Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Police-Induced Confessions: Risk Factors and Recommendations

Law and Human Behavior volume 34, pages 3–38 (2010)Cite this article

Abstract

Recent DNA exonerations have shed light on the problem that people sometimes confess to crimes they did not commit. Drawing on police practices, laws concerning the admissibility of confession evidence, core principles of psychology, and forensic studies involving multiple methodologies, this White Paper summarizes what is known about police-induced confessions. In this review, we identify suspect characteristics (e.g., adolescence; intellectual disability; mental illness; and certain personality traits), interrogation tactics (e.g., excessive interrogation time; presentations of false evidence; and minimization), and the phenomenology of innocence (e.g., the tendency to waive Miranda rights) that influence confessions as well as their effects on judges and juries. This article concludes with a strong recommendation for the mandatory electronic recording of interrogations and considers other possibilities for the reform of interrogation practices and the protection of vulnerable suspect populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Abram, K. M., Teplin, L. A., & McClelland, G. M. (2003). Comorbidity of severe psychiatric disorders and substance use disorders among women in jail. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 1007–1010.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abramovitch, R., Higgins-Biss, K., & Biss, S. (1993). Young persons’ comprehension of waivers in criminal proceedings. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 35, 309–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramovitch, R., Peterson-Badali, M., & Rohan, M. (1995). Young people’s understanding and assertion of their rights to silence and legal counsel. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Bar Association. (2004). Resolution 8A—Videotaping custodial interrogations. Approved February 9, 2004.

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. A., Lepper, M. R., & Ross, L. (1980). Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1037–1049.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. D., & Hewitt, J. (2002). The effect of competency restoration training on defendants with mental retardation found not competent to proceed. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 343–351.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, K. L., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1994). Criminal justice-related competencies in defendants with mental retardation. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 22, 483–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279 (1991).

  • Aronson, E. (1999). The social animal. New York: Worth/Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70, 416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins v. Virginia, 536, U.S. 304 (2002).

  • Ayling, C. J. (1984). Corroborating false confessions: An empirical analysis of legal safeguards against false confessions. Wisconsin Law Review, 1984, 1121–1204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, F., Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2003). Delay discounting differs between current and never-smokers across commodities, sign, and magnitudes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 382–392.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. (1993). Police interview techniques: Establishing truth or proof? British Journal of Criminology, 33, 325–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1996). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedau, H. A., & Radelet, M. L. (1987). Miscarriages of justice in potentially capital cases. Stanford Law Review, 40, 21–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, D. J. (1966). Inducing belief in false confessions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 707–710.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, W. K., & Marsch, L. A. (2001). Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: Delay discounting processes. Addiction, 96, 73–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, W. K., Odum, A. L., & Madden, G. L. (1999). Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: Delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology, 146, 447–454.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Billings, F. J., Taylor, T., Burns, J., Corey, D. L., Garven, S., & Wood, J. M. (2007). Can reinforcement induce children to falsely incriminate themselves? Law and Human Behavior, 31, 125–139.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blagrove, M. (1996). Effects of length of sleep deprivation on interrogative suggestibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, J. P. (2005). A test of the unusual false confession perspective using cases of proven false confessions. Criminal Law Bulletin, 41, 127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boetig, B. P., Vinson, D. M., & Weidel, B. R. (2006). Revealing incommunicado. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 75(12), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchard, E. M. (1932). Convicting the innocent: Errors of criminal justice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bram v. United States, 168 U.S. 532 (1897).

  • Brewer, W. F. (1977). Memory for pragmatic implications of sentences. Memory and Cognition, 5, 673–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278 (1936).

  • Brown, W. A. (1998). The placebo effect. Scientific American, 278, 90–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, D. M., & Jayne, B. C. (2005). Electronic recording of interrogations. Eagle River, WI: Hahn Printing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, J. (2006). The Reid technique of interviewing and interrogation. In T. Williamson (Ed.), Investigative interviewing: Rights, research, regulation (pp. 190–206). Devon, UK: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, R., & Soukara, S. (2009). A set of studies of what really happens in police interviews with suspects. In G. D. Lassiter & C. A. Meissner (Eds.), Interrogations and confessions: Research, practice, and policy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. A., Caldwell, J. L., Brown, D. L., & Smith, J. K. (2004). The effects of 37 hours of continuous wakefulness on the physiological arousal, cognitive performance, self-reported mood, and simulator flight performance of F-117A pilots. Military Psychology, 16, 163–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candel, I., Merckelbach, H., Loyen, S., & Reyskens, H. (2005). “I hit the Shift-key and then the computer crashed”: Children and false admissions. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1381–1387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, P. G. (1996a). Miranda’s social costs: An empirical reassessment. Northwestern University Law Review, 90, 387–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, P. G. (1996b). All benefits, no costs: The grand illusion of Miranda’s defenders. Northwestern University Law Review, 90, 1084–1124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, P. G., & Hayman, B. S. (1996). Police interrogation in the 1990s: An empirical study of the effects of Miranda. UCLA Law Review, 43, 839–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, J. C. K., & McDermott, K. B. (2006). Remembering pragmatic inferences. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 633–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clare, I., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1991). Recall and understanding of the caution and rights in police detention among persons of average intellectual ability and persons with a mild mental handicap. Issues in Criminological and Legal Psychology, 1, 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clare, I., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1995). The vulnerability of suspects with intellectual disabilities during police interviews: A review and experimental study of decision-making. Mental Handicap Research, 8, 110–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, C., & Milne, R. (2001). National evaluation of the PEACE investigative interviewing course. Police Research Award Scheme. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloud, M., Shepard, G. B., Barkoff, A. N., & Shur, J. V. (2002). Words without meaning: The Constitution, confessions, and mentally retarded suspects. University of Chicago Law Review, 69, 495–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157 (1986).

  • Colwell, L., Cruise, K., Guy, L., McCoy, W., Fernandez, K., & Ross, H. (2005). The influence of psychosocial maturity on male juvenile offenders’ comprehension and understanding of the Miranda warning. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 33, 444–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth v. DiGiambattista, 813 N.E.2d 516 (Mass. 2004).

  • Connery, D. S. (Ed.). (1996). Convicting the innocent. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, V. G., & Zapf, P. A. (2008). Psychiatric patients’ comprehension of Miranda rights. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 390–405.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J., Voelkl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 218–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D., & O’Donahue, W. (2004). The road to perdition: Extreme influence tactics in the interrogation room. In W. O’Donahue (Ed.), Handbook of forensic psychology (pp. 897–996). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deluty, M. Z. (1978). Self-control and impulsiveness involving aversive events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4, 250–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–112.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000).

  • Donahue, J. (1998). Did Miranda diminish police effectiveness. Stanford Law Review, 50, 1147–1180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. (2005). True witness: Cops, courts, science, and the battle against misidentification. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drizin, S. A., & Colgan, B. A. (2001). Let the cameras roll: Mandatory videotaping of interrogations is the solution to Illinois’ problem of false confessions. Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 32, 337–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drizin, S. A., & Colgan, B. (2004). Tales from the juvenile confession front: A guide to how standard police interrogation tactics can produce coerced and false confessions from juvenile suspects. In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 127–162). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drizin, S. A., & Leo, R. A. (2004). The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review, 82, 891–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drizin, S. A., & Reich, M. J. (2004). Heeding the lessons of history: The need for mandatory recording of police interrogations to accurately assess the reliability and voluntariness of confessions. Drake Law Review, 52, 619–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dror, I. E., & Charlton, D. (2006). Why experts make errors. Journal of Forensic Identification, 56, 600–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, C. (2006, February 22). A murderer no more. The Australian Newspaper, p. 13.

  • Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964).

  • Everington, C., & Fulero, S. (1999). Competence to confess: Measuring understanding and suggestibility of defendants with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 37, 212–220.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faigman, D. L., Kaye, D. H., Saks, M. J., & Sanders, J. (2002). Science in the law: Forensic science issues. St. Paul, MN: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeney, F. (2000). Police clearances: A poor way to measure the impact of Miranda on the police. Rutgers Law Review, 32, 1–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, B. (1999). Bad kids: Race and the transformation of the juvenile court. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, B. (2006a). Juveniles’ competence to exercise Miranda rights: An empirical study of policy and practice. Minnesota Law Review, 91, 26–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, B. (2006b). Police interrogations of juveniles: An empirical study of policy and practice. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 97, 219–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findley, K. A., & Scott, M. S. (2006). The multiple dimensions of tunnel vision in criminal cases. Wisconsin Law Review, 2006, 291–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firstman, R., & Salpeter, J. (2008). A criminal injustice: A true crime, a false confession, and the fight to free Marty Tankleff. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, K. D., Wadkins, T. A., & Miller, R. L. (2002). The role of preexisting stress on false confessions: An empirical study. Journal of Credibility Assessment and Witness Psychology, 3, 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J., & Frank, B. (1957). Not guilty. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier v. Cupp, 394 U.S. 731 (1969).

  • Fulero, S., & Everington, C. (1995). Assessing competency to waive Miranda rights in defendants with mental retardation. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 533–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulero, S., & Everington, C. (2004). Mental retardation, competency to waive Miranda rights, and false confessions. In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 163–179). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall, J. A., & Freckelton, I. (1999). Fitness for interview: Current trends, views and an approach to the assessment procedure. Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine, 6, 213–223.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, B. A. (Ed.). (2004). Black’s law dictionary (8th ed.). Eagan, MN: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, B. (2008). Judging innocence. Columbia Law Review, 108, 55–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garven, S., Wood, J. M., & Malpass, R. S. (2000). Allegations of wrongdoing: The effects of reinforcement on children’s mundane and fantastic claims. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 38–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geller, W. A. (1993). Videotaping interrogations and confessions: National Institute of Justice Research in Brief. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, W. A. (1994, January). Videotaping interrogations and confessions. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin.

  • Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T., Savitsky, K., & Medvec, V. H. (1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others’ ability to read one’s emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 332–346.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gohara, M. (2006). A lie for a lie: False confessions and the case for reconsidering the legality of deceptive interrogation techniques. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 33, 791–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, N., Condie, L., Kalbeitzer, R., Osman, D., & Geier, J. (2003). Juvenile offenders’ Miranda rights comprehension and self-reported likelihood of false confessions. Assessment, 10, 359–369.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, N. J., & Fleisher, W. L. (2006). Effective interviewing and interrogation techniques (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grano, J. D. (1994). Confessions, truth, and the law. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T. (1980). Juveniles’ capacities to waive Miranda rights: An empirical analysis. California Law Review, 68, 1134–1166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T. (1981). Juveniles’ waiver of rights: Legal and psychological competence. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T. (1986). Evaluating competencies. Forensic assessments and instruments. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T. (1996). Society’s retributive response to juvenile violence: A developmental perspective. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 229–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T., & Ring, J. (1979). Parents’ attitudes toward juveniles’ rights in interrogation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 6, 221–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T., & Schwartz, R. (Eds.). (2000). Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T., Steinberg, L., Woolard, J., Cauffman, E., Scott, E., Graham, S., et al. (2003). Juveniles’ competence to stand trial: A comparison of adolescents’ and adults’ capacities as trial defendants. Law and Human Behavior, 27(4), 333–363.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, S. R., Jacoby, K., Matheson, D. J., Montgomery, N., & Patel, S. (2005). Exonerations in the United States, 1989 through 2003. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 95, 523–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H. (1991). The effects of intelligence and memory on group differences in suggestibility and compliance. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 503–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H. (1992). The psychology of interrogations, confessions, and testimony. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H. (2005). Fitness to be interviewed. In J. Payne-James, R. W. Byard, T. S. Corey, & C. Henderson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of forensic and legal medicine (Vol. 2, pp. 169–174). London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H. (2006). Disputed confessions and miscarriages of justice in Britain: Expert psychological and psychiatric evidence in the court of appeal. The Manitoba Law Journal, 31, 489–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H., Clare, I., Rutter, S., & Pearse, J. (1993). Persons at risk during interviews in police custody: The identification of vulnerabilities. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H., & Clare, I. C. H. (1995). The relationship between confabulation and intellectual ability, memory, interrogative suggestibility, and acquiescence. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 333–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H., & Grisso, T. (2008). Legal competencies in relation to confession evidence. In A. R. Felthous & H. Sass (Eds.), International handbook on psychopathic disorders and the law (Vol. 2, pp. 177–187). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H., & MacKeith, J. A. C. (1982). False confessions: Psychological effects of interrogation. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 253–269). Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H., & MacKeith, J. A. C. (1994). Learning disability and the Police and Criminal Evidence Act of 1984. Protection during investigative interviewing: A video-recorded false confession to double murder. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 5, 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H., & Sigurdsson, J. F. (1999). The Gudjonsson Confession Questionnaire-Revised (GCQ-R). Factor structure and its relationship with personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 953–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J. F., Asgeirsdottir, B. B., & Sigfusdottir, I. D. (2006). Custodial interrogation, false confession, and individual differences: A national study among Icelandic youth. Personality and Individuals Differences, 41, 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J. F., Asgeirsdottir, B. B., & Sigfusdottir, I. D. (2007a). Custodial interrogation: What are the background factors associated with claimed false confessions? The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 18, 266–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J. F., Asgeirsdottir, B. B., & Sigfusdottir, I. D. (in press). Interrogation and false confession among adolescents in seven European countries: What background and psychological variables best discriminate between false confessors and non-false confessors? Psychology, Crime, and Law.

  • Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J. F., Bragason, O., Einarsson, E., & Valdimarsdottir, E. B. (2004). Confessions and denials and the relationship with personality. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 121–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J. F., & Einarsson, E. (2004). The role of personality in relation to confessions and denials. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10, 125–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J. F., Einarsson, E., Bragason, O. O., & Newton, A. K. (2008). Interrogative suggestibility, compliance and false confessions among prison inmates and their relationship with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms. Psychological Medicine, 38, 1037–1044.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H., Young, S., & Bramham, J. (2007b). Interrogative suggestibility in adults diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A potential vulnerability during police questioning. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 737–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley v. Ohio, 332 U.S. 596 (1948).

  • Harris, R. J., & Monaco, G. E. (1978). Psychology of pragmatic implication: Information processing between the lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Y., & Horne, J. A. (2000). The impact of sleep deprivation on decision making: A review. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 236–249.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Kronkvist, O. (2006). Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: When training to detect deception works. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 603–619.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L., & Vrij, A. (2005). Detecting deception via strategic closure of evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 469–484.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasel, L. E., & Kassin, S. M. (2009). On the presumption of evidentiary independence: Can confessions corrupt eyewitness identifications? Psychological Science, 20, 122–126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie, R., & Dawes, R. (2001). Rational choice in an uncertain world: The psychology of judgment and decision-making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, L. A., Coffman, K. A. J., & Dailey, E. M. (2008). A survey of people’s attitudes and beliefs about false confessions. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 26, 555–584.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 7, 243–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J., Rachlin, H., & Laibson, D. I. (Eds.). (1997). The matching law: Papers in psychology and economics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershkowitz, I., Horowitz, D., Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., & Sternberg, K. J. (2004). Interviewing youthful suspects in alleged sex crimes: A descriptive analysis. Child Abuse and Neglect, 28, 423–438.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C., Memon, A., & McGeorge, P. (2008). The role of confirmation bias in suspect interviews: A systematic evaluation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13, 357–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, D. J. (1995). The social context of reasoning: Conversational inference and rational judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 248–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, A. (2005a). Threats, promises, and false confessions: Lessons of slavery. Howard Law Journal, 49, 31–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, A. (2005b). The tragedy of false confessions and a common sense proposal (book review). North Dakota Law Review, 81, 343–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (1985). Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2003). Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. Codes of Practice A-E Revised Edition. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, E. J. (1931). Our lawless police: A study of the unlawful enforcement of the law. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopt v. Utah, 110 U.S. 574 (1884).

