Skip to main content
Log in

Conductive polymer biocomposites based on poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) and poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) with various graphene fillers for thermistor applications

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of this research was to develop highly efficient conductive biopolymer composite films for pyroresistive and temperature sensors. Natural poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) was chosen as the base biopolymer material, and graphene nanomaterials of different structures, including raw and oxidized multi-walled carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets, were used as conductive fillers. The fabrication process involved a simple solvent casting procedure, where the conductive graphene fillers were incorporated into the biopolymer matrix without additional procedures. Due to the high crystallinity and poor film-forming ability of PHBV, a commercial poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT) was added as a modifier to improve the film quality. Through optimization, a PHBV/PBAT mass ratio of 50:50 was identified as the most promising composition to achieve composite films with desirable mechanical properties. The influence of graphene material structure and concentration on the crystallinity, thermal, mechanical, electrical, and piezoresistive properties of the composites was investigated. The results demonstrated that the PHBV/PBAT matrix filled with graphene materials has the potential to fully replace conventional structural composite materials, such as polypropylene, with biomaterials, making them suitable for a wide range of applications, including pyroresistive sensors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Panaitescu DM, Nicolae CA, Frone AN, Chiulan I, Stanescu PO, Draghici C, et al. Plasticized poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) with improved melt processing and balanced properties. J Appl Polym Sci. 2017;134:44810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zaccone M, Patel MK, De Brauwer L, Nair R, Montalbano ML, Monti M, et al. Influence of chitin nanocrystals on the crystallinity and mechanical properties of poly(hydroxybutyrate) biopolymer. Polymers. 2022;14:562.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Panaitescu DM, Ionita ER, Nicolae CA, Gabor AR, Ionita MD, Trusca R, et al. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) modified by nanocellulose and plasma treatment for packaging applications. Polymers. 2018;10:1249.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Yeo JCC, Muiruri JK, Thitsartarn W, Li Z, He C. Recent advances in the development of biodegradable PHB-based toughening materials: approaches, advantages and applications. Mater Sci Eng C. 2018;92:1092–116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Seoane IT, Manfredi LB, Cyras VP, Torre L, Fortunati E, Puglia D. Effect of cellulose nanocrystals and bacterial cellulose on disintegrability in composting conditions of plasticized PHB nanocomposites. Polymers. 2017;9:561.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Barbosa JL, Perin GB, Felisberti MI. Plasticization of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) with an oligomeric polyester: miscibility and effect of the microstructure and plasticizer distribution on thermal and mechanical properties. ACS Omega. 2021;6:3278–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Nosal H, Moser K, Warzała M, Holzer A, Stańczyk D, Sabura E. Selected fatty acids esters as potential PHB-V bioplasticizers: effect on mechanical properties of the polymer. J Polym Environ. 2020;29:38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oprică MG, Uşurelu CD, Frone AN, Gabor AR, Nicolae CA, Vasile V, et al. Opposite roles of bacterial cellulose nanofibers and foaming agent in polyhydroxyalkanoate-based materials. Polymers. 2022;14:5358.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. de Sousa Junior RR, dos Santos CAS, Ito NM, Suqueira AN, Lackner M, dos Santos DJ. PHB processability and property improvement with linear-chain polyester oligomers used as plasticizers. Polymers. 2022;14:4197.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Radusin T, Torres-Giner S, Stupar A, Ristic I, Miletic A, Novakovic A, et al. Preparation, characterization and antimicrobial properties of electrospun polylactide films containing Allium ursinum L. extract. Food Packag Shelf Life. 2019;21:100357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2019.100357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Frone AN, Nicolae CA, Eremia MC, Tofan V, Ghiurea M, Chiulan I, et al. Low molecular weight and polymeric modifiers as toughening agents in poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) films. Polymers. 2020;12:1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. El-Hadi A, Schnabel R, Straube E, Müller G, Riemschneider M. Effect of melt processing on crystallization behavior and rheology of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) and its blends. Macromol Mater Eng. 2002;287:363–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brosda M, Nguyen P, Olowinsky A, Gillner A. Laserwelding of biopolymers. Procedia CIRP. 2018;74:548–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Quispe MM, Lopez OV, Boina DA, Stumbé JF, Villar MA. Glycerol-based additives of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) films. Polym Test. 2021;93:107005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Szeluga U, Kumanek B, Trzebicka B. Composites: Part A synergy in hybrid polymer/nanocarbon composites—a review. Compos PART A. 2015;73:204–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.02.021.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Szeluga U, Pusz S, Kumanek B, Olszowska K, Kobyliukh A, Trzebicka B. Effect of graphene filler structure on electrical, thermal, mechanical, and fire retardant properties of epoxy-graphene nanocomposites—a review. Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408436.2019.1708702.

  17. Xu J, Cao Z, Zhang Y, Yuan Z, Lou Z, Xu X, et al. Chemosphere A review of functionalized carbon nanotubes and graphene for heavy metal adsorption from water: preparation, application, and mechanism. Chemosphere. 2018;195:351–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.061.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nowak AP, Trzciński K, Zarach Z, Li J, Roda D, Szkoda M. Poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) as a biodegradable binder in a negative electrode material for lithium-ion batteries. Appl Surf Sci. 2022;606:154933.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang S, Madbouly SA, Schrader JA, Grewell D, Kessler MR, Graves WR. Processing and characterization of bio-based poly (hydroxyalkanoate)/poly(amide) blends: improved flexibility and impact resistance of PHA-based plastics. J Appl Polym Sci. 2015;2015(42209):1–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pan H, Li Z, Yang J, Li X, Ai X, Hao Y, et al. properties of poly(lactic acid) and poly(butylene). RSC Adv. 2018;8:4610–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Maria R, Wellen R, Rabello MS, Cesar I, Júnior A. Melting and crystallization of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate): effect of heating/cooling rates on phase transformation. Polímeros. 2015;1–10.

  22. França DC, Almeida TG, Abels G, Canedo EL, Carvalho LH, Wellen RMR, et al. Tailoring PBAT/PLA/Babassu films for suitability of agriculture mulch Tailoring PBAT/PLA/Babassu films for suitability of agriculture mulch application. J Nat Fibers. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2018.1441092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schawea3 JEK, Bergmannb E. thermochimica acts Elsevier Investigation of polymer melting by temperature modulated differential scanning calorimetry and it’s description using kinetic models. Thermochim. Acts. 1997.

  24. Danko M, Mosnáčková K, Vykydalová A, Kleinová A, Puškárová A, Pangallo D, et al. Properties and degradation performances of biodegradable poly(Lactic acid)/poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) blends and keratin composites. Polymers. 2021;13:2693.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Samek O, Obruča S, Šiler M, Sedláček P, Benešová P, Kučera D, et al. Quantitative raman spectroscopy analysis of polyhydroxyalkanoates produced by cupriavidus necator H16. Sensors. 2016;16:1808.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bittmann B, Bouza R, Barral L, Castro-lopez M, Dopico-garcia S. Morphology and thermal behavior of poly poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate)/clay nanocomposites. Polym Compos. 2015;3–10.

  27. Szeluga U, Olszowska K, Myalski J, Godzierz M, Kobyliukh A, Tsyntsarski B. Effect of grain fractions of crushed carbon foam on morphology and thermomechanical and tribological properties of random epoxy-carbon composites. Wear. 2021;467:203558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Beber VC, De Barros S, Banea MD, Brede M, De Carvalho LH, Hoffmann R, et al. Effect of babassu natural filler on PBAT/PHB biodegradable blends: an investigation of thermal, mechanical, and morphological behavior. Materials. 2018;11:820.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Tang CY, Kwon Y-N, Leckie JO. Effect of membrane chemistry and coating layer on physiochemical properties of thin film composite polyamide RO and NF membranes II. Membrane physiochemical properties and their dependence on polyamide and coating layers. Desalination. 2009;242:168–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Abdo HS, Elzatahry AA, Alharbi HF, Khalil KA. Electrical conductivity behavior of biopolymer composites. Biopolym Compos Electron. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809261-3/00002-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Raffaela A, Costa DM, Marques R, Edson S, Ito N, Hecker L, et al. Melt and cold crystallization in a poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) blend. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;9:1078–97.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Raffaela A, Costa M, Ito EN, Cavalho LH, Canedo EL. Non-isothermal melt crystallization kinetics adipate-co-terephthalate and its mixture. Polímeros. 2019;5169:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Roja BP. Electrochemical study of cassava starch conductive biopolymers synthesized at different pH A. Arrieta Álvaro, 1 E. Montoya Miguel and 2 S. Palencia Manuel Departamento de Biología y Química, Universidad de Sucre, Carrera 28 N° 5–267 Departamento de. 2018;15:148–51.

  34. Zhao H, Cui Z, Wang X, Turng L, Peng X. Composites: part B processing and characterization of solid and microcellular poly(lactic acid)/polyhydroxybutyrate-valerate (PLA/PHBV) blends and PLA/PHBV/Clay nanocomposites. Compos PART B. 2013;51:79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dodabalapur A. Organic and polymer transistors for electronics. Mater Today. 2006;9:24–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Jaques NG, Dos Santos Silva ID, Da Cruz Barbosa Neto M, Ries A, Canedo EL, Wellen RMR. Effect of heat cycling on melting and crystallization of PHB/TiO2 compounds. Polimeros. 2018;28:161–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nassira H, Sánchez-Ferrer A, Adamcik J, Handschin S, Mahdavi H, Taheri Qazvini N, et al. Gelatin-graphene nanocomposites with ultralow electrical percolation threshold. Adv Mater. 2016;28:6914–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Futaki H. A new type semiconductor (critical temperature resistor). Jpn J Appl Phys. 1965;4:28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially realized in the frame of the project “Processing and joining of new functionalized biopolymer materials” between the Polish Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (2022-2024), and Polish-Ukrainian Laboratory ADPOLCOM “Formation and characterization of advanced polymers and polymer composites” localized in Centre of Polymer and Carbon Materials Polish Academy of Sciences, as well as in the Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry and E.O. Paton Welding Institute of National Academy of Science of Ukraine.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the material preparation, data collection and analysis. The study conception and design were prepared by MG and US. The investigation was performed by VT, WS, MI and AK. The first draft of the manuscript was written by VT and AK and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. The final version of manuscript has been prepared by MG, US and GA. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Marcin Godzierz or Urszula Szeluga.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Talaniuk, V., Godzierz, M., Iurhenko, M. et al. Conductive polymer biocomposites based on poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) and poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) with various graphene fillers for thermistor applications. J Therm Anal Calorim 149, 2593–2607 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-12844-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-12844-4

Keywords

Navigation