Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics investigation on heat transfer growth of sonochemically synthesized ZnO-DW based nanofluids inside square heat exchanger

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent decades, the growth of heat transfer using nanomaterials in the conventional base fluid has caught the attention of researchers around the world. The present research investigates the growth in heat transfer using ZnO-DW based nanofluids in a square heat exchanger. ZnO nanoparticles were synthesized by using the single-pot sonochemical technique. The ZnO-DW based nanofluids with different concentrations (0.1, 0.075, 0.05 and 0.025 mass%) were prepared by using probe sonication technique. The heat transfer growth will be benchmarked using the experimental data from distilled water experiment. Reynolds numbers, average convective heat transfer coefficient (h), and Nusselt number were calculated and analyzed in this investigation. Significant enhancement of 52% in thermal conductivity was noticed at 45 °C for 0.1 mass% concentration of ZnO-DW based nanofluids, which is due to the presence of maximum ZnO nanoparticles. Moreover, the maximum improvement in Nusselt values recorded at the end of the square pipe is 47% for 0.1 mass%, while 32%, 27% and 17% increase was recorded for 0.075, 0.05 and 0.025 mass% concentrations, and heat transfer enhancement was from 500 to 1100, 500 to 960, 500 to 910, and 500 to 900 W m−2 K−1 for different ZnO-DW based nanofluids mass% concentrations, which is more than water due to stability of nanoparticles. It can be concluded that the heat transfer performance enhancement is credited to the combination of square pipe and well-dispersed and stable ZnO-DW based nanofluids for heat exchanger applications.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

The inner area of pipe

D h :

Hydraulic diameter

C P :

Heat capacity for nanofluid

P P :

System pumping power

Q :

Heat flux

mass%:

Nanoparticles mass concentration

k :

Thermal conductivity (W m−1 K−1)

I :

Inlet condition

PN:

Prantadel numbers (Pr = cp·η/k)

S gen :

Entropy ratio

B :

Bulk value

c p :

Specific heat (J kg−1 K−1)

Re:

Reynolds numbers (Re = ρ·v·D/η)

T out :

Outlet temperature of fluid

T in :

Inlet temperature of fluid

T s :

Pipe surface temperature

T b :

Fluid bulk temperature

V :

Velocity (m s−1)

nf:

Nanofluid

bf:

Value of base fluid

np:

Nanoparticle

r:

Ratio

µ :

Dynamical viscosity (MPa s)

ρ :

Fluid density in (kg m−3)

ω :

Mass concentration (%)

ff:

Friction factor

PEG:

Poly ethylene glycol

TEM:

Transmission electron microscopy

DW:

Distilled water

TC:

Thermocouple

HVAC:

