Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 177–189 | Cite as

Spatial and non-spatial factors: When do they affect landscape indicators of watershed loading?

  • Sarah E. GergelEmail author
Research article

Abstract

The percentage of a watershed occupied by agricultural areas is widely used to predict nutrient loadings and in-stream water chemistry because water quality is often linked to non-point sources in a watershed. Measures of the spatial location of source areas have generally not been incorporated into such landscape indicators although empirical evidence and watershed loading models suggest that spatially explicit information is useful for predicting loadings. I created a heuristic grid-based surface-flow model to address the discrepancies between spatially explicit and non-spatial approaches to understanding watershed loading. The mean and variance in loading were compared among thousands of simulated watersheds with varying percentages of randomly located source and sinks. The variability in loading among replicate landscapes was greatest for those landscapes with ~65% source areas. This variance peak suggests that considering the spatial arrangement of cover types is most important for watersheds with intermediate relative abundances of sources and sinks as the wide variety of different spatial configurations can lead to either very high or very low loading. Increasing the output from source pixels (relative to the amount absorbed by sink pixels) among different landscapes moved the peak in variance to landscapes with lower percentages of sources. A final scenario examined both broad- and fine-scale heterogeneity in source output to disentangle the relative contributions of spatial configuration, percentage of source covers, and heterogeneity of sources in governing variability in loading. In landscapes with high percentages of source pixels, fine-scale heterogeneity in source output was responsible for a greater portion of the total variability in loading among different watersheds than was spatial arrangement. These results provide several testable hypotheses for when spatial and non-spatial approaches might be most useful in relating land cover to water chemistry and suggest improvements for the spatial sensitivity analyses of eco-hydrologic watershed models.

Keywords

Landscape metrics Land use Monitoring Neutral landscape models Non-point source pollution Nutrient loading model Percolation theory Random maps Spatial models Spatial sensitivity analysis Water chemistry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, R.B., Johnes, P.J., Boyer, E.W., Smith, R.A. 2002A comparison of models for estimating the riverine export of nitrogen from large watershedsBiogeochemistry57295339Google Scholar
  2. Band, L.E., Tague, C.L., Groffman, P., Belt, K. 2001Forest ecosystem processes at the watershed scale: hydrological and ecological controls of nitrogen exportHydrological Processes1520132028Google Scholar
  3. Boyer E.W., Goodale C.L. Jaworsk N.A. et al. 2002. Nitrogen sources and relationships to riverine nitrogen export in the northeastern USA. Biogeochemistry 57(1): 137–169. Google Scholar
  4. Correll, D.L. 1991Human impact on the functioning of landscape boundariesHolland, M.M.Risser, P.J.Naiman, R.J. eds. The Role of Landscape Boundaries in the Management and Restoration of Changing EnvironmentsChapman & HallNew York90109Google Scholar
  5. Cahn, M.D., Hummel, J.W., Brouer, B.H. 1994Spatial analysis of soil fertility for site-specific crop managementSoil Science Society of America Journal5812401248Google Scholar
  6. Carpenter S.R., Caraco N.R., Correll D.L., Howarth R.H., Sharpley A.N. and Smith V.H. 1998. Issues in Ecology No. 3, Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecological Society of America.Google Scholar
  7. Cambardella, C.A., Moorman, T.B., Novak, J.M., Parkin, T.B., Karlen, D.L., Turco, R.F., Konopka, A.E. 1994Field-scale variability of soil properties in Central Iowa soilsSoil Science Society of America Journal5815011511Google Scholar
  8. Cresser, M.S., Smart, R., Billett, M.F., Soulsby, G., Neal, C., Wade, A., Langan, S., Edwards, A.C. 2000Modelling water chemistry for a major Scottish river from catchment attributesJournal of Applied Ecology37171184Google Scholar
  9. Delgado, J.A., Mosier, A.R., Valentine, D.W., Schimel, D.S., Parton, W.J. 1996Long term N-15 studies in a catena of the shortgrass steppeBiogeochemistry324152Google Scholar
  10. Delgado, J.A. 2002Quantifying the loss mechanisms of nitrogenJournal of Soil and Water Conservation57389398Google Scholar
  11. Fisher, P., Abrahart, R.J., Herbinger, W. 1997The sensitivity of two distributed non-point source pollution models to the spatial arrangement of the landscapeHydrological Processes11241252Google Scholar
  12. Gergel, S.E., Turner, M.G., Miller, J.R., Stanley, E.H., Melack, J.M. 2002Landscape indicators of human impacts to riverine systemsAquatic Sciences64118128Google Scholar
  13. Gergel, S.E., Turner, M.G., Kratz, T.K. 1999Scale-dependent landscape effects on north temperate lakes and riversEcological Applications913771390Google Scholar
  14. Griffith, J.A. 2002Geographic techniques and recent applications of remote sensing to landscape-water quality studiesWater Air and Soil Pollution138181197Google Scholar
  15. Groffman, P.M., Hanson, G.C. 1997Wetland denitrification: influence of site quality and relationships with wetland delineation protocolsSoil Science Society of America Journal61323329Google Scholar
  16. Hanrahan, G., Gledhill, M., House, W.A., Worsfold, P.J. 2001Phosphorus loading in the Frone CatchmentUK: seasonal refinement of the coefficient modeling approachJournal of Environmental Quality3017381746PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Harding, J.S., Benfield, E.F., Bolstad, P.V., Helfman, G.S., Jones, E.B.D. 1998Stream biodiversity: the ghost of land use pastProceedings of the National Academy of Science951483414847Google Scholar
  18. Herlihy, A.T., Stoddard, J.L., Johnson, C.B. 1998The relationship between stream chemistry and watershed level land cover data in the mid-atlantic region, USWater Air and Soil Pollution105377386Google Scholar
  19. Hill, A.R., Devito, K.J., Campagnolo, S., Sanmugadas, K. 2000Subsurface denitrification in a forest riparian zone: interactions between hydrology and supplies of nitrate and organic carbonBiogeochemistry51193223Google Scholar
  20. Hornberger, G.M., Raffensperger, J.P., Wiberg, P.L., Eshleman, K.N. 1998Elements of Physical HydrologyJohns Hopkins University PressBaltimore302Google Scholar
  21. Jetten, V., Govers, G., Hessel, R. 2003Erosion models: quality of spatial predictionsHydrological Processes17887900Google Scholar
  22. Johnes, P.J. 1996Evaluation and management of the impact of land use change on the nitrogen and phosphorus load delivered to surface waters: the export coefficient modeling approachJournal of Hydrology183249323Google Scholar
  23. Johnes, P.J., Moss, B., Phillips, G. 1996The determination of total nitrogen and total phosphorous concentrations in freshwaters from land usestock headage and population data: testing a model for use in conservation and water quality managementFreshwater Biology36451473Google Scholar
  24. Johnson, L.B., Richards, C., Host, G.E., Arthur, J.W. 1997Landscape influence on water chemistry in Midwestern stream ecosystemsFreshwater Biology37193218Google Scholar
  25. Jones, K.B., Neale, A.C., Nash, M.S., Riitters, K.H., Wickham, J.D., O’Neill, R.V., van Remortel, R.D. 2000aLandscape correlates of breeding bird richness across the United States mid-Atlantic regionEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment63159174Google Scholar
  26. Jones, K.B., Heggem, D.T., Wade, T.G., Neale, A.C., Ebert, D.W., Nash, M.S., Mehaffey, M.H., Hermann, K.A., Selle, A.R., Augustine, S., Goodman, I.A., Pedersen, J., Bolgrien, D., Viger, J.M., Chiang, D., Lin, C.J., Zhong, Y.H., Baker, J., van Remortel, R.D. 2000bAssessing landscape condition relative to water resources in the western United States: a strategic approachEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment64227245Google Scholar
  27. Jones, K.B., Neale, A.C., Nash, M.S., Van Remortel, R.D., Wickham, J.D., Riitters, K.H., Oȁ9Neill, R.V. 2001Predicting nutrient and sediment loadings to streams from landscape metrics: a multiple watershed study from the United States Mid-Atlantic regionLandscape Ecology16301312Google Scholar
  28. Jordan, T.E., Correll, D.L., Weller, D.E. 1997Relating nutrient discharges from watersheds to land use and streamflow variabilityWater Resources Research3325792590Google Scholar
  29. Kelling K.A., Bundy L.G., Combs S.M. and Peters J.B. 1998. 973 Soil Test Recommendations for Field, Vegetable and Fruit 974 Crops. University of Wisconsin, Cooperative Extension Ser-975 vice Bulletin A2809.Google Scholar
  30. Klein, R.D. 1979Urbanization and stream quality impairmentWater Resources Bulletin15948963Google Scholar
  31. Khosla, R., Fleming, K., Delgado, J.A., Shaver, T.M., Westfall, D.G. 2002Use of site-specific management zones to improve nitrogen management for precision agricultureJournal of Soil and Water Conservation57513518Google Scholar
  32. Lee, K.Y., Fisher, T.R., Jordan, T.E., Correll, D.L., Weller, D.E. 2000Modeling the hydrochemistry of the Choptank River Basin using GWLF and Arc/Info: 1. Model calibration and validationBiogeochemistry49143173Google Scholar
  33. Lowrance, R. 1992Groundwater nitrate and denitrification in a coastal plain riparian forestJournal of Environmental Quality21401405Google Scholar
  34. Lowrance, R., Todd, R., Fail, J.,Jr., Hendrickson, O.,Jr., Leonard, R. 1984Riparian forests as nutrient filters in agricultural watershedsBioScience34374377Google Scholar
  35. Ludwig, J.A., Eager, R.W., Bastin, G.N., Chewings, V.H., Liedloff, A.C. 2002A leakiness index for assessing landscape function using remote sensingLandscape Ecology17157171Google Scholar
  36. Mattikalli, N.M., Richards, K.S. 1996Estimation of surface water quality changes in response to lands use change: application of the export coefficient model using remote sensing and geographical information systemJournal of Environmental Management48263282Google Scholar
  37. McClain, M.E., Boyer, E.W., Dent, C.L., Gergel, S.E., Grimm, N.B., Groffman, P.M., Hart, S.C., Harvey, J.W., Johnston, C.A., Mayorga, E., McDowell, W.H., Pinay, G. 2003Biogeochemical hot spots and hot moments at the interface of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystemsEcosystems6301312Google Scholar
  38. Mosier, A.R., Parton, W.J., Valentine, D.W., Ojima, D.S., Schimel, D.S., Delgado, J.A. 1996CH4N2O fluxes in the Colorado shortgrass steppe. Impact of landscape and nitrogen additionGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles10387399Google Scholar
  39. Moussa, R., Voltz, M., Andrieux, P. 2002Effects of the spatial organization of agricultural management on the hydrological behaviour of a farmed catchment during flood eventsHydrological Processes16393412Google Scholar
  40. Norton, M.M., Fisher, T.R. 2000The effects of forest on stream water quality in two coastal plain watersheds of the Chesapeake BayEcological Engineering14337362Google Scholar
  41. Peterjohn, W.T., Correll, D.L. 1984Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: observations on the role of a riparian forestEcology6514661475Google Scholar
  42. Richards, D., Johnson, L.B., Host, G. 1996Landscape-scale influences on stream habitats and biotaCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences53295311 Suppl. 1Google Scholar
  43. Schueler, T.R., Galli, J. 1992Environmental impacts of stormwater pondsKimble, P.Schueler, T. eds. Watershed Restoration Source BookMetropol, Wash. Counc. GovWashington DCGoogle Scholar
  44. Sponseller, R.A., Benfield, E.F., Valett, H.M. 2001Relationships between land usespatial scale and stream macroinvertebrate communitiesFreshwater Biology4614091424Google Scholar
  45. Tague, C.L., Band, L.E. 2001Evaluating explicit and implicit routing for watershed hydro-ecological models of forest hydrology at the small catchment scaleHydrological Processes1514151439Google Scholar
  46. Turner, M.G., Gardner, R.H., Oȁ9Neill, R.V. 2001Landscape Ecology in Theory and PracticeSpringer-VerlagNY401Google Scholar
  47. Verchot, L.V., Groffman, P.M., Frank, D.A. 2002Landscape versus ungulate control of gross mineralization and gross nitrification in semi-arid grasslands of Yellowstone National ParkSoil Biology and Biochemisty3416911699Google Scholar
  48. Weller, D.E., Jordan, T.E., Correll, D.L. 1998Heuristic models for material discharge from landscapes with riparian buffersEcological Applications811561169Google Scholar
  49. With, K.A., King, A.W. 1997The use and misuse of neutral landscape models in ecologyOikos79219229Google Scholar
  50. Zak, D.R., Grigal, D.F. 1991Nitrogen mineralization, nitrification and denitrification in upland and wetland ecosystemsOecologia88189196Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Applied Conservation Research, Department of Forest SciencesUniversity of British ColumbiaBCCanada

Personalised recommendations