Skip to main content
Log in

Influences of black nickel coating thickness on thermal behaviour of flat plate solar collector: performance evaluation

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adapting coating material for copper absorber tubes with fins probably plays a significant role, which should have higher absorptance and lower emissivity. This study used FPC heat transfer augmentation through an absorber tube integrated with black nickel blended with industrial black matt paint and the coating thickness at 0.3, 0.2, and 0.1 μm made via spray pyrolysis. Based on a thermal mathematical model, heat absorption, heat transfer coefficient, and thermal and exergy efficiency of FPC were estimated, and the results were compared with the non-coating FPC. The excellent coating thickness exhibits a peak absorptance (0.98) and emissivity (0.097), leading to improved heat transfer behaviour, specifically 0.1 μm thin film-coated FPC. Hence, the outlet temperature of the working fluid is approximately 96.1 °C, when utilizing a 0.1 μm thin film coating. It represents the highest outlet temperature observed among the coating conditions and non-coating absorber tubes. The exposure of 0.1 µm thin black nickel coated FPC recorded superior heat absorption and heat transfer coefficient values of 1689W and 140.58 W m−2 K−1. Similarly, the average thermal and exergy efficiency is about 74.3% and 54.9%, respectively, by 0.1 μm thin film coating absorber through higher absorptance and lower emissivity (0.097). Moreover, the 0.1 μm thin film coating exhibits the lowest entropy generation of about 0.00065 W K−1. It indicates that, in addition to achieving higher outlet temperatures, the 0.1 μm thin film coating performs more efficiently, minimizing irreversible processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All the data required are available within the manuscript.

Abbreviations

A c :

Collector area (m2)

C p :

Specific heat of fluid (J kg1 K1)

CuO:

Copper oxide

FPC:

Flat plate collector

F R :

Heat removal factor

I :

Solar radiation (W m2)

\(\dot{m}\) :

Flow rate (kg s1)

PV:

Photo-voltaic

Q u :

Heat absorption (W)

Q in :

Energy input (W)

S:

Entropy generation (W K1)

T amb :

Ambient temperature (K)

T in :

Inlet temperature (K)

T out :

Outlet temperature (K)

T sun :

Sun temperature (5770 K)

U l :

Heat loss coefficient (W m2 K1)

XRD:

X-Ray Diffraction

\(\tau\) :

Transmittance

\(\alpha\) :

Absorptivity

S :

Change in entropy

η th :

Thermal efficiency (%)

η e :

Exergy efficiency (%)

\({w}_{{\text{x}}}\) :

Uncertainty

References

  1. Vasudevan A, Muralinath P, Subramani K, Logesh K. Experimental investigation on radiation heat transfer properties degradation of (black nickel-coated aluminium) solar receiver tube material. Int J Ambient Energy. 2019;40:401–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang J, Wang C, Shi J, Wei D, Zhao H, Ma C. Solar selective absorber for emerging sustainable applications. Adv Energy Sustain Res. 2022;3:2100195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lizama-Tzec FI, Herrera-Zamora DM, Arés-Muzio O, Gómez-Espinoza VH, Santos-González I, Cetina-Dorantes M, Vega-Poot AG, García-Valladares O, Oskam G. Electro deposition of selective coatings based on black nickel for flat-plate solar water heaters. Sol Energy. 2019;194:302–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yalin Lu, Chen Z. Experimental study on thermal performance of solar absorber with CuO nano structure selective coating. Energy Procedia. 2019;158:1303–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Padhy A, Vishal B, Verma P, Dwivedi G, Behura AK. Fabrication of parabolic trough hybrid solar PV-T collector using a-Si thin film solar cells in Indian perspective. Mater Today Proc. 2021;38:56–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Li Z, Ji J, Yuan W, Zhao B, Zhou F, Uddin MM, Ren X, Yu B, Song Z. Experimental & numerical investigation and optimization on a novel flat-plate PV/T system using CdfTe thin-film solar modules of sandwich structure. Sol Energy. 2021;223:261–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sean Wu, Cheng C-H, Hsiao Y-J, Juang R-C, Wen W-F. Fe2O3 films on stainless steel for solar absorbers. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;58:574–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dias D, Rebouta L, Costa P, Al-Rjoub A, Benelmeki M, Tavares CJ, Barradas NP, Alves E, Santilli P, Pischow K. Optical and structural analysis of solar selective absorbing coatings based on AlSiOx: W cermets. Sol Energy. 2017;150:335–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ning Y, Wang W, Wang L, Sun Y, Song P, Man H, Zhang Y, Dai B, Zhang J, Wang C, Zhang Y, Zhao S, Tomasella E, Bousquet A, Cellier J. Optical simulation and preparation of novel Mo/ZrSiN/ZrSiON/SiO2 solar selective absorbing coating. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2017;167:178–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kasaeian A, Daviran S, Azarian RD, Rashidi A. Performance evaluation and nanofluid using capability study of a solar parabolic trough collector. Energy Convers. 2015;89:368–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar R, Verma SK, Singh M. Experimental investigation of nanomaterial doped in black paint coating on absorber for energy conversion applications. Mater Today Proc. 2021;44:961–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar R, Verma SK, Sharma VK. Performance enhancement analysis of triangular solar air heater coated with nanomaterial embedded in black paint. Mater Today Proc. 2020;26:2528–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. El Nady J, Kashyout AB, Ebrahim S, Soliman MB. Nanoparticles Ni electroplating and black paint for solar collector applications. Alex Eng J. 2016;55:723–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Subramaniam B, Senthil R. Heat transfer enhancement of concentrated solar absorber using hollow cylindrical fins filled with phase change material. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2021;46:22344–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sakhaei SA, Valipour MS. Investigation on the effect of different coated absorber plates on the thermal efficiency of the flat-plate solar collector. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2020;140:1597–610.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Choudhury C, Sehgal HK. Lack cobalt selective coatings by spray pyrolysis for photothermal conversion of solar energy. Sol Energy. 2020;28:25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. FatihSelimefendigil CeylinŞirin, Öztop HF. Experimental analysis of combined utilization of CuO nanoparticles in latent heat storage unit and absorber coating in a single-slope solar desalination system. Sol Energy. 2022;233:278–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharafeldin MA, Gróf G, Abu-Nada E, Mahian O. Evacuated tube solar collector performance using copper nanofluid: Energy and environmental analysis. Appl Therm Eng. 2019;162:114205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jouybari HJ, Saedodin S, Zamzamian A, Nimvari ME. Experimental investigation of thermal performance and entropy generation of a flat-plate solar collector filled with porous media. Appl Therm Eng. 2017;127:1506–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Coccia G, Di Nicola G, Sotte M. Design, manufacture, and test of a prototype for a parabolic trough collector for industrial process heat. Renew Energy. 2015;74:727–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bacelis-Martínez RD, Herrera-Zamora DM, Ávila Santos M, García-Valladares O, Franco-Bacca AP, Rodríguez-Gattorno G, Ruiz-Gómez MÁ. Enhanced performance of nickel–cobalt Oxides as selective coatings for flat-plate solar thermal collector applications. Coatings. 2023;13:1329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shamshirgaran SR, Assadi MK, Badescu V, Al-Kayiem HH. Upper limits for the work extraction by nanofluid-filled selective flat-plate solar collectors. Energy. 2018;160:875–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kumar R, Verma SK, Thakur AK, Sharma A, Alam T, Yadav AS. Performance evaluation of solar air heater absorber plate with nanoparticles coating. In: Goyal R, Patel S, Sharma A, editors. Renewable energy accelerating the energy transition. Energy systems in electrical engineering. Singapore: Springer; 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sun B, Wang L, Sun Y, Ren J, Yang Y, Liu H, Liang D, Li A, Wang C. Optical performance, thermal stability, and failure analysis of the WNx-Si3N4 multilayer solar selective absorbing coatings. ACS Appl Energy Mater. 2022;5:1883–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kumar KP, Mallick S, Sakthivel S. Nanoparticles based single and tandem stable solar selective absorber coatings with wide angular solar absorptance. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2022;242:111758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2024R373), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. The first draft of the manuscript was written by R. Venkatesh, and the individual contributions of all authors are given below. Ponnuswamy Palanikumar involved in formal analysis, A. H. Seikh involved in investigation, methodology, writing, Md Abul Kalam involved in review, editing, writing and language help, R. Venkatesh involved in original draft preparation, supervision, and validation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Venkatesh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. The authors have no competing interests to declare relevant to this article’s content. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Ethical approval

This is an observational study. Influences of black nickel coating thickness on thermal behaviour of flat plate solar collector: Performance evaluation; Research Ethics Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palanikumar, P., Seikh, A.H., Kalam, M.A. et al. Influences of black nickel coating thickness on thermal behaviour of flat plate solar collector: performance evaluation. J Therm Anal Calorim (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-024-13177-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-024-13177-6

Keywords

Navigation