Law and Critique

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 119–126 | Cite as

The Denier-in-Chief: Climate Change, Science and the Election of Donald J. Trump

Article

Abstract

The election of Donald J. Trump as the 45th President of the United States reminded us that climate deniers are anything but endangered species. In this short paper, we discuss President Trump’s position on climate change in the wider context of climate controversies and denial. In particular, we put it into perspective with other notorious contrarian leaders and their influence on national and international climate politics. Finally, we provide a brief analysis of President Trump discourses on climate change and discuss them in light of reflections about post-truth politics.

Keywords

Climate controversies Climate denial Contrarian leaders Climate politics Post-truth 

References

  1. Abbott, Tony. 2009. Battlelines. Melbourne: Melbourne Univ. Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Anderegg, W.R., J.W. Prall, J. Harold, and S.H. Schneider. 2010. Expert credibility in climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (27): 12107–12109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boykoff, Maxwell T., and Jules M. Boykoff. 2004. Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change 14 (2): 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dagorn, Gary. 2016. Les volte-face de Nicolas Sarkozy sur le changement climatique. Le Monde. http://www.lemonde.fr/les-decodeurs/article/2016/09/15/les-volte-face-de-nicolas-sarkozy-sur-le-changement-climatique_4998385_4355770.html#S48VEgAm31TfyCPX.99. Accessed 10 March 2017.
  5. DiChristopher, Tom. 2017. Scott Pruitt’s latest climate change denial sparks backlash from scientists, environmentalists. CNBC. http://www.cnbc.com/2017/03/09/scott-pruitts-latest-climate-change-denial-sparks-backlash.html. Accessed 10 March 2017.
  6. Dunlap, Riley E. 2013. Climate change skepticism and denial: An introduction. American Behavioral Scientist 57(6): 691–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213477097. Accessed 10 March. 2017.
  7. Dunlap, Riley E., and Aaron M. McCright. 2008. A widening gap: Republican and Democratic views on climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 50 (5): 26–35.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, P.N., and S.H. Schneider. 1997. The 1995 IPCC report: Broad consensus or ‘scientific cleansing’. Ecofable/Ecoscience 1 (1): 3–9.Google Scholar
  9. Hoffman, Andrew J. 2011. Talking past each other? Cultural framing of skeptical and convinced logics in the climate change debate. Organization & Environment 24 (1): 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoag, H. 2012. Canadian budget hits basic science. Innovation wins over basic research and the environment. Nature. http://www.nature.com/news/canadian-budget-hits-basic-science-1.10366. Accessed 10 March 2017.
  11. Hoggan, James, and Richard Littlemore. 2009. Climate cover-up: The crusade to deny global warming. Vancouver: Greystone Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  12. Klaus, Vaclav. 2010. The Climate change doctrine is part of environmentalism, not of science. https://www.klaus.cz/clanky/2694. Accessed 11 March 2017.
  13. Lahsen, Myanna. 2008. Experiences of modernity in the greenhouse. Global Environmental Change 18: 204–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lahsen, Myanna. 2013. Anatomy of dissent: A cultural analysis of climate skepticism. American Behavioral Scientist 57 (6): 732–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Latour, Bruno. 2012. Que la bataille se livre au moins à armes égales. In Controverses climatiques, sciences et politique, ed. E. Zaccai, F. Gemenne, and J.M. Decroly. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  16. Levin, Kelly, B. Cashore, S. Bernstein, and G. Auld. 2012. Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences 45 (2): 123–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lynch, Michael. 2017. Post-truth, alt-facts, and asymmetric controversies (Part II). http://first100days.stsprogram.org/2017/02/20/post-truth-alt-facts-and-asymmetric-controversies-part-ii/. Accessed 11 March 2017.
  18. Mann, Michael E., Raymond S. Bradley, and Malcolm K. Hughes. 1999. Northern hemisphere temperatures during the past millennium: Inferences, uncertainties, and limitations. Geophysical Research Letters 26 (6): 759–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mann, Michael E. 2012. The hockey stick and the climate wars. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCright, Aaron M., and Riley E. Dunlap. 2000. Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims. Social Problems 47 (4): 499–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCright, Aaron M., and Riley E. Dunlap. 2011. Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change 21 (4): 1163–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McGee, Kyle. 2017. Heathen Earth. Trumpism and political ecology. Punctum books.Google Scholar
  23. New York Times. 2016. Donald Trump’s New York Times interview: Full transcript https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/23/us/politics/trump-new-york-times-interview-transcript.html?_r=1. Accessed 10 March 2017.
  24. Ogden, Lesley E. 2016. Nine years of censorship. Nature. http://www.nature.com/news/nine-years-of-censorship-1.19842. Accessed 10 March 2017.
  25. Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik M. Conway. 2010. Merchants of doubt. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik M. Conway. 2008. Challenging knowledge: How climate science became a victim of the cold war. In Agnotology. The making and unmaking of ignorance, ed. R. Proctor, and L. Schiebinger. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Painter, James. 2011. Poles apart. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.Google Scholar
  28. Pielke Jr, Roger A. 2007. The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Poortinga, W., A. Spence, L. Whitmarsh, S. Capstick, and N.F. Pidgeon. 2011. Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environmental Change 21 (3): 1015–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Powell, James Lawrence. 2011. The inquisition of climate science. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rahmstorf, Stefan. 2004. The climate sceptics. In The State of Science. Weather catastrophes and climate change: Is there still hope for us. ed. Munich Re. Munich: PG Verlag. The state of science. http://www.pik-potsdam.de/~stefan/Publications/Other/rahmstorf_climate_sceptics_2004.pdf. Accessed 13 March 2017.
  32. Sarewitz, Daniel. 2010. Curing climate backlash. Nature 464 (7285): 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. The Guardian. 2011. Canada pulls out of Kyoto protocol. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2011/dec/13/canada-pulls-out-kyoto-protocol. Accessed 10 March 2017.
  34. Turner, Chris. 2014. The war on science: Muzzled scientists and wilful blindness in Stephen Harper’s Canada. Vancouver: Greystone Books Ltd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CERI, Sciences PoParisFrance
  2. 2.Global Studies Institute/Département de Science Politique et Relations InternationalesUniversité de GenèveGenevaSwitzerland
  3. 3.Politics of the Earth, Sciences PoParisFrance
  4. 4.The Hugo ObservatoryUniversity of LiègeLiègeBelgium

Personalised recommendations