Abstract
What distinguishes studies of government (gouvernamentalité) from histories of administration, historical sociologies of state formation and sociologies of governance is their power to open space for critical thought. According to Michel Foucault, studies on government are studies of a particular stratum of knowing and acting, of the emergence of particular ‘regimes of truth’ concerning the conduct of conduct, ways of speaking truths and the costs of so doing, and of the inventing and assemblage of particular apparatuses and devices for exercising power and intervening in particular problems. The key point of this paper is that in the analytics of governmentality political freedom no longer depends on the systemic logic of the balance between government and governed, but on subjects’ obstinate and wild desire to live freely and on the ethos of those who intend to govern themselves and their like autonomously, which obstructs that logic even with extreme consequences. This capacity of resistance comes from life, from the sum of its functions that are useful in resisting death and no longer from a core of subjective rights, or from the will of individuals who oppose the state or the market.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
N. Rose, The Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 19.
N. Rose, ibid., 21.
A. Barry, T. Osborne and N. Rose, The Foucault and Political Reason. Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Nationalities of Government (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996); N. Rose, The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and the Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century (New Jersey: (In-formation) Princeton University Press, 2007); T. Lemke, Eine Kritik der Politischen Vernunft. Foucault Analyse der moderne Gouvernementalität (Hamburg: Berlino, 1997); P. O’Malley, Crime and Risk Society (Aldershot: Dartmouth 1998); U. Bröckling, S. Krasmann and T. Lemke, Gouvernementalität der Gegenwart (Suhrkamp: Frankfurt/M, 2000); J.Z. Bratich, J. Packer and C. McCarthy, Foucault, Cultural Studies and Governmentality (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2003); P. O’Malley, Risk, Uncertainty and Government (London: Cavendish, Glasshouse, 2004); N. Rose and P. Miller, “Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government”, The British Journal of Sociology, 43/2 (1992), 172–205; N. Rose, P. O’Malley and M. Valverde, “Governmentality”, The Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2/5 (2006), 1–5.22.
B. Latour, Science in Action (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1987), 219–232.
Rose, The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and the Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century, supra n. 3.
K.S. Rajan, Biocapital. The Constitution of Postgenomic Life (Durham/London: Duke University Press, 2006).
J. Donzelot and C. Gordon, “Comment gouverner les sociétés libérales? L’effet Foucault dans le monde anglo-saxon”, Esprit, 339 (November 2005).
M. Dean, Governmentality. Power and Rule in Modern Society (London: Sage, 1999), 206–207.
M. Foucault, “Qu’est-ce que les Lumières?” in Dits et Ecrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 1381–1397, 1498–1507.
T. Osborne, Aspects of Enlightenment. Social Theory and the Ethics of Truth (London: UCL Press, 1998).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ciccarelli, R. Reframing Political Freedom In The Analytics Of Governmentality. Law Critique 19, 307–327 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-008-9032-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-008-9032-z