Skip to main content
Log in

Fire hazard evaluation of activated carbons

Pyrolysis kinetic parameters analyses and model development

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Activated carbons are widely used in the iodine adsorbers in nuclear plants, but little information about their combustibility is available for fire engineers. Series of TGA experiments were conducted for activated carbons, charcoal and XPS foam. The results show that the activated carbons oxidize strongly in air atmosphere but little in N2 atmosphere. The calculated activation energies of the wood AC, anthracite AC and coconut shell AC are, respectively, 100.56, 96.34 and 91.00 kJ mol−1, which are larger than that of the XPS foam, 55.95 kJ mol−1. However, the calculated activation energies of impregnated coconut shell activated carbon is 48.60 kJ mol−1, which is smaller than that of XPS foam. A new parameter, A12, is introduced to describe the amount of evaporative mass fraction during the fast pyrolysis stage. Additionally, the (Tp, DTGp) map and quarter division method is introduced to compare fire hazard of different materials. Finally, a quantitative fire hazard evaluation model is developed based on four important parameters: E, DTGp, Tp and A12. The calculated Relative Fire Safety Factors by this model for wood AC, anthracite AC, coconut shell AC, impregnated coconut shell activated carbon, charcoal and XPS foam are 1.49, 1.91, 1.51, 1.37 and 1.0, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Activated_carbon.

  2. Lu L, Di ZG. The conflagration risk of the nuclear power plant and study of firefighting. Urgent Rescue. 2012;2:49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  3. GB 12268-2012: List of dangerous goods.

  4. International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code (IJ200E), Volume 2: Dangerous goods lists, special provisions and exceptions, 2014; International Maritime Organization.

  5. Tachibana E, Ikuo A. Application technology of activated carbons (Chinese translation version). Nanjing: Southeast University Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang N. Study on spontaneous combustion risk of activated carbon. PhD dissertation: Dalian University of Technology, Dalian; 2012.

  7. Buettner LC, Leduc CA, Glover G. Instantaneous ignition of activated carbon. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2014;53:15793–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cameron A, MacDowall JD. Self heating of commercial powered activated carbons. J Appl Chem Biotechnol. 1972;22:1007–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. So JY, Cho HR. Thermal characteristics of spent activated carbon generated from air cleaning units in korean nuclear power plants. Nucl Eng Technol. 2017;49(4):873–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shawabkeh RA, Aslam Z, Hussien IA. Thermochemical treatment of fly ash for synthesis of mesoporous activated carbon. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;122(3):1191–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lam SS, Liew RK, Wong YM, Yek PNY, Ma NL, Lee CL, Chase HA. Microwave-assisted pyrolysis with chemical activation, an innovative method to convert orange peel into activated carbon with improved properties as dye adsorbent. J Clean Prod. 2017;162:1376–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jayabalan T, Pre P, Hequet V, Le Cloirec P. Statistical quantification of the influence of material properties on the oxidation and ignition of activated carbons. Adsorption. 2008;14:679–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jayabalan T, Pre P, Hequet V, Rouzaud JN, Le Cloirec P. Material properties influencing the oxidation and ignition reactivity of activated carbons: thermal analysis, HRTEM study, and statistical modeling. Energ Fuel. 2009;23:4051–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kissinger HE. Reaction kinetics in differential thermal analysis. Anal Chem. 1957;19:1702–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang Y, Xie QY, Tang XY. Trace analyses of flame-retardant in pyrolysis of XPS foams and its revelation for flame-retardant optimization. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;132(3):1893–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hammarstrom JL, Sacco A. Investigation of deactivation mechanisms of ASC whetlerite charcoal. J Catal. 1988;112:267–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Szekely T, Varhegyi G, Till F. Determination and use of second derivative thermogravimetric function (DDTG) and calculation of kinetic constants of some decomposition reaction types. J Therm Anal. 1973;5:2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen ZH, Zhu QJ, Wang X, Xiao B, Liu SM. Pyrolysis behaviors and kinetic studies on Eucalyptus residues using thermogravimetric analysis. Energ Convers and Manag. 2015;105:251–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51476157), National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC0805901) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK2320000041). The authors thankfully acknowledge all these supports.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiyuan Xie.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lei, Q., Xie, Q. & Ding, Y. Fire hazard evaluation of activated carbons. J Therm Anal Calorim 139, 441–449 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08417-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-019-08417-z

Keywords

Navigation