Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics of late Neolithic pottery of the Zau culture: analysis of pottery samples from Iernut-Site II (Mures County, Romania)

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The analysed samples come from the archaeological rescue digs undertaken on the Iernut-Chețani segment from the Transilvania Highway (Sector 2A Ogra-Câmpia Turzii). The samples were taken from 7 pottery sherds, as well as clay taken from within the dig site. The 7 sherds, dated to the Neolithic period, are different and consist of 4 fine pottery sherds, 1 semifine pottery sherd and 2 coarse. Complementary techniques were used in the analysis, namely TG/HF, FTIR, SEM, EDX and XRD. The purpose of the analysis was to determine similarities between the composition of the pottery sherds, as well as similarities between the pottery composition and the soil samples, in order to determine whether the raw materials used had a local origin. Furthermore, the techniques employed were selected to also help identify the pottery technology (estimating the firing temperatures).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ursuțiu A, Cociș S, Stanciu I, Onofrei C, Cristea Ș, Malvinka U, Szabolcs F, 103. Iernut. Mureș County. Site II, km 9+300 - 8+800, Transilvania Highway A3, Sector 2A Ogra-Câmpia Turzii, Iernut-Chețani. Cronica Cercetărilor Arheologice din România – Campania 2016 (The Archaeological Research Chronical of Romani – 2017 Campaign), Institutul Național al Patrimoniului (National Heritage Institute), Bucharest; 2017.

  2. Vlase D, Rogozea O, Moșoiu C, Vlase G, Lazău R, Vlase T. Thermoanalytical investigations of some ceramics dated from the Neolithic period, discovered at Oxamplatz, Sânandrei, Romania. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;138:2145–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghe L. The absolute and relative chronology and evolution of the Zau Culture. Acta Musei Porolissensis. 2012;34:55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Drașovean F. Regarding the relative and absolute chronology of the Neolithic and early Eneolithic in the eastern Carpathian basin. A Bayesian approach. Analele Banatului-Arheologie-Istorie. 2014;22:33–77.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roberts JP. Determination of the firing temperature of ancient ceramics by measurement of thermal expansion. Archaeometry. 1963;6:21–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Drebushchak VA, Mylnikova LN, Drebushchak TN. Thermoanalytical investigations of ancient ceramics. Review on theory and practice. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;133:135–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vlase DS, Vlase T, Micle D. FT-IR, TG/DTG/DTA-DSC analysis applied on Ottoman pottery discovered following archaeological rescue excavations in Libertății Square, Timișoara (2013–’14 campaign). ArheoVest. 2015;III–2:831–48.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anghel D. Experimental contributions regarding methods of use for the different types of neo-eneolithic pottery firing installations. Apulum. 2003;40:523–33.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anghel D. Pottery degradation as a result of technological deficiencies. Apulum. 2002;39:597–613.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alaiba RE. Cucuteni culture pottery. Arheol Mold. 2005;28:57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lazarovici G, Ionescu C, Gherghari L. Ceramic artefacts from the mid Neolithic fom Transylvania: CCTLNI culture from the Zau site (Mureş county). Angvstia. 2002;7:7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mihăilescu L. Specifics of pottery from south-western Romania, observed in the pottery centers of Sasca Română, Potoc and Socolari (Caraş-Severin county). Studi şi Comunicări-Etnografie şi Istorie. 1975;I:111–23.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lazarovici G, Traore F. A pottery firing technique used from prehistory to the present day. An ethno-archaeological study. ActaMN. 1989–1993; 26–30 I/2:553–5556.

  14. Orton C, Tyers P, Vince A. Pottery technology. Cambridge: University Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marian A, Ciută M, Anghel D. Historical considerations regarding a physical chemical analysis of Precriș culture pottery. Sargetia. 2003;31:37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shoval S, Beck P, Kirsh Y, Levy D, Gaft M, Yadin E. Rehydroxylation of clay minerals and hydration in ancient pottery from the Lasng of Deshur. J Therm Anal Calorim. 1991;37:1579.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Muller CM, Pejcic B, Esteban L, Piane CD, Raven M, Mizaikoff B. Infrared attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy: an innovative strategy for analyzing mineral components in energy relevant systems. Sci Rep. 2014;4:6764.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Palanivel R, Rajesh KU. Thermal and spectroscopic analysis of ancient potteries. Rom J Phys. 2011;56(1–2):195–208.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shoval S, Beck P. Thermo-FTIR spectroscopy analysis as a method of characterizing ancient ceramic technology. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2005;82:609–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. El OM, Daoudi L, Hatert F, Fagel N. Modified mineral phases during clay ceramic firing. Clays Clay Miner. 2015;63(5):404–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Amicone S, Mathur A, Rengasamy DP, Mirković-Marić N, Pantović I, Kuzmanovic-Cvetkovic J. Beneath the surface: Exploring variability in pottery paste recipes within Vinča culture. Quat Int. 2020;560–561:86–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bate S, Stevens T, Buylaert J-P, Markovic S, Tasić N. Pottery versus sediment: Optically stimulated luminescence dating of the Neolithic Vinča culture, Serbia. Quat Int. 2020;429-A:45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gajic Kvascev M, Marić Stojanović M, Šmit Ž, Kantarelou V, Karydas A, Šljivar D, Milovanović D, Andrić V. New evidence for the use of cinnabar as a colouring pigment in the Vinča culture. J Archaeol Sci. 2012;2012(39):1025–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jakucs J. LBK and Vinča in South-East Transdanubia: comments on merging, interleaving and diversity. Quat Int. 2020;2020(560–561):119–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Predescu S, Cultural heritage: Identity and collective capacity building. In Sava S., Borca C., Clitan Gh. (eds.), Collective Capacity Building. London: Brill/Sense Publishers 2020;35–43. ISBN: 978-90-04-42220-9

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would also like to offer our gratitude to M. Răchită, Ph.D. student at Babes-Bolyay University from Cluj-Napoca, for providing the analysed samples, as well as to A. Ursuțiu, Ph.D., from the Archaeology and Art History Institute of Cluj-Napoca, who led the collective that carried out the archaeological excavations at Iernut-Site II, during which the sherds were discovered.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Paula Sfîrloagă or Gabriela Vlase.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vlase, D., Vlase, T., Bunoiu, M. et al. Characteristics of late Neolithic pottery of the Zau culture: analysis of pottery samples from Iernut-Site II (Mures County, Romania). J Therm Anal Calorim 147, 5351–5363 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-022-11261-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-022-11261-3

Keywords

Navigation