Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biophysical and socioeconomic factors explaining the extent of forest cover on private ownerships in a Midwestern (USA) agrarian landscape

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As landscape fragmentation continues to escalate, it is imperative that we improve our understanding of the factors that contribute to the creation and retention of forest on privately-owned land to most effectively design and implement conservation policy. This article presents the percentages of variation in the proportion of forest on private ownerships across an agriculturally-dominated landscape in north-central Indiana, USA that can be explained by biophysical characteristics, landowner (socioeconomic) attributes, and private landowner assistance programs. While biophysical characteristics of the land accounted for the majority of variation explained (17.35%, p < 0.0001, n = 194), attitudinal and demographic attributes of the landowners contributed significantly to explaining additional variation (7.97%, p<0.0001), and overlapped with biophysical characteristics to explain another 17.31%. Program familiarity and enrollment did not explain a significant amount of the variation independent of either biophysical or landowner attributes. Private landowner assistance programs should broaden their objectives and increase incentives to appeal to the variety of landowners who possess the decision-making authority for most of the land in the region and the nation as a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alig R.J., Lee K.J. and Moulton R.J. 1990. Likelihood of timber management on nonindustrial private forests: evidence from research studies. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report SE-60.

  • M.J. Anderson A.N. Gribble (1998) ArticleTitlePartitioning the variation among spatial, temporal and environmental components of a multivariate data set Aust. J. Ecol. 23 158–167

    Google Scholar 

  • A.N. Auclair (1976) ArticleTitleEcological factors in the development of intensive-management ecosystems in the Midwestern United States Ecology 57 431–444 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1936429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.H. Beach S.K. Pattanayak J-C. Yang B.C. Murray R.C. Abt (2005) ArticleTitleEconometric studies of non-industrial private forest management: A review and synthesis Forest Policy Econ. 7 261–281 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00065-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lochmueller Bernardin et al. (2002) Floodplains in Indiana (1:633,600 polygon shapefile) G. Douglas Clark (Eds) The Indiana Water Resource: Availability, Uses, and Needs Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates, Evansville Indiana

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Best L.A. Wayburn (2001) America's Private Forests: Status and Stewardship Island Press Washington 268

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch T.W. 1996. Private-forest land owners of the United States, 1994. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Resource Bulletin NE-134. USDA Forest Service, Radnor, Pennsylvania.

  • D.G. Brown (2003) ArticleTitleLand use and forest cover on private parcels in Upper Midwest, USA, 1970 to 1990 Landscape Ecol. 18 777–790 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:LAND.0000014470.16973.cb

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Burgi M.G. Turner (2002) ArticleTitleFactors and processes shaping land cover and land cover changes along the Wisconsin River Ecosystems 5 184–201 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10021-001-0064-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B.J. Butler E.C. Leatherberry (2004) ArticleTitleAmerica's family forest owners J. Forest. 102 4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Dillman (2000) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method EditionNumber2 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • A.F. Egan A.E. Luloff (2000) ArticleTitleThe exurbanization of American's forests: Research in rural social science J. Forest. 98 26–30

    Google Scholar 

  • D.L. Erickson R.L. Ryan R. Young ParticleDe (2002) ArticleTitleWoodlots in the rural landscape: Landowner motivations and management attitudes in a Michigan (USA) case study Landsc. Urban Plan. 58 101–112 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00213-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzmeier D.P., Steinhardt G.C. and Lee B.D. 2001. Indiana soils: evaluation and conservation. Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service Publication ID-72, pp. 7–01

  • C.A. Frissell D. Bayles (1996) ArticleTitleEcosystem management and the conservation of aquatic biodiversity and ecological integrity Water Resour. Bull. 32 229–240 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK28XjtV2gsL4%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D.L. Guber (2003) The Grassroots of a Green Revolution: Polling American on the Environment MIT Press Cambridge 279

    Google Scholar 

  • B.R. Hull D.P Robertson G.J. Buhyoff (2004) ArticleTitle“Boutique” forestry: New forest practices in urbanizing landscapes J. Forest. 102 14–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Indiana Geological Survey 2002a. Quaternary geologic map of Indiana (Indiana Geological Survey, 1:500,000, Polygon Shapefile). Indiana Geological Survey, Bloomington, IN.

  • Indiana Geological Survey 2002b. Thickness ranges of unconsolidated deposits in Indiana (Indiana Geological Survey, 1:500,000, Polygon Shapefile). Indiana Geological Survey, Bloomington, IN.

  • L.R. Iverson (1988) ArticleTitleLand-use changes in Illinois, USA: The influence of landscape attributes on current and historic land use Landscape Ecol. 2 45–61 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00138907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Jones R.E. Dunlap (1992) ArticleTitleThe social bases of environmental concern: have they changed over time? Rural Sociol. 57 28–47 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1549-0831.1992.tb00455.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.L. Kanagy H.M. Nelsen (1995) ArticleTitleReligion and environmental concern: challenging the dominant assumptions Rev. Relig. Res. 37 33–45

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Kendra R.B. Hull (2005) ArticleTitleMotivations and behaviors of new forest owners in Virginia Forest Sci. 51 142–154

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Lengendre L. Legendre (1998) Developments in Numerical Ecology (NATO ASI Series, Series G: Ecological Sciences, Volume 14) Springer New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Lidestav M. Ekström (2000) ArticleTitleIntroducing gender in studies on management behaviour among non-industrial private forest owners Scand. J. Forest Res. 15 378–386 Occurrence Handle10.1080/028275800448011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Lönnstedt (1997) ArticleTitleNonindustrial private forest owners’ decision process: A qualitative study about goals, time perspectiveopportunity, and alternatives Scand. J. Forest Res. 12 302–310 Occurrence Handle10.1080/02827589709355414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Loyland V. Ringstad H. Oy (1995) ArticleTitleDeterminants of forest activities – A study of private nonindustrial forestry in Norway J. Forest Econ. 1 219–237

    Google Scholar 

  • M.F. Magalhaes D.C. Batalha M.J. Collares-Pereira (2002) ArticleTitleGradients in stream fish assemblages across a Mediterranean landscape: contributions of environmental and spatial structure Freshw. Biol. 47 1015–1031 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00830.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.L. Mallow (1964) Choosing Variables in a Linear Regression: A Graphical Aid Presented at the Central Regional Meeting of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics Manhattan, Kansas

    Google Scholar 

  • P.C. Marsh J.E. Luey (1982) ArticleTitleOases for aquatic life within agricultural watersheds Fisheries 7 16–24 Occurrence Handle10.1577/1548-8446(1982)007<0016:OFALWA>2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K.E. Medley B.W. Okey G.W. Barrett M.F. Lucas W.H. Renwick (1995) ArticleTitleLandscape change with agricultural intensification in a rural watershed, southwestern Ohio, USA Landscape Ecol. 10 161–176 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00133029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.E. Moore R.K. Swihart (2005) ArticleTitleModeling patch occupancy by forest rodents: Incorporating detectability and spatial autocorrelation with hierarchically structured data Journal of Wildlife Management. 69(3) 933–949. Occurrence Handle10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[0933:MPOBFR]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Conservation Service 1994. State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) database for Indiana (1:250,000). US Department of Agriculture, NRCS, Fort Worth, Texas.

  • J. Neter M.H. Kutner C.J. Nachtsheim W. Wasserman (1996) Applied Linear Statistical Models EditionNumber4 McGraw-Hill New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • M.J. Norušis (2003) SPSS 12.0 Statistical Procedures Companion Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ USA

    Google Scholar 

  • W.E. Odum (1982) ArticleTitleEnvironmental degradation and the tyranny of small decisions BioScience 32 728–729 Occurrence Handle10.2307/1308718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Omernik (1987) ArticleTitleEcoregions of the conterminous United States Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 77 118–125 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00149.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Pan G. Domon S. Blois Particlede A. Bouchard (1998) ArticleTitleTemporal (1958–1993) and spatial patterns of land use changes in Haunt-Saint-Laurent (Quebec, Canada) and their relation to landscape physical attributes Landscape Ecol. 14 35–52 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008022028804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.P. Royer R.J. Moulton (1987) ArticleTitleReforestation incentives: Tax incentives and cost sharing in the south J. Forest. 85 45–47

    Google Scholar 

  • P.R. Scull J.R. Harman (2004) ArticleTitleForest distribution and site quality in southern Lower Michigan, USA J. Biogeogr. 31 1503–1514 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01121.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.M. Turner (1997) Achieving private-sector involvement and its implications for resource professionals J.E. William C.A. Wood M.P. Dombeck (Eds) Watershed Restoration: Principles and Practices American Fisheries Society Bethesda, MD, USA 158–176

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Census Bureau 2005. State and County Quickfacts. [online] URL: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/ Accessed October 16, 2005.

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameUnited States Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Agriculture Statistics Service (NASS) (2005) Cropland data layer (USDANASS, 1:100,000, Grid) USDA-NASS Marketing Division Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameUnited States Geological Survey (2004) National elevation data set USGS, Sioux Falls South Dakota

    Google Scholar 

  • K.D. Liere ParticleVan R.E. Dunlap (1980) ArticleTitleThe social bases of environmental concern: a review of hypotheses, explanation, and empirical evidence Public Opin. Q. 44 181–197 Occurrence Handle10.1086/268583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Whittaker (1984) ArticleTitleModel interpretation form the additive elements of the likelihood function Appl. Stat. 33 52–64 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2347663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Zhang W.A. Flick (2001) ArticleTitleSticks, Carrots, and reforestation investment Land Econ. 77 443–456 Occurrence Handle10.2307/3147135

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. L. Ross-Davis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frimpong, E.A., Ross-Davis, A.L., Lee, J.G. et al. Biophysical and socioeconomic factors explaining the extent of forest cover on private ownerships in a Midwestern (USA) agrarian landscape. Landscape Ecol 21, 763–776 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-5476-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-5476-9

Keywords

Navigation