Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bridging the Gap between Centrally Defined Policies and Local Decisions – Towards more Sensitive and Creative Rural Landscape Management

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

European policies and instruments such as the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and many instruments for nature and landscape conservation in Europe have for some decades been dominated by centralisation and standardisation. This paper shows that this has led to the neglect of contextual and place-related approaches and an unnecessarily high degree of over-simplification. Recently, as a reaction to this over-simplification, diversity and specific character has been particularly stressed in many European and national strategies for rural landscapes and conservation, but the processes of simplification still continue. Using examples from mixed agriculture and forestry landscapes in Portugal, Slovenia and Sweden, this paper aims to contribute to understanding the gap between centrally defined strategies for rural landscapes and awareness and management practices at local level. The three countries are situated at the outer fringes of Europe, and are complementary with their different degrees of urbanisation, forest distribution and tree-richness in the agricultural landscapes. Furthermore, the aim is to show how local landscape management is driven and to identify factors contributing to a better use of public policies through a participatory process with visions for the future. Systems of landscape classifications such as landscape character assessment often recognise the specific character of these landscapes, but have so far achieved very little for the preservation of their locally specific values, nor have they contributed to the development and the creation of new visions for future management. Such systems could contribute much more if they could be opened to adaptation on a more local scale in communication-led management planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • P. Alphandery Y. Bitoun P. Dupont (1990) ArticleTitleLes agriculteurs et la sensibilité ecologique Courrier de la Cellule Environment de l’INRA 90 14–15

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Alvesson K. Sköldberg (1994) Tolkning och reflektion. Vetenskapsfilosofi och kvalitativ metod Studentlitteratur Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Ambroise M. Barnaud G. Vedel D. Legros (1998) ArticleTitleBilan de l’experience des plans de development durable au point the vue de la relation agriculture-environment Le Courrier l’Environment de l’INRA 34 5–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharel F. and Pinto-Correia T. 1999. Land usenature conservation and regional policy in AlentejoPortugal. In: Kroenert R., Baudry J., Bowler I. and Reenberg A. (eds), Land-Use Changes and their Environmental Impact in Rural Areas in Europe. Man and the Biosphere Series, Vol. 24, Paris.

  • D.M. Baldock G. Beaufoy (1993) Nature Conservation and New Directions in the Common Agricultural Policy IEEP London

    Google Scholar 

  • D.M. Baldock G. Beaufoy F. Brouwer F. Godeschalk (1996) Farming at the Margins. Abandonment or Redeployment of Agricultural Land in Europe IEEP and LEI-DLO London and The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Berleant (1997) Living in the Landscape. Toward an Aesthetics of Environment University Press of Kansas Kansas, Lawrence

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Berleant (2004) Re-thinking Aesthetics TJ International Ltd Padstow, Cornwall

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Bethe E. Bolsius (Eds) (1995) Marginalisation of Agricultural land in Europe: Essays and Country Studies National Spatial Planning Agency The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Bishop A. Phillips (Eds) (2004) Countryside Planning. New Approaches to Management and Conservation Earthscan London

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Brady (2003) Aesthetics of the Natural Environment The University of Alabama Press Tuscaloosa

    Google Scholar 

  • B.C. Breman T. Pinto Correia (2003) Coping with Marginalization and Multifunctional Land use in Portugal – A National Inventory for the Eurolan Project Departamento de Planeamento Biofísico e Paisagístico Universidade de Évora

    Google Scholar 

  • Buijs A., Pedroli B. and Luginbuhl Y. 2006. From hiking through farmland to farming in a leisure landscape: Changing social perceptions of the European landscape. Landscape Ecol., this issue.

  • Buller H., Wilson G.A. and Holl A. 2000. Agri-Environmental Policy in the European Union. Ashgate, Aldersholt.

  • Cancela d’Abreu A., Pinto-Correia T. and Oliveira R. (Coord.) 2004. Contributos para a Identificação e Caracterização da Paisagem em Portugal Continental. Vol. I–V, Colecção Estudos 10, DGOT-DU, Lisboa.

  • J. Carew-Reid R. Prescott-Allen S. Bass B. Dalal-Clayton (1994) Strategies for National Sustainable Development. A Handbook for their Planning and Implementation IUCN, IIED and Earthscan Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Carlson (2000) Aesthetics and the Environment. The Appreciation of NatureArt and Architecture Routledge London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. 2000. European Landscape Convention. T-Land6, Strasbourg.

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameCouncil of Europe, UNEP and ECNC. (1996) The Pan-European Biological and Landscape Diversity Strategy. A Vision of Europe’s Natural Heritage ECNC Tilburg, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Cronon (1996) Uncommon Ground. Rethinking the Human Place in Nature W.W. Norton & Company New York and London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dramstad W. and Sogge C. 2003. Agricultural impacts on landscapes. Developing indicators for policy analysis. Proceedings from the NIJOS/OECD Expert Meeting on Agricultural Landscape Indicators, 7–9 Oct., Oslo.

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameECNC (1997) Action Theme 4: European Landscapes. Draft Action Plan for European Landscapes European Centre for Nature Conservation Tilburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden P. and Vieira M. 2000. Portugal: agri-environmental policy and the maintenance of biodiversity rich extensive farming systems. In: Buller H., Wilson G.A. and Holl A. (eds), Agri-Environmental Policy in the European Union. Ashgate, Aldersholt.

  • European Commission. 1999. State of Application of Regulation (EEC) 2078/92: Evaluation of Agri-Environment Programmes. DGVI Commission Working DocumentVI/7655/98, Brussels.

  • J.W. Fisk O.B. Herteman T.L. Thorburn (2000) Integrated farming systems: a sustainable agriculture learning community in the USA N.G. Roling M.A.E. Wagemakers (Eds) Facilitating Sustainable Agriculture Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Foster (2000) Restoring nature in American culture: an environmental aesthetic perspective P. Gobster B. Hull (Eds) Restoring Nature Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities Island Press California 71–94

    Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Gago (1998) The Social Sciences Bridge Observatório das Ciências e das Tecnologias Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Gerdehag M. Aronsson (1999) Bygden där vinden vände Prisma Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Gibbons C. Limoges H. Nowotny S. Schwartzman P. Scott T. Trow (1994) The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies Sage London

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Green W. Vos (Eds) (2001) Threatened Landscapes Conserving Cultural Environments SPON Press London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Gustavsson (1995) Landskapsförändringar inom vår egen tid; exemplet Bräkneåns dalgång i en jämförelse av foton från 1974 och 1994 Blekinge Natur Karlskrona

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Gustavsson A. Peterson (2003) Authenticity in landscape conservation and management: the importance of the local context H. Palang G. Fry (Eds) Landscape Interfaces Kluwer Academic publishers Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Hagedorn (Eds) (2002) Environmental Co-operation and Institutional Change Edward Elgar Publishing Limited Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Hansen J. Primdahl (1991) Miljofolsomme omraader: evaluering af MFO-ordningens ivarksaettelse og betydning DSR Landskabsserie 1 Frederiksberg

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Helmfrid (1994) Landscape and Settlements. National Atlas of Sweden Department of Geography, University of Stockholm Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Hladnik D. 2005. Spatial structure of disturbed landscapes in Slovenia. Ecol. Eng.

  • B. Ilbery (Eds) (1998) The Geography of Rural Change Longman Essex

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Jollivet (1997) Des campagnes paysannes au rural ‘vert’: naissance d’une ruralité postindustrielle M. Jollivet (Eds) Vers un Rural Postindustriel Rural et Environment dans huit Pays Européens l’Harmattan, Paris 77–126

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Klijn W. Vos (Eds) (2000) From Landscape Ecology to Landscape Science Kluwer Academic Publishers London

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Lowe C. Ray N. Ward D. Wood R. Woodward (1998) Participation in Rural Development: A Review of European Experience Centre for Rural Economy Newcastle upon Tyne

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Lowe D. Baldock (2000) Integration of environmental objectives into agricultural policy making F. Brouwer P. Lowe (Eds) CAP Regimes and the European Countryside CABI Publishing Wallingford 31–52

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Marusic et al. (1998) Regional Distribution of Landscape Types in Slovenia. Methodological Basis National Office for Physical Planning Republic of Slovenia

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Mormont (1999) ArticleTitleUn questionnaire durkheimien du développement durable. EnvironnementQui participe ? Environ. Soc. 21 67–79

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Nilsson Å Persson (2003) ArticleTitleFramework for analysing environmental policy integration J. Environ. Policy Plan. 5 333–359

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Nowotny P. Scott M. Gibbons (2002) Re-thinking Science – Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty Polity Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira R. and Pinto-Correia T. 2003. An Interdisciplinary Approach for integrating Landscape Management in the Common Agricultural Policy – Application to the municipality of Mértola, Southern Alentejo, Portugal. Proceedings of NATO Workshop, Nov, Poland.

  • T. O’Riordan H. Voisey (1998) The Transition to Sustainability, The Politics of Agenda 21 in Europe Earthscan London

    Google Scholar 

  • Palang H., Gyuro E.K., Urbanc M., Melik A., Skowronek E. and Woloszyn W. 2006. The forgotten landscapes of Central and Eastern Europe. Landscape Ecol.this issue.

  • B. Pedroli (Eds) (2000) Landscape – Our Home/Lebensraum Landschaft, Essays on The Culture of the European Landscape as a Task Indigo Zeist 221

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman C. 2004. Retorikens imperium. Brutus Östlings Bokförlag Symposion. (Original title: L’empire rhétorique. Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, Paris 1977).