High-voltage alternating current

References

  1. Choi SU, Eastman JA. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles (No. ANL/MSD/CP-84938; CONF-951135-29). Lemont: Argonne National Lab; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aghahadi MH, Niknejadi M, Toghraie DJ. An experimental study on the rheological behavior of hybrid Tungsten oxide (WO3)-MWCNTs/engine oil Newtonian nanofluids. JoMS. 2019;1197:497–507.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Elsaid AM. Experimental study on the heat transfer performance and friction factor characteristics of Co3O4 and Al2O3 based H2O/(CH2OH) 2 nanofluids in a vehicle engine radiator. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer. 2019;108:104263.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Xie H, Wang J, Xi T, Liu YJ. Thermal conductivity of suspensions containing nanosized SiC particles. IJT. 2002;23(2):571–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leong KY, Razali I, Ahmad KK, Ong HC, Ghazali MJ, Rahman MRA. Thermal conductivity of an ethylene glycol/water-based nanofluid with copper-titanium dioxide nanoparticles: an experimental approach. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer. 2018;90:23–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pang C, Jung J-Y, Lee JW, Kang YTJ. Thermal conductivity measurement of methanol-based nanofluids with Al2O3 and SiO2 nanoparticles. IJHMT. 2012;55(21–22):5597–602.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pourfattah F, Motamedian M, Sheikhzadeh G, Toghraie D, Akbari OA. The numerical investigation of angle of attack of inclined rectangular rib on the turbulent heat transfer of water–Al2O3 nanofluid in a tube. IJMS. 2017;131:1106–16.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Qiu L, Zhu N, Feng Y, Michaelides EE, Żyła G, Jing D, et al. A review of recent advances in thermophysical properties at the nanoscale: from solid state to colloids. Phys Rep 2019;843:1–81.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Qiu L, Zhu N, Zou H, Feng Y, Zhang X, Tang DJ, et al. Advances in thermal transport properties at nanoscale in China. IJoH. 2018;125:413–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wen D, Ding Y. Experimental investigation into convective heat transfer of nanofluids at the entrance region under laminar flow conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2004;47(24):5181–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sadeghinezhad E, Mehrali M, Tahan Latibari S, Mehrali M, Kazi SN, Oon CS, et al. Experimental investigation of convective heat transfer using graphene nanoplatelet based nanofluids under turbulent flow conditions. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2014;53(31):12455–65. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie501947u.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Elsaid AM. Experimental study on the heat transfer performance and friction factor characteristics of Co3O4 and Al2O3 based H2O/(CH2OH) 2 nanofluids in a vehicle engine radiator. ICHMT. 2019;108:104263.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Abdelrazek AH, Kazi S, Alawi OA, Yusoff N, Oon CS, Ali HM, et al. Heat transfer and pressure drop investigation through pipe with different shapes using different types of nanofluids. JTAC. 2020;139:1637–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wen D, Ding YJ. Experimental investigation into convective heat transfer of nanofluids at the entrance region under laminar flow conditions. IJHMT. 2004;47(24):5181–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Heydari M, Toghraie D, Akbari OA. The effect of semi-attached and offset mid-truncated ribs and water/TiO2 nanofluid on flow and heat transfer properties in a triangular microchannel. TSEP. 2017;2:140–50.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baïri A. Experimental study on enhancement of free convective heat transfer in a tilted hemispherical enclosure by using water–ZnO nanofluid saturated porous materials. Appl Therm Eng. 2019;148:992–8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sarafraz M, Arya H, Saeedi M, Ahmadi D. Flow boiling heat transfer to MgO-therminol 66 heat transfer fluid: experimental assessment and correlation development. Appl Therm Eng. 2018;138:552–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Esfe MH, Zabihi F, Rostamian H, Esfandeh S. Experimental investigation and model development of the non-Newtonian behavior of CuO-MWCNT-10w40 hybrid nano-lubricant for lubrication purposes. J Mol Liq. 2018;249:677–87.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shahsavar A, Moradi M, Bahiraei M. Heat transfer and entropy generation optimization for flow of a non-Newtonian hybrid nanofluid containing coated CNT/Fe3O4 nanoparticles in a concentric annulus. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. 2018;84:28–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shahsavar A, Sardari PT, Toghraie DJ. Free convection heat transfer and entropy generation analysis of water–Fe3O4/CNT hybrid nanofluid in a concentric annulus. Int J Numer Methods Heat & Fluid Flow. 2019.

  21. Esfe MH, Arani AAA, Madadi MR, Alirezaie A. A study on rheological characteristics of hybrid nano-lubricants containing MWCNT-TiO2 nanoparticles. J Mol Liq. 2018;260:229–36.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bahiraei M, Godini A, Shahsavar A. Thermal and hydraulic characteristics of a minichannel heat exchanger operated with a non-Newtonian hybrid nanofluid. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. 2018;84:149–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Huminic G, Huminic A. The influence of hybrid nanofluids on the performances of elliptical tube: recent research and numerical study. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;129:132–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Afshari A, Akbari M, Toghraie D, Yazdi ME. Experimental investigation of rheological behavior of the hybrid nanofluid of MWCNT-alumina/water (80%)–ethylene-glycol (20%). JTAC. 2018;132(2):1001–15.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Aberoumand S, Jafarimoghaddam A. Experimental study on synthesis, stability, thermal conductivity and viscosity of Cu-engine oil nanofluid. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. 2017;71:315–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Moradi A, Toghraie D, Isfahani AHM, Hosseinian AJ. An experimental study on MWCNT-water nanofluids flow and heat transfer in double-pipe heat exchanger using porous media. JTAC. 2019;137:1797–807.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sadri R, Hosseini M, Kazi SN, Bagheri S, Abdelrazek AH, Ahmadi G, et al. A facile, bio-based, novel approach for synthesis of covalently functionalized graphene nanoplatelet nano-coolants toward improved thermo-physical and heat transfer properties. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2018;509:140–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoo D-H, Hong K, Yang H-S. Study of thermal conductivity of nanofluids for the application of heat transfer fluids. JTA. 2007;455(1–2):66–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tiwari AK, Ghosh P, Sarkar J. Performance comparison of the plate heat exchanger using different nanofluids. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci. 2013;49:141–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ruhani B, Barnoon P, Toghraie DJ. Statistical investigation for developing a new model for rheological behavior of silica-ethylene glycol/water hybrid Newtonian nanofluid using experimental data. PASMA. 2019;525:616–27.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kherbeet AS, Mohammed H, Salman BJ. The effect of nanofluids flow on mixed convection heat transfer over microscale backward-facing step. IJHMT. 2012;55(21–22):5870–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hernaiz M, Alonso V, Estellé P, Wu Z, Sundén B, Doretti L, et al. The contact angle of nanofluids as thermophysical property. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;547:393–406.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Al-Shamani AN, Yazdi MH, Alghoul M, Abed AM, Ruslan MH, Mat S, et al. Nanofluids for improved efficiency in cooling solar collectors—a review. RSER. 2014;38:348–67.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zadeh AD, Toghraie DJ. Experimental investigation for developing a new model for the dynamic viscosity of silver/ethylene glycol nanofluid at different temperatures and solid volume fractions. JTAC. 2018;131(2):1449–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Suganthi K, Rajan K. ZnO-propylene glycol-water nanofluids with improved properties for potential applications in renewable energy and thermal management. CSAPEA. 2016;506:63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Satdeve NS, Ugwekar RP, Bhanvase BA. Ultrasound assisted preparation and characterization of Ag supported on ZnO nanoparticles for visible light degradation of methylene blue dye. J Mol Liq. 2019;291:111313.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Patil PP, Bohara RA, Meshram JV, Nanaware SG, Pawar SH. Hybrid chitosan-ZnO nanoparticles coated with a sonochemical technique on silk fibroin-PVA composite film: a synergistic antibacterial activity. IJBM. 2019;122:1305–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Suganthi K, Rajan KJ. Temperature induced changes in ZnO–water nanofluid: zeta potential, size distribution and viscosity profiles. IJHMT. 2012;55(25–26):7969–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Suganthi K, Rajan KJ. A formulation strategy for preparation of ZnO–propylene glycol–water nanofluids with improved transport properties. IJHMT. 2014;71:653–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Witharana S, Palabiyik I, Musina Z, Ding YJ. Stability of glycol nanofluids—the theory and experiment. PT. 2013;239:72–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Fedele L, Colla L, Bobbo S, Barison S, Agresti FJ. Experimental stability analysis of different water-based nanofluids. NRL. 2011;6(1):300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fernández-Seara J, Uhía FJ, Sieres J, Campo AJ. A general review of the Wilson plot method and its modifications to determine convection coefficients in heat exchange devices. ATE. 2007;27(17–18):2745–57.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Duangthongsuk W, Wongwises S. Effect of thermophysical properties models on the predicting of the convective heat transfer coefficient for low concentration nanofluid. ICHTM. 2008;35(10):1320–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Gnielinski VJ. New equations for heat and mass transfer in the turbulent flow in pipes and channels. NSrtrA. 1975;75:8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Petukhov B. Heat transfer and friction in turbulent pipe flow with variable physical properties. Advances in heat transfer. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1970. p. 503–64.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mansour RB, Galanis N, Nguyen CT. Effect of uncertainties in physical properties on forced convection heat transfer with nanofluids. ATE. 2007;27(1):240–9.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hamilton RL, Crosser OJ. Thermal conductivity of heterogeneous two-component systems. IECF. 1962;1(3):187–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Holman JP, Gajda WJ. Experimental methods for engineers. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Xu S, Fu L, Pham TSH, Yu A, Han F, Chen L. Preparation of ZnO flower/reduced graphene oxide composite with enhanced photocatalytic performance under sunlight. CI. 2015;41(3):4007–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Patel HE, Sundararajan T, Das SK. An experimental investigation into the thermal conductivity enhancement in oxide and metallic nanofluids. JNR. 2010;12(3):1015–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Patterson A. The Scherrer formula for X-ray particle size determination. PR. 1939;56(10):978.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Poongavanam GK, Ramalingam V. Characteristics investigation on thermophysical properties of synthesized activated carbon nanoparticles dispersed in solar glycol. Int J Therm Sci. 2019;136:15–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Pak BC, Cho YI. Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron metallic oxide particles. Experimental Heat Transfer an International Journal. 1998;11(2):151–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Amiri A, Sadri R, Shanbedi M, Ahmadi G, Kazi S, Chew B, et al. Synthesis of ethylene glycol-treated graphene nanoplatelets with one-pot, microwave-assisted functionalization for use as a high performance engine coolant. Energy Convers Manag. 2015;101:767–77.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Goudarzi K, Jamali H. Heat transfer enhancement of Al2O3-EG nanofluid in a car radiator with wire coil inserts. ATE. 2017;118:510–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors gratefully acknowledge the UMRG Grant RP045C-17AET, UM Research University Grant GPF050A-2018, Institute of Advanced Studies, Nanotechnology and Catalysis Research Center, and UM Research University Grant GPF017A-2019, Department of Mechanical Engineering and the University of Malaya for the support to conduct this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Waqar Ahmed or S. N. Kazi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author professed that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, W., Chowdhury, Z.Z., Kazi, S.N. et al. Characteristics investigation on heat transfer growth of sonochemically synthesized ZnO-DW based nanofluids inside square heat exchanger. J Therm Anal Calorim 144, 1517–1534 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09593-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09593-z

Keywords

Navigation