Advertisement

Law and Critique

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 63–81 | Cite as

Hobbes’ Frontispiece: Authorship, Subordination and Contract

  • Janice RichardsonEmail author
Article

Abstract

In this article I argue that the famous image on Hobbes’ frontispiece of Leviathan provides a more honest picture of authority and of contract than is provided by today’s liberal images of free and equal persons, who are pictured as sitting round a negotiating table making a decision as to the principles on which to base laws. Importantly, in the seventeenth century, at the start of modern political thought, Hobbes saw no contradiction between contractual agreement and subordination. I will draw out these arguments by comparing three images of politics that employ the human body: Hobbes’ frontispiece is compared firstly with an earlier picture of the state, the illustration of the Fable of the Belly, and then with a later Rawlsian image of the social contract described above. At stake is Hobbes’ view of two associated concepts: authorship and authority. I argue that Hobbes’ image is a vivid portrayal of a ‘persona covert’, akin to the feme covert, a wife characterised in common law as so dominated by her husband that she is imagined as being ‘covered’ by his body.

Keywords

Authorship Carole Pateman Hobbes’ frontispiece Leviathan Subordination 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Justin Clemens for inviting me to Melbourne University’s Conference on Genre, Affect and Authority in Early Modern Europe, where I started to discuss the frontispiece of Leviathan. Thanks also to the anonymous referees.