  • T. Pinto-Correia (2000a) ArticleTitleAs medidas agro-ambientais como instrumento integrado para a preservação da paisagem rural: a importância da sensibilização dos técnicos locais e dos chefes de exploração GeoInova 1 81–98

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Pinto-Correia (2000b) ArticleTitleFuture development in Portuguese rural areas: how to manage agricultural support for landscape conservation? Landscape Urban Plan. 50 95–106

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Pinto-Correia E.M. Sorensen (1998) ArticleTitleAnalysing current changes in farm structure in two Danish parishes: types of farmers and their strategies Forest Landscape Res. 1 491–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto-Correia T. and Vos W. 2004. Multifunctionality in Mediterranean landscapes – past and future. In: Jongman R. (eds), The New Dimensions of the European Landscape. Wageningen UR Frontis Series, Springer, Vol. 4, pp. 135–164.

  • J. Pirnat (2000) ArticleTitleConservation and management of forest patches and corridors in suburban landscapes Landscape Urban Plan. 52 135–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J. 2000. Supportive policies and practice for scaling up sustainable agriculture. In: Roling N.G. and Wagemakers M.A.E. (eds), Facilitating Sustainable Agriculture. Cambridge University Press, pp. 23–45.

  • Primdahl J. and Pinto-Correia T. 2004. Environmental Policy Integration and the CAP – the answer to a new landscape policy agenda? Paper submitted to the Congress ‘From Landscape Research to Landscape in Action’, Bordeaux, 1–3 Dec.

  • J.L. Ramìréz (1995) Skapande mening En begreppsgeneologisk undersökning om rationalitetvetenskap och planering Nordiska Institutet för Samhällsplanering Avhandling 13:2 Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling N.G. and Wagemakers M.A.E. (eds), 2003. Facilitating Sustainable Agriculture. Cambridge University Press.

  • T. Sá Marques (2004) Portugal na Transição do Século. Retratos e Dinâmicas Territoriais Ed Afrontamento Porto

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholtes P. 1999. Agriculteurs et environment: la participation des agriculteurs au programme agri-environment wallon. Environment et Société22. F.U.L., Arlon.

  • Schramek J., Biehl D., Buller H. and Wilson G. (eds), 1999. Implementation and Effectiveness of Agri-Environmental Schemes Established Under Regulation 2078/92. Report of Project FAIR 1 CT95–274, Frankfurt.

  • Selman P. 2004. Barriers and bridges to sustaining cultural landscapes. In: Jongman R. (eds), The New Dimensions of the European Landscape. Wageningen UR Frontis Series, Vol. 4, Springer.

  • U. Sporrong U. Ekstam K. Samuelson (1995) Swedish Landscapes Swedish Environmental Protection Agency Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Stanners P. Bourdeau (Eds) (1995) Europe’s Environment. The Dobřis Assessment European Environment Agency Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Terwan M. Ritchie W. Wejden G. Verschuur J. Joannides (2004) Values of Agrarian Landscapes Across Europe and North America Reed Business Information The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Toulmin (1972) Human Understanding. The Collective Use and Evolution of Concepts Princeton University Press Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameUNECE (1998) Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters UN Economic Commission for Europe Aarhus

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Woerkum ParticleVan N. Aarts (2000) Communication between farmers and government over nature: a new approach to policy development N.G. Roling M.A.E. Wagemakers (Eds) Facilitating Sustainable Agriculture Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos W., Austad I. and Pinto-Correia T. 1993. Sustainable forestry in old cultural landscapes in Europe. In: Koch N.E. (eds), The Scientific Basis for Sustainable Multiple-Use Forestry in the European Community. Proc. Sci. Workshop under the EC Research Programme AIR, Brussels 28–29 June, pp. 81–96.

  • M. Wageman J. Boerma (2000) The implementation of nature policy in the Netherlands: platforms designed to fail N.G. Roling M.A.E. Wagemakers (Eds) Facilitating Sustainable Agriculture Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Warburton (2004) Policy context for community involvement in countryside planning K. Bishop A. Phillips (Eds) Countryside Planning. New Approaches to Management and Conservation Earthscan London

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Whitby (1996) The European Environment and the CAP Reform. Policies and Prospects for Conservation CAB International Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • G.A. Wilson (2000) ArticleTitleFrom productivism to post-productivism and back again? Exploring the un(changed) natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 26 77–102

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa Pinto-Correia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pinto-Correia, T., Gustavsson, R. & Pirnat, J. Bridging the Gap between Centrally Defined Policies and Local Decisions – Towards more Sensitive and Creative Rural Landscape Management. Landscape Ecol 21, 333–346 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-4720-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-4720-7

Keywords

Navigation