Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Thermochemical characterization of husk biomass resources with relevance to energy use

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biomass combustion or co-firing in modern coal power plants for steam/power generation is a carbon–neutral process, but it could pose acidic air pollutants and ash-related challenges like slagging and fouling. This paper aimed to evaluate the energetic potential of six special crop husk residues (i.e., chestnut husk, coffee bean husk, cocoa pod husk, coconut shell, peanut husk, and water caltrop husk) through their thermochemical characterization and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) study. The thermochemical characterization included the proximate analysis, ultimate (elemental) analysis, calorific value (higher heating value, HHV), and elemental compositions of ash. The results showed that these residues have the potential for the biomass feedstocks in the boilers due to the large carbon contents (43.81–49.27 mass%), low ash contents (e.g., 0.27 mass% for coffee bean husk), and high HHVs (18.65–21.26 MJ kg−1). The HHVs were higher for the biomass husk residues with a low O/C ratio and low ash content. The chlorine, nitrogen, and sulfur contents, responsible for acidic air pollutants, were less than 1% except for chlorine in caltrop husk (1.59%). However, based on the relevant slagging/fouling indices using the data on the ash compounds and chlorine content, it was revealed that the ashes of chestnut husk, cocoa pod husk, and water caltrop husk had a high slagging tendency mainly due to the high contents of potassium and chlorine. In contrast, co-firing of biomass husks—coffee bean husk, peanut husk, and coconut shell, with coal could result in lower emissions of particulates, oxides of sulfur- and chlorine-bearing pollutants, and reduced slagging and fouling tendencies. In this regard, coconut shell is a very clean biomass fuel due to its excellent properties and large amounts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included in the article. Besides, the datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Basu P. Biomass gasification, pyrolysis and torrefaction. 3rd ed. London: Academic Press; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clauser NM, González G, Mendieta CM, Kruyeniski J, Area MC, Vallejos ME. Biomass waste as sustainable raw material for energy and fuels. Sustainability. 2021;13:794.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang K, Peng X, Kong L, Wu W, Chen Y, Maravelias CT. Greenhouse gas emission mitigation potential of chemicals produced from biomass. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2021;9:14480–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. de Jong W. Biomass composition, properties, and characterization. In: de Jong W, van Ommen JR, editors. Sustainable energy source for the future: fundamentals of conversion processes. 1st ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2015. p. 36–68.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Teixeira P, Lopes H, Gulyurtlu I, Lapa N, Abelha P. Slagging and fouling during coal and biomass cofiring: chemical equilibrium model applied to FBC. Energy Fuels. 2014;28:697–713.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vassilev SV, Vassileva CG, Vassilev VS. Advantages and disadvantages of composition and properties of biomass in comparison with coal: an overview. Fuel. 2015;158:330–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen C, Bi Y, Huang Y, Huang H. Review on slagging evaluation methods of biomass fuel combustion. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2021;135:105082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu Q, Chmely SC, Abdoulmoumine N. Biomass treatment strategies for thermochemical conversion. Energy Fuels. 2017;31:3525–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vassilev SV, Vassileva CG, Song YC, Li WY, Feng J. Ash contents and ash-forming elements of biomass and their significance for solid biofuel combustion. Fuel. 2017;208:377–409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee YJ, Choi JW, Park JH, Namkung H, Song GS, Park SJ, Lee DW, Kim JG, Jeon CH, Choi YC. Techno-economical method for the removal of alkali metals from agricultural residue and herbaceous biomass and its effect on slagging and fouling behavior. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2018;6:13056–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schneider T, Müller D, Karl J. A review of thermochemical biomass conversion combined with Stirling engines for the small-scale cogeneration of heat and power. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2020;134:110288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fatehi H, Weng W, Li Z, Bai XS, Aldén M. Recent development in numerical simulations and experimental studies of biomass thermochemical conversion. Energy Fuels. 2021;35:6940–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Teixeira P, Lopes H, Gulyurtlu I, Lapa N, Abelha P. Evaluation of slagging and fouling tendency during biomass co-firing with coal in a fluidized bed. Biomass Bioenergy. 2012;39:192–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Niu Y, Zhu Y, Tan H, Hui S, Jing Z, Xu W. Investigations on biomass slagging in utility boiler: Criterion numbers and slagging growth mechanisms. Fuel Process Technol. 2014;128:499–508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu Y, Niu Y, Tan H, Wang X. Short review on the origin and countermeasure of biomass slagging in grate furnace. Front Environ Res. 2014;2:7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Garcia-Maraver A, Mata-Sanchez J, Carpio M, Perez-Jimenez JA. Critical review of predictive coefficients for biomass ash deposition tendency. J Energy Inst. 2017;90:214–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wen X, Xu Y, Wang J. Assessing slagging propensity of coal from their slagging indices. J Energy Inst. 2018;91:646–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhu C, Tu H, Bai Y, Ma D, Zhao Y. Evaluation of slagging and fouling characteristics during Zhundong coal co-firing with a Si/Al dominated low rank coal. Fuel. 2019;254:115730.