Skip to main content


Log in

Mapping Spatial Patterns with Morphological Image Processing

  • Report
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript


We use morphological image processing for classifying spatial patterns at the pixel level on binary land-cover maps. Land-cover pattern is classified as ‘perforated,’ ‘edge,’ ‘patch,’ and ‘core’ with higher spatial precision and thematic accuracy compared to a previous approach based on image convolution, while retaining the capability to label these features at the pixel level for any scale of observation. The implementation of morphological image processing is explained and then demonstrated, with comparisons to results from image convolution, for a forest map of the Val Grande National Park in North Italy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others


  • Bogaert J, Ceulemans R, Salvador-Van Eysenrode D (2004) Decision tree algorithm for detection of spatial processes in landscape transformation. Environ Manage 33:62–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Civco DL, Hurd JD, Wilson EH, Arnold CL, Prisloe Jr. MP (2002) Quantifying and describing urbanizing landscapes in the northeast United States. Photogram Eng Rem S 68:1083–1090

    Google Scholar 

  • Estreguil CM, Cerruti M (2004) Portfolio of Earth Observation based indicators for Biodiversity and Nature Protection. EUR 21078/EN

  • Forman RTT (1995a) Land mosaics. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (1995b) Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Land Ecol 10:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman GE, Strittholt JR, Slosser NC, Dellasala DA (2002) Forest fragmentation of the conterminous United States: assessing forest intactness through road density and spatial characteristics. BioScience 52:411–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinz Center (The H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Economics and the Environment) (2002) The state of the nation’s ecosystems: measuring the lands, waters, and living resources of the United States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Wu J (2004) Use and misuse of landscape indices. Land Ecol 19:389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malahide (2004) Message from Malahide. The conference ‘Biodiversity and the EU—Sustaining Life, Sustaining Livelihoods’ was held under the Irish Presidency in Malahide, Ireland, 25–27 May 2004.

  • Matheron G (1967) Eléments pour une théorie des milieux poreux. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Montréal Process Liaison Office (2000) Montréal process year 2000 progress report—progress and innovation in implementing criteria and indicators for the conservation and sustainable management of temperate and boreal forests. The Montréal Process Liaison Office, Canadian Forest Service, Ottawa, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger JP, Muller E (1996) Characterizing the complexity of landscape boundaries by remote sensing. Land Ecol 11:65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger JP, Décamps H (1997) The structural connectivity threshold: an hypothesis in conservation biology at the landscape scale. Acta Oecol Int J Ecol 18:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musick HB, Grover HD (1991) Image textural measures as indices of landscape pattern. In: Turner MG, Gardner RH (eds) Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Neel MC, McGarigal K, Cushman SA (2004) Behavior of class-level landscape metrics across gradients of class aggregation and area. Land Ecol 19:435–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riitters KH, Wickham JD, O’Neill RV, Jones KB, Smith ER (2000) Global-scale patterns of forest fragmentation. Ecol Soc (formerly Cons Ecol) 4(2):3

    Google Scholar 

  • Riitters KH, Wickham JD, O’Neill RV, Jones KB, Smith ER, Coulston JW, Wade TG, Smith JH (2002) Fragmentation of continental United States forests. Ecosystems 5:815–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riitters KH, Wickham JD, Coulston JW (2004) A preliminary assessment of Montréal process indicators of forest fragmentation for the United States. Environ Monitor Assess 91:257–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soille P (2003) Morphological image analysis: principles and applications, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (2001) Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and process. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA Forest Service (2004) National report on sustainable forests 2003. Report FS-766, USDA Forest Service, Washington

  • Zipperer WC (1993) Deforestation patterns and their effects on forest patches. Land Ecol 8:177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Marco Cerruti for providing data and in-depth knowledge on the Val Grande National Park. Many special thanks to Pierre Soille and Marcin Iwanowski from JRC/LMNH for the in-depth discussion on morphological image processing techniques.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Vogt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vogt, P., Riitters, K.H., Estreguil, C. et al. Mapping Spatial Patterns with Morphological Image Processing. Landscape Ecol 22, 171–177 (2007).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: