Landscape Ecology

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 127–135 | Cite as

Edge avoidance and movement of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus in matrix and non-matrix habitat

Research article

Abstract

We experimentally examined edge effects and movement patterns of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus in two habitat types, its preferred meadow habitat, and intervening forest matrix habitat. We followed the movement of 46 butterflies released at either 5 or 20m from a forest edge in either forest or meadow habitat. In contrast to theoretical predictions, we found that butterflies flew less frequently, shorter distances, and at lower rates in matrix habitat than they did in meadow habitat. Distance from the edge had little effect on these aspects of movement. Flight was strongly influenced by light levels with butterflies flying more readily at higher light levels. Light levels were higher in meadows than in forest explaining much of the difference in movement patterns. Turning angles showed that butterflies flying in meadow habitat avoided forest edges and that this effect extended nearly 25 m into meadows. Analysis of net displacement from the forest edge reinforced this result and showed that there may be attraction to the meadow for butterflies flying within forest.

Keywords

Alberta Dispersal Ecotone Emigration Migration Patch Rocky Mountains 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belisle, M., Desrochers, A. 2002Gap-crossing decisions by forest birds: an empirical basis for parameterizing spatially-explicitindividual-based modelsLandscape Ecology17219231Google Scholar
  2. Bowne, D.R., Peles, J.D., Barrett, G.W. 1999Effects of landscape structure on movement patterns of the hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus)Landscape Ecology145365Google Scholar
  3. Brdar, C.L. 2000Limits to butterfly movement in a successional landscapeMSc. ThesisUniversity of AlbertaEdmonton, AlbertaCanada85 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Connor, E.F., Faeth, S.H., Simberloff, D. 1983Leafminers on oak: the role of immigration and in situ reproductive recruitmentEcology64191204Google Scholar
  5. Crone, E.E., Doak, D., Pokki, J. 2001Ecological influences on the dynamics of a field vole metapopulationEcology82831843Google Scholar
  6. Ehrlich, P.R. 2003

