Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of the aging temperature on soybean biodiesel oxidation, quantifying the formed gums and sediments by thermogravimetry

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biodiesel has been widely used as an alternative fuel in diesel engines. However, although its physicochemical properties make it a substitute for traditional diesel fuel, biodiesel is more susceptible to oxidation and degradation during storage than diesel. The high content of unsaturated fatty acid methyl (or ethyl) esters in biodiesel causes its fast oxidative degradation when in contact with precursor agents as oxygen. These reaction products are highly unstable, resulting in a mixture of different species, some of them of high molecular weight, producing sediments and undesirable polymeric compounds. In this study, a sample of commercial soybean biodiesel (BS100) was aged at 50 °C, 110 °C, 150 °C and 200 °C in a Rancimat apparatus. This was performed bubbling air into the sample at 10 L h−1 flow rate for 5 h. The original biodiesel and the aged samples were analyzed by thermogravimetry (TG/DTG), in dynamic mode, under nitrogen atmosphere. Data were compared with those obtained from the analyses performed by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analyses were also performed. The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of the aging temperature on the oxidation of biodiesel and on the degraded product composition, as well as to quantify the formed gums and sediments. The thermogravimetric analysis shows that biodiesel samples aged at 150 °C and 200 °C have a higher content of heavier products (gum), 33.4% and 44.9%, respectively, than the non-aged biodiesel (2.8%). The SEC analysis indicates molecular weight value of 283, 1241 and 1380 g mol−1 for samples aged at 150 °C, 200 °C and for the non-aged sample, respectively, which confirms the results of the TG/DTG analysis. The widening of ester carbonyl stretching band (C=O, 1740 cm−1) in the FTIR spectra, as the aging temperature rises, confirms the degradation of biodiesel into acids, ketones and other compounds containing this functional group. The decrease in percentage transmittance in the region corresponding to the fingerprint (1500–500 cm−1) indicates that heavy products (gums and sediments) are produced. These results indicate that the degradation product content in the aged biodiesel is strongly dependent on the temperature of the aging process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BS100:

100% Soybean biodiesel

FTIR:

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

DTG:

Derivative thermogravimetry (ic)

TG:

Thermogravimetry (ic)

SEC:

Size-exclusion chromatography

NMR:

Nuclear magnetic resonance

GC-MS:

Gas chromatography and mass spectrometry

HPLC:

High-performance liquid chromatography

ASTM:

American Society for Testing and Materials

ANP:

Brazilian National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels

Mn:

Number-averaged molar weight

MW:

Molecular mass

T R :

Retention time

DTGS:

Deuterated triglycine sulfate detector 

T endset :

Endset temperature

T onset :

Onset temperature

T max :

Maximum mass loss rate temperature

References

  1. Ravindranath NH, Sita Lakshmi C, Manuvie R, Balachandra P. Biofuel production and implications for land use, food production and environment in India. Energy Policy. 2011;39:5737–45.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Padula AD, Santos MS, Ferreira L, Borenstein D. The emergence of the biodiesel industry in Brazil: current figures and future prospects. Energy Policy. 2012;44:395–405.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hamamci C, Saydut A, Tonbul Y, Kaya C, Kafadar AB. Biodiesel production via transesterification from safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) seed oil. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util Environ Effects. 2011;33:512–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh D, Sharma D, Soni SL, Sharma S, Kumari D. Chemical compositions, properties, and standards for different generation biodiesels: a review. Fuel. 2019;253:60–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yesilyurt MK, Cesur C. Biodiesel synthesis from Styrax officinalis L. seed oil as a novel and potential non-edible feedstock: a parametric optimization study through the Taguchi technique. Fuel. 2020;265:117025.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Singh G, Mohapatra SK, Ragit S, Kundu K. Optimization of biodiesel production from grape seed oil using Taguchi’s orthogonal array. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util Environ Effects. 2018;40:2144–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Manaf ISA, Embong NH, Khazaai SNM, Rahim MHA, Yusoff MM, Lee KT, et al. A review for key challenges of the development of biodiesel industry. Energy Convers Manag. 2019;185:508–17.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sitepu EK, Heimann K, Raston CL, Zhang W. Critical evaluation of process parameters for direct biodiesel production from diverse feedstock. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2020;123:109762.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gülüm M, Yesilyurt MK, Bilgin A. The modeling and analysis of transesterification reaction conditions in the selection of optimal biodiesel yield and viscosity. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27:10351–66.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoekman SK, Broch A, Robbins C, Ceniceros E, Natarajan M. Review of biodiesel composition, properties, and specifications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16:143–69.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kassem Y, Çamur H. Effects of storage under different conditions on the fuel properties of biodiesel admixtures derived from waste frying and canola oils. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. 2018;8:825–45.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. MacAmo AJ, Lucas C, Boene KM, Biquiza L, Kobashi Y, Kato S. Effect of storage conditions on the quality of Jatropha curcas oils. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;34:3239–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Santos MN, De Souza EF, Fiorucci AR, Da Silva MS. Assessment of antioxidant action of curcumin during storage of commercial biodiesel produced from soybean oil and beef tallow. Periodico Tche Quimica. 2019;16:491–502.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Byrne G, Shaughnessy SMO, Byrne G, Shaughnessy SMO. Performance characteristics and exhaust gas analysis of a diesel engine using biodiesel fuel blends biodiesel fuel blends. Biofuels. 2020;11:297–308.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yesilyurt MK, Arslan M. Analysis of the fuel injection pressure effects on energy and exergy efficiencies of a diesel engine operating with biodiesel. Biofuels. 2019;10:643–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mccarthy P, Rasul MG, Moazzem S. Comparison of the performance and emissions of different biodiesel blends against petroleum diesel. Int J Low-Carbon Technol. 2011;6:255–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Alves-Fortunato M, Ayoub E, Bacha K, Mouret A, Dalmazzone C. Fatty acids methyl esters (FAME) autoxidation: new insights on insoluble deposit formation process in biofuels. Fuel. 2020;268:117074.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mayer FD, Brondani M, VasquezCarrillo MC, Hoffmann R, SilvaLora EE. Revisiting energy efficiency, renewability, and sustainability indicators in biofuels life cycle: analysis and standardization proposal. J Clean Prod. 2020;252:119850.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rand SJ, Verstuyft AW. Manual Significance of test for petroleum products, 9th edition. ASTM Stock Number: MNL1-9TH. 2018.

