Abstract
The crisis of the New Deal constitutions and the shift to ‚biopolitical’ forms of global governance in the late 20th century have dramatically disturbed the epistemological groundings and the political locations of contemporary critical legal movements. In epistemological terms, the emergence of the ‚biopolitical’ has rendered transparent the impossibility of the binaries that have thus far sustained critical legal theories. With the divide between ‚inside’ and ‚outside’, ‚base’ and ‚superstructure’, ‚state’ and ‚society’, ‚society’ and ‚law’, no longer operative, critical legal movements have to outgrow their legal realist ‚roots’. Could deconstruction provide here a viable option? Confronted by an order of governance that is now both ‚global’ and ‚imperial’, critical legal movements cannot recover a politics through such ephemeral theories. Rather, the future of critical legal movements must be located in an affirmation and promulgation of radically new constitutional principles which would confront the realities, but also harness the emancipatory potential, of the ‚biopolitical’ horizon [eds.].
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Critical Legal Conference, Kent Law School, September 2001, courtesy of a videolink from Rome organized by Maria Drakopoulou and facilitated by Harm Schepel, both of Kent Law School [J.H.C].
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Negri, A. Postmodern Global Governance and the Critical Legal Project1. Law Critique 16, 27–46 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-005-4903-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-005-4903-z