Abstract
Two experiments investigated mock jurors' perceptions of elder abuse (EA) in a physical assault case. In Experiment 1, participants read a fictional criminal trial summary of a physical assault case in which the alleged victim was 66, 76, or 86 years old. In Experiment 2, the age of the alleged victim was 76 years old, but the gender of the alleged victim and the gender of the defendant were crossed. The results of the experiments showed that women believed the alleged victim more and rendered a guilty verdict more often than men. Overall, the alleged victim was believed more than the defendant regardless of the age of the alleged victim, and most verdicts were guilty. These results are discussed in terms of the factors that affect perceptions of alleged victims of EA in court.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75–91.
Bottoms, B. L. (1993). Individual differences in perceptions of child sexual assault victims. In G. S. Goodman & B. Bottoms (Eds.), Child victims, child witnesses (pp. 229–261). NY: Guilford.
Bottoms, B. L., & Goodman, G. S. (1994). Perceptions of children's credibility in sexual assault cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 702–732.
Cooper, W. S. (1999). Kentucky instructions to juries. Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing Co.
Delbec-Derousesne, J., & Beauvois, M. F. (1989). Memory processes and aging: A defect of automatic rather than controlled processes? Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Supplement, 1, 121–150.
Diamond, S. S. (1997). Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 561–571.
Eagley, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 309–330.
Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429–456.
Golding, J. M., Sanchez, R. P., & Sego, S. A. (1999). Age factors affecting the believability of repressed memories of child sexual assault. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 257–268.
Golding, J. M., Stewart, T. L., Yozwiak, J. A., & Djadali, Y. (2000). The impact of DNA evidence in a child sexual assault trial. Child Maltreatment, 5, 373–383.
Haegerich, T. M., & Bottoms, B. L. (2000). Empathy and jurors' decisions in patricide trials involving child sexual assault allegations. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 421–448.
Hummert, M. L., Garstka, T. A., Shaner, J. L., & Strahm, S. (1994). Stereotypes of the elderly held by young, middle-aged, and elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 49, 240–249.
Kalavar, J. M. (2001). Examining ageism: Do male and female college students differ. Educational Gerontology, 27, 507–513.
Kentucky Revised Statutes. (2002). Available at http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/statrev/frontpg.htm.
Lonsway, K. A., & Fitgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164.
McCabe, D. P., & Smith, A. D. (2002). The effect of warnings on false memory in younger and older adults. Memory and Cognition, 30, 1065–1077.
Missouri Revised Statutes. (2002). 565-180, 565-182, 565-184. http://www.moga.state.mo.us/homestat.asp.
National Center on Elder Abuse. (2002). Available at http://www.elderabusecenter.org/laws/index.html.
National Elder Abuse Incidence Study. (1998). Available at http://www.aoa.gov/abuse/report/default.htm.
Nunez, N., McCoy, M. L., Clark, H. L., & Shaw, L. A. (1999). The testimony of elderly victim/witnesses and their impact on juror decisions: The importance of examining multiple stereotypes. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 413–423.
Polisky, R. A. (1995). Criminalizing physical and emotional elder abuse. Elder Law Journal, 3 Elder L. J., 377, 1–25.
Quas, J. A., Bottoms, B. L., Haegerich, T. M., & Nysse-Carris, K. L. (2002). Effects of victim, defendant and juror gender on decisions in child sexual assault cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1993–2021.
Quinn, M. J., & Tomita, S. K. (1997). Elder abuse (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
Robak, R. W., Griffin, P. w., Lacomb, M., & Quint, W. (2000). Perceptions of aging and their relation with age, death depression, and sex. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 1179–1183.
Ross, D. F., Dunning, D., Toglia, M. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1990). The child in the eyes of the jury. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 5–23.
Schuller, R. A., Smith, V. L., & Olson, J. M. (1994). Jurors' decisions in trials of battered women who kill: The role of prior beliefs and expert testimony. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 316–337.
Sherman, L. W., & Berk, R. A. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261–272.
U. S. House of Representatives, Select Committee on Aging. (1981). Elder Abuse: An examination of a hidden problem. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
Wolf, R. S. (2000). A research agenda on abuse of older persons and adults with available. Available at http://www.gwjapan.com/NCEA/research/index.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Golding, J.M., Yozwiak, J.A., Kinstle, T.L. et al. The Effect of Gender in the Perception of Elder Physical Abuse in Court. Law Hum Behav 29, 605–614 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-6831-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-005-6831-8