  20. Urzędowska W, Stępień Z. Prediction of threats caused by high FAME diesel fuel blend stability for engine injector operation. Fuel Process Technol. 2016;142:403–10.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rizwanul Fattah IM, Masjuki HH, Kalam MA, Hazrat MA, Masum BM, Imtenan S, et al. Effect of antioxidants on oxidation stability of biodiesel derived from vegetable and animal based feedstocks. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2014;30:356–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar N. Oxidative stability of biodiesel: causes, effects and prevention. Fuel. 2017;190:328–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Silva WC, Castro MPP, Perez VH, Machado FA, Mota L, Sthel MS. Thermal degradation of ethanolic biodiesel: physicochemical and thermal properties evaluation. Energy. 2016;114:1093–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Christensen ED, Alleman T, McCormick RL. Re-additization of commercial biodiesel blends during long-term storage. Fuel Process Technol. 2018;177:56–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Baena LM, Zuleta EC, Calderón JA. Evaluation of the stability of polymeric materials exposed to palm biodiesel and biodiesel-organic acid blends. Polymers. 2018;10:511.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Decker EA, Alamed J, Castro IA. Interaction between polar components and the degree of unsaturation of fatty acids on the oxidative stability of emulsions. JAOCS J Am Oil Chem Soc. 2010;87:771–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chaiyasit W, Elias RJ, Mcclements DJ, Decker EA. Role of physical structures in bulk oils on lipid oxidation. Crit Rev CRC Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2007;47:299–317.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Waynick JA. Characterization of biodiesel oxidation and oxidation products (CRC Project No. AVFL-2b) SwRI® Project No. 08-10721. NREL-National Renewable Energy Laboratory. 2005;1–51.

  29. Pullen J, Saeed K. Factors affecting biodiesel engine performance and exhaust emissions—part I: review. Energy. 2014;72:1–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Singer P, Rühe J. On the mechanism of deposit formation during thermal oxidation of mineral diesel and diesel/biodiesel blends under accelerated conditions. Fuel. 2014;133:245–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fan L, Bai Y, Ma X, Song E. Analysis upon fuel injection quantity variation of common rail system for diesel engines. J Mech Sci Technol. 2016;30:3365–77.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Todaka M, Kowhakul W, Masamoto H, Shigematsu M, Onwona-Agyeman S. Thermal decomposition of biodiesel fuels produced from rapeseed, jatropha, and coffee oils with different alcohols. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2013;113:1355–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jeyalakshmi P. Characterization of Simarouba glauca seed oil biodiesel: a comprehensive study. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;136:267–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Santos AGD, Caldeira VPS, Farias MF, Araújo AS, Souza LD, Barros AK. Characterization and kinetic study of sunflower oil and biodiesel. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2011;106:747–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wako FM, Reshad AS, Goud VV. Thermal degradation kinetics study and thermal cracking of waste cooking oil for biofuel production. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;131:2157–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. de Miranda MIG, Samios D, de Oliveira Piñeiro T, Vaghetti JCP, Piatnicki CMS. Kinetics of oxidation and decomposition of soybean biodiesel evaluated by the TTT superposition theory and the Freeman–Carroll method. J Mol Liq. 2017;245:121–8.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fang HL, McCormick RL. Spectroscopic study of biodiesel degradation pathways. SAE Technical Papers. 2006;776–90.