  • Horselenberg, R., Merckelbach, H., & Josephs, S. (2003). Individual differences and false confessions: A conceptual replication of Kassin and Kiechel (1996). Psychology, Crime and Law, 9, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horselenberg, R., Merckelbach, H., Smeets, T., Franssens, D., Ygram Peters, G.-J., & Zeles, G. (2006). False confessions in the lab: Do plausibility and consequences matter? Psychology, Crime and Law, 12, 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hourihan, P. (1995). Earl Washington’s confession: Mental retardation and the law of confessions. Virginia Law Review, 81, 1473–1501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes v. Washington, 373 U.S. 503 (1963).

  • In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967).

  • Inbau, F. E. (1991). Miranda’s immunization of low intelligence offenders. The Prosecutor: Journal of the National District Attorney’s Association, 24(Spring), 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2001). Criminal interrogation and confessions (4th ed.). Gaithersberg, MD: Aspen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglis, T. (2004). Truth power and lies: Irish society and the case of the Kerry babies. Dublin: University College Dublin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irving, B. (1980). Police interrogation. A case study of current practice. Research Studies No 2. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irving, B., & McKenzie, I. K. (1989). Police interrogation: The effects of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act. London: Police Foundation G.B.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, D. J., & Glaze, L. E. (2006). Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junkin, T. (2004). Bloodsworth: The true story of the first death row inmate exonerated by DNA. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Justice Project. (2007). Electronic recording of custodial interrogations: A policy review. Washington, DC: The Justice Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, J. (2005, September 21). Deep flaws, and little justice, in China’s court system. The New York Times.

  • Kahn, R., Zapf, P., & Cooper, V. (2006). Readability of Miranda warnings and waivers: Implications for evaluating Miranda comprehension. Law & Psychology Review, 30, 119–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamisar, Y. (1963). What is an “involuntary” confession? Some comments on Inbau and Reid’s criminal interrogation and confessions. Rutgers Law Review, 17, 728–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamisar, Y. (1977). Foreword: Brewer v. Williams—A hard look at a discomfiting record. Georgetown Law Journal, 66, 209–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsen, C. F. (1989). The devil in the shape of a woman: Witchcraft in colonial New England. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52, 221–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M. (2002, November 1). False confessions and the jogger case, New York Times, p. A31.

  • Kassin, S. M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60, 215–228.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M. (2006). A critical appraisal of modern police interrogations. In T. Williamson (Ed.), Investigative interviewing: Rights, research, regulation (pp. 207–228). Devon, UK: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M. (2008). False confessions: Causes, consequences, and implications for reform. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(4), 249–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M., Goldstein, C. J., & Savitsky, K. (2003). Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: On the dangers of presuming guilt. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 187–203.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The psychology of confession evidence: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 35–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M., & Kiechel, K. L. (1996). The social psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization, and confabulation. Psychological Science, 7, 125–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M., Leo, R. A., Meissner, C. A., Richman, K. D., Colwell, L. H., Leach, A.-M., et al. (2007). Police interviewing and interrogation: A Self-report survey of police practices and beliefs. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 381–400.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M., & McNall, K. (1991). Police interrogations and confessions: Communicating promises and threats by pragmatic implication. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 233–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M., Meissner, C. A., & Norwick, R. J. (2005). “I’d know a false confession if I saw one”: A comparative study of college students and police investigators. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 211–227.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M., & Neumann, K. (1997). On the power of confession evidence: An experimental test of the “fundamental difference” hypothesis. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 469–484.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S., & Norwick, R. (2004). Why people waive their Miranda rights: The power of innocence. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 211–221.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M., & Sukel, H. (1997). Coerced confessions and the jury: An experimental test of the “harmless error” rule. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1980). Prior confessions and mock juror verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 133–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1985). Confession evidence. In S. Kassin & L. Wrightsman (Eds.), The psychology of evidence and trial procedure (pp. 67–94). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • The King v. Warrickshall (1793), 168 Eng. Rep. 234, 234-35 (K.B. 1783).

  • Klaver, J., Lee, Z., & Rose, V. G. (2008). Effects of personality, interrogation techniques and plausibility in an experimental false confession paradigm. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13, 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollins, S. H. (2003). Delay discounting is associated with substance use in college students. Addictive Behaviors, 28, 1167–1173.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, H. R., & Weinberger, L. E. (1998). Persons with severe mental illness in jails and prisons: A review. Psychiatric Services, 49, 483–492.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Horowitz, D., & Abbott, C. B. (2007). Does the type of prompt affect the accuracy of information provided by alleged victims of abuse in forensic interviews? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 1117–1130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Sternberg, K. J., Hershkowitz, I., & Horowitz, D. (2000). Accuracy of investigators’ verbatim notes of their forensic interviews with alleged child abuse victims. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 699–707.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, B. (2008, July 1). Freed after 17 years in prison, L.I. man will not face new trial. The New York Times, p. A1.

