Law and Critique

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 215–233 | Cite as

The Work of Humiliation: A Psychoanalytic Understanding of Checkpoints, Borders and the Animation of the Legal World

  • Juliet Brough RogersEmail author


The policing of checkpoints demands a commitment from the soldier. These commitments are realized, as Robert Cover says of legal judgments, in the flesh of those subject to the policing and of those who police. Such commitments are sometimes difficult to maintain in the face of arbitrary policies and even arbitrary re-locations of checkpoints and borders. Obedience is required, but obedience is not simply an act of acceptance. This article employs a psychoanalytic lens and the work of animation theory to consider how obedience is legitimated in the minds of those who police borders and how practices of humiliation toward civilians at the borders function both to display the uncertainties about the regime’s legitimacy, and to aggressively depict this legitimacy in the flesh of those subject to the borders. This depiction, I argue, employs understandings of time, identity and the question, and these are then employed as techniques of humiliation. These techniques evoke a rhetorical landscape located somewhere between Freud’s discussion of the work of jokes and Scarry’s discussion of torture; between these two points is the promise of a legal world where there are only angels and devils and where these figures are animated in the flesh of both civilian and soldier.


Borders Checkpoints Humiliation Israel Northern Ireland Psychoanalysis Sovereignty 



This work was made possible with the assistance of Australia Research Council DECRA funding for the project ‘The Quality of Remorse’ DE120102304. My gratitude to the Council and to many colleagues at Kent Law School and Queens University Law School who participated in conversations on early versions of this work.


  1. Australian Research Council Project. 2013. ‘The Quality of Remorse’, Interview with Mr M, 17 October. Belfast: Northern Ireland.Google Scholar
  2. Breaking the Silence. Accessed 21 Oct 2015.
  3. Browning, Christopher. 1992. Ordinary men: Reserve police battalion 101 and the final solution. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, Judith. 1997. The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cash, John. 2009. Negotiating insecurity. Australian Feminist Law Journal 30: 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cavell, Stanley. 1969. Music discomposed. In Must we mean what we say? 180–212. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
  7. Cover, Robert. 1986. Violence and the word. Yale Law Journal 95: 1601–1629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cuneen, Chris. 2006. Racism, discrimination and the over-representation of indigenous people in the criminal justice system: Some conceptual and explanatory issues. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 17(3): 329–346.Google Scholar
  9. Dorsett, Shaunagh, and Shaun McVeigh. 2012. Jurisdiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (trans: Alan Sheridan). New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  11. Freud, Sigmund. 2001 (1905). Jokes and their relation to the unconscious, Vol VIII (trans: James Strachey). London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  12. Gobodo-Madikizela, Pumla. 2004. A human being died that night: A South African woman confronts the legacy of Apartheid. New York: Mariner Books.Google Scholar
  13. Goodrich, Peter. 1994. Jani anglorum: Signs, symptoms, slips and interpretation. In Politics, postmodernity and critical legal studies: The legality of the contingent, ed. Costas Douzinas, Peter Goodrich, and Yifat Hachamovitch, 107–144. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Grosz, Elizabeth. 1994. Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana Books.Google Scholar
  15. Hatzfeld, Jean. 2005. Machete season: The killers in Rwanda speak. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  16. Kappeler, Susanne. 1995. The will to violence: The politics of personal behaviour. Melbourne: Spinifex.Google Scholar
  17. Lacan, Jacques. 2006. Ecrits: The first complete edition in English (trans: Bruce Fink). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  18. Lacan, Jacques. 2007. The other side of psychoanalysis: The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XVII (trans: Russell Grigg). London: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  19. Langer, Lawrence. 1980. The dilemma of choice in the death camps. Centerpoint 4(Fall): 222–231.Google Scholar
  20. Lavi, Amit. 2015. ‘Keeping things interesting’. Accessed 21 Oct 2015.
  21. Milgram, Stanley. 1974. The perils of authority. Harpers Magazine.Google Scholar
  22. Minow, Martha. 1998. Between vengeance and forgiveness: Facing history after genocide and mass violence. Massachusetts: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  23. Na’amen, Oded. 2015. ‘I never knew he was in distress’. Accessed 21 Oct 2015.
  24. Na’amen, Oded. 2015. ‘You have no judgment’ Accessed 21 Oct 2015.
  25. Pick, Daniel. 2012. The pursuit of the Nazi mind: Hitler, Hess and the analysts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Rogers, Juliet. 2010. Torture: A modicum of recognition. Law and Critique 32: 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rogers, Juliet. 2013. Law’s cut on the body of human rights: Female circumcision, torture and sacred flesh. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Rush, Peter. 2005. Surviving common law: Silence and the violence internal to the legal sign. Cardozo Law Review 27(2): 753–766.Google Scholar
  29. Salecl, Renata. 2010. Choice. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  30. Scarry, Elaine. 1985. Body in pain: The making and unmaking of the world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Sereny, Gitta. 1995. Albert Speer: His battle with truth. London: Picador.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social and Political SciencesUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations