Abstract
This study assessed how the quality of a sexual abuse investigative interview with a child and the age of the child influence jurors’ reactions to either the original interview with the child or to testimony by an adult hearsay witness (the interviewer). Participants (N = 360) were randomly assigned to 1 of 12 conditions in a 2 (type of testimony:hearsay testimony vs. child interview) × (interview quality: poor, typical, or good) × (age of the child: 4 years old vs. 10 years old) factorial design. Participants reached individual verdicts, answered a series of questions, and then deliberated in a group with five other participants. As predicted, jurors in the child interview conditions were more likely to find the defendant guilty if they read the good interview than if they read either the poor or the typical interview, but in the hearsay conditions verdicts did not significantly differ by interview quality. These findings suggest that there is a significant loss of information when the testimony of a hearsay witness is used in place of the actual interview with the child, and call into question the appropriateness of admitting hearsay testimony by interviewers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boat, B. W., & Everson, M. D. (1996). Concerning practices of interviewers when using a natomical dolls in Child Protective Services investigations. Child Maltreatment, 1, 96–104.
Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75–91.
Brigham, J. C. (1998). Adults’ evaluations of characteristics of children’s memory. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19, 15–39.
Bruck, M., Ceci, S. J., & Francoeur, E. (1999). The accuracy of mothers’ memories of conversations with their preschool children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 89–106.
Ceci, S. J., Huffman, M. L. C., Smith, E., & Loftus, E. F. (1994). Repeatedly thinking about a non-event: Source misattributions among preschoolers. Consciousness and Cognition, 3, 388–407.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press, Inc.
Garven, S., Wood, J. M., Malpass, R. S., & Shaw, J. S. (1998). More than suggestion: The effect of interviewing techniques from the McMartin Preschool case. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 347–359.
Golding, J. M., Alexander, M. C., & Stewart, T. L. (1999a). The effect of hearsay witness age in a child sexual assault trial. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 420–438.
Golding, J. M., Sanchez, R. P., & Sego, S. A. (1999b). Brief research report: Age factors affecting believability of repressed memories of child sexual assault. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 257–268.
Golding, J. M., Sanchez, R. P., & Sego, S. A. (1997). The believability of hearsay testimony in a child sexual assault trial. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 299–325.
G. S. Goodman J. M. Golding V. S. Helgeson M. M. Haith J. Michelli (1987) ArticleTitleWhen a child takes the stand: Jurors’ perceptions of children’s eyewitness testimony Law and Human Behavior 11 IssueID1 27–40
Hazelwood, D. L., & Brigham, J. C. (1998). The effects of juror anonymity on jury verdicts. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 695–713.
Hopkins, K. D. (1982). The unit of analysis: Group means vs. individual observations. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 5–18.
Kenny, D. A., & dssLa Voie, L. (1985). Interpersonal relations and group processes: Separating individual and group effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 339–348.
Kerr, N. L., Niedermeier, K. E., & Kaplan, M. F. (1999). Bias in jurors vs. bias in juries: New evidence from the SDS perspective. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes. Special Issue: Twenty-five Years of Social Scheme Theory, 80(1), 70–86.
Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Sternberg, K. J., Hershkowitz, I., & Horowitz, D. (2000). Accuracy of investigators’ verbatim notes of their forensic interviews with alleged child abuse victims. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 699–708.
London, K., & Nunez, N. (2000). The effect of jury deliberations on jurors’ propensity to disregard inadmissible evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 932–939.
MacCoun, R. J., & Kerr, N. L. (1988). Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors’ bias for leniency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 21–33.
Manson, M. A. (1992). Social workers as expert witnesses in child sexual abuse cases. Social Work, 37, 30–34.
McCoy, M. L., Nunez, N., & Dammeyer, M. M. (1999). The effect of jury deliberations on jurors’ reasoning skills. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 557–575.
McGough, L. S. (1994). Child witness: Fragile voices in the American legal system. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
McGough, L. S. (1999). Hearing and believing hearsay. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 485–498.
Meissner, C. A., Brigham, J. C., & Pfeifer, J. E. (2003). Jury nullification: The influence of judicial instruction on the relationship between attitudes and juridical decision making. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 243–254.
Myers, J. E. B. (1992). Evidence in child abuse and neglect (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley Law Publications.
Myers, J. E. B. (1996). A decade of international reform to accommodate child witnesses. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 402–422.
Myers, J. E. B., Redlich, A. D., Goodman, G. S., Prizmich, L. P., & Imwinkelried, E. (1999). Jurors’ perception of hearsay in child sexual abuse cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 388–419.
Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz, D. (2000). Assessing the value of structured protocols for forensic interviews of alleged child abuse victims. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 733–752.
Orcutt, H. K., Goodman, G. S., Tobey, A. E., Batterman-Faunce, J. M., & Thomas, S. (2001). Detecting deception in children’s testimony: Factfinders’ abilities to reach the truth in open court and closed-circuit trials. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 339–372.
Pathak, M. K., & Thompson, W. C. (1999). From child to witness to jury: Effects of suggestion on the transmission and evaluation of hearsay. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 372–387.
Poole, D. A., & Lamb, M. E. (1998). Investigative interviews of children. Washington, DC: American Psychology Association.
Redlich, A. D., Myers, J. E. B., Goodman, G. S., & Qin, J. (2002). A comparison of two forms of hearsay testimony in child sexual abuse cases. Child Maltreatment, 7, 312–328.
Ross, D. F., Dunning, D., Toglia, M. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1989). Age stereotypes, communication modality, and mock jurors’ perceptions of the child witness. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Perspectives on children’s testimony (pp. 37–56). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Ross, D. F., Dunning, D., Toglia, M. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1990). The child in the eyes of the jury: Assessing mock jurors’ perceptions of the child witness. Law and Human Behavior, 14(1), 5–23.
Ross, D. F., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Marsil, D. F. (1999a). The impact of hearsay testimony on conviction rates in trials of child sexual abuse: Toward balancing the rights of defendants and child witnesses. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 439–455.
Ross, D. F., Warren, A. R., & McGough, L. S. (1999b). Foreword: Hearsay testimony in trials involving child witnesses. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 251–254.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 174–221). New York: Academic Press.
Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. W., & Mitchell, S. (2001). Use of a structured investigative protocol enhances young children’s responses to free-recall prompts in the course of forensic interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 997–1005.
Terrance, C. A., Matheson, K., & Spanos, N. P. (2000). Effects of judicial instructions and case characteristics in a mock jury trial of battered women who kill. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 207–229.
Tobey, A. E., Goodman, G. S., Batterman-Faunce, J. M., Orcutt, H. K., & Sachsenmaier, T. (1995). Balancing the rights of children and defendants: Effects of closed-circuit television on children’s accuracy and jurors’ perceptions. In M. S. Zaragoza, J. R. Graham, G. C. N. Hall, R. Hirschman, & Y. S. Ben-Porath (Eds.), Memory and testimony in the child witness (pp. 214–239). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tubb, V. A., Wood, J. M., & Hosch, H. M. (1999). Effects of suggestive interviewing and indirect evidence on child credibility in a sexual abuse case. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1111–1127.
Warren, A. R., Nunez, N., Keeney, J. M., Buck, J. A., & Smith, B. (2002). The believability of children and their interviewers’ hearsay testimony: When less is more. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 846–857.
Warren, A. R., & Woodall, C. E. (1999). The reliability of hearsay testimony: How well do interviewers recall their interviews with children? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 355–371.
Warren, A. R., Woodall, C. E., Hunt, J.S., & Perry, N. W. (1996). “It sounds good in theory, but...”: Do investigative interviewers follow guidelines based on memory research? Child Maltreatment, 1, 231–245.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Buck, J.A., Warrren, A.R. & Brigham, J.C. When Does Quality Count?: Perceptions of Hearsay Testimony About Child Sexual Abuse Interviews. Law Hum Behav 28, 599–621 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-004-0486-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-004-0486-8