  • Lassiter, G. D. (Ed.). (2004). Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment. New York: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassiter, G. D., Diamond, S. S., Schmidt, H. C., & Elek, J. K. (2007). Evaluating videotaped confessions: Expertise provides no defense against the camera-perspective effect. Psychological Science, 18, 224–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassiter, G. D., & Geers, A. L. (2004). Evaluation of confession evidence: Effects of presentation format. In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 197–214). New York: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassiter, G. D., Geers, A. L., Handley, I. M., Weiland, P. E., & Munhall, P. J. (2002). Videotaped confessions and interrogations: A change in camera perspective alters verdicts in simulated trials. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 867–874.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lassiter, G. D., Geers, A. L., Munhall, P. J., Handley, I. M., & Beers, M. J. (2001). Videotaped confessions: Is guilt in the eye of the camera? Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 189–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassiter, G. D., & Irvine, A. A. (1986). Videotaped confessions: The impact of camera point of view on judgments of coercion. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 268–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassiter, G. D., Slaw, R. D., Briggs, M. A., & Scanlan, C. R. (1992). The potential for bias in videotaped confessions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1838–1851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latane, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leo, R. A. (1996a). Miranda’s revenge: Police interrogation as a confidence game. Law and Society Review, 30, 259–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leo, R. A. (1996b). Inside the interrogation room. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 266–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leo, R. A. (1996c). The impact of Miranda revisited. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 621–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leo, R. A. (2004). The third degree and the origins of psychological police interrogation in the United States. In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 37–84). New York: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leo, R. A. (2005). Re-thinking the study of miscarriages of justice: Developing a criminology of wrongful conviction. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21, 201–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leo, R. A. (2008). Police interrogation and American justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leo, R. A., Drizin, S., Neufeld, P., Hall, B., & Vatner, A. (2006). Bringing reliability back in: False confessions and legal safeguards in the twenty-first century. Wisconsin Law Review, 2006, 479–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leo, R. A., & Liu, B. (2009). What do potential jurors know about police interrogation techniques and false confessions? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 27(3), 381–399.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leo, R. A., & Ofshe, R. J. (1998). The consequences of false confessions: Deprivations of liberty and miscarriages of justice in the age of psychological interrogation. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 429–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leo, R. A., & Ofshe, R. J. (2001). The truth about false confessions and advocacy scholarship. The Criminal Law Bulletin, 37, 293–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyra v. Denno, 347 U.S. 556 (1954).

  • Loftus, E. F. (1997). Creating false memories. Scientific American, 277, 70–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12, 361–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lykken, D. T. (1998). A tremor in the blood: Uses and abuses of the lie detector. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynumn v. Illinois, 372 U.S. 528 (1963).

  • Lyznicki, J. M., Doege, T. C., Davis, R. M., & Williams, M. A. (1998). Sleepiness, driving, and motor vehicle crashes. Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 1908–1913.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Magid, L. (2001). Deceptive police interrogation practices: How far is too far? Michigan Law Review, 99, 1168.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, J. T. (1998). A conceptual framework for identifying various types of confessions. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 16, 441–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, C. T. (1972). Handbook of the law of evidence (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, C. A., & Kassin, S. M. (2002). “He’s guilty!”: Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 469–480.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G., Petrila, J., Poythress, N., & Slobogin, C. (1997). Psychological evaluations for the courts (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. R., & Reppucci, N. D. (2007). Police practices and perceptions regarding juvenile interrogations and interrogative suggestibility. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25, 757–780.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. G., & Youngjohn, J. R. (1991). Effects of feedback and validity expectancy on response in a lie detector interview. Forensic Reports, 4, 235–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. T., & McFarland, C. (1987). Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 298–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, R., & Bull, R. (1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).

  • Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. (2004).

  • Morgan, C. A., Hazlett, G., Doran, A., Garrett, S., Hoyt, G., Thomas, P., et al. (2004). Accuracy of eyewitness memory for persons encountered during exposure to highly intense stress. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 27, 265–279.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moston, S., Stephenson, G. M., & Williamson, T. (1992). The effects of case characteristics on suspect behaviour during police questioning. British Journal of Criminology, 32, 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munsterberg, H. (1908). On the witness stand. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, R. A., & Wade, K. A. (2009). Innocent but proven guilty: Using false video evidence to elicit false confessions and create false beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 624–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council, Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. (2003). The polygraph and lie detection. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarick, D. J. (1982). Negative reinforcement and choice in humans. Learning and Motivation, 13, 361–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, N. P. (2007, March). Interviewing using the RIP technique. Paper presented at “Off the Witness Stand, Using Psychology in the Practice of Justice,” John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York City.

  • Neuschatz, J. S., Lawson, D. S., Swanner, J. K., Meissner, C. A., & Neuschatz, J. S. (2008). The effects of accomplice witnesses and jailhouse informants on jury decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 137–149.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oberlander, L., Goldstein, N., & Goldstein, A. (2003). Competence to confess. In I. Wiener & A. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Volume 22, forensic psychology (pp. 335–357). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberlander, L. B., & Goldstein, N. E. (2001). A review and update on the practice of evaluating Miranda comprehension. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 453–471.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, M. J., Garmoe, W., & Goldstein, N. E. S. (2005). Miranda comprehension in adults with mental retardation and the effects of feedback style on suggestibility. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 359–369.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ofshe, R. J., & Leo, R. A. (1997a). The social psychology of police interrogation: The theory and classification of true and false confessions. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, 16, 189–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofshe, R. J., & Leo, R. A. (1997b). The decision to confess falsely: Rational choice and irrational action. Denver University Law Review, 74, 979–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, C. (1956). Fundamentals of criminal investigation. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onishi, N. (2007, May 11). Pressed by police, even innocent confess in Japan. The New York Times.

  • Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84 (1954).

  • Otto, H. D. (2006). “Im namen des irrtums!” Fehlurteile in mordprozessen. Mänchen: F.A. Herbig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Kostelnik, J., Reppucci, N. D., & Meyer, J. D. (2006). Testimony and interrogation of minors: Assumptions about maturity and morality. American Psychologist, 61, 286–304.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parke, R. D., Ornstein, P. A., Reiser, J. J., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (1994). A century of developmental psychology. Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearse, J., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1996). Police interviewing techniques at two south London police stations. Psychology, Crime and Law, 3, 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penney, S. (1998). Theories of confession admissibility: A historical view. American Journal of Criminal Law, 25, 309–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • People of the State of New York v. Kharey Wise, Kevin Richardson, Antron McCray, Yusef Salaam, & Raymond Santana: Affirmation in Response to Motion to Vacate Judgment of Conviction (2002). Indictment No. 4762/89, December 5, 2002.

  • People v. Daoud, 614 N.W.2d 152 (Mich. S. Ct., 2000).

  • Perske, R. (2004). Understanding persons with intellectual disabilities in the criminal justice system: Indicators of progress? Mental Retardation, 42, 484–487.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce v. United States, 160 U.S. 355 (1896).

  • Pilcher, J. J., & Huffcut, A. (1996). Effects of sleep deprivation on performance: A meta-analysis. Sleep, 19, 318–326.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. D., Finniss, D. G., & Benedetti, F. (2008). A comprehensive review of the placebo effect: Recent advances and current thought. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 565–590.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin, H. (2000). The science of self-control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radelet, M., Bedau, H., & Putnam, C. (1992). In spite of innocence: Erroneous convictions in capital cases. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redlich, A. D. (2004). Mental illness, police interrogations, and the potential for false confession. Psychiatric Services, 55, 19–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Redlich, A. D. (2007). Double jeopardy in the interrogation room: Young age and mental illness. American Psychologist, 62, 609–611.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Redlich, A. D. (in press). False confessions and false guilty pleas. In G. D. Lassiter & C. A. Meissner (Eds.), Interrogations and confessions: Current research, practice and policy. Washington, DC: APA Books.

  • Redlich, A. D., & Drizin, S. (2007). Police interrogation of youth. In C. L. Kessler & L. Kraus (Eds.), The mental health needs of young offenders: Forging paths toward reintegration and rehabilitation (pp. 61–78). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redlich, A. D., Ghetti, S., & Quas, J. A. (2008a). Perceptions of children during a police interview: A comparison of suspects and alleged victims. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 705–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redlich, A. D., & Goodman, G. S. (2003). Taking responsibility for an act not committed: Influence of age and suggestibility. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 141–156.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Redlich, A. D., Quas, J. A., & Ghetti, S. (2008b). Perceptions of children during a police interview: Guilt, confessions, and interview fairness. Psychology, Crime and Law, 14, 201–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redlich, A. D., Silverman, M., Chen, J., & Steiner, H. (2004). The police interrogation of children and adolescents. In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 107–125). New York: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redlich, A. D., Silverman, M., & Steiner, H. (2003). Pre-adjudicative and adjudicative competence in juveniles and young adults. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 393–410.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, B., Richards, J. B., Horn, K., & Karraker, K. (2004). Delay discounting and probability discounting as related to cigarette smoking status in adults. Behavioral Processes, 65, 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigoni, M. E., & Meissner, C. A. (2008). Is it time for a revolution in the interrogation room? Empirically validating inquisitorial methods. Paper presented at Meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, Jacksonville, FL.

  • Roberts, P. (2007). Law and criminal investigation. In T. Newburn, T. Williamson, & A. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of criminal investigation (pp. 92–145). Devon, UK: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, G. D. (July 24, 2007 NC 01:44:29). NC lawmakers approve lineup, interrogation recording standards. AP-Alerts.

  • Rofe, Y. (1984). Stress and affiliation: A utility theory. Psychological Review, 91, 235–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R., Harrison, K., Hazelwood, L., & Sewell, K. (2007a). Knowing and intelligent: A study of Miranda warnings in mentally disordered defendants. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 401–418.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R., Harrison, K., Shuman, D., Sewell, K., & Hazelwood, L. (2007b). An analysis of Miranda warnings and waivers: Comprehension and coverage. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 177–192.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R., Hazelwood, L., Sewell, K., Harrison, K., & Shuman, D. (2008). The language of Miranda warnings in American jurisdictions: A replication and vocabulary analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 124–136.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005).

  • Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 174–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russano, M. B., Meissner, C. A., Narchet, F. M., & Kassin, S. M. (2005). Investigating true and false confessions within a novel experimental paradigm. Psychological Science, 16, 481–486.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, F. (2006, September 21). DNA evidence frees a man imprisoned for half his life. New York Times, p. A1.

  • Santtila, P., Alkiora, P., Ekholm, M., & Niemi, P. (1999). False confessions to robbery: The role of suggestibility, anxiety, memory disturbance and withdrawal symptoms. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 10, 399–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saywitz, K., Nathanson, R., & Snyder, L. S. (1993). Credibility of child witnesses: The role of communicative competence. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, S. (1959). The psychology of affiliation: Experimental studies of the sources of gregariousness. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, S., & Singer, J. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69, 379–399.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L. (2001). The seven sins of memory: How the mind forgets and remembers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheck, B., Neufeld, P., & Dwyer, J. (2000). Actual innocence. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulhofer, S. (1981). Confessions and the court. Michigan Law Review, 79, 865–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulhofer, S. J. (1996). Miranda’s practical effect: Substantial benefits and vanishingly small social costs. Northwestern University Law Review, 90, 500–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrer, H. (2005). Murdered woman’s innocent boyfriend exonerated after bizarre “confession” is exposed as false. Justice: Denied, January 2005.

  • Sigurdsson, J., & Gudjonsson, G. (1997). The criminal history of ‘false confessors’ and other prison inmates. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 8, 447–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigurdsson, J. F., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1996). The psychological characteristics of false confessors: A study among Icelandic prison inmates and juvenile offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 321–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigurdsson, J. F., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2001). False confessions: The relative importance of psychological, criminological and substance abuse variables. Psychology, Crime and Law, 7, 275–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigurdsson, J. F., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). Forensic psychology in Iceland: A survey of members of the Icelandic Psychological Society. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 45, 325–329.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sigurdsson, J. F., Gudjonsson, G. H., Einarsson, E., & Gudjonsson, G. (2006). Differences in personality and mental state between suspects and witnesses immediately after being interviewed by the police. Psychology, Crime and Law, 12, 619–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, D. (1991). Homicide: A year on the killing streets. New York: Ivy Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K., & Gudjonsson, G. (1992). Interrogative suggestibility among adolescent boys and its relationship to intelligence, memory, and cognitive set. Journal of Adolescence, 15, 155–161.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, J. H., & Leo, R. A. (1992). The ethics of deceptive interrogation. Criminal Justice Ethics, 11, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobogin, C. (2003). Toward taping. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 1, 309–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobogin, C. (2007). Lying and confessing. Texas Tech Law Review, 39, 1275–1292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith v. United States, 348 U.S. 147 (1954).

  • Snyder, H. (2006). Juvenile arrests 2004. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soukara, S., Bull, R., Vrij, A., Turner, M., & Cherryman, C. (in press). A study of what really happens in police interviews with suspects. Psychology, Crime and Law.

  • Spano v. New York, 360 U.S. 315 (1959).

  • Sparf v. United States, 156 U.S. 51 (1895).

  • State v. Barnett, 789 A.2d 629–633 (N.H. 2002).

  • State v. Cayward, 552 So. 2d 921 (Fla. 1989).

  • State v. Chirokovskcic, 860 A.2d 986 (N.J.Super.2004).

  • State v. Hajtic, 724 N.W.2d 449,455 (Ia. 2006).

  • State v. Mauchley, 67 P.3d 477 (Utah 2003).

  • State v. Patton, 826 A.2d 783, N.J. Super. A.D. (2003).

  • State v. Scales, 518 N.W.2d 587 (Minn. 1994).

  • Stephan v. State, 711 P.2d 1156 (Alaska 1985).

  • Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 69–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (2007). Risk taking in adolescence: New perspectives from brain and behavioral science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (1996). Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 249–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83–110.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steingrimsdottir, G., Hreinsdottir, H., Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J. F., & Nielsen, T. (2007). False confessions and the relationship with offending behaviour and personality among Danish adolescents. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 287–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suedfeld, P. (Ed.). (1990). Psychology and torture. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T. (2007, April). Federal law enforcement agencies should record custodial interrogations. The Champion, 8–12.

  • Sullivan, T. P. (2004). Police experiences with recording custodial interrogations. Chicago: Northwestern University Law School, Center on Wrongful Convictions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, Y. P., Vail, A. W., & Anderson, H. W. (2008). The case for recording police interrogation. Litigation, 34(3), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanner, J. K., Beike, D. R., & Cole, A. T. (in press). Snitching, lies and computer crashes: An experimental investigation of secondary confessions. Law and Human Behavior.

  • Taffinder, N. J., McManus, I. C., Gul, Y., Russell, R. C., & Darzi, A. (1998). Effect of sleep deprivation on surgeons’ dexterity on laparoscopy simulator. Lancet, 352, 1191.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. D. (2005). Evidence beyond confession: Abolish Arizona’s corpus delicti rule. Arizona Attorney, 41, 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Technical Working Group for Eyewitness Evidence. (1999). Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. C. (1996). Is Miranda a real-world failure? A plea for more (and better) empirical evidence. UCLA Law Review, 43, 821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. C. (2007). Regulating police deception during interrogation. Texas Tech Law Review, 39.

  • Thomas, G. C., & Leo, R. A. (2002). The effects of Miranda v. Arizona: “Embedded” in our national culture? Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 29(20), 3–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trainum, J. (2007, September 20). I took a false confession—So don’t tell me it doesn’t happen! The California Majority Report. http://www.camajorityreport.com/index.php?module=articles&func=display&ptid=9&aid=2306.

  • Trainum, J. (2008, October 24). The case for videotaping interrogations: A suspect’s false confession to a murder opened an officer’s eyes. The Los Angeles Times.

  • Uchino, B. N., Cacioppo, J. T., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (1996). The relationship between social support and physiological processes: A review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 488–531.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valins, S. (1966). Cognitive effects of false heart-rate feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 400–408.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veasey, S., Rosen, R., Barzansky, B., Rosen, I., & Owens, J. (2002). Sleep loss and fatigue in residency training: A reappraisal. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 1116–1124.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viljoen, J., Klaver, J., & Roesch, R. (2005). Legal decisions of preadolescent and adolescent defendants: Predictors of confessions, pleas, communication with attorneys, and appeals. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 253–278.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viljoen, J., & Roesch, R. (2005). Competence to waive interrogation rights and adjudicative competence in adolescent defendants: Cognitive development, attorney contact, and psychological symptoms. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 723–742.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viljoen, J., Zapf, P., & Roesch, R. (2007). Adjudicative competence and comprehension of Miranda rights in adolescent defendants: A comparison of legal standards. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25, 1–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar, W. A. (2002). False confessions after repeated interrogation: The Putten murder case. European Review, 10, 519–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, M., Ayres, R., Hess, D. W., Schantz, M., & Whitebread, C. H. (1967). Interrogations in New Haven: The impact of Miranda. The Yale Law Journal, 76, 1519–1648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, S., & Furlong, J. (1985). Comprehension of Miranda rights by urban adolescents with law-related education. Psychological Reports, 56, 359–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warden, R. (2005). Wilkie Collins’s the dead alive: The novel, the case, and wrongful convictions. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinger, M. B., & Ancoli-Israel, S. (2002). Sleep deprivation and clinical performance. Journal of American Medical Association, 287, 955–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, B. (1961). Police interrogation of arrested persons: A skeptical view. In C. R. Sowle (Ed.), Police power and individual freedom (pp. 153–181). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. L., Malpass, R. S., Lindsay, R. C. L., Fisher, R. P., Turtle, J. W., & Fulero, S. M. (2000). From the lab to the police station: A successful application of eyewitness research. American Psychologist, 55, 581–598.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M., & Brimacombe, C. A. E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, W. S. (1997). False confessions and the constitution: Safeguards against untrustworthy confessions. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 32, 105–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, W. S. (1998). What is an involuntary confession now? Rutgers Law Review, 200, 1–2057.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, W. S. (2001). Miranda’s waning protections: Police interrogation practices after Dickerson. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, W. S. (2003). Confessions in capital cases. University of Illinois Law Review, 2003, 979–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickersham Commission Report (1931). National Commission on Law Observance and Law Enforcement. (1931). Report on lawlessness in law enforcement. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, E. C., & Wheaton, S. (2004). So what’s a concerned psychologist to Do? Translating the research on interrogations, confessions and entrapment into policy. In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 265–280). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigmore, J. H. (1970). Evidence in trials at common law (3rd ed.). Little, Brown: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T. (Ed.). (2006). Investigative interviewing: Rights, research, regulation. Devon, UK: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T. (2007). Psychology and criminal investigations. In T. Newburn, T. Williamson, & A. Wright (Eds.), Handbook of criminal investigation (pp. 68–91). Devon, UK: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, C. (2005, July 17). Taped interrogations can still be false. Los Angeles Times (online edition).

  • Wilson v. United States, 162 U.S. 613 (1896).

  • Wisconsin Criminal Justice Study Commission. (2007). Position paper on false confessions. Madison, WI. www.wcjsc.org/Position_Paper_on_False_Confessions.pdf

  • Wrightsman, L. S., & Kassin, S. M. (1993). Confessions in the courtroom. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. (2007). Forensic aspects of ADHD. In M. Fitzgerald, M. Bellgrove, & M. Gill (Eds.), Handbook of attention deficit hyperactive disorder. Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbardo, P. G. (1967). The psychology of police confessions. Psychology Today, 1(17–20), 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, F. E., & Hawkins, G. (1986). Capital punishment and the American agenda. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

For their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript, the authors are indebted to Ray Bull, Michael Lamb, Dan Lassiter, Timothy Moore, Edward Mulvey, Richard Petty, Daniel Schacter, Laurence Steinberg, Gary Wells, and two anonymous reviewers. We also want to thank Bill Thompson, AP-LS Chair of the Scientific Review Committee, not only for his useful comments but for his invaluable support and advice throughout the process.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA

    Saul M. Kassin

  2. Northwestern University School of Law and Center on Wrongful Convictions, Chicago, IL, USA

    Steven A. Drizin

  3. University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA

    Thomas Grisso

  4. Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College, London, UK

    Gisli H. Gudjonsson

  5. University of San Francisco School of Law, San Francisco, CA, USA

    Richard A. Leo

  6. State University of New York at Albany, Albany, NY, USA

    Allison D. Redlich

Authors
  1. Saul M. Kassin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steven A. Drizin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas Grisso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gisli H. Gudjonsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Richard A. Leo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Allison D. Redlich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saul M. Kassin.

About this article

Cite this article

Kassin, S.M., Drizin, S.A., Grisso, T. et al. Police-Induced Confessions: Risk Factors and Recommendations. Law Hum Behav 34, 3–38 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6

Keywords

search

Navigation