Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry

, Volume 136, Issue 4, pp 1575–1585 | Cite as

An investigation on the anti-water properties of phosphorus building gypsum (PBG)-based mortar

  • Qiang WangEmail author
  • Shiyu Zhuang
  • Ruiquan Jia


This study aimed to manufacture phosphorus building gypsum (PBG)-based mortar with a high water resistance coefficient and to explore the anti-water mechanism of PBG-based mortar containing ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) and calcium hydroxide (CH). The main hydration products of PBG-based mortar were CS(A)H and ettringite (AFt), along with CsH2; the chemical reaction 2A + 6CH + 6CsH0.5 + 55H → 2(C3A·3Cs·32H) occurred in PBG-based mortar; and AFt was produced gradually after the majority of the CsH0.5 was hydrated into CsH2. Gelatinous CS(A)H densely coated the CsH2 crystals to inhibit the connection between CsH2 and water. AFt crystals prevented the CsH2 crystals from water corrosion through the complex actions of the AFt crystals coating the surface of the CsH2 crystals and transforming the direct contact among the CsH2 crystals into the indirect contact among the CsH2 crystals. The contents and morphologies of AFt were the key factors for increasing the water resistance coefficient of PBG-based mortar. As mPG:mGGBS:mCH = 240:160:15, the water-saturated strength and water resistance coefficient of PBG-based mortar reached 20.8 MPa and 0.89, which meant that as long as the mix proportion was appropriate, PBG-based mortar with a high water resistance coefficient can be successfully produced.


PBG-based mortar Ground granulated blast furnace slag Calcium hydroxide Water resistance coefficient AFt 



Authors would like to acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51778334).


  1. 1.
    Rashad AM. Phosphogypsum as a construction material. J Clean Prod. 2017;166:732–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang L, Zhang Y, Yan Y. Utilization of original phosphogypsum as raw material for the preparation of self-leveling mortar. J Clean Prod. 2016;127:204–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jiang G, Wu A, Wang Y, Lan W. Low cost and high efficiency utilization of hemihydrate phosphogypsum: used as binder to prepare filling material. Constr Build Mater. 2018;167:263–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sahu SK, Ajmal PY, Bhangare RC, Tiwari M, Pandit GG. Natural radioactivity assessment of a phosphate fertilizer plant area. J Radiat Res Appl Sci. 2014;7:123–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhou J, Gao H, Shu Z, Wang Y, Yan C. Utilization of waste phosphogypsum to prepare non-fired bricks by a novel hydration-recrystallization process. Constr Build Mater. 2012;34:114–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kadirova ZC, Hojamberdiev M, Bo L, Hojiyev R, Okada K. Ion uptake properties of low-cost inorganic sorption materials in the CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 system prepared from phosphogypsum and kaolin. J Clean Prod. 2014;83:483–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tan H, Guo Y, Zou F, Jian S, Ma B, Zhi Z. Effect of borax on rheology of calcium sulphoaluminate cement paste in the presence of polycarboxylate superplasticizer. Constr Build Mater. 2018;176:394–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhu C, Zhang J, Yi W, Cao W, Peng J, Liu J. Research on degradation mechanisms of recycled building gypsum. Constr Build Mater. 2018;173:540–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aranda B, Guillou O, Lanos C, Daiguebonne C, Freslon S, Tessier C. Effect of multiphasic structure of binder particles on the mechanical properties of a gypsum-based material. Constr Build Mater. 2016;102:175–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mun K, So S. Properties of cement mortar with phosphogpysum under steam curing condition. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2008;2018:382490.
  11. 11.
    Rashad AM. Potential use of phosphogypsum in alkali-activated fly ash under the effects of elevated temperatures and thermal shock cycles. J Clean Prod. 2015;87:717–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mun KJ, Hyoung WK, Lee CW, So SY, Soh YS. Basic properties of nonsintering cement using phosphogypsum and waste lime as activator. Constr Build Mater. 2007;21:1342–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhao FQ, Liu HJ, Hao LX, Li Q. Water resistant block from desulfurization gypsum. Constr Build Mater. 2012;27:531–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pervyshin GN, Yakovlev GI, Gordina AF, Keriene J, Polyanskikh IS, Fischer HB, Rachimovad NR, Buryanov AF. Water-resistant gypsum compositions with man-made modifiers. Procedia Eng. 2017;172:867–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tokarev Y, Ginchitsky E, Sychugov S, Krutikov V, Yakovlev G, Buryanov A. Modification of gypsum binders by using carbon nanotubes and mineral additives. Procedia Eng. 2017;172:1161–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li J, Li G, Yu Y. The influences of gypsum water-proofing additive on gypsum crystal growth. Mater Lett. 2007;61:872–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kondratieva N, Barre M, Goutenoire F, Sanytsky M. Study of modified gypsum binder. Constr Build Mater. 2017;149:535–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sokolova YA, Moreva IV. Using domestic modifiers for regulating the properties of low-grade plaster. Dry Build Mix. 2011;3:16–7.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vernon RH, Green TH. Experimental high-pressure hydration of cordierite. Nat Phys Sci. 1972;239:11–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kuryatnyk T, Angulski DLC, Ambroise J, Pera J. Valorization of phosphogypsum as hydraulic binder. J Hazard Mater. 2008;160:681–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Patrycja M, Maria M. Hydration kinetics of calcium sulphate hemihydrate modified by water-soluble polymers. Int J Eng Res Sci. 2017;3:5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Long GC, Li YY, Ma C, Xie YJ, Shi Y. Hydration kinetics of cement incorporating different nanoparticles at elevated temperatures. Thermochim Acta. 2018;664:108–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang X, Pan Z, Shen X, Liu W. Stability and decomposition mechanism of ettringite in presence of ammonium sulfate solution. Constr Build Mater. 2016;124:786–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Robert BP, Carl DP. Solubility of ettringite (Ca6[Al(OH)6]2 (SO4)3·26H2 O) at 5–75 °C. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1999;63:1969–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Warren CJ, Reardon EJ. The solubility of ettringite at 25 °C. Cem Concr Res. 1994;24:1515–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Al-Barrak K, Rowell DL. The solubility of gypsum in calcareous soils. Geoderma. 2006;136:830–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Min SK, Jun Y, Lee C, Oh JE. Use of CaO as an activator for producing a price-competitive non-cement structural binder using ground granulated blast furnace slag. Cem Concr Res. 2013;54:208–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Song H, Jeong Y, Bae S, Jun YB, Yoon S, Oh JE. A study of thermal decomposition of phases in cementitious systems using HT-XRD and TG. Constr Build Mater. 2018;169:648–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhou Q, Glasser F. Thermal stability and decomposition mechanisms of ettringite at < 120 °C. Cem Concr Res. 2001;31:1333–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rashad AM, Sadek DM. An investigation on Portland cement replaced by high-volume GGBS pastes modified with micro-sized metakaolin subjected to elevated temperatures. Int J Sustain Built Environ. 2017;6:91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Monkman S, Kenward PA, Dipple G, Macdonald M, Raudsepp M. Activation of cement hydration with carbon dioxide. J Sustain Cem Based Mater. 2018;7:160–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Scheinherrová L, Doleželová M, Havlín J, Trník A. Thermal analysis of ternary gypsum-based binders stored in different environments. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018;133:177–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Li CH, Lu XL, Jing GJ, Ye ZM, Wang SX, Cheng X. The effect of gypsum on the hydration of alite–belite–ferrite phase system. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018. Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations