Law and Critique

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 87–108 | Cite as

Smoke, Curtains and Mirrors: The Production of Race Through Time and Title Registration

Article

Abstract

This article analyses the temporal effects of title registration and their relationship to race. It traces the move away from the retrospection of pre-registry common law conveyancing and toward the dynamic, future-oriented Torrens title registration system. The Torrens system, developed in early colonial Australia, enabled the production of ‘clean’, fresh titles that were independent of their predecessors. Through a process praised by legal commentators for ‘curing’ titles of their pasts, this system produces indefeasible titles behind its distinctive ‘curtain’ and ‘mirror’, which function similarly to magicians’ smoke and mirrors by blocking particular realities from view. In the case of title registries, those realities are particular histories of and relationships with land, which will not be protected by property law and are thus made precarious. Building on interdisciplinary work which theorises time as a social tool, I argue that Torrens title registration produces a temporal order which enables land market coordination by rendering some relationships with land temporary and making others indefeasible. This ordering of relationships with land in turn has consequences for the human subjects who have those relationships, cutting futures short for some and guaranteeing permanence to others. Engaging with Renisa Mawani and other critical race theorists, I argue that the categories produced by Torrens title registration systems materialise as race.

Keywords

Colonialism Land Race Time Title registration Torrens 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Enormous thanks to the careful reading, feedback and support I have received in writing this paper. Particular thanks to Nadine El-Enany for detailed comments on several drafts. Also to Emily Grabham, Nick Piska, Katie Cruz, Renisa Mawani, Shelley Bielefeld, Shiri Pasternak, Lucy Finchett-Maddock and anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier drafts. All errors are mine alone.

References

  1. Ahmed, Sara. 2000. Strange encounters: Embodied others in post-coloniality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Ainger, Susanne. 1991 (June). Aboriginal trailblazer discovers ‘extraordinary conspiracy’, 18–19. Sydney: Sydney University Gazette.Google Scholar
  3. Altman, Jon. 2013. Helping the homelands. Journal of Indigenous Policy 14: 107–110.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, Stuart. 1998. The 1925 Property legislation: Setting contexts. In Land law: Themes and perspectives, ed. Susan Bright, and John Dewar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bankes, Nigel, Sharon Mascher, and Jonnette Watson Hamilton. 2014. The recognition of Aboriginal title and its relationship with settler state land titles systems. University of British Columbia Law Review 47(3): 829–888.Google Scholar
  6. Barrows, Adam. 2011. The cosmic time of empire: Modern Britain and world literature. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bastian, Michelle. 2012. Fatally confused: Telling the time in the midst of ecological crises. Environmental Philosophy 9(1): 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Besteman, Catherine. 1994. Individualisation and the assault on customary tenure in Africa: Title registration programmes and the case of Somalia. Africa 64(04): 484–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhandar, Brenna. 2015. Title by registration: Instituting modern property law and creating racial value in the settler colony. Journal of Law and Society 42(2): 253–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Black, Christine F. 2011. The land is the source of the law: A dialogic encounter with indigenous jurisprudence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Buck, A.R. 2005. This remnant of feudalism: Primogeniture and political culture in colonial New South Wales, with some Canadian comparisons. In Despotic dominions: Property rights in settler societies, ed. John McLaren, A.R. Buck, and Nancy E. Wright. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  12. Burns, Fiona. 2011. Adverse possession and title-by-registration systems in Australia and England. Melbourne University Law Review 35: 773–820.Google Scholar
  13. Coulthard, Glen Sean. 2014. Red skin, white masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crabtree, Louise, Nicole Moore, Peter Phibbs, Hazel Blunden, and Carolyn Sappideen. 2015. Community land trusts and indigenous communities: From strategies to outcomes. AHURI final report no. 239. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Crenshaw, Kimberley, Neil Gotanda, Garry Peller, and Kendall Thomas (eds.). 1995. Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  16. Davies, Margaret. 2007. Property: Meanings, histories, theories. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish.Google Scholar
  17. Federici, Silvia. 2004. Caliban and the witch: Women, the body and primitive accumulation. New York: Autonomedia.Google Scholar
  18. Gidwani, Vinay and Brett Story. 2012. In conversation: On waste as the political other of value. In Garage sale standard, ed. Martha Rosler, 7–9. New York: Museum of Modern Art, 17–30 November.Google Scholar
  19. Gilmore, Ruth. 2007. Golden gulag: Prisons, surplus, crisis, and opposition in globalizing California. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gilroy, Paul. 1987. ‘There ain’t no black in the Union Jack’: The cultural politics of race and nation. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  21. Girard, Philip. 2005. Land law, liberalism, and the agrarian ideal: British North America. In Despotic dominions: Property rights in settler societies, ed. John McLaren, A.R. Buck, and Nancy E. Wright, 1750–1920. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  22. Graham, Nicole. 2011. Lawscape: Property, environment, law. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Gray, Kevin J., and Susan Francis Gray. 2009. Elements of land law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Green, Kate. 1998. Citizens and squatters: Under the surfaces of land law. In Land law: Themes and perspectives, ed. Susan Bright, and John Dewar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Greenhouse, Carol J. 1996. A moment’s notice: Time politics across cultures. London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Grosz, Elizabeth. 1999a. Becoming: An introduction. In Becomings: Explorations in time, memory and futures, ed. Elizabeth Grosz, 1–12. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Grosz, Elizabeth. 1999b. Thinking the new: Of futures yet unthought. In Becomings: Explorations in time, memory and futures, ed. Elizabeth Grosz, 15–28. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hall, Stuart. 1997. Race: The floating signifier. In Media education foundation. http://www.mediaed.org/transcripts/Stuart-Hall-Race-the-Floating-Signifier-Transcript.pdf.
  29. Harris, Cheryl. 1993. Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review 106(8): 1707–1791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harvey, David. 1989. The limits to capital. Midway reprint edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hepburn, Samantha J. 2013. Principles of property law. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Home, Robert. 2013. Outside de Soto’s bell jar: Colonial/postcolonial land law and the exclusion of the peri-urban poor. In Demystifying the mystery of capital: Land tenure & poverty in Africa and the Caribbean, ed. Robert Home, and Hilary Lim. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Kain, Roger J.P., and Elizabeth Baigent. 1992. The Cadastral map in the service of the state: A history of property mapping. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Keenan, Sarah. 2014. Moments of decolonization: Indigenous Australia in the here and now. Canadian Journal of Law and Society 29(02): 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kerruish, Valerie, and Jeannine Purdy. 1998. He ‘look’ honest: Big white thief. Law/Text/Culture 4: 146–171.Google Scholar
  36. Lim, Hilary, and Kate Green. 1995. Cases and materials in land law, 2nd ed. London: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Mawani, Renisa. 2014. Law as temporality: Colonial politics and Indian settlers. University of California Irvine Law Review 4: 65–96.Google Scholar
  38. McCrimmon, Les A. 1994. Protection of equitable interests under the Torrens system: Polishing the mirror of title. Monash University Law Review 20: 300–316.Google Scholar
  39. Moreton-Robinson, Aileen. 2003. I still call Australia home: Indigenous belonging and place in a white postcolonizing society. In Uprootings/regroundings: Questions of home and migration, ed. Sara Ahmed, Claudia Castaneda, Anne-Marie Fortier, and Mimi Sheller. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  40. Moss, Jim. 1985. Sound of trumpets: History of the Labour movement in South Australia. Adelaide: Wakefield Press.Google Scholar
  41. Offer, Avner. 1981. Property and politics, 1870–1914: Landownership, law, ideology, and urban development in England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. O’Connor, Pamela. 2005. Registration of invalid dispositions: Who gets the property? In Modern studies in property law, ed. Elizabeth Cooke. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. O’Connor, Pamela. 2006. Private taking of land: Adverse possession, encroachment by buildings and improvement under a mistake. University of Western Australia Law Review 33: 31–62.Google Scholar
  44. O’Connor, Pamela. 2009. Deferred and immediate indefeasibility: Bijural ambiguity in registered land title systems. Edinburgh Law Review 13(2): 194–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Omi, Michael, and Howard Winant. 1994. Racial formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1980s, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Pasternak, Shiri. 2014. How capitalism will save colonialism: The privatization of reserve lands in Canada. Antipode 47(1): 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Patton, R.G. 1951. Extension of the Torrens System into Hawaii, the Philippine Islands and Latin-American jurisdictions. Minnesota Law Review 36: 213–226.Google Scholar
  48. Perera, Suvendrini, and Joseph Pugliese. 2011. Death in a dry river: Black life, white property, parched justice. Somatechnics 1(1): 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peterson, Christopher L. 2011. Two faces: Demystifying the mortgage electronic registration system’s land title theory. William and Mary Law Review 53: 111–161.Google Scholar
  50. Polanyi, Karl. 1944/2001. The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  51. Pottage, Alain. 1994. The measure of land. Modern Law Review 57(3): 361–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pottage, Alain. 1998. Evidencing ownership. In Land law: Themes and perspectives, ed. Susan Bright, and John Dewar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Raff, Murray J. 2003. Private property and environmental responsibility: A comparative study of German real property law. New York: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  54. Razack, Sherene H. 2015. Dying from improvement: Inquests and inquiries into indigenous deaths in custody. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  55. Rogers, Edmund. 2006. The impact of the Australian Torrens system on the land transfer debate in the United Kingdom, 1858–1914. Australia and New Zealand Law and History E-Journal 4: 125–132.Google Scholar
  56. Scott, James C. 1999. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Secher, Ulla. 2000. Native title: An exception to indefeasibility and a ground for invoking the deferred indefeasibility theory. James Cook University Law Review 7: 17–73.Google Scholar
  58. Selway, Bradley. 1997. The constitution of South Australia. Sydney: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
  59. Simpson, S. Rowton. 1976. Land law and registration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Spade, D. 2011. Normal life: Administrative violence, critical trans politics, and the limits of law. Brooklyn, NY: South End Press.Google Scholar
  61. Taylor, Greg. 2008. The law of the land: The advent of the Torrens System in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thomas, Rod, Rouhshi Low, and Lynden Griggs. 2013. Australasian Torrens automation, its integrity, and the three proof requirements. New Zealand Law Review 2: 227–262.Google Scholar
  63. Thompson, E.P. 1975. Whigs and hunters: The origin of the Black Act. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  64. Watson, Irene. 2002. Buried alive. Law and Critique 13(3): 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Watson, Irene. 2009. In the Northern Territory intervention, what is saved or rescued and at what cost? Cultural Studies Review 15(2): 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wolfe, Patrick. 2006. Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native. Journal of Genocide Research 8(4): 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawBirkbeck, University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations