Skip to main content
Log in

Reactivity of fluororubber-modified aluminum in terms of heat transfer effect

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fluororubber-modified aluminum (AlF) was investigated by core–shell heat transfer model and compared with traditional aluminum with oxide shell (AlO) in terms of heat transfer effect on the reaction behavior of aluminum. Reaction delay behaviors of both AlF and AlO were calculated with diameter ranging from 200 nm to 3.2 µm at different environment temperature. Calculation results showed that AlF got the upper hand over AlO in terms of reaction delay. In the same heat transfer condition, AlF could participate in the reaction with significantly shorter delay time than AlO, which benefits the energy release of the aluminum. Ceiling shell thickness of AlF was determined according to the basic timescale and temperature profile of the explosive reaction zone. Detonation velocity test of AlF was performed with two kinds of AlO as comparisons. Test proved the AlF exhibited higher reactivity than nanoaluminum. Besides, formulation with AlF showed higher detonation velocity than that with AlO, which on the other side verified the reliability of the heat transfer model. Finally, reaction model of AlF in detonation environment was proposed containing three main procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig.7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dreizin EL. Metal-based reactive nanomaterials. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2009;35(2):141–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou X, Torabi M, Lu J, Shen R, Zhang K. Nanostructured energetic composites: synthesis, ignition/combustion modeling, and applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6(5):3058–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Babuk V, Dolotkazin I, Gamsov A, Glebov A, DeLuca L, Galfetti L. Nanoaluminum as a solid propellant fuel. J Propul Power. 2009;25(2):482–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jayaraman K, Anand K, Bhatt DS, Chakravarthy SR, Sarathi R. Production, characterization, and combustion of nanoaluminum in composite solid propellants. J Propul Power. 2009;25(2):471–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou Y, Liu J, Li H, et al. Combustion of aluminum particles in a high-temperature furnace under various O2/CO2/H2O atmospheres. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2020;139:251–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Trunov MA, Schoenitz M, Dreizin E. Effect of polymorphic phase transformations in alumina layer on ignition of aluminium particles. Combust Theory Model. 2006;10(4):603–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Laboureur D, Glabeke G, Gouriet JB. Aluminum nanoparticles oxidation by TGA/DSC. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;137:1199–210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Manner VW, Pemberton SJ, Gunderson JA, Herrera TJ, Lloyd JM, Salazar PJ, et al. The role of aluminum in the detonation and post-detonation expansion of selected cast HMX-based explosives. Propellants Explos Pyrotech. 2012;37(2):198–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mathe VL, Varma V, Raut S, Nandi AK, Pant A, Prasanth H, et al. Enhanced active aluminum content and thermal behaviour of nano-aluminum particles passivated during synthesis using thermal plasma route. Appl Surf Sci. 2016;368:16–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sossi A, Duranti E, Manzoni M, Paravan C, DeLuca L, Vorozhtsov A, et al. Combustion of HTPB-based solid fuels loaded with coated nanoaluminum. Combust Sci Technol. 2013;185(1):17–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kwon YS, Gromov AA, Strokova JI. Passivation of the surface of aluminum nanopowders by protective coatings of the different chemical origin. Appl Surf Sci. 2007;253(12):5558–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang H, Huang C, Chen H. Tuning reactivity of nanoaluminum with fluoropolymer via electrospray deposition. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;127(3):2293–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh A, Sharma TC, Kishore P. Thermal degradation kinetics and reaction models of 1, 3, 5-triamino-2, 4, 6-trinitrobenzene-based plastic-bonded explosives containing fluoropolymer matrices. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;129(3):1403–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Crouse CA, Pierce CJ, Spowart JE. Synthesis and reactivity of aluminized fluorinated acrylic (AlFA) nanocomposites. Combust Flame. 2012;159(10):3199–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuwahara T. Metal-fluorocarbon based energetic materials. Propellants Explos Pyrotech. 2012;37(3):373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Risha G, Boyer E, Wehrman R, Evans B, Kuo K. Nano-sized aluminum and boron-based solid fuel characterization in a hybrid rocket engine. In: 39th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit; 2003.

  17. Ye M, Zhang S, Liu S, Han A, Chen X. Preparation and characterization of pyrotechnics binder-coated nano-aluminum composite particles. J Energ Mater. 2017;35(3):300–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chan SK. Reaction delay of aluminum in condensed explosives. Propellants Explos Pyrotech. 2014;39(6):897–903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zeng L, Jiao QJ, Ren H, Zhou Q. Effect of particle size of nano-aluminum powder on oxide film thickness and active aluminum content. Chinese J Explos Propellants. 2011;34(4):26–9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bulian C, Kerr T, Puszynski J. Ignition studies of aluminum and metal oxide nanopowders. In: 31st Proc. Int. Pyrotech. Seminar; 2004.

  21. Fedoseev V. Burning of magnesium and aluminum particles in various media(Mg and Al particles burning in air, water vapor, Cl and nitrous oxide). Fizika Aerodispersnykh Sistem. 1970;3:61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liu D, Chen L, Wang C, Wu J. Detonation reaction characteristics for CL-20 and CL-20-based aluminized mixed explosives. Cent Eur J Energ Mater. 2017;14:573.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou ZQ, Nie JX, Zeng L, Jin ZX, Jiao QJ. Effects of aluminum content on TNT detonation and aluminum combustion using electrical conductivity measurements. Propellants Explos Pyrotech. 2016;41(1):84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pei MJ, Tian ZY, Hu LQ. Response analysis of aluminum in the process of thermobaric explosive detonation. Chin J Explos Propellants. 2013;36(4):7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sundaram DS, Puri P, Yang V. A general theory of ignition and combustion of nano-and micron-sized aluminum particles. Combust Flame. 2016;169:94–109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to greatly acknowledge the financial support from Major Project of Propellants and Explosives of The General Armament Department (No. 00401020202).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Ren.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 286 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Ren, H., Yan, T. et al. Reactivity of fluororubber-modified aluminum in terms of heat transfer effect. J Therm Anal Calorim 142, 871–876 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09676-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09676-x

Keywords

Navigation