  38. Velvarská R, Vráblík A, Fiedlerová M, Černý R. Near-infrared spectroscopy for determining the oxidation stability of diesel, biodiesel and their mixtures. Chem Papers. 2019;73:2987–93.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hariram V, John JG, Seralathan S. Spectrometric analysis of algal biodiesel as a fuel derived through base-catalysed transesterification. Int J Ambient Energy. 2019;40:195–202.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Popovicheva OB, Irimiea C, Carpentier Y, Ortega IK, Kireeva ED, Shonija NK, et al. Chemical composition of diesel/biodiesel particulate exhaust by FTIR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry: impact of fuel and driving cycle. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2017;17:1717–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kim JK, Jeon CH, Lee HW, Park YK, Min K, Hwang I, et al. Effect of accelerated high temperature on oxidation and polymerization of biodiesel from vegetable oils. Energies. 2018;11:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Knothe G, Kenar JA. Determination of the fatty acid profile by 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. 2004;106:88–96.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Chand P, Reddy CV, Venkat JG, Wang T, Grewell D. Thermogravimetric quantification of biodiesel produced via alkali catalyzed transesterification of soybean oil. Energy Fuels. 2009;23:989–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Flitsch S, Neu PM, Schober S, Kienzl N, Ullmann J, Mittelbach M. Quantitation of aging products formed in biodiesel during the Rancimat accelerated oxidation test. Energy Fuels. 2014;28:5849–56.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Besser C, Pisarova L, Frauscher M, Hunger H, Litzow U, Orfaniotis A, et al. Oxidation products of biodiesel in diesel fuel generated by artificial alteration and identified by mass spectrometry. Fuel. 2017;206:524–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Liu ZW, Li FS, Wang W, Wang B. Impact of different levels of biodiesel oxidation on its emission characteristics. J Energy Inst. 2019;92:861–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Li H, Niu SL, Lu CM, Cheng SQ. Comparative evaluation of thermal degradation for biodiesels derived from various feedstocks through transesterification. Energy Convers Manag. 2015;98:81–8.

    Google Scholar 

  48. de Carvalho GC, de Moura MDV, de Castro HGC, et al. Influence of the atmosphere on the decomposition of vegetable oils: study of the profiles of FTIR spectra and evolution of gaseous products. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2020;140:2247–58.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ferreira EN, Arruda TBMG, Rodrigues FEA, Arruda DTD, da Silva Júnior JH, Porto DL, et al. Investigation of the thermal degradation of the biolubricant through TG-FTIR and characterization of the biodiesel—Pequi (Caryocar brasiliensis) as energetic raw material. Fuel. 2019;245:398–405.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Tudorachi N, Mustata F. Thermal degradation and evolved gas analysis of some vegetable oils using TG/FT-IR/MS technique. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;119:1703–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Márquez-Ruiz G, Holgado F, García-Martínez MC, Dobarganes MC. A direct and fast method to monitor lipid oxidation progress in model fatty acid methyl esters by high-performance size-exclusion chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2007;1165:122–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ball JC, Anderson JE, Wallington TJ. Depolymerization of polyester polymers from the oxidation of soybean biodiesel. Energy Fuels. 2018;32:12587–96.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. ASTM D4052- Standard test method for density, relative density, and API gravity of liquids by digital density meter. ASTM committee on petroleum products, liquid fuels, and lubricants. In: ASTM annual book of standards. West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 2018. p. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4052-18A.

  54. ASTM D445- Standard test method for kinematic viscosity of transparent and opaque liquids (and calculation of dynamic viscosity). ASTM committee on petroleum products, Liquid Fuels, and Lubricants. In: ASTM annual book of standards. West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 2017. p. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1520/D0445-17A.

  55. ASTM 6584. Standard test method for determination of total monoglycerides, total diglycerides, total triglycerides, and free and total glycerin in B-100 biodiesel methyl esters by gas chromatography. ASTM committee on petroleum products, liquid fuels, and lubricants. In: ASTM annual book of standards. West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 2017. p. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1520/D6584-17.

  56. EN 14112. Fat and oil derivatives—Fatty acid methyl esters (FAME). Determination of oxidative stability (accelerated oxidation test), EN 14112:2003. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization (CEN); 2003.

  57. EN 14103. Fat and oil derivatives. Fatty acid methyl esters (FAME). Determination of ester and linolenic acid methyl ester contents. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization (CEN); 2003.

  58. BIOSTAB. Stability of biodiesel—used as a fuel for diesel engines and heating systems. In: Presentation of the BIOSTAB project results. Proceedings. Graz, July 3rd, 2003. Published by BLT Wieselburg, Austria; 2003.

  59. Ma G, Allen HC. Handbook of spectroscopy, volumes 1 and 2 edited by Günter Gauglitz (University of Tübingen) and Tuan Vo-Dinh (Oak Ridge National Laboratory). Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim. 2003. p. 1168. ISBN: 3-527-29782-0.

Download references

Acknowledgements

To the Laboratory of Biodiesel Stability Evaluation of the Chemistry School at Federal University of Rio de Janeiro / Brazil and to the Brazilian National Council of Research (CNPq).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. S. Leonardo.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leonardo, R.S., Dweck, J. & Murta Valle, M.L. Effect of the aging temperature on soybean biodiesel oxidation, quantifying the formed gums and sediments by thermogravimetry. J Therm Anal Calorim 142, 2049–2059 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09900-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09900-8

Keywords

Navigation