Sensing 25(9):1565–1596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D, Prade H (2000) Fundamentals of fuzzy sets. The handbook of fuzzy sets series. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher P (2000) Sorites paradox and Vague Geographies. Fuzzy Sets Systems 113(1):7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonte CC, Lodwick WA (2004) Areas of fuzzy geographical entities. Int J Geograph Inform Sci 18(2):127–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foody GM (1996) Approaches for the production and evaluation of fuzzy land cover classifications from remotely-sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 17(7):1317–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes AD (1995) Classification algorithm evaluation: five performance measures based on confusion matrices. J Clin Monitoring 11:189–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gopal S, Woodcock C (1994) Theory and methods for accuracy assessment of thematic maps using fuzzy sets. Photogrammetric Eng Remote Sensing 60 (2):181–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Modelling 135:147–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Insightful (2001) S-Plus 6 for Windows: User’s Guide. Seattle7 Insightful, 688 pp

  • Jäger G, Benz U (2000) Measures of classification accuracy based on fuzzy similarity. IEEE Trans GeoSci Remote Sensing 38:1462–1467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kienast F (1993) Analysis of historic landscape patterns with a Geographical Information system – a methodological outline. Landscape Ecol 8(2):103– 118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klir GJ, Wierman MJ (1999) Uncertainty – based information – elements of generalized information theory. Springer, Physica-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnapuram R, Keller JM (1993) A possibilistic approach to clustering. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 1:98–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis HG, Brown M (2001) A generalised confusion matrix for assessing area estimates from remotely sensed data. Int J Remote Sensing 22(16):3223–3235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leyk S, Boesch R, Weibel R (2005) A conceptual framework for uncertainty investigation in map-based land cover change modelling. Trans GIS 9(3):291–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leyk S, Zimmermann NE (2004) A predictive uncertainty model for field-based survey maps using Generalized Linear Models. In: Egenhofer M, Freksa C, Miller H (eds) GIScience 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3234. Springer, pp 191–205

  • Lu D, Mausel P, Brondizio E, Moran E (2004) Change detection techniques. Int J Remote Sensing 25(12):2365–2407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsakis P, Andréfouët S, Capolsini P (2000) Evaluation of fuzzy partitions. Remote Sensing Environ 74:516–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plewe B (2002) The nature of uncertainty in historical geographic information. Trans GIS 6(4):431–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power C, Simms A, White R (2001) Hierarchical fuzzy pattern matching for the regional comparison of land use maps. Int J Geograph Information Sci 15(1):77–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson VB (1988) Some implications of fuzzy set theory applied to geographic databases. Computers, Environ Urban Systems 12:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson VB (2003) A perspective on the fundamentals of fuzzy sets and their use in Geographical Information Systems. Trans GIS 7(1):3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruspini EH (1969) A new approach to clustering. Information Control 15:22–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele BM, Winne JC, Redmond RL (1998) Estimation and mapping of misclassification probabilities for thematic land cover maps. Remote Sensing Environ 66:192–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock CE, Gopal S (2000) Fuzzy set theory and thematic maps: accuracy assessment and area estimation. Int J Geograph Information Sci 14:153–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Information Control 8:338–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is part of the project “Retrospective Assessments“ funded by the Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape and the Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow, and Landscape. We would also like to thank the two reviewers for their valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Leyk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leyk, S., Zimmermann, N.E. Improving land change detection based on uncertain survey maps using fuzzy sets. Landscape Ecol 22, 257–272 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9021-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-006-9021-2

Keywords

Navigation