References

  1. Agamben, Giorgio. 2011. The kingdom and the glory: For a theological genealogy of economy and government. Trans. Lorenzo Chiesa and Matteo Mandarini. (Homo Sacer, II). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. 1857. Aristotle’s treatise on rhetoric: Literally translated from the Greek, with an analysis by Thomas Hobbes, and a series of questions; Also the poetic of Aristotle, ed. Theodore Alois Buckley. Trans. Thomas Hobbes. London: Henry G. Bohn.Google Scholar
  3. Battersby, Christine. 1998. The phenomenal woman: Feminist metaphysics and the patterns of identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, Ulrich and Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim. 1995. The normal chaos of love. Trans. Mark Ritter and Jane Wiebel. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blackstone, Sir William. 1765. Commentaries on the laws of England: In four books. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bredekamp, Horst. 2007. Thomas Hobbes’s visual strategies. In The Cambridge companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, ed. Patricia Springborg, 29–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brennan, Teresa, and Carole Pateman. 1979. ‘Mere auxiliaries to the Commonwealth’: Women and the origins of liberalism. Political Studies 27(2): 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, Keith. 1978. The artist of the leviathan title-page. British Library Journal 4(2): 24–36.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, Keith. 1980. Thomas Hobbes and the title-page of Leviathan. Philosophy 55(213): 410–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, Wendy. 2010. Walled states, waning sovereignty. New York, NY: Zone.Google Scholar
  11. Cavarero, Adriana. 2002. Stately bodies: Literature, philosophy, and the question of gender. Trans. Robert de Lucca and Deanna Shemek. The Body, in Theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  12. Champion, Justin. 2010. Decoding the Leviathan: Doing the history of ideas through images, 1651–1714. In Printed images in early modern Britain: Essays in interpretation, ed. Michael Hunter, 255–278. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  13. Clemens, Justin. 2013. Psychoanalysis is an antiphilosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldsmith, M.M. 1981. Picturing Hobbes’s politics? The illustrations to philosophical rudiments. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 44: 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goodrich, Peter. 2013a. The political theology of private law. International Journal of Constitutional Law 11(1): 146–161.Google Scholar
  17. Goodrich, Peter. 2013b. Legal emblems and the art of law: Obiter Depicta as the vision of governance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hampton, Jean. 2007. The intrinsic worth of persons: Contractarianism in moral and political philosophy, ed. David Farnham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hobbes, Thomas. 1994a. The correspondence, ed. Noel Malcolm. Vol. 6, 7. 14 vols. Clarendon Edition of the Works of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  20. Hobbes, Thomas. 1994b. Leviathan: With selected variants from the Latin edition of 1668, ed. Edwin Curley. Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
  21. Hobbes, Thomas. 1997. A dialogue between a philosopher and a student of the common laws of England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Jacobson, Norman. 1998. The strange case of the Hobbesian Man. Representations, no. 63: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kantorowicz, Ernst Hartwig. 1961. Gods in uniform. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 105(4): 368–393.Google Scholar
  24. Kantorowicz, Ernst Hartwig. 1997. The king’s two bodies: A study in Mediaeval political theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kristiansson, Magnus, and Johan Tralau. 2014. Hobbes’s hidden monster: A new interpretation of the frontispiece of Leviathan. European Journal of Political Theory 13(3): 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Livy, 1971. The early history of Rome: Books 1–5 of The history of Rome from its foundation. Trans. Aubrey De Sélincourt. New ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  27. Locke, John. 1988. Locke: Two treatises of government, ed. Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Macpherson, Crawford Brough. 1962. The political theory of possessive individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  29. Malcolm, Noel. 2002. Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Manow, Philip. 2010. In the king’s shadow: The political anatomy of democratic representation. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  31. Marx, Karl. 1976. Capital: Volume 1: A critique of political economy. Trans. Ben Fowkes. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  32. Münkler, Herfried. 1994. Politische Bilder, Politik Der Metaphern. Frankfurt: Fischer-Taschenbuch-Verlag.Google Scholar
  33. Nagl-Docekal, Herta. 2004. Feminist philosophy. Trans. Katharina Vester. Boulder: Westview Press Inc.Google Scholar
  34. Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. Ogilby, John, and Aesop. 1668. The Fables of Aesop Paraphras’d in verse adorn’d with sculpture, and illustrated with annotations. The second edition. London: Printed by Thomas Roycroft, for the author.Google Scholar
  36. Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  37. Östman, Lars. 2012. The frontispiece of Leviathan–Hobbes’ Bible use. Akademeia 2(1): ea0112.Google Scholar
  38. Pateman, Carole. 1979. The problem of political obligation: A critique of liberal theory. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Pateman, Carole. 1988. The sexual contract. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  40. Pateman, Carole. 1996. A comment on Johnson’s Does Capitalism Really Need Patriarchy. Women’s Studies International Forum 19(3): 203–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pateman, Carole. 2002. Self-ownership and property in the person: Democratization and a tale of two concepts. The Journal of Political Philosophy 10(1): 20–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pateman, Carole. 2004. Democratizing citizenship: Some advantages of a basic income. Politics and Society 32(1): 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Poole, Thomas. 2004. What’s God got to do with it? Waldron on equality. Journal of Law and Society 31(3): 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Quintilian. 1891. Quintilian’s institutes of oratory: Or, education of an orator. In Twelve books. Literally translated with notes, by Rev. John Selby Watson. Trans. John Selby Watson. London: George Bell.Google Scholar
  45. Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice, 1st ed. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Richardson, Janice. 2007. Contemporary feminist perspectives on social contract theory. Ratio Juris 20(3): 402–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Richardson, Janice. 2009. The classic social contractarians. London: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  48. Selden, John. 1614. Titles of honor. London: printed by William Stansby for Richard Whitakers sic.Google Scholar
  49. Skinner, Quentin. 2002. Machiavelli on Virtù and the maintenance of liberty. In Renaissance virtues, Vol. 2, 160–185. Visions of Politics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Skinner, Quentin. 2008. Hobbes and Republican Liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Spinoza, Benedictus de. 1991. The ethics; treatise on the emendation of the intellect; selected letters. Trans. Samuel Shirley. Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
  52. Stanton, Timothy. 2011. Hobbes and Schmitt. History of European Ideas 37(2): 160–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stoffel, Brian. 1991. Hobbes on self-preservation and suicide. Hobbes Studies, no. 4: 26–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Strauss, Leo. 1996. Notes on Carl Schmitt, The concept of the political by Leo Strauss. In The concept of the political, Trans. George Schwab and Harvey Lomax, 97–122. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  55. Waldron, Jeremy. 2002. God, Locke, and Equality: Christian Foundations of John Locke’s Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity of MonashMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations