Abstract
Low and medium temperature pyrolysis technology is an important way of clean and utilization of low metamorphic coal. In this paper, three kinds of char samples were prepared in tube furnace according to different pyrolysis temperatures, and their combustion characteristics were compared by means of thermal analysis. Three modeless kinetic methods, KAS, FWO and Fredman, were used to study the combustion reaction activity under nonisothermal conditions from TG curve and DSC curve. In the end, Malek method is used to explore the mechanism function of the reaction process, and the results are analyzed numerically. The objective programming model and MATLAB are used to calculate the combined mechanism function of the reaction process. The results show that with the increase in the pyrolysis temperature, the combustion of char gradually shifts to the high temperature zone and shows a secondary effect between the volatile matter and the combustion characteristic temperature. The results show that the flammability index and burnout index increase first and then decrease, and the char prepared at 550 °C has the most developed pores and the best combustion performance with the increase in pyrolysis temperature, the average reaction activation energy decreases first and then increases, and the char prepared at 550 °C has the lowest activation energy. When the combustion heating rate is 5 °C min−1, the experimental curve and theoretical curve have a higher coincidence, and the combined mechanism function is adopted. The number is more suitable than the single most probable mechanism function to describe the combustion process of char. At this heating rate, the fuel reaction conforms to Z–L–T equation and reaction order model, which is limited by three-dimensional diffusion and chemical reaction. The distribution coefficients of the combined mechanism function are 0.4207 and 0.5886.
References
Liu ZY, Guo XJ, Shi L, He WJ, Wu JF, Liu QY, Liu JH. Reaction of volatiles-A crucial step in pyrolysis of coals. Fuel. 2015;154:361–9.
Wang Y, Zhang ZL. Analysis on semi-coke basic properties and utilization path. Coal Qual Technol. 2018;2:1–5.
Zhao JX, Li HJ, Li XM, Liu JL, Hua JS. Technical progress and analysis of semi-coke production with low metamorphic degree coal. Clean Coal Technol. 2010;16:20–3.
Ma C, Zou C, Zhao JX, Shi RM, Li XM, He JY, Zhang XR. Pyrolysis characteristics of low-rank coal under a co-containing atmosphere and properties of the prepared coal chars. Energy Fuels. 2019;33:6098–112.
Asanuma M, Ariyama T, Sato M, Murai R, Nonaka T, Okochi L, Tsukiji H, Nemoto K. Development of waste plastics injection process in blast furnace. ISIJ Int. 2000;40:244–51.
Tian B, Qiao YY, Tian YY, Liu Q. Investigation on the effect of particle size and heating rate on pyrolysis characteristics of a bituminous coal by TG-FTIR. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2016;121:376–86.
Zhu WK, Song WL, Lin WG. Effect of the coal particle size on pyrolysis and char reactivity for two types of coal and demineralized coal. Energy Fuels. 2008;22:2482–7.
Girolamo AD, Lameu NK, Zhang L, Ninomiya Y. Ignitability and combustibility of Yallourn pyrolysis char under simulated blast furnace conditions. Fuel Process Technol. 2017;156:113–23.
Girolamo AD, Grufas A, Lyamin I, Nishio I, Ninomiya Y, Zhang L. Ignitability and combustibility of Yallourn pyrolysis char blended with pulverized coal injection coal under simulated blast furnace conditions. Energy Fuels. 2016;30:1858–68.
Yang SP, Guo SQ, Zhang PH, Zhou JF, Wang M. Influence of semi-coke on blending coal injection characteristics. J Iron Steel Res Int. 2017;29:201–7.
Zhang LG, Ren W, Liu DJ, Zhang W, Wang ZY, Deng W. Study on semi-coke used as pulverized coal for injection into blast furnace. Angang Technol. 2015;391:13–7.
He XM, Fu PR, Wang CX, Lin HT, Wu S, Cao SX. Combustion performance of low-rank converted semi-coke from low-rank coal for blast furnace injection. Iron Steel. 2014;49:92–6.
Zou C, Ma C, Zhao JX, Wen LY, Bai CG. Analysis and suggestions on the present situation of medium and low temperature pyrolysis semi-coke as fuel for blast furnace injection. Clean Coal Technol. 2017;23:57–64.
Yang F, Jia XR, Meng XS, Shi ZH, Song CZ. Study on Semi-coke prepared from Shengli Lignite in Inner Mongolia and its combustion performance. Coal Preparation Technol. 2015;5(28–30):35.
Liu FD, Wei XL, Sheng HZ. Thermogravimetric study on combustion characteristics of semi-coke. J Eng Thermophys. 2007;3:13–6.
Liu JZ, Liu MQ, Zhao WD, Zhang B, Zhou JH, Cen KF. Thermogravimetric study on combustion characteristics of lignite semi-coke. Thermal Power Generation. 2013;42:86–92.
Hu YJ, Wang ZQ, Cheng XX, Ma CY. Non-isothermal TGA study on the combustion reaction kinetics and mechanism of low-rank coal char. RSC Adv. 2018;8:22909–16.
Ren N, Zhang JJ. Progress in datum treatment methods of thermal analysis kinetics. Prog Chem. 2006;18:50–6.
Zhang BS, Liu JZ, Zhou JH, Feng ZG, Cen F. A new method based on multi-heating rate methods for coal combustion parameters. CSEE. 2009;29:45–50.
Jeong HM, Seo MW, Jeong SM, Na BK, Yoon SJ, Lee JG, Lee WJ. Pyrolysis kinetics of coking coal mixed with biomass under non-isothermal and isothermal conditions. Bioresour Technol. 2014;155:442–5.
Ferrara F, Orsini A, Plaisant A, Pettinau A. Pyrolysis of coal, biomass and their blends: performance assessment by thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresour Technol. 2014;171:433–41.
Roduit B. Computational aspects of kinetic analysis. Part E: the ICTAC Kinetics project-numerical techniques and kinetics of solid state processes. Thermochim Acta. 2000;355:171–80.
Otero M, Calvo LF, Gil MV, Garcia AI, Moran A. Co-combustion of different sewage sludge and coal: a non-isothermal thermogravimetric kinetic analysis. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:6311–9.
Lu L, Sahajwalla V, Kong CH, McLean A. Chemical structure of chars prepared under conditions prevailing in the blast furnace PCI operation. ISIJ Int. 2002;42:816–25.
Slyusarskiy KV, Larionov KB, Osipov VI, Yankovsky SA, Gubin VE, Gromov AA. Non-isothermal kinetic study of bituminous coal and lignite conversion in air and in argon/air mixtures. Fuel. 2017;191:383–92.
Babiński P, Łabojko G, Kotyczka-Morańska M, Plis A. Kinetics of coal and char oxycombustion studied by TG-FTIR. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;113:371–8.
Li XG, Ma BG, Xu L, Hu ZW, Wang XG. Thermogravimetric analysis of the co-combustion of the blends with high ash coal and waste tyres. Thermochim Acta. 2006;441:79–83.
Wang J, Zhang SY, Guo X, Dong AX, Chen C, Xiong SW, Fang YT, Yin WD. Thermal behaviors and kinetics of Pingshuo coal/biomass blends during copyrolysis and cocombustion. Energy Fuels. 2012;26:7120–6.
Zou C, She Y, Shi Y. Particle size-dependent properties of a char produced using a moving-bed pyrolyzer for fueling pulverized coal injection and sintering operations. Fuel Process Techno. 2019;190:1–12.
Du RL, Wu Q, Liu QH, Yuan X, Zhang L. Study on kinetics of pyrolysis reaction of Xinglongzhuang coal by segmentation method. J Harbin Inst Technol. 2016;48:172–6.
Liu QH, Wu K, Du RL, She Y, Liu X. Kinetic analysis of tar’s separation from Lump coal. ISIJ Int. 2015;55:947–51.
Ma BG, Li XG, Xu L, Wang K, Wang XG. Investigation on catalyzed combustion of high ash coal by thermogravimetric analysis. Thermochim Acta. 2006;445:19–22.
Zou C, Wu H, Zhao JX, Li XM. Effects of dust collection from converter steelmaking process on combustion characteristics of pulverized coal. Powder Technol. 2018;332:70–8.
Hu RZ, Gao SL, Zhao FQ, Shi QZ, Zhang TL, Zhang JJ. Thermal analysis kinetics. Beijing: Beijing Science Press; 2008. p. 156–62.
Kissinger HE. Reaction kinetics in differential thermal analysis. Anal Chem. 1957;29:1702–6.
Joseph HF, Leo AW. A quick, direct method for the determination of activation energy from thermogravimetric data. Polym Lett. 1966;4:323–8.
Friedman HL. New methods for evaluating kinetic parametersfrom thermal analysis data. Polym Lett. 1969;7:41–6.
Yu DX, Xu MH, Sui JC, Liu XW, Yu Y, Cao Q. Effect of coal particle size on the proximate composition and combustion properties. Thermochim Acta. 2005;439:103–9.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledged the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51704224 and 51874224); Young Talents Support Program of the Science and Technology Association of Shaanxi, China (No. 20190603).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, H., Zheng, J., Zou, C. et al. Numerical analysis of kinetics of char combustion process and selection of mechanism functions. J Therm Anal Calorim 147, 3217–3227 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-021-10749-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-021-10749-8