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen C, Huang Y, Qin S, Huang D, Xiaoyan BuX, Huang H. Slagging tendency estimation of aquatic microalgae and comparison with terrestrial biomass and waste. Energy. 2020;194:116889.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lachman J, Balas M, Lisy M, Lisa H, Milcak P, Elbl P. An overview of slagging and fouling indicators and their applicability to biomass fuels. Fuel Process Technol. 2021;217:106804.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cioabla AE, Pop N, Calinoiu DG, Trif-Tordai G. An experimental approach to the chemical properties and the ash melting behavior in agricultural biomass. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;121:421–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vassilev SV, Baxter D, Andersen LK, Vassileva CG. An overview of the chemical composition of biomass. Fuel. 2010;89:913–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsai WT, Jiang TJ, Tang MS, Chang CH, Kuo TH. Enhancement of thermochemical properties on rice husk under a wide range of torrefaction conditions. Biomass Convers Biorefin. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01945-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fernandes IJ, Calheiro D, Kieling AG, Moraes CAM, Rocha TLAC, Brehm FA, Modolo RCE. Characterization of rice husk ash produced using different biomass combustion techniques for energy. Fuel. 2016;165:351–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zinla D, Gbaha P, Koffi PME, Koua BK. Characterization of rice, coffee and cocoa crops residues as fuel of thermal power plant in Côte d’Ivoire. Fuel. 2021;283:119250.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen H, Wang W, Martin JC, Oliphant AJ, Doerr PA, Xu JF, DeBorn KM, Chen C, Sun L. Extraction of lignocellulose and synthesis of porous silica nanoparticles from rice husks: a comprehensive utilization of rice husk biomass. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2013;1:254–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. El-Sayed SA, Khairy M. Effect of heating rate on the chemical kinetics of different biomass pyrolysis materials. Biofuels. 2015;6:157–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rodrigues ALP, Cruz G, Souza MEP, Gomes WC. Application of cassava harvest residues (Manihot esculenta Crantz) in biochemical and thermochemical conversion process for bioenergy purposes: a literature review. Afr J Biotechnol. 2018;17(3):37–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cruz G, Crnkovic PM. Assessment of the physical–chemical properties of residues and emissions generated by biomass combustion under N2/O2 and CO2/O2 atmospheres in a drop tube furnace (DTF). J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;138:401–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cruz G, Rodrigues ALP, da Silva DF, Gomes WC. Physical–chemical characterization and thermal behavior of cassava harvest waste for application in thermochemical processes. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2021;143:3611–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ozgen S, Cernuschi S, Caserini S. An overview of nitrogen oxides emissions from biomass combustion for domestic heat production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021;135:110113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Krol D, Motyl P, Poskrobko S. Chlorine corrosion in a low-power boiler fired with agricultural biomass. Energies. 2022;15:382.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Safavi A, Richter C, Unnthorsson R. Dioxin formation in biomass gasification: a review. Energies. 2022;15:700.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lu JJ, Chen WH. Investigation on the ignition and burnout temperatures of bamboo and sugarcane bagasse by thermogravimetric analysis. Appl Energy. 2015;60:49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wnorowska J, Ciukaj S, Kalisz S. Thermogravimetric analysis of solid biofuels with additive under air atmosphere. Energies. 2021;14:2257.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Surahmanto F, Saptoadi H, Sulistyo H, Rohmat TA. Effect of heating rate on the slow pyrolysis behaviour and its kinetic parameters of oil-palm shell. Int J Renew Energy Res. 2017;7:1138–44.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Radhakumari M, Prakash DJ, Satyavathi B. Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of algal biomass using tga analysis based on ICTAC recommendations. Biomass Conv Bioref. 2016;6:189–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Anca-Couce A, Tsekos C, Retschitzegger S, Zimbardi F, Funke A, Banks S, Kraia T, Marques P, Scharler R, de Jong W, Kienzl N. Biomass pyrolysis TGA assessment with an international round robin. Fuel. 2020;276:118002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Instrument Centers of National Chung Hsing University and National Ching-Hwa University for the ultimate (C/H/N/S/O) analysis and the inductively coupled plasma—optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), respectively.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Institute of Bioresources, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung, 91201, Taiwan

    Wen-Tien Tsai & Jia-Wen Han

Authors
  1. Wen-Tien Tsai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jia-Wen Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

W.T.T. initiated the work, designed the experiment, and drafted the manuscript. J.W.H. performed the experiment and analyzed the data. All authors read and approved the submitted manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Tien Tsai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsai, WT., Han, JW. Thermochemical characterization of husk biomass resources with relevance to energy use. J Therm Anal Calorim 148, 8061–8069 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-022-11551-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-022-11551-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation