Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Thermal analysis of the flow of the Maxwell nanofluid through the cone and disk system space with dual diffusion and multiple rotations

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Among various non-Newtonian models, the current study considers Maxwell fluid flow between cone and disk devices in conjunction with dual diffusion. In this scenario, the combination of Fourier’s and Fick’s law assumptions, including the Cattaneo–Christov heat and mass flux terminologies, is used for describing heat and mass transfer, respectively. The flow is analyzed in four different cases including: (i) rotation of the disk and cone in the reverse direction, (ii) rotation of both cone and disk in one direction, (iii) rotation of the cone and stationary status of the disk, and (iv) rotating disk with the stationary cone. The primary governing model consists of partial differential equations, which are tackled through the control volume finite element method (CVFEM). This system is reduced into a set of nonlinear ordinary differential equations with the help of similarity variables, which is solved using the Runge–Kutta fourth-order (RK-4) technique. In order to understand heat transfer and mass diffusion, the performance of the physical parameters is analyzed for the potential applications of heat exchange devices. It is observed that the increasing Maxwell parameter has inauspicious effects on fluid motion and thermal state. The radial component of velocity is noted to dwindle with higher magnetic parameter. Meanwhile, the case of a swirling disk and a still cone improves the transverse velocity. Despite that, the thermal boundary layer is observed to be an increasing function of thermophoretic and Brownian motion parameters. Moreover, higher thermal relaxation time and Prandtl number fasten the convection process. Furthermore, the thermophoretic parameter, concentration relaxation parameter, and Schmidt number have apparently favorable effects on relative mass diffusion regions compared to the Brownian parameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aifantis EC. Continuum basis for diffusion in regions with multiple diffusivity. J Appl Phys. 1979;50:1334–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ganesan S, Vasanthakumari R. Influence of magnetic field and thermal radiation on peristaltic motion with double-diffusive convection in Jeffery nanofluids. Heat Trans. 2020;49:2025–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Raju A, Ojjela O, Kambhatla PK. The combined effects of induced magnetic field, thermophoresis and Brownian motion on double stratified nonlinear convective-radiative Jeffrey nanofluid flow with heat source/sink. J Anal. 2020;28:503–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mabood F, Mackolil J, Mahanthesh BSEP, Rauf A, Shehzad SA. Dynamics of Sutterby fluid flow due to a spinning stretching disk with non-Fourier/Fick heat and mass flux models. Appl Math Mech. 2020;42:1247–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pandey R, Kumar M, Majdoubi J, Rahimi-Gorji M, Srivastav VK. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019;187:105243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Imran MA, Shaheen A, Sherif ESM, Rahimi-Gorji M, Seikh AH. Analysis of peristaltic flow of Jeffrey six constant nanofluid in a vertical non-uniform tube. Chin J Phys. 2020;66:60–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hassan M, El-Zahar ER, Khan SU, Rahimi-Gorji M, Ahmad A. Boundary layer flow pattern of heat and mass for homogenous shear thinning hybrid-nanofluid: An experimental database modeling. Numer Methods Partial Differ Equ. 2021;37(2):1234–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Raza J, Mebarek-Oudina F, Ali L. The flow of magnetised convective Casson liquid via a porous channel with shrinking and stationary walls. Pramana J Phys. 2022;96:229.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramesh K, Mebarek-Oudina F, Ismail AI, Jaiswal BR, Warke AS, Lodhi RK, Sharma T. Computational analysis on radiative non-Newtonian Carreau nanofluid flow in a microchannel under the magnetic properties. Sci Iran. 2023;30:376–90.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mebarek-Oudina F, Preeti AS, Sabu HV, Lewis RW, Areekara S, Mathew A, Ismail AI. Int J Mod Phys B. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979224500036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ali F, Mebarek-Oudina F, Barman A, Das S, Ismail AI. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-12217-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mooney M, Ewart RH. The conicylindrical viscometer. Physics. 1934;5:350–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Phan-Thien N. Cone-and-plate flow of the Oldroyd-B fluid is unstable. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech. 1985;17:37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoppmann WH, Baronet CN. Flow generated by cone rotating in a liquid. Nature. 1964;201:1205–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wan Wang CY. Boundary layers on rotating cones, discs and axisymmetric surfaces with a concentrated heat source. Acta Mech. 1990;81:245–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Owen JM. Flow and heat transfer in rotating-disc systems. In: International symposium on heat transfer in turbomachinery. Begel House Inc; 1992.

  17. Turkyilmazoglu M. On the fluid flow and heat transfer between a cone and a disk both stationary or rotating. Math Comput Simul. 2020;177:329–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Basavarajappa M, Bhatta D. Phys Fluids. 2022;34:112004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gul T, Gul RS, Noman W, Saeed A, Mukhtar S, Alghamdi W, Alrabaiah H. CNTs-nanofluid flow in a rotating system between the gap of a disk and cone. Phys Scr. 2020;95: 125202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Moatimid GM, Mohamed MA, Elagamy KA. Sci Rep. 2022;12:11275.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Shevchuk IV. Concerning the effect of radial thermal conductivity in a self-similar solution for rotating cone-disk systems. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow. 2023;33:204–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Srilatha P, Srinivas R, Mulupuri N, Harjot S, Prasannakumara BC. Heat and mass transfer analysis of a fluid flow across the conical gap of a cone-disk apparatus under the thermophoretic particles motion. Energies. 2023;16:952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Turkyilmazoglu M. The flow and heat in the conical region of a rotating cone and an expanding disk. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow. 2023;33:2181–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Alilat N, Sastre F, Martín-Garín A, Velazquez A, Baïri A. Heat transfer in a conical gap using H2O–Cu nanofluid and porous media. Effects of the main physical parameters. Case Stud Therm Eng. 2023;47:103026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Basavarajappa M, Bhatta D. Lie group analysis of flow and heat transfer of a nanofluid in cone–disk systems with Hall current and radiative heat flux. Math Method Appl Sci. 2023;46(14):15838–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Srilatha P, Remidi S, Nagapavani M, Singh H, Prasannakumara BC. Heat and mass transfer analysis of a fluid flow across the conical gap of a cone-disk apparatus under the thermophoretic particles motion. Energies. 2023;16:952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Farooq U, Waqas H, Fatima N, Imran M, Noreen S, Bariq A, Galal AM. Computational framework of cobalt ferrite and silver-based hybrid nanofluid over a rotating disk and cone: a comparative study. Sci Rep. 2023;13:5369.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Shevchuk IV. Phys Fluids. 2023;35:043603.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Abbasi FM, Shehzad SA. Heat transfer analysis for three-dimensional flow of Maxwell fluid with temperature dependent thermal conductivity: application of Cattaneo–Christov heat flux model. J Mol Liq. 2016;220:848–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Straughan B. Thermal convection with the Cattaneo–Christov model. Int J Heat Mass Trans. 2010;53:95–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sarojamma G, Vijaya LR, Satya NPV, Animasaun IL. Exploration of the significance of autocatalytic chemical reaction and Cattaneo–Christov heat flux on the dynamics of a micropolar fluid. J Appl Comput Mech. 2020;6:77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Li H. The finite element method. In: Graded finite element methods for elliptic problems in nonsmooth domains. Cham: Springer;2022. pp. 1–12.

  33. Kumar KG, Reddy MG, Vijaya KP, Aldalbahi A, Rahimi-Gorji M, Rahaman M. Application of different hybrid nanofluids in convective heat transport of Carreau fluid. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2020;41: 110350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mukhtar S, Gul T. Solar radiation and thermal convection of hybrid nanofluids for the optimization of solar collector. Mathematics. 2023;11:1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ramadhan NR, Minggi I, Side S. The accuracy comparison of the RK-4 and RK-5 method of SEIR model for tuberculosis cases in South Sulawesi. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Pub. 2021. vol. 1918. pp. 042027

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dhandapani PB, Thippan J, Martin-Barreiro C, Leiva V, Chesneau C. Electronics. 2022;11:1478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Huang K, Kai S. A study on energy preservability of Runge–Kutta methods in power system simulation. In:2022 IEEE Power Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM). IEEE;2022. pp.01–05

    Google Scholar 

  38. Xiong PY, Almarashi A, Dhahad HA, Alawee WH, Absorrah AM, Issakhov A, Chu YM. Nanomaterial transportation and exergy loss modeling incorporating CVFEM. J Mol Liq. 2021;330: 115591.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhou L, Wang J, Liu M, Li M, Chai Y. Evaluation of the transient performance of magneto-electro-elastic based structures with the enriched finite element method. Compos Struct. 2022;280: 114888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bouselsal M, Mebarek-Oudina F, Biswas N, Ismail AI. Heat transfer enhancement using Al2O3-MWCNTHybrid-nanofluid inside a tube/shell heat exchanger with different tube shapes. Micromachines. 2023;14:1072.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Gul T, Alharbi SO, Khan I, Khan MS, Alzahrani S. Comparative analysis of the flow of the hybrid nanofluid stagnation point on the slippery surface by the CVFEM approach. Alex Eng J. 2023;76:629–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gul T, Nasir S, Berrouk AS, Raizah A, Alghamdi W, Al I, Bariq A. Simulation of the water-based hybrid nanofluids flow through a porous cavity for the applications of the heat transfer. Sci Rep. 2023;3:7009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Cartwright JH, Piro O. The dynamics of Runge–Kutta methods. Int J Bifurc Chaos. 1992;2:427–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University for funding this work through research groups under grant number RGP2/31/44.

Funding

Funding is received through Grant number RGP2/31/44.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. City University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan

    Taza Gul

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha, 61421, Saudi Arabia

    Hamdi Ayed

  3. Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha, 61421, Saudi Arabia

    Abir Mouldi

  4. Department of Basic Sciences, Preparatory Year Deanship, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia

    Safyan Mukhtar

  5. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 400, Al-Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia

    Ishtiaq Ali

  6. Department of Mathematics, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan

    Fatima Ali

Authors
  1. Hamdi Ayed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abir Mouldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Taza Gul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Safyan Mukhtar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ishtiaq Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fatima Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Project PI = HA; AM; Methodology = HA; AM, Software = TG; SM; IA, Manuscript writing = TG & FAl, Validation = HA; AM; TG.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taza Gul.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ayed, H., Mouldi, A., Gul, T. et al. Thermal analysis of the flow of the Maxwell nanofluid through the cone and disk system space with dual diffusion and multiple rotations. J Therm Anal Calorim 148, 12699–12710 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-12547-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-12547-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation