Transitional justice as a field of inquiry is a relatively new one. Referring to the range of mechanisms used to assist the transition of a state or society from one form of (usually repressive) rule to a more democratic order, transitional justice has become the dominant language in which the move from war to peace is discussed in the early twenty-first century. Applying a deconstructive analysis to the question of transitional justice, the paper seeks to interrogate the core assumptions that underlie transitional justice literature in relation to the relationship between law, politics and justice. As a discourse, transitional justice is replete with antinomies or binary oppositions, that of war and peace being the most obvious. Therefore the essentially deconstructible structure of differánce already exists within the concept. By examining the ways in which legal and political narratives are framed and reproduced, the paper seeks to deconstruct the opposition between law and politics on which much of the transitional justice literature rests. The article does not purport to provide a definitive critical analysis of transitional justice but aims to provoke debate and to prompt critical scholars to engage with the themes raised by providing an introductory analysis of some of the core features of a field of inquiry which seems ripe for deconstruction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Akhavan, Payam. 1998. Justice in The Hague, peace in the former Yugoslavia? A commentary on the United Nations War Crimes Tribunal. Human Rights Quarterly 20: 737.
Arthur, Paige. 2009. How ‘transitions’ reshaped human rights: A conceptual history of transitional justice. Human Rights Quarterly 31: 321.
Beardsworth, Richard. 1996. Derrida and the political. London: Routledge.
Bell, Christine. 2000. Peace agreements and human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bell, Christine. 2006. Negotiating justice? Human rights and peace agreements. Geneva: International Council on Human Rights Policy.
Bell, Christine. 2009. Transitional justice, interdisciplinarity and the state of the ‘field’ or ‘non field’. International Journal of Transitional Justice 3: 5.
Bell, Christine, Colm Campbell, and Finonuala Ní Aoláin. 2004. Justice discourses in transition. Social and Legal Studies 13(3): 305.
Campbell, Colm, et al. 2003. The frontiers of legal analysis: Reframing the transition in Northern Ireland. Modern Law Review 66: 317.
Campbell, Colm, and Fionnuala Ní Aoláin. 2005. The paradox of transition in conflicted democracies. Human Rights Quarterly 27: 172.
Chandler, David. 2000. Bosnia: Faking democracy after Dayton. London: Pluto Press.
Dancy, Geoff. 2010. Impact assessment, not evaluation: Defining a limited role for positivism in the study of transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice 4: 355.
Davies, Margaret. 2001. Derrida and law: Legitimate fictions. In Jacques Derrida and the humanities: A critical reader, ed. Tom Cohen, 213–237. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Derrida, Jacques. 1987. Before the law. In Kafka and the contemporary critical performance, ed. A. Udoff. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Derrida, Jacques. 1992. Force of law: The mystical foundation of authority. In Deconstruction and the possibility of justice, ed. Drucilla Cornell. New York: Routledge.
Derrida, Jacques. 2001. On cosmopolitanism and forgiveness. Trans Mark Dooley and Michael Hughes. London: Routledge.
Derrida, Jacques. 2002. Declarations of Independence. In Negotiations, interventions and interviews, ed. E. Rottenbert, 1971–2001. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Derrida, Jacques. 2003. Autoimmunity: Real and symbolic suicides. In Philosophy in a time of terror: Dialogues with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida, ed. Giovanna Borradori, 85–136. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
De Ville, Jacques. 2008. Sovereignty without sovereignty: Derrida’s declarations of independence. Law and Critique 19: 87.
Douzinas, Costas. 2005. Violence, justice, deconstruction. German Law Journal 6: 171.
Dugard, John. 1997. Retrospective justice: International law and the South African Model. In Transitional justice and the rule of law in new democracies, ed. A.J. McAdams. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Fitzpatrick, Peter. 2005. In God we trust’ can relieve us of trusting each other: Peter Fitzpatrick interviewed by Jill Stauffer. The Believer 3(8): 63–72.
IJTJ. 2007. Editorial note. International Journal of Transitional Justice 1: 1.
Kingsbury, Benedict. 2002. Legal positivism as normative politics: International society, balance of power and Lassa Oppenheim’s positive international law. European Journal of International Law 13(2): 401.
La Caz, Margarite. 2007. At the intersection: Kant, Derrida and the relation between ethics and politics. Political Theory 35: 781.
McCormick, John. 2001. Derrida on law: Or, poststructuralism gets serious. Political Theory 29: 395.
McEvoy, Kieran. 2007. Transitional justice from below: Towards a thicker understanding of transitional justice. Journal of Law and Society 34: 411.
Mechlem, Kerstin. 2009. Treaty bodies and the interpretation of human Rights. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 42: 905.
Nagy, Rosemary. 2008. Transitional justice as global project: Critical reflections. Third World Quarterly 29: 275.
Newman, Saul. 2001. Derrida’s deconstruction of authority. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27(3): 1.
Orentlicher, Diane. 1991. Settling accounts: The duty to prosecute human rights violations of a prior regime. Yale Law Journal 100: 2539.
Rolston, Bill. 2006. Dealing with the past: Pro state paramilitaries, truth and transition in Northern Ireland. Human Rights Quarterly 28: 652.
Sarkin, Jeremy. 2001. The tension between justice and reconciliation in Rwanda: Politics, human rights, due process and the role of Gacaca Courts in dealing with the genocide. Journal of African Law 45: 143.
Simpson, Kirk. 2007. Voices silenced, voices re-discovered: Victims of violence and the reclamation of language in transitional societies. International Journal of Law in Context 3: 89.
Simpson, Kirk. 2009. Unionist voices and the politics of remembering the past in Northern Ireland. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sokoloff, William. 2005. Between justice and legality: Derrida on decision. Political Research Quarterly 58: 341.
Subotic, Jelena. 2012. The transformation of international transitional justice advocacy. International Journal of Transitional Justice 6: 106.
Teitel, Ruti. 2000. Transitional justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Teitel, Ruti. 2003. Transitional justice genealogy. Harvard Human Rights Journal 16: 69.
Turner, Catherine. 2008. Delivering lasting peace, democracy and human rights in transition: The role of international law. International Journal of Transitional Justice 2: 126.
Turner, Catherine. 2010. Political representations of law in Northern Ireland. Public Law 3: 451.
Turner, Catherine. 2011. Human rights and the empire of (international) law. Law and Inequality 29: 311.
United Nations. 2004. Report of the Secretary General on transitional justice and the rule of law in conflict and post conflict societies. UN Doc S/2004/616.
United Nations. 2011. Report of the Secretary General on transitional justice and rule of law in conflict and post conflict societies. UN Doc S/2011/634.
I would like to thank Sara Ramshaw, Louise Mallinder and Ilan Rua Wall for comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
About this article
Cite this article
Turner, C. Deconstructing Transitional Justice. Law Critique 24, 193–209 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-013-9119-z
- Transitional justice