    Butterflies, test systems, and biodiversity

    Boggs, C.L.Watt, W.B.Ehrlich, P.E.R. eds. Butterflies: ecology and evolution taking flightUniversity of Chicago PressChicagoUSA739 p.
    Google Scholar
  7. Fownes, S., Roland, J. 2002Effects of meadow suitability on female behaviour in the alpine butterfly, Parnassius smintheus DoubledayEcological Entomology27457466Google Scholar
  8. Gobeil, J.F., Villard, M.A. 2002Permeability of three boreal forest landscape types to bird movements as determined from experimental translocationsOikos98447458Google Scholar
  9. Haddad, N.M. 1999Corridor and distance effects on interpatch movements: a landscape experiment with butterfliesEcological Applications9612622Google Scholar
  10. Hanski, I. 1994A practical model of metapopulation dynamicsJournal of Animal Ecology63151162Google Scholar
  11. Hanski, I. 1999Metapopulation EcologyOxford University PressOxfordUK313 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Hein, S., Gombert, J., Hovestadt, T., Poethke, H. 2003Movement patterns of the bush cricket Platycleis albopunctata in different types of habitat: matrix is not always matrixEcological Entomology28432438Google Scholar
  13. Ide, J. 2002Mating behaviour and light conditions cause seasonal changes in the dispersal pattern of the satyrine butterfly Lethe dianaEcological Entomology273340Google Scholar
  14. Jonsen, I.D., Bourchier, R.S., Roland, J. 2001The influence of matrix habitat on Aphthona flea beetle immigration to leafy spurge patchesOecologia127287294Google Scholar
  15. Keyghobadi, N., Roland, J., Strobeck, C. 1999Influence of landscape on the population genetic structure of the alpine butterfly Parnassius smintheus (Papilionidae)Molecular Ecology814811495PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuras, T., Benes, J., Celechovsky, A., Vrabec, V., Konvicka, M. 2000Parnassius mnemosyne (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in North Moravia: review of present and past distribution, proposal for conservation Klapalekiana3693112Google Scholar
  17. Kuussaari, M., Nieminen, M., Hanski, I. 1996An experimental study of migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxiaJournal of Animal Ecology65791801Google Scholar
  18. Land, M.F. 1997Visual acuity in insectsAnnual Review of Entomology42147177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lima, S.L., Dill, L.M. 1990Behavioral decisions made under this risk of predation: a review and prospectusCanadian Journal of Zoology68619640Google Scholar
  20. Matter, S.F. 1996Interpatch movement of the red milkweed beetleTetraopes tetraophthalmus: individual responses to patch size and isolationOecologia105447453Google Scholar
  21. Matter, S.F. 1997Population density and area: the role of within and between patch processesOecologia110533538Google Scholar
  22. Matter, S.F., Roland, J. 2002An experimental examination of the effects of habitat quality on the dispersal and local abundance of Parnassius smintheusEcological Entomology27308316Google Scholar
  23. Matter S.F., Roland J., Moilanen A. and Hanski I. 2004. Migration and survival of Parnassius smintheus: detecting effects of habitat for individual butterflies. In Press, Ecological Applications.Google Scholar
  24. Matter, S.F., Zawacki, J.F., Bowers, M.A. 1996Habitat fragmentation and the perceived and actual risk of predationVirginia Journal of Science471927Google Scholar
  25. Merckx, T., van Dyck, H., Karlsson, B., Leimar, O. 2003The evolution of movements and behaviour at boundaries in different landscapes: a common arena experiment with butterfliesProceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B27018151821PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Moilanen, A., Hanski, I. 1998Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structureEcology7925032515Google Scholar
  27. Moilanen, A., Nieminen, M. 2002Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecologyEcology8311311145Google Scholar
  28. Pither, J., Taylor, P.D. 1998An experimental assessment of landscape connectivityOikos83166174Google Scholar
  29. Pryke, S.R., Samways, M.J. 2001Width of grassland linkages for the conservation of butterflies in South African afforested areasBiological Conservation1018596Google Scholar
  30. Pulliam, H. 1988Sources, sinks, and population regulationAmerican Naturalist132652661Google Scholar
  31. Racette, G., Chouinard, G., Vincent, C., Hill, S.B. 1992Ecology and management of plum CurculioConotrachelus nenuphar (ColeopteraCurculionidae), in apple orchardsPhytoprotection7385100Google Scholar
  32. Ries, L., Debinski, D.M. 2001Butterfly responses to habitat edges in the highly fragmented prairies of Central IowaJournal of Animal Ecology70840852Google Scholar
  33. Ricketts, T.H. 2001The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapesAmerican Naturalist1588799Google Scholar
  34. Roland, J., Keyghobadi, N., and Fownes, S. 2000Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population sizeEcology8116421653Google Scholar
  35. Rutowski, R.L., McCoy, L., Demlong, M.J. 2001Visual mate detection in a territorial male butterfly (Asterocampa leilia): effects of distance and perch locationBehaviour1383143Google Scholar
  36. Schtickzelle, N., Baguette, M. 2003Behavioural responses to habitat patch boundaries restrict dispersal and generate emigration-patch area relationships in fragmented landscapesJournal of Animal Ecology72533545Google Scholar
  37. Shultz, C.B., Crone, E.E. 2001Edge-mediated dispersal behavior in a prairie butterflyEcology8218791892Google Scholar
  38. Simberloff, D., Farr, J.A., Cox, J., Mehlman, D.W. 1992Movement corridors – conservation bargains or poor investments?Conservation Biology6493504Google Scholar
  39. Thomas, C.D., Singer, M.C., Boughton, D.A. 1996Catastrophic extinction of population sources in a butterfly metapopulationAmerican Naturalist148957975Google Scholar
  40. Tischendorf, L., Fahrig, L. 2000On the use and measurement of landscape connectivityOikos90719Google Scholar
  41. Turchin, P. 1991Translating foraging movements in heterogeneous environments into the spatial distribution of foragersEcology7212531266Google Scholar
  42. Vä;isä;nen, R., Somerma, P. 1985The status of Parnassius mnemosyne (LepidopteraPapilionidae) in FinlandNotulae Entomologica65109118Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Andrew Ross
    • 1
  • Stephen F. Matter
    • 2
  • Jens Roland
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of ScienceTruman State UniversityKirksvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Cincinnati and Cincinnati Museum CenterCincinnatiUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of AlbertaAlbertaCanada

Personalised recommendations