Advertisement

Law and Critique

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 189–206 | Cite as

‘Expression of Contempt’: Hegel’s Critique of Legal Freedom

  • Daniel LoickEmail author
Article

Abstract

In this paper, I argue for the existence of pathologies of juridicism. I attempt to show that the Western regime of right tends to colonize our intersubjective relations, resulting in the formation of affective and habitual dispositions that actually hinder participation in social life. Speaking of pathologies of juridicism is to claim that the legal form fundamentally contaminates the way in which we relate to ourselves, to others, and to the world, resulting in an ethically deformed, distorted or deficient form of (inter-) subjectivity. To support my thesis I consult a philosopher, whose work still provides a powerful analysis and critique of juridicism, namely, Hegel. Hegel provides an historic and a systematic theory of the pathologies of juridicism. His historical theory locates the origin of the abstract subjectivity of right in Roman antiquity. His systematic theory understands the negative effects of an absolutization of the legal domain as a persistent threat to social integration and an individual’s pursuit of the good life. I clarify these argumentative dimensions in two steps, beginning with Hegel’s historical analysis of right in his Lectures on the Philosophy of History. I then reconstruct Hegel’s critique of the subjectivity of right in the short chapter on the ‘Condition of Right’ in his Phenomenology of Spirit. In conclusion, I argue that, although Hegel’s diagnosis is correct, his prescribed therapy must fail: instead of radically altering abstract right in terms of content and form, it only recommends its complementation through other ethical spheres.

Keywords

Abstract right Hegel Juridicism Legal subjectivity Rome Social pathology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the VolkswagenStiftung (Germany) and carried out during my fellowship at the Mahindra Humanities Center at Harvard University. I am grateful for tremendously helpful comments by Amy Allen, Chad Kautzer, and the participants of the ‘Right & Subjectivity’ workshop that took place in April 2013 at Harvard.

References

  1. Adorno, Theodor W. 2004. Negative dialectics (trans: Ashton, E.B.). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, Hannah. 2006. What is authority? In Between past and future. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  3. Bernasconi, Robert. 1991. Persons and masks: The Phenomenology of Spirit and its laws. In Hegel and legal theory, ed. Drucilla Cornell, Michel Rosenfeld, and David Gray Carlson. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Brudner, Alan. 1991. Hegel and the crisis of private law. In Hegel and legal theory, ed. Drucilla Cornell, Michel Rosenfeld, and David Gray Carlson. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Chiereghin, Franco. 2009. Freedom and thought: Stoicism, scepticism, and unhappy consciousness. In The Blackwell guide to Hegel’s phenomenology of spirt, ed. Kenneth R. Westphal. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Desmond, William. 1989. Hegel, legal status, and otherness. Cardozo Law Review 10(5–6): 1713–1726.Google Scholar
  7. Fuhrmann, Manfred. 1989. Person. Von der Antike bis zum Mittelalter. In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, Band 7, ed. Joachim Ritter, Karlfried Gründer and Gottfried Gabriel. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
  8. Franklin, Mitchell. 1958. The significance of stoicism in Roman law in the development and outcome of Hegel’s theory of alienation. Acta Juridica 246: 246–259.Google Scholar
  9. Hegel, Georg W.F. 1956. The philosophy of history (trans: Sibree, J.). Mineola: Dover.Google Scholar
  10. Hegel, Georg W.F. 1977. Phenomenology of spirit (trans. Miller, A.V.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hegel, Georg W.F. 2008. Outlines of the philosophy of right (trans. Know, T.M.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Honneth, Axel. 1996. The struggle for recognition. The moral grammar of social conflict (trans. Anderson, Joel). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Honneth, Axel. 2000. Pathologien des Sozialen. Tradition und Aktualität der Sozialphilosophie. In Das Andere der Gerechtigkeit. Aufsätze zur praktischen Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  14. Honneth, Axel. 2010. The pathologies of individual freedom. Hegel’s social theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Honneth, Axel. 2014. Freedom’s right. The social foundations of democratic life (trans. Ganahl, Joseph.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hyppolite, Jean. 1974. Genesis and structure of Hegel’s phenomenology of spirit. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jaeggi, Rahel. 2014. Alienation (trans. Neuhouser, Frederic.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kant, Immanuel. 1996. The metaphysics of morals (trans. Gregor, Mary). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kautzer, Chad. 2014. Self-defensive subjectivity: The diagnosis of a social pathology. Philosophy and Social Criticism 40(8): 743–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Loick, Daniel. 2014. Juridification and politics: From the dilemma of juridification to the paradoxes of rights. Philosophy and Social Criticism 40(8): 757–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marx, Karl. 1964. Early writings (trans. Bottomore, T.B.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  22. Marx, Karl. 1996. The eighteenth brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Later political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. 2013. The Communist manifesto (trans. Bender, Frederic). London: Norton.Google Scholar
  24. Menke, Christoph. 2012. Recht und Gewalt. Berlin: August.Google Scholar
  25. Menke, Christoph, and Juliane Rebentisch, ed. 2009. Kreation und Depression. Freiheit im gegenwärtigen Kapitalismus. Berlin: Kadmos.Google Scholar
  26. Pinkard, Terry. 1996. Hegel’s phenomenology. The sociality of reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Rosa, Hartmut. 2013. Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity (trans. Trejo-Mathys, Jonathan). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rose, Gillian. 1981. Hegel contra sociology. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
  29. Schiemann, Gottfried. 2013. Persona. In Der Neue Pauly, ed. Hubert Cancik, Helmuth Schneider, and Manfred Landfester. Brill Online.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für PhilosophieGoethe UniversityFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations