Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gasification of chars from tetralin liquefaction of < 1.5 g cm−3 carbon-rich residues derived from waste coal fines in South Africa

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The float–sink density separation method was used to produce a < 1.5 g cm−3 coal density fraction. The sample was subjected to tetralin liquefaction experiments and pyrolysed to produce char samples. The < 1.5 g cm−3 coal density fraction and its liquefaction carbon-rich residue chars formed from the pyrolysis experiments were evaluated using the CO2 gasification tests. The chars were characterized using a thermogravimetric analyzer by heating the samples at isothermal temperatures between 880 and 940 °C under a CO2 atmosphere. The results obtained from the gasification experiments revealed that the gasification reactivity values (Ri, Rs, Rtf, Rt/0.5) of the liquefaction carbon-rich residue chars were higher than those of the < 1.5 g cm−3 coal density fraction chars. Some inherent mineral matter in the residues may play a catalytic role during gasification of South African lighter density waste coal density fractions and their liquefaction residue chars. The initial reactivity of the liquefaction residue chars was observed to be approximately double than those of the < 1.5 g cm−3 coal density fraction chars. Significant increases in a number of pores were associated with the liquefaction experiments of these carbon-rich particles, which aid in the acceleration of the gasification reactions. These increases in the number of pores assisted the reduction of the gasification activation energy values. The RPM was shown to fit the experimental data the best and used to determine kinetic parameters. The gasification activation energy of the < 1.5 g cm−3 coal density fraction chars was shown to be 190.5 kJ mol−1 and 236.7 kJ mol−1 for Highveld float (HF) and Waterberg float (WF) chars, respectively. The values of the apparent activation energy for the liquefaction carbon-rich residues from the same two < 1.5 g cm−3 coal density fraction residue samples were 145.3 kJ mol−1 for the Highveld coal sample and 196.0 kJ mol−1 for the Waterberg coal sample. The gasification results obtained in this study indicate that the possibility of utilizing the waste coal floats and their liquefaction carbon-rich residues in the thermochemical processes (pyrolysis and gasification) is high.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khare S, Dell’Amico M. An overview of conversion of residues from coal liquefaction processes. Can J Chem Eng. 2013;91:1660–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Uwaoma RC, Strydom CA, Matjie RH, Bunt JR. Influence of density separation of selected South African coal fines on the products obtained during liquefaction using tetralin as a solvent. Energy Fuels. 2019;33:1837–49.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cui H, Yang J, Liu Z, Bi J. Characteristics of residues from thermal and catalytic coal hydroliquefaction. Fuel. 2003;82:1549–56.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vasireddy S, Morreale B, Cugini A, Song C, Spivey JJ. Clean liquid fuels from direct coal liquefaction: chemistry, catalysis, technological status, and challenges. Energy Environ Sci. 2011;4:311–45.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chu XJ, Li W, Li BQ, Chen HK. Gasification property of direct coal liquefaction residue with steam. Process Saf Environ. 2006;84:440–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yan J, Bai Z, Li W, Bai J. Direct liquefaction of a Chinese brown coal and CO2 gasification of the residues. Fuel. 2014;136:280–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Itoh H, Hiraide M, Kidoguchi A, Onozaki M, Ishibashi H, Namiki Y, Ikeda K, Inokuchi K, Morooka S. Simulator for coal liquefaction based on the NEDOL process. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2001;40:210–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu L, Tang M, Liu B, Ma X, Zhang Y, Argyle MD, Fan M. Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of residue from China Shenhua industrial direct coal liquefaction plant. Thermochim Acta. 2014;589:1.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chu X, Li W, Li B, Chen H. Sulfur transfers from pyrolysis and gasification of direct liquefaction residue of Shenhua coal. Fuel. 2008;87:211–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Li J, Yang JL, Zhou SF. Li YM Pyrolysis property of solvent extracts from a direct coal liquefaction residue. J Fuel Chem Technol. 2010;38:647–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Li XH, Xue YL. LI WY Properties of semi-coke from co-pyrolysis of lignite and direct liquefaction residue of Shendong coal. J Fuel Chem Technol. 2015;43:1281–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu P, Luo A, Zhang F, Lei Z, Zhang J, Zhang J. Effects of extractable compounds on the structure and pyrolysis behaviours of two Xinjiang coal. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2018;133:128–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zou L, Jin L, Li Y, Zhu S, Hu H. Effect of tetrahydrofuran extraction on lignite pyrolysis under nitrogen. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2015;112:113–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Li J, Yang J, Liu Z. Hydro-treatment of a direct coal liquefaction residue and its components. Catal Today. 2008;130:389–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sugano M, Mashimo K, Wainai T. Upgrading reactions of coal liquefaction residue with basic coal liquid related model compounds. Fuel. 1998;77:447–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Xiao N, Zhou Y, Qiu J, Wang Z. Preparation of carbon nanofibers/carbon foam monolithic composite from coal liquefaction residue. Fuel. 2010;89:1169–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiao N, Zhou Y, Ling Z, Qiu J. Synthesis of a carbon nanofiber/carbon foam composite from coal liquefaction residue for the separation of oil and water. Carbon. 2013;59:530–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ergun S. Kinetics of the reaction of carbon dioxide with carbon. J Phys Chem. 1956;60:480–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Koening P, Squires R, Laurendeau N. Char gasification by carbon dioxide. Fuel. 1986;65:412–6.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Radovic L, Jiang H, Lizzio A. A transient kinetics study. References of char gasification in carbon dioxide and oxygen. Energy Fuels. 1991;5:68–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen S, Yang R, Kapteijn F, Moulijn J. A new surface oxygen complex on carbon: toward a unified mechanism for carbon gasification reactions. Ind Eng Chem. 1993;32:2835–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Everson RC, Neomagus HW, Kaitano R, Falcon R, Du Cann VM. Properties of high ash coal-char particles derived from inertinite-rich coal: II. Gasification kinetics with carbon dioxide. Fuel. 2008;87:3403–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Everson RC, Okolo GN, Neomagus HW, Dos Santos JM. X-ray diffraction parameters and reaction rate modeling for gasification and combustion of chars derived from inertinite-rich coals. Fuel. 2013;109:148–56.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Uwaoma RC, Strydom CA, Matjie RH, Bunt JR, Okolo GN. Brand DJ pyrolysis of tetralin liquefaction derived residues from lighter density fractions of waste coals taken from waste coal disposal sites in South Africa. Energy Fuels. 2019;33:9074–86.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Roberts MJ, Everson RC, Neomagus HW, Van Niekerk D, Mathews JP, Branken DJ. Influence of maceral composition on the structure, properties and behaviour of chars derived from South African coals. Fuel. 2015;142:9–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Önal Y, Ceylan K. Effects of treatments on the mineral matter and acidic functional group contents of Turkish lignites. Fuel. 1995;74:972–7.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wijaya N, Zhang L. A critical review of coal demineralization and its implication on understanding the speciation of organically bound metals and submicrometer mineral grains in coal. Energy Fuels. 2011;25:1–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Okolo GN, Everson RC, Neomagus HW, Roberts MJ, Sakurovs R. Comparing the porosity and surface areas of coal as measured by gas adsorption, mercury intrusion and SAXS techniques. Fuel. 2015;141:293–304.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Molina A, Mondragón F. Reactivity of coal gasification with steam and CO2. Fuel. 1998;77:1831–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu G, Benyon P, Benfell KE, Bryant GW, Tate AG, Boyd RK, Harris DJ, Wall TF. The porous structure of bituminous coal chars and its influence on combustion and gasification under chemically controlled conditions. Fuel. 2000;79:617–26.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Meng L, Wang M, Yang H, Ying H, Chang L. Catalytic effect of alkali carbonates on CO2 gasification of Pingshuo coal. Int J Min Sci Technol. 2011;21:587–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cetin E, Moghtaderi B, Gupta R. Wall TF Biomass gasification kinetics: influences of pressure and char structure Combust. Sci Technol. 2005;177:765–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Roberts DG, Harris DJ. Char gasification with O2, CO2, and H2O: effects of pressure on intrinsic reaction kinetics. Energy Fuels. 2000;14:483–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Levenspiel O. Chemical reaction engineering. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Wiley Eastern Ltd; 1972. p. 357–408.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wen CY. Noncatalytic heterogeneous solid-fluid reaction models. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1968;60:34–54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bhatia SK, Perlmutter DD. A random pore model for fluid-solid reactions: I. Isothermal, kinetic control. AIChE J. 1980;26:379–86.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Matjie RH, French D, Ward CR, Pistorius PC, Li Z. Behaviour of coal mineral matter in sintering and slagging of ash during the gasification process. Fuel Process Technol. 2011;92:1426–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Spears DA, Duff PD, Caine PM. The West Waterberg tonstein, South Africa. Int J Coal Geo. 1988;9:221–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Tsemane MM, Matjie RH, Bunt JR, Neomagus HW, Strydom CA, Waanders FB, Van Alphen C, Uwaoma RC. Mineralogy and petrology of chars produced by South African caking coals and density separated fractions during pyrolysis and their effects on caking propensity. Energy Fuels. 2019;33:7645–58.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Rautenbach R, Strydom CA, Bunt JR, Matjie RH, Campbell QP, Van Alphen C. Mineralogical, chemical, and petrographic properties of selected South African power stations’ feed coals and their corresponding density separated fractions using float-sink and reflux classification methods. Int J Coal Prep Util. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392699.2018.1533551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Heller-Kallai L. Reactions of salts with kaolinite at elevated temperatures. I. Clay Miner. 1978;2:221–35.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zogała A, Janoszek T. CFD simulations of influence of steam in gasification agent on parameters of UCG process. J Sustain Min. 2015;14:2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Uwaoma RC, Strydom CA, Bunt JR, Okolo GN, Matjie RH. The catalytic effect of Benfield waste salt on CO2 gasification of a typical South African Highveld coal. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;135:2723–32.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mangena SJ (2008) Fuel evaluation and coal properties transformation in a Sasol-Lurgi fixed bed dry bottom gasifier operating on North Dakota lignite coal, PhD Thesis. https://repository.nwu.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10394/9720/Mangena_SJ_Chapter_4.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors of this manuscript give thanks to the analysts, researchers and funders following different laboratories and the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation of South Africa: Mrs Belinda Venter of NWU geology laboratories, Bureau Veritas laboratories; SGS laboratories for their support to characterize coal, char and residue samples of this project by X-ray fluorescence and X-ray diffraction equipment; Dr Gregory Okolo for surface area analysis of the solid samples; and DST and NRF for the schemes offering financial assistance to the South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Coal Research Chair Grant No.: 86880 and incentive grant No. 115228. DST and NRF departments are not responsible for the manuscript contents.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre of Excellence in Carbon-Based Fuels, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom, 2520, South Africa

    R. C. Uwaoma, C. A. Strydom, R. H. Matjie & J. R. Bunt

Authors
  1. R. C. Uwaoma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. A. Strydom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. H. Matjie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. R. Bunt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. C. Uwaoma.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uwaoma, R.C., Strydom, C.A., Matjie, R.H. et al. Gasification of chars from tetralin liquefaction of < 1.5 g cm−3 carbon-rich residues derived from waste coal fines in South Africa. J Therm Anal Calorim 147, 2353–2367 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-021-10609-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-021